SEC and CFTC signal execution phase for crypto regulation at harmonization meeting

ambcrypto发布于2026-01-29更新于2026-01-29

文章摘要

US financial regulators, the SEC and CFTC, have announced a shift from coordination to execution in crypto regulation. At a harmonization meeting, officials outlined plans to advance joint rulemaking using existing authority, without waiting for final legislation from Congress. A key initiative, "Project Crypto," aims to create a shared taxonomy for crypto assets, clarify jurisdictional boundaries, and reduce regulatory duplication and uncertainty. The CFTC stated that most crypto assets are not securities, marking a departure from past ambiguity. Planned rulemaking covers tokenized collateral, onshore crypto perpetual derivatives, retail leveraged trading, and treatment of software in DeFi. The goal is to provide regulatory clarity and reduce friction while maintaining market integrity.

US financial regulators signalled a shift from coordination to execution on crypto oversight on Thursday, 29 January.

Senior officials from the Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC] and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission [CFTC] outlined plans to advance joint rulemaking using existing authority.

The remarks came during a rescheduled SEC–CFTC harmonization meeting, where both agencies emphasised regulatory clarity, reduced duplication, and a more coordinated approach to overseeing crypto asset markets.

Regulators move beyond coordination rhetoric

Speaking at the event, Michael S. Selig said the CFTC would begin exercising oversight of the crypto market without waiting for Congress to finalize market structure legislation.

He described the moment as a transition toward implementation. Staff have been directed to draft rules and revisit existing proposals that have contributed to regulatory uncertainty.

Selig said the CFTC would work jointly with the SEC on “Project Crypto.” This is a framework aimed at harmonizing oversight across agencies.

The initiative is designed to establish a shared crypto asset taxonomy. Also, it is to clarify jurisdictional boundaries and reduce overlapping compliance requirements.

Joint taxonomy and jurisdictional clarity

A central focus of the meeting was developing a common classification framework for digital assets. Selig said he agreed with Paul S. Atkins that most crypto assets trading today are not securities.

This position would mark a departure from years of regulatory ambiguity.

Selig added that CFTC staff have been instructed to work with their SEC counterparts on the joint codification of a crypto asset taxonomy as an interim measure. At the same time, Congress continues to work on broader legislation.

The aim, he said, is to draw clearer jurisdictional lines and avoid leaving market participants “trapped in uncertainty.”

Rulemaking plans span derivatives, collateral, and software

Beyond taxonomy, Selig outlined several areas where the CFTC plans to move forward with rulemaking.

These include developing rules to support the use of tokenised collateral, creating pathways to onshore perpetual crypto derivatives. Also, the rule will clarify the treatment of leveraged and margined retail crypto trading.

He also announced plans to withdraw earlier proposals that restricted certain event contracts and to begin rulemaking on prediction markets.

In addition, the CFTC will explore whether innovation exemptions or safe harbours are appropriate for software developers and non-custodial systems operating in the decentralized finance space.

Harmonization aimed at reducing regulatory friction

Both agencies framed harmonization as a practical exercise rather than a blurring of statutory boundaries.

Selig said substituted compliance and aligned requirements could allow firms to operate more efficiently without compromising market integrity. This is particularly as crypto markets span products traditionally overseen by different regulators.

While recent congressional action has advanced market structure legislation, regulators stressed that the execution phase would proceed independently, using existing authorities to modernise oversight as innovation continues.


Final Thoughts

  • US regulators signalled a move from coordination to implementation, with the SEC and CFTC outlining concrete steps toward joint crypto rulemaking.
  • Planned actions span asset classification, derivatives, tokenised collateral, and software treatment, indicating regulatory execution will move ahead of final legislation.

相关问答

QWhat was the main shift signaled by US financial regulators regarding crypto oversight on January 29?

AUS financial regulators signaled a shift from coordination to execution on crypto oversight, with the SEC and CFTC outlining plans to advance joint rulemaking using existing authority.

QWhat is the name of the joint framework mentioned for harmonizing crypto oversight between the SEC and CFTC?

AThe joint framework is called 'Project Crypto', aimed at harmonizing oversight, establishing a shared crypto asset taxonomy, clarifying jurisdictional boundaries, and reducing overlapping compliance requirements.

QAccording to Michael S. Selig, what is the classification of most crypto assets trading today?

AMichael S. Selig agreed that most crypto assets trading today are not securities, which marks a departure from years of regulatory ambiguity.

QWhat are some specific areas where the CFTC plans to move forward with rulemaking?

AThe CFTC plans to develop rules for tokenised collateral, create pathways to onshore perpetual crypto derivatives, clarify treatment of leveraged and margined retail crypto trading, withdraw earlier proposals restricting certain event contracts, and begin rulemaking on prediction markets.

QHow do the agencies view harmonization in the context of crypto regulation?

ABoth agencies framed harmonization as a practical exercise aimed at reducing regulatory friction, allowing firms to operate more efficiently without compromising market integrity, through substituted compliance and aligned requirements.

你可能也喜欢

BTC“数字黄金”的叙事是不是失败了?

这篇文章从三个核心问题探讨了比特币的现状与未来,强调提供的是思考框架而非投资建议。 **如何看待比特币资产?** 作者认为比特币是一种全新的、更优秀的“黄金”资产。其优势在于总量恒定、转移便捷、交易可审计。尽管早期与灰色地带关联,但合规化是趋势。目前全球数字货币渗透率仅3%-4%,类比互联网和电商的早期阶段,意味着比特币仍处于发展初期,潜力巨大但波动性也极高。 **如何理解本轮下跌?** 比特币自2025年10月高点(近12.6万美元)持续下跌,2026年2月一度跌破6.1万美元,单日跌幅达15%,随后又快速反弹。这被解读为遵循四年减半周期的共识性获利了结。特别之处在于,美国比特币ETF的批准引入了机构资金,也促使早期低成本持有者(如矿工和信仰者)进行大规模“换手”,这是资产迈向主流化的必经过程。历史数据显示,比特币历次大跌的幅度在收窄(从93%到当前的约50%),表明资产正在成熟,波动率逐步下降,但高波动仍是其获取超额回报的固有特征。 **长期如何看待发展?** 长期价值可对标黄金。当前比特币市值仅为黄金市值的约7%,若“数字黄金”叙事实现一半,上行空间依然显著。但作者提醒,短期市场脆弱,换手可能未完,底部无法预测。真正的风险并非资产归零(概率较低),而在于错误的仓位管理(如All-in或加杠杆)以及对资产缺乏深刻理解。投资者必须计算并承受潜在的最大回撤(例如从已跌50%的位置再跌50%),才能存活至长期价值兑现。 文章最后以亚马逊在互联网泡沫后暴涨为例,指出关键不在于比特币未来是否上涨,而在于投资者能否通过理性的仓位管理和深度认知,扛过剧烈波动存活到那一天。文末提问引导读者反思:当前黄金涨、比特币跌的局面,究竟意味着“数字黄金”叙事失败,还是资产进化过程中的换手阵痛?这取决于每个人对比特币最底层的信仰。

marsbit5小时前

BTC“数字黄金”的叙事是不是失败了?

marsbit5小时前

BTC“数字黄金”的叙事是不是失败了?

标题:BTC“数字黄金”的叙事是不是失败了? 作者:@wuk_Bitcoin 本文从三个核心问题出发,探讨比特币的现状与未来。 **如何看待比特币?** 作者认为比特币是一种全新的、更优秀的“黄金”类资产。其优势在于:总量恒定(2100万枚);资产可转移性极强,在全球不确定性时代具备溢价;所有交易链上可审计,透明度高。反驳了比特币主要用于灰色地带的过时观点,指出其正走向合规。目前全球数字货币渗透率仅约3%-4%,类比互联网和电商早期,意味着该资产类别仍处早期,潜力与巨大波动并存。 **如何理解本轮下跌?** 比特币自2025年10月高点(近12.6万美元)持续下跌,2026年2月初曾单日暴跌15%,跌破6.1万美元。这被视为遵循其四年减半周期的规律性回调,是长期持有者在周期高点锁定利润的结果。本轮下跌的特殊性在于:美国比特币ETF的批准引入了大量机构新资金,但也促使成本极低的早期持有者(矿工、OG)进行历史性抛售,即从“早期信仰者”向“长期配置机构”的换手过程。历史数据显示,比特币历次大回撤的跌幅在逐步收窄(从93%到目前的约50%),表明资产在成熟,波动率在下降,但高波动仍是获取超额回报的代价。 **长期怎么看?** 若将比特币视为“数字黄金”,其当前总市值(约1.4万亿美元)仅为黄金总市值(约20万亿美元)的7%。即使该叙事仅部分实现,上行空间依然可观。但作者强调短期风险:换手可能未结束,市场脆弱,不排除进一步下跌。真正的风险不在于资产归零(概率极低),而在于错误的仓位管理(如All-in、加杠杆)和对资产缺乏深度理解,这可能导致投资者无法承受巨大波动而提前被迫出局。 **最后对比** 作者以亚马逊在互联网泡沫破裂后股价跌95%又最终上涨42倍为例,指出关键在于“活着等到那一天”。对于比特币,核心同样是能否通过理性仓位管理活到其价值兑现之时。文末提问:当黄金大涨而比特币大跌,这究竟是“数字黄金”叙事的失败,还是资产进化过程中的阵痛?答案取决于每个人对比特币最底层的信仰。

链捕手5小时前

BTC“数字黄金”的叙事是不是失败了?

链捕手5小时前

从代码到认知:机器人大脑进化的万字指南

本文概述了机器人大脑从传统代码控制到现代人工智能模型驱动的演进历程。文章首先回顾了前大型语言模型(LLM)时代,机器人依赖手工编码的模块化技术栈(感知、状态估计、规划、控制)和行为树,虽稳定但泛化能力差。随后,深度学习改进了感知,强化学习和模仿学习进入了控制层,但策略仍较为狭窄。 ChatGPT的出现带来了转折。LLM最初被用作自然语言编译器,将指令转化为机器人可执行的原子技能序列(如谷歌的SayCan)。但更重要的突破是视觉-语言-动作模型(VLA),例如谷歌的RT-2和开源的OpenVLA,它能将视觉、语言信息融合,直接输出动作指令,实现了推理与行动的耦合。 目前最先进的系统采用“双脑”架构(如Figure AI的Helix、NVIDIA GR00T):一个慢速、参数多的“系统2”负责高层次推理和规划;一个快速、小巧的“系统1”负责高频动作生成。其下还可能有一个“系统0”反射层处理平衡等底层控制。出于延迟和可靠性考虑,安全关键的控制回路通常在机器人本地(如NVIDIA Jetson模块)运行,而对话界面和集群学习等任务可交由云端。 开源模型(如OpenVLA、GR00T、π0)降低了行业门槛,让初创公司能在其基础上用自有数据微调。然而,当前VLA机器人仍存在任务中途恢复能力弱、样本效率低、缺乏物理常识和长期规划能力等局限。 这催生了下一代方向:世界模型。这类模型(如NVIDIA Cosmos、Meta V-JEPA)能根据当前状态和动作预测未来结果,让机器人在行动前进行模拟和评估,从而改善恢复能力、泛化能力和长期规划。架构上主要分为像素级视频扩散、联合嵌入预测架构(JEPA)和潜在动作世界模型等流派。 文章最后指出,数据采集(特别是远程操作数据)是核心竞争力,仿真训练至关重要,机器人成本正在迅速下降。当前物理AI的发展阶段大约相当于“GPT-2时代”,虽未完全自主,但正通过架构的持续演进(从代码到感知、规划、策略,最终到世界模型),朝着更通用、更强大的方向稳步前进。

marsbit5小时前

从代码到认知:机器人大脑进化的万字指南

marsbit5小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片