Assessing community sentiment after David Sacks’s 130-day term as crypto czar ends

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-28Last updated on 2026-03-28

Abstract

David Sacks has concluded his 130-day term as AI and crypto czar for former President Donald Trump. His performance has received mixed reviews from the crypto community. A key achievement was helping pass the GENIUS Act, a stablecoin legislation bill. However, broader goals, such as establishing a U.S. strategic Bitcoin reserve (SBR), remain unfulfilled, drawing criticism from some community members who view this as a failure. Sacks is transitioning to a new role as co-chair of the President’s Council of Advisers on Science and Technology (PCAST), where he will advise on a wider range of tech issues. Despite his departure, advocacy for crypto policy continues within the administration.

David Sacks’s role as AI and crypto czar for President Donald Trump has ended after his 130-day term expired this month. However, his scorecard and ratings across the crypto community have been mixed.

On Thursday, the venture capitalist told Bloomberg that he will be joining the President’s Council of Advisers on Science and Technology (PCAST) as co-chair.

I think moving forward as co-chair of PCAST, I can now make recommendations on not just AI but an expanded range of technology topics.

Mixed views on David Sacks’s scorecard

As crypto czar, Sacks helped push the GENIUS Act, a stablecoin legislation bill, into law last year. This was also done in collaboration with Bo Hines, who was Trump’s chief crypto advisor at that time.

However, after Bo Hines resigned and joined Tether, Patrick Witt, the current White House crypto chief advisor, stepped up to coordinate the broader crypto market structure bill – The CLARITY Act.

In 2024, the sector had a key policy agenda it was pushing. This included an overhaul of the regulatory authorities (SEC and CFTC), the establishment of a U.S strategic Bitcoin reserve (SBR), and the adoption of clear rules via the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act.

As it stands, most of the agenda has been met with the CLARITY Act still in progress. However, the U.S SBR has been muted and hasn’t received much attention lately. Unfortunately, some sections of the community are using it as the main scorecard for Sacks.

According to one user, for instance, both Bo Hines and David Sacks failed to audit the current BTC stack held by the U.S government and the way forward to establishing the related reserve.

Source: X

For her part though, Jacquelyn Melinek, Founder of Token Relations, dismissed the framing as “misleading.” She added,

This is misleading. David Sacks didn’t choose to be ‘out,’ it’s just his term finished. There are other people still at the WH advocating for digital assets and policy. Breathe.

Meanwhile, the chance for a U.S SBR before 2027 was below 30% on the predictions site Polymarket.

Final Summary

  • David Sacks’s AI and crypto czar term has expired as he steps up to the President’s tech council.
  • However, his crypto scorecard elicited mixed reactions despite helping fast-track the GENIUS Act – A stablecoin law.

Related Questions

QWhat was David Sacks' role and for how long did he serve?

ADavid Sacks served as AI and crypto czar for President Donald Trump for a 130-day term.

QWhat is David Sacks' new position after his term as crypto czar ended?

AHe will be joining the President’s Council of Advisers on Science and Technology (PCAST) as co-chair.

QWhat was a key legislative achievement credited to David Sacks during his term?

AHe helped push the GENIUS Act, a stablecoin legislation bill, into law.

QAccording to the article, what is the main point of criticism some in the community have against Sacks?

ASome criticize him for failing to audit the U.S. government's Bitcoin holdings and establish a U.S. strategic Bitcoin reserve (SBR).

QHow did Jacquelyn Melinek respond to the criticism of David Sacks' departure?

AShe dismissed the framing as 'misleading,' stating his term simply finished and that there are other people still advocating for digital assets policy at the White House.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit2h ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit2h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit2h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit2h ago

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinist2h ago

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinist2h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit4h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit4h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit4h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions