Bank of Korea Urges Bank-Led Won Stablecoin Issuance

TheNewsCrypto發佈於 2026-02-23更新於 2026-02-23

文章摘要

The Bank of Korea (BOK) has urged that the issuance of Korean won-pegged stablecoins should be led by commercial banks, warning that private issuance could undermine monetary policy and create foreign exchange and financial stability risks. In a report submitted to the National Assembly, the central bank described stablecoins as "currency-like substitutes" and emphasized that their rollout must consider broader economic impacts, not just industrial profits. The BOK expressed concerns that stablecoins could be used to circumvent foreign exchange regulations and stressed that non-bank issuers might conflict with Korea’s separation of banking and commerce principles. It recommended that banks, which are subject to strict regulatory standards, should be the primary issuers, with any expansion beyond banks proceeding cautiously after risk assessments. The report reflects ongoing debates among policymakers about who should be allowed to issue won stablecoins and echoes the BOK’s previous warnings on the matter. While acknowledging stablecoins' potential role in the digital asset revolution, the bank proposed structural safeguards, including a bank-focused consortium model and a statutory interagency policy body for oversight. The BOK cited the U.S. GENIUS Act as an example of cross-agency supervision. However, this bank-led approach has faced opposition from industry members, including some policymakers, who argue that clearer rules for issuers could sufficiently mitigate risks.

The central bank of South Korea has allegedly renewed its push to keep Korean won-pegged stablecoin issuance in the hands of commercial banks, alerting policymakers that privately issued digital tokens could diminish monetary policy and create new foreign-exchange and financial-stability risks.

Recently, a report was submitted to the National Assembly Strategy and Finance Committee of South Korea. The Bank of Korea (BOK) mentioned won stablecoins as “currency-like substitutes” and said their rollout must account not only for industrial profits but also for monetary policy, foreign exchange stability and financial risks, as per the report.

The central bank restated concerns that stablecoins could be used to avoid foreign exchange regulations, comprising earlier reporting needs, and claimed that permitting non-bank bodies to issue them independently could conflict with the separation of banking and commerce principles of Korea.

It also mentioned that banks, which are subject to capital, governance and compliance standards, should be allowed first, with any widening beyond banks advancing slowly after risk assessments.

The report lands as policymakers debate a postponed stablecoin framework, with one of the prominent sticking points being who should be eligible to issue won-pegged tokens and how much control banks should hold in any issuing body.

The Echo of Previous Warnings

The bank allegedly stated programmable stablecoins could back the digital asset revolution and function as payment tools, but it also floated structural safeguards, including a bank-focused consortium model and a statutory interagency policy body that could systemise approvals and supervision over regulators.

As per the reports, the Bank of Korea also quoted the GENIUS Act framework of the United States as an example of cross-agency supervision that comprises the Treasury Department, the Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

The report reflects its previous warnings, which claim that banks should be heading the introduction for stablecoin issuance since they are so far subject to strict regulatory needs. Although, this approach has witnessed a repulsion from the members of the industry, including some policymakers.

The chair of the Kaia DLT Foundation, Sangmin Seo, has earlier mentioned that the argument for banks heading the stablecoin launch is short on logical foundation. Seo mentioned that setting clearer rules for issuers can reduce risks.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Arthur Hayes Reveals Portfolio Bet on Commodities and Crypto

TagsGenius ACTKoreaStablecoin

熱門幣種推薦

相關問答

QWhat is the Bank of Korea's main stance on who should issue won-pegged stablecoins?

AThe Bank of Korea's main stance is that the issuance of won-pegged stablecoins should be led by and kept in the hands of commercial banks.

QWhat are the three main areas of risk the BOK says stablecoin rollout must account for?

AThe three main areas of risk are monetary policy, foreign exchange stability, and financial risks.

QAccording to the BOK report, what principle could allowing non-banks to issue stablecoins conflict with?

AIt could conflict with Korea's principle of the separation of banking and commerce.

QWhich U.S. regulatory framework did the Bank of Korea cite as an example of cross-agency supervision?

AThe Bank of Korea cited the U.S. GENIUS Act framework as an example.

QWho is Sangmin Seo and what was his criticism of the bank-led stablecoin model?

ASangmin Seo is the chair of the Kaia DLT Foundation. He criticized the bank-led model, stating that the argument for banks heading the stablecoin launch is short on logical foundation and that setting clearer rules for issuers can reduce risks.

你可能也喜歡

AI 成绩单背后,藏着一位华人“出题人”

AI领域重要的基准评测MMLU-Pro、MMMU、MMMU-Pro背后,都站着同一位“出题人”——加拿大滑铁卢大学助理教授陈文虎。 随着大语言模型能力快速提升,旧的评测基准如MMLU逐渐“失灵”,顶尖模型得分趋近满分,难以区分高下。为此,陈文虎团队于2024年推出MMLU-Pro。它通过将选项扩至10个、增加推理题比例、剔除简单题等方式,使模型准确率相较旧基准显著下降16%-33%,成绩波动更小,有效拉开了模型间的真实差距。 在多模态评测方面,陈文虎团队推出的MMMU基准包含1.15万道需结合图像与专业知识的复杂题目,即便是当时最强的GPT-4V和Gemini Ultra准确率也未超过60%。后续的MMMU-Pro则进一步堵住模型仅凭文本猜答案的漏洞,强制其进行真正的多模态理解。 陈文虎的研究方向长期聚焦于复杂信息理解与推理。他曾于谷歌DeepMind参与Gemini多模态模型的研发与评估工作,这让他深谙模型能力增长路径与评估盲区。他创立的“老虎实验室”不仅做评测,也研发视频理解与生成等模型,这种“既做题也出题”的经历,使其能更精准地设计出触及模型能力边界的评估体系。 如今,陈文虎已加入Meta超级智能实验室,继续专注于多模态预训练与评估工作。他的故事反映了在AI浪潮中,众多华人研究者正深度参与并塑造着行业发展的核心基础工作。

marsbit1 小時前

AI 成绩单背后,藏着一位华人“出题人”

marsbit1 小時前

Alliance 联创致创业者的一封信:写在 Cursor 卖出 600 亿美元之际

作者Imran以Cursor以600亿美元被收购为引,致信创业者,探讨如何发现并抓住创业机遇。 文章指出,许多创业者在看到成功案例后,因感觉市场饱和而放弃。真正的机会在于识别长期的技术趋势转变,并基于对未来的非共识信念,在市场成熟前默默构建。Cursor、Stripe、Figma、Shopify等公司均遵循此模式:在现有解决方案(如PayPal、Adobe、亚马逊)验证市场后,围绕新洞察、新技术或变化的用户需求进行重构。 创业者应首先找准自己在技术周期中的位置:早期入场者(如Coinbase、Cursor)应致力于让新技术对重度用户更易用;后期入场者则需寻找先行者忽视的“阴面”机会。 积累独特见解至关重要。创业者需深度沉浸于目标市场,体验所有竞品,与用户深入交流,从而发现未被满足的“火烧眉毛”般的痛点或能带来十倍提升的机会。产品MVP应极其聚焦,提供用户无法拒绝的转换理由,并尽可能降低用户的转换成本。 分发渠道常被低估,却是关键护城河。创业者需打造自己的分发引擎,通过无法规模化的“笨功夫”手动获取早期用户,实现渠道与市场的契合。 最后,成功离不开坚韧与适应力。伟大公司的创始人并非更聪明,而是能在漫长而艰难的过程中坚持足够久,让洞察产生复利。文章总结框架为:寻找技术周期更迭、培养独特洞察、痴迷市场、与客户交流、找到核心痛点、打造简单切入点、赢得分发渠道,并在困难时永不放弃。

链捕手1 小時前

Alliance 联创致创业者的一封信:写在 Cursor 卖出 600 亿美元之际

链捕手1 小時前

交易

現貨
合約

熱門文章

什麼是 $BANK

銀行人工智能:銀行未來的革命性步伐 介紹 在這個科技迅速進步的時代,銀行人工智能處於人工智能(AI)和銀行服務的交匯點。這個創新的項目旨在重新定義金融格局,通過人工智能的力量提高運營效率、安全措施和客戶體驗。在我們探索銀行人工智能的過程中,將深入探討這一項目的內涵、運作動態、歷史背景以及重要里程碑。 銀行人工智能是什麼? 從本質上講,銀行人工智能代表了一項變革性倡議,旨在將人工智能整合進各種銀行運營中。這個項目利用人工智能的能力來自動化流程、改善風險管理協議,並通過個性化服務增強客戶互動。 銀行人工智能的主要目標包括: 銀行功能自動化:通過利用人工智能技術,銀行人工智能旨在自動化日常任務,減輕人力資源的負擔並提高效率。 加強風險管理:該項目利用人工智能算法來預測和識別風險,從而強化針對欺詐和其他威脅的安全措施。 銀行服務個性化:銀行人工智能專注於通過分析客戶數據和行為提供量身定制的金融產品和服務。 改善客戶體驗:實施由人工智能驅動的解決方案,如聊天機器人和虛擬助手,旨在為用戶提供更接近人類的互動,徹底改變客戶與銀行的互動方式。 有了這些目標,銀行人工智能將自己定位為在提高銀行效率、安全性和以用戶為中心的關鍵角色。 銀行人工智能的創造者是誰? 關於銀行人工智能的創造者的具體細節尚不清楚。因此,在可用信息中尚未確定具體的個人或組織。圍繞該項目創建的匿名性引發了問題,但並未減少其雄心壯志的願景和目標。 銀行人工智能的投資者是誰? 與項目的創造者類似,關於銀行人工智能的投資者或支持組織的具體信息尚未披露。沒有這些信息,很難概述可能推動該項目向前發展的財務支持和機構支持。儘管如此,擁有堅實的投資基礎對於在這樣一個創新領域中保持發展至關重要。 銀行人工智能是如何運作的? 銀行人工智能在幾個創新領域運作,專注於使其與傳統銀行框架區分開來的獨特因素。以下是主要的運作特點: 自動化:通過應用機器學習算法,銀行人工智能自動化銀行內的各種手動流程。這樣不僅減少了運營成本,還使人力工作者能夠將精力轉向更具戰略性的活動。 先進的風險管理:將人工智能整合到風險管理實踐中,使銀行獲得準確預測潛在威脅(如欺詐)的工具,確保客戶信息和資產的安全。 量身定制的財務建議:通過持續學習客戶互動,人工智能系統發展出對用戶需求的細緻理解,能夠對財務決策提供量身定制的建議。 增強的客戶互動:利用由人工智能驅動的聊天機器人和虛擬助手,銀行人工智能提供了更具吸引力的客戶體驗,使用戶能夠快速解決問題,從而減少等待時間並提高滿意度。 這些運作特徵使銀行人工智能成為銀行業的先驅,建立服務交付和運營卓越的新標準。 銀行人工智能的時間線 了解銀行人工智能的發展軌跡需要看其歷史背景。以下是突顯重要里程碑和發展的時間線: 2010年代早期:對人工智能整合到銀行服務的概念開始引起關注,隨著銀行機構認識到潛在利益。 2018年:隨著銀行開始使用聊天機器人等人工智能工具進行基本客戶服務和風險管理系統以改善安全處理,人工智能技術的實施顯著增加。 2023年:人工智能的技術不斷進步,生成式人工智能被引入進行更複雜的任務,如文件處理和實時投資分析。今年標誌著人工智能技術為銀行提供能力的重要飛躍。 2024-當前狀態:截至今年,銀行人工智能正處於上升軌道,持續的研究和開發預示著將進一步提升銀行業務的能力。對人工智能應用的持續探索暗示著未來令人興奮的發展。 銀行人工智能的關鍵點 人工智能在銀行中的整合:銀行人工智能專注於採用人工智能來簡化銀行流程並改善用戶體驗。 自動化和風險管理的聚焦:該項目強烈關注這些領域,旨在減輕例行任務的負擔,同時通過預測分析增強安全框架。 個性化的銀行解決方案:通過利用客戶數據,銀行人工智能提供滿足個別用戶需求的量身定制銀行服務。 對發展的承諾:銀行人工智能致力於持續的研究和開發,確保其隨著技術的持續演變而保持適應性和持續相關性。 結論 總結來說,銀行人工智能展現了銀行業的一個重要進步,利用人工智能重塑運營範式、提高安全性,並促進客戶滿意度。儘管有關創造者和投資者的信息仍有缺口,但銀行人工智能的明確目標和功能機制為其持續發展提供了堅實基礎。隨著人工智能技術的不斷進步和與銀行業的融合,銀行人工智能在金融服務未來的影響力將十分顯著,改善我們對銀行的理解和互動方式。

126 人學過發佈於 2024.04.06更新於 2024.12.03

什麼是 $BANK

如何購買BANK

歡迎來到HTX.com!在這裡,購買Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)變得簡單而便捷。跟隨我們的逐步指南,放心開始您的加密貨幣之旅。第一步:創建您的HTX帳戶使用您的 Email、手機號碼在HTX註冊一個免費帳戶。體驗無憂的註冊過程並解鎖所有平台功能。立即註冊第二步:前往買幣頁面,選擇您的支付方式信用卡/金融卡購買:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即時購買Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)。餘額購買:使用您HTX帳戶餘額中的資金進行無縫交易。第三方購買:探索諸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方式以增加便利性。C2C購買:在HTX平台上直接與其他用戶交易。HTX 場外交易 (OTC) 購買:為大量交易者提供個性化服務和競爭性匯率。第三步:存儲您的Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)購買Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)後,將其存儲在您的HTX帳戶中。您也可以透過區塊鏈轉帳將其發送到其他地址或者用於交易其他加密貨幣。第四步:交易Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)在HTX的現貨市場輕鬆交易Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)。前往您的帳戶,選擇交易對,執行交易,並即時監控。HTX為初學者和經驗豐富的交易者提供了友好的用戶體驗。

1.0k 人學過發佈於 2025.05.09更新於 2026.06.02

如何購買BANK

相關討論

歡迎來到 HTX 社群。在這裡,您可以了解最新的平台發展動態並獲得專業的市場意見。 以下是用戶對 BANK (BANK)幣價的意見。

活动图片