“很多人可能不了解AI是什么”:Acuity Trading首席执行官

币界网Published on 2024-08-07Last updated on 2024-08-07

币界网报道:

Acuity Trading的创始人兼首席执行官Andrew Lane表示:“公司都说他们对人工智能(AI)很友好,但AI这个词有很多含义。”他强调了这一趋势是“AIwashing”

莱恩将“AIwashing”一词与“greenwashing”进行了比较,后者是公司急于展示自己有多么环保,以便在投资者中获得可持续发展分数,但实际上并非如此。绿色清洗的规模和影响甚至迫使监管机构介入。

莱恩说:“人工智能这个词有很多含义。”他补充道:“我更多地从机器学习的角度来理解它。很多人说,‘哦,我们有人工智能,我们的产品就是这个人工智能’,他们可能甚至不明白人工智能是什么。”

“以自动方式从文本中提取信息”

Lane于2013年创立了Acuity,这是一家使用机器学习和自然语言处理为交易者提供数据和市场信息的公司。在加入Acuity之前,他曾在道琼斯公司工作,在那里他早期从事自然语言处理工作,也参与了自然语言生成。

他解释说:“它以自动化的方式从文本中提取信息,并将其转化为数字。”。“这些公司提到的积极性,他们提到的地理位置,所有这些数据都是从文本中提取出来的,并被转化为数字,然后对冲基金可以用这些数据进行交易。”

莱恩说:“10年前,我们在Acuity推出了一款非常小的产品,它以视觉效果的形式为零售商提供情绪分析。”。“如今,我们已经取得了长足的进步。因此,我们仍然将NLP作为我们工作的核心,但我们从互联网上提取了更多的信息,包括文本、新闻稿、经纪人发布以及你可以从新闻报道中找到的大量信息。”

“我们最近的创新是将我们的技术分析与情绪分析相结合。NLP通常被称为情绪——新闻的情绪、新闻中的积极性和消极性。我们还在一家受监管的公司下推出了一款技术分析产品。我们是第一家能够将两者合并的公司。”

“我们有点像迷你彭博社”

在解释Acuity的核心客户时,Lane说:“我们以白标的方式与经纪商合作”,并补充道:“他们拿走了我们的工具,把它们放在他们的交易平台上,然后把它提供给他们的交易员,以刺激他们,让他们对交易更有信心。”

“我们有点像迷你彭博社,”他补充道。“我们有一个研究终端,为任何级别或复杂程度的交易者提供大量不同的信息点。因此,从这个意义上说,任何交易者都可以访问我们的信息,无论是外汇、加密货币、股票交易者还是投资者对交易者。但现在我们仍然非常关注交易,而不是不加改变地投资。”

莱恩继续说道:“我的下一步是更多地转向长期投资,而不仅仅是交易员。”。“我认为,长期以来,经纪人一直需要吸引投资者和交易员,我们希望将我们的产品与他们相匹配。”

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

China Monopolizes the Humanoid Market: The U.S. Is Forced to Defend Itself

China's Humanoid Robot Market Domination and US Response According to a report by Smart Analytics Global (SAG), Chinese manufacturers supplied over 97% of the global humanoid robot shipments (approximately 19,100 units) in the first half of 2026, a 272% year-on-year increase. Shanghai-based AGIBOT led with a 44% market share, followed by Unitree Robotics with 31%. Together, these two firms accounted for about 75% of global shipments. China itself represented over 85% of global demand for these devices, with industrial and commercial applications now comprising more than 70% of shipments. Key factors driving China's leadership include strong state support, abundant funding, expanding production capacity, IPO waves for developers, and a vast manufacturing ecosystem for rapid testing and deployment. Furthermore, over 90% of key components for humanoid robots are now sourced domestically. In response, the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) banned federal agencies and subsidy recipients from purchasing or using foreign "advanced robotic devices," including humanoid and quadruped robots, citing national security concerns in July 2026. SAG forecasts global shipments to approach 60,000 units for full-year 2026, with industry revenue around $1.6 billion, projecting 500,000 units by 2030. The analysis notes potential challenges for Chinese expansion, such as reputational risks from alleged ties to China's defense sector and the precedent of trade disputes seen in solar panels and batteries, potentially triggered by the current low average robot price.

cryptonews.ru6m ago

China Monopolizes the Humanoid Market: The U.S. Is Forced to Defend Itself

cryptonews.ru6m ago

What's New in Ethereum's Roadmap: Privacy, Quantum Security, Native Rollup?

On August 10, 2024, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin revealed an updated technical roadmap, highlighting significant changes in priorities and new focus areas. Key new additions include: - **Strong Privacy Protection**: Elevated to a top-tier protocol concern. Proposals like EIP-8250 (keyed nonces for concurrency), EIP-8272 (recent roots for verification), and EIP-8182 (shared protocol-level privacy pools) aim to enable private transfers of ETH and ERC-20s, moving toward default private accounts. - **Quantum Resilience**: Priority increased. The plan addresses risks to ECDSA/BLS signatures, KZG commitments, and ZK systems, exploring solutions like leanSPHINCS signatures, STARK proofs (considered quantum-resistant), and streamlined verification processes. A full L1 upgrade is tentatively targeted for ~2029. - **Native Rollups**: A novel concept where rollups could reuse Ethereum's core validation infrastructure via a new EXECUTE precompile (EIP-8079 draft). This aims to reduce custom code and enhance security for certain L2s, while specialized chains will continue to exist. - **Protocol Simplification & Formal Verification**: Leveraging AI tools to make full-protocol formal verification feasible, aiming for more rigorous and machine-verifiable specifications. Other notable shifts: - State storage is evolving from Verkle trees to a Partitioned Binary Tree (PBT, EIP-8347 draft). - Some 2023 items like VDFs and certain EVM improvements were deprioritized. - Long-term discussions include blob/gas futures and non-EVM instruction sets (e.g., RISC-V). The "Strawmap" outlines potential upgrades through ~2029 but is a directional guide, not a firm timeline. Key milestones to watch include the Glamsterdam (Q4 2026) and Hegotá (2027) forks. Many proposals remain in draft or research phases.

marsbit28m ago

What's New in Ethereum's Roadmap: Privacy, Quantum Security, Native Rollup?

marsbit28m ago

Hyperliquid Trading Volume Soars, So Why Are Profits Falling?

Hyperliquid, a leading decentralized perpetuals trading platform, has seen its open interest surge to a record high above $11 billion, capturing roughly 9% of the global market share. Trading volume remains robust, nearing $178 billion over 30 days, driven largely by the explosive growth of third-party markets offering tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) like stocks and commodities. Despite this growth, the platform's protocol revenue has declined for four consecutive quarters, falling 43% from its Q3 2025 peak of $357 million to approximately $202 million in Q2 2026. This divergence is primarily attributed to the HIP-3 governance proposal, which allows external developers to launch their own markets and keep up to half of the generated fees. These third-party markets now account for nearly 50% of total volume. Consequently, the share of revenue redistributed to developers, market makers, and the treasury has tripled from 6% to 18% in a year. This directly reduces the funds allocated to the platform's buyback-and-burn mechanism for its native HYPE token, weakening a key price support. HYPE's price has fallen 28% from its all-time high. The platform's growth is also heavily concentrated, with a single entity, Trade.xyz, responsible for over 90% of HIP-3 open interest, introducing systemic risk. Additionally, the ecosystem lacks diversity beyond HYPE, faces ongoing token unlocks adding sell pressure, and is encountering increased regulatory scrutiny and new competition from platforms like Robinhood Chain. While still a major revenue generator in crypto, Hyperliquid's model of sharing fees to fuel expansion is currently compressing its own earnings and token economics.

marsbit28m ago

Hyperliquid Trading Volume Soars, So Why Are Profits Falling?

marsbit28m ago

Citi Research Report Analysis: U.S. Proposed Ban on Chinese Optical Modules Has No Substantial Progress, Short-term Enforcement Faces Supply Constraints

Citi Report Analysis: U.S. Proposed Ban on Chinese Optical Modules Lacks Substantive Progress, Faces Supply Bottlenecks in Short Term. Reuters reported on August 4th that the U.S. government and FCC are considering a ban on Chinese optical modules. Citi's August 9th report clarifies that optical modules are not listed on any effective FCC ban. The FCC's Order 26-50 established two restricted list mechanisms (based on manufacturer and production location), but optical modules were only mentioned once, as an example in a disclosure requirement, not as a restricted product. The reported ban remains at a proposal stage. Citi estimates Chinese suppliers provide 60-70% of high-speed optical modules for U.S. hyperscalers. Non-Chinese suppliers cannot fill this gap in the short term, making the immediate implementation of a genuine ban unlikely. Future regulatory paths could be manufacturer-based (least likely), location-based covering all offshore production (strictest), or location-based covering only China (more feasible but with unresolved definitions). A ban would pressure U.S. AI infrastructure, conflicting with stated policy goals. Citi sees low near-term implementation probability, with the issue potentially becoming a negotiation chip in bilateral talks. U.S. domestic capacity build-out is a key long-term variable. Among Chinese companies, XSENS and Dongshan Precision have the highest U.S. exposure, while Tianfu Communication, as a passive component supplier, is relatively insulated. Citi maintains Buy ratings on all three with respective price targets. The conclusion is that Chinese modules are currently irreplaceable in the U.S. AI supply chain, creating a longer timeline for potential restrictions than the market may expect.

marsbit1h ago

Citi Research Report Analysis: U.S. Proposed Ban on Chinese Optical Modules Has No Substantial Progress, Short-term Enforcement Faces Supply Constraints

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片