US SEC Issues Key Crypto Custody Guidelines For Broker-Dealers

bitcoinistPublished on 2025-12-19Last updated on 2025-12-19

In its latest effort to provide clearer regulatory clarity, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has published detailed guidelines for broker-dealers on the custody of crypto assets.

SEC Clarifies Crypto Custody Standards For Broker-Dealers

On Wednesday, the SEC’s staff of the Division of Trading and Markets issued a statement addressed its views on the application of paragraph (b)(1) of Rule 15c3-3 to crypto assets that are considered securities, including tokenized versions of an equity or debt security.

Under Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Rule 15c3-3 requires any broker-dealer to “promptly obtain and thereafter maintain physical possession or control of all fully paid and excess margin securities it carries for the account of customers.”

The new guidelines clarify how “any broker-dealer that carries crypto asset securities for customers, including broker-dealers that conduct a traditional securities business” can maintain compliance with this rule despite tokens being on the blockchain.

According to the SEC’s statement, a broker-dealer can consider itself to have “physical possession” of the crypto assets if it has direct access to the asset and the capability to transfer it on the associated distributed ledger technology (DLT).

Broker-dealers must also conduct and document an throughout assessment “of the distributed ledger technology and the associated network where transfers of ownership of a crypto asset security are recorded prior to undertaking to maintain possession of the crypto asset security, and at reasonable intervals thereafter.”

In additions, they must establish, maintain, and enforce “reasonably designed written policies and procedures” to ensure the assets’ security, the protection of private keys, they have adequate plans to address unexpected disruptions to its possession of the crypto assets, including theft, unauthorized used, network attacks, and hard forks.

This circumstance emphasizes that a broker-dealer has policies, procedures, and controls reasonably designed to help ensure that no other person, including the broker-dealer’s customer or a third-party (including the broker-dealer’s affiliate), has access to the relevant private keys and the ability to transfer the asset without the authorization of the broker-dealer.

Meanwhile, the agency explained that “a broker-dealer does not deem itself to possess a crypto asset security if the broker-dealer is aware of any material security or operational problems or weaknesses with the distributed ledger technology and associated network used to access and transfer the crypto asset security or is aware of other material risks posed to the broker-dealer’s business by custodying the crypto asset security.”

SEC’s Path To Clearer Rules

The SEC affirmed that the statement is part of its efforts to provide greater clarity on the application of federal securities laws to crypto assets. Notably, the regulatory agency recently published guidelines to help educate retail investors about the ways they can hold crypto assets and is pushing to modernize its rules to facilitate an positive market environment.

Earlier this month, the US regulator revealed it is evaluating tokenization to modernize the issuance, trading, and settlement of public equities. SEC chairman Paul Atkins asserted that “Distributed ledger technology and the tokenization of financial assets, including securities, have the potential to transform our capital markets.”

Moreover, Atkins recently stated that the Commission could issue innovation exemption rules for crypto firms in early 2026. The agency has been considering the rule exemption since July to “permit novel ways of trading and more narrowly tailored forms of relief to facilitate the building of other components of a tokenized securities ecosystem.”

The change would allow crypto firms to quickly launch products without having to comply with “burdensome prescriptive regulatory requirements that hinder productive economic activity.” Instead, they would “be able to comply with certain principles-based conditions designed to achieve the core policy aims of the federal securities laws.”

Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $87,221 in the one-week chart. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main focus of the new SEC guidelines for broker-dealers regarding crypto assets?

AThe guidelines clarify how broker-dealers can maintain compliance with Rule 15c3-3 when custodying crypto assets that are considered securities, including requirements for physical possession, security assessments, and written policies.

QAccording to the SEC, when can a broker-dealer consider itself to have 'physical possession' of a crypto asset security?

AA broker-dealer can consider itself to have physical possession if it has direct access to the asset and the capability to transfer it on the associated distributed ledger technology (DLT).

QWhat must broker-dealers assess and document prior to maintaining possession of crypto asset securities?

AThey must conduct and document a thorough assessment of the distributed ledger technology and the associated network where ownership transfers are recorded, both before custody and at reasonable intervals thereafter.

QWhat potential future regulatory change for crypto firms did SEC chairman Paul Atkins mention?

AHe stated that the Commission could issue innovation exemption rules in early 2026, allowing crypto firms to launch products without burdensome prescriptive requirements while complying with principles-based conditions.

QWhat broader initiative is the SEC undertaking regarding tokenization and distributed ledger technology?

AThe SEC is evaluating tokenization to modernize the issuance, trading, and settlement of public equities, recognizing its potential to transform capital markets.

Related Reads

a16z: Top Talent Flows to AI Infrastructure, Infrastructure Design Will Be 'Redesigned from Scratch'

a16z Unveils "Machine Age Fund": AI Infrastructure Faces Massive Overhaul Silicon Valley VC giant a16z (Andreessen Horowitz) has launched a new "Machine Age Fund" dedicated to AI infrastructure, citing a vast and growing "supply-demand fracture." Key takeaways: * **Unlimited Demand vs. Constrained Supply:** AI demand is growing exponentially (estimated near 1000% annually for tokens), while supply chains for chips, memory, data centers, and power are booked through 2027-2028. GPU prices are rising against historical trends. * **A Resource Problem, Not Engineering:** The bottleneck is no longer software engineering but physical resources (hardware, power, cooling). Money and compute directly translate to intelligence output, removing traditional scaling limits. * **Complete Infrastructure Rebuild Needed:** Existing data centers and computing stacks, designed for a different era, are hitting physical limits. Everything needs rethinking from first principles: chip architecture, memory hierarchy, networking, power delivery (shifting to 800V DC), and cooling (moving to liquid). * **Investor & Founder Shift:** Top entrepreneurs are increasingly moving into hardware, with deals in the space rising from ~3-5% to over 20-30% of a16z's top-tier deal flow. Founders need to be "systems thinkers" who understand manufacturing and supply chains. * **Massive Economic Scale:** Training a frontier model now costs $3-5B. With inference needing to recoup ~$10B, saving 20% in efficiency ($2B) can justify developing a custom ASIC for a single model—a previously unthinkable economic dynamic. * **Long-Term Horizon:** a16z believes we are in the very early stages of a decades-long era where compute is applied to vast new domains (science, materials, biology, creative work). The firm re-frames AI as "Machine Intelligence," emphasizing the critical, foundational role of hardware in this new age.

marsbit27m ago

a16z: Top Talent Flows to AI Infrastructure, Infrastructure Design Will Be 'Redesigned from Scratch'

marsbit27m ago

Claude's Safety Mechanism Backfires Spectacularly, AI Deletes Developer's 700GB Home Directory in a Fit of Rage

Claude's safety mechanisms backfired spectacularly, leading an AI to delete a developer's entire 700GB home directory. The developer, Guillemot, asked Claude Fable 5 to write a script to create isolated sandbox folders in /tmp for AI agents and clean them up afterward, ensuring files in use wouldn't be deleted. Because the task involved risky delete operations, Claude's built-in safety system triggered an "adversarial review," automatically downgrading the model from the capable Fable 5 to the more conservative Opus 5, and then to Opus 4.8, to perform a security check. The Opus 4.8 model successfully tested the script, correctly identifying the /tmp and home directories as off-limits for deletion. However, during the cleanup phase that followed the test, it reused a variable name from the testing phase. This variable contained the path to the user's home directory. Consequently, the model executed a delete command on that exact path it had just deemed unsafe, wiping out 700GB of data. The intended /tmp directory remained untouched. The incident highlights critical flaws in Anthropic's safety downgrade system, which community developers have criticized for being overly sensitive, reducing model capability for complex tasks, and being "sticky" for an entire session once triggered. The irony is that a mechanism designed to hand off dangerous tasks to a safer, more conservative model instead delegated it to a weaker model that made a catastrophic error in variable scope and path handling.

marsbit49m ago

Claude's Safety Mechanism Backfires Spectacularly, AI Deletes Developer's 700GB Home Directory in a Fit of Rage

marsbit49m ago

Starting from Anthropic, Dissecting the Hyperliquid Perpetual Contract Sector

The article explores the emergence of pre-IPO perpetual synthetic asset markets on Hyperliquid's HIP-3 protocol, focusing on platforms like Ventuals, Trade.xyz, and Entropy. It begins with the intense secondary market demand for Anthropic stock, as illustrated by Jesse Leimgruber's experience. The HIP-3 protocol allows anyone to launch a perpetual DEX by locking $40M, with 30% of Hyperliquid's volume flowing through it. The piece details the rise and fall of Ventuals, the first major platform for trading pre-IPO synthetics like Anthropic and SpaceX. Its failure was due to extreme funding rates (reportedly hitting 8,700% annualized for Anthropic) and a pricing model vulnerable to thin liquidity, leading to a 45% crash in a SpaceX contract. Trade.xyz succeeded by using a simple 30-minute internal TWAP for pricing and dominates HIP-3 volume. Entropy, backed by a $14M Ribbit Capital-led round, attempts to improve on Ventuals by capping funding rates and using a hybrid oracle that blends its order book with private market valuations, while pricing Anthropic by total market cap. However, it struggles with accurately pricing private companies like Anthropic, unlike public stocks like SanDisk (SNDK) where arbitrage bots align prices. The article concludes by noting a potential Kraken testnet deployment on HIP-3, suggesting regulated entities may adopt its technology within permissioned frameworks. The evolution of these platforms highlights the challenges and iterative progress in creating decentralized markets for private company exposure.

marsbit1h ago

Starting from Anthropic, Dissecting the Hyperliquid Perpetual Contract Sector

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of US (US) are presented below.

活动图片