Matrixport Research: Bitcoin Falls into Bear Market Territory, Could a Weakening Dollar Become the Next Support?

Matrixport发布于2026-02-03更新于2026-02-03

文章摘要

Bitcoin has entered a bearish phase, trading below its 21-week moving average, amid policy uncertainty from the U.S. midterm elections and its typical four-year cycle pressures. While structural weakness persists, a weakening U.S. dollar and ongoing reflation narrative could provide medium-term support for risk assets, including Bitcoin. The October 10 flash crash exacerbated market fragility, widening arbitrage gaps and reducing liquidity. Notably, realized losses were largely absorbed by speculative retail investors—particularly on platforms like Hyperliquid—rather than institutional players. Macro conditions show tolerance for a weaker dollar, which historically benefits Bitcoin. However, risk appetite is cooling: stablecoin growth has slowed, retail interest remains low, and quantum computing concerns continue to dampen Bitcoin’s safe-haven narrative. Although the dollar’s 14-year bullish trend has broken—a positive long-term signal—Bitcoin’s price action remains weak, with rallies being met with selling. A more bullish outlook requires clearer technical and capital flow confirmations.

"The structurally weak bias remains unchanged, but the shift in the dollar trend is becoming a key variable."

After the latest round of pullbacks, Bitcoin's price structure has further weakened. The most direct signal is that it continues to trade below the 21-week moving average, aligning with the technical characteristics of a bear market. At the same time, the policy uncertainty of the U.S. midterm election year, combined with the typical four-year cycle of Bitcoin, makes this historical time window more prone to price pressure. However, against the backdrop of a weakening dollar and the ongoing reflation narrative, we maintain a relatively positive view on overall risk assets, but our assessment of Bitcoin still requires careful evaluation in conjunction with structural signals.

Price Structure Under Pressure: Selling Pressure Not from Institutions, but from Dispersed Speculative Losses

Over the past six months, Bitcoin has failed to strengthen in sync with gold and other risk assets. Since June 2025, sustained selling by early holders was seen as the main suppressing factor. However, since October, as gold accelerated its upward trend and Bitcoin entered a correction, it has become clear that a single factor can no longer explain the current divergence.

The flash crash on October 10, 2025, became a significant watershed. This event led to a significant widening of cross-asset relative pricing and inter-exchange spreads, squeezing the risk budgets of market makers and market-neutral funds, thereby weakening short-term liquidity. Notably, there are almost no signs of concentrated losses among major trading institutions. Instead, realized losses are occurring more dispersed among a broader range of market participants. Data shows that traders on the Hyperliquid platform contributed over 50% of the realized losses, indicating that this round of shock was primarily borne by speculative retail investors, not led by institutions.

Capital and Narrative Shifts: Weakening Dollar is a Supporting Variable, but Risk Appetite is Still Cooling

On a macro level, the reflation narrative persists, and the dollar remains in a weak trading range. Historically, Bitcoin has often found medium-term support during periods of sustained dollar weakness. Recently, Trump has neither sent a clear signal of support for a weaker dollar nor made strong statements against it. The market tends to interpret this as increased tolerance for a weaker dollar, suggesting the reflation trade may still find support in the short term.

However, from a capital flow perspective, risk appetite is showing marginal cautiousness. The one-year rolling growth rates of the stablecoin supplies for both USDT and USDC peaked around October 2025 and have since slowed significantly, with USDC seeing a more pronounced decline. Meanwhile, Bitcoin's overall search popularity has remained low since its peak in 2021, reflecting more a cooling of retail attention rather than a wave of panic. Although discussions around quantum computing have subsided, they continue to somewhat suppress Bitcoin's "safe asset" narrative, making it difficult for its safety premium to recover.

Overall, although the dollar's 14-year-long uptrend has been broken—a change that historically tends to favor Bitcoin in establishing medium to long-term support—the current price structure remains weak, with rebounds often being met with selling. The overall trend remains within a consolidation range under a bear market framework. Our view on Bitcoin has become marginally more constructive compared to before, but before shifting to a clearer bullish stance, we still need to wait for further improvement and confirmation from technical and capital flow signals.

Some of the above views are from Matrix on Target. Contact us to obtain the full Matrix on Target report.

Disclaimer: The market is risky, and investment requires caution. This article does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset trading can be extremely risky and volatile. Investment decisions should be made after careful consideration of personal circumstances and consultation with financial professionals. Matrixport is not responsible for any investment decisions based on the information provided in this content.

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QAccording to the Matrixport research, what are the key technical characteristics indicating Bitcoin has entered a bear market territory?

AThe key technical characteristic is that Bitcoin's price continues to trade below its 21-week moving average, which aligns with the technical features of a bear market.

QWhat event on October 10, 2025, served as a significant watershed moment for Bitcoin's price action, and what was its primary impact?

AThe flash crash on October 10, 2025, was a significant watershed. It led to a significant widening of cross-asset relative pricing and inter-exchange spreads, which squeezed risk budgets for market makers and market-neutral funds, resulting in weaker short-term liquidity.

QThe report suggests the recent selling pressure did not primarily come from institutions. Which group of market participants was responsible for over 50% of the realized losses?

AOver 50% of the realized losses were contributed by traders on the Hyperliquid platform, indicating that the recent selling pressure was primarily shouldered by speculative retail traders, not institutions.

QHow does a weakening US Dollar historically tend to affect Bitcoin, and what is the current market interpretation of former President Trump's stance on the dollar?

AHistorically, Bitcoin tends to find more medium-term support during periods of sustained US Dollar weakness. The current interpretation of former President Trump's stance is that he has shown increased tolerance for a weaker dollar, as he has neither sent a clear signal of support nor made strong statements against its decline.

QWhat two signals from the stablecoin market and web search trends indicate a cooling in risk appetite among market participants?

AThe one-year rolling growth rate of the supply of stablecoins USDT and USDC peaked around October 2025 and has since slowed significantly, with USDC seeing a more pronounced decline. Additionally, Bitcoin's overall search popularity has remained low since its peak in 2021, reflecting cooling retail interest rather than a wave of panic.

你可能也喜欢

如何让自己变得让人工智能永远也无法取代

面对人工智能的冲击,许多人担心工作被取代。然而,真正的威胁在于个人对他人和系统的依赖,以及由此产生的“薪资奴役”——即为生存而从事无意义、枯燥的工作。摆脱这种困境的关键,不是抵制技术,而是成为拥有高自主性的“不可受雇”个体。 文章提出了成功抵御AI替代的五个核心要素:自主性(主动行动的能力)、品味(判断事物价值的经验)、说服力(让他人关注你工作的能力)、毅力(坚持并从错误中学习)和迭代(根据反馈持续改进)。这些能力无法仅通过理论学习获得,必须通过实践来培养。 要启动转变,首先要彻底改变环境,重塑身份认同。其次,应选择一个能获得真实、快速反馈的实践领域,例如创业。在众多技能中,内容创作(媒体)比编写代码更具优势,因为其价值是主观的,需要独特的审美和判断力,这正是AI目前难以完全复制的。 具体行动上,可以从三个步骤开始: 1. **挖掘原始素材**:反思自己长期痴迷的知识领域、轻松解决的难题或童年被压抑的兴趣,找到独特的个人经验。 2. **确立反向思考主轴**:找出你坚信但主流观点错误的地方,或行业内普遍忽视的“皇帝新衣”,形成独特的批判性视角。 3. **立即发布**:将前两步的思考融合,撰写并发布第一个核心内容(如帖子、视频),勇敢接受真实世界的反馈,并在此基础上持续学习和迭代。 最终,抵御AI的关键在于构建一份与自身身份深度契合的毕生事业,通过持续的内容创作和真实互动,建立无法被自动化取代的独特价值和影响力。行动,从今天发布第一个想法开始。

marsbit5小时前

如何让自己变得让人工智能永远也无法取代

marsbit5小时前

通过掷骰子离线保管比特币密钥:并非人人愿意为之

文章探讨了通过投掷骰子生成比特币钱包种子短语的安全方法及其现实挑战。核心观点如下: **1. 骰子提供物理熵源** 骰子结果由众多微小变量决定,理论上虽可预测,但实践中无法被攻击者复制或计算,从而提供高质量的随机性。每个六面骰子投掷约产生2.585比特熵,50次投掷即可满足典型12词助记词(128比特熵)的安全需求。 **2. Coldcard漏洞事件凸显手工熵源的价值** 近期Coldcard硬件钱包因固件漏洞导致其内部随机数生成器存在缺陷,致使约1128枚比特币被盗。但那些**完全**通过足量骰子投掷生成种子短语的用户未受此漏洞影响,因为他们的主密钥未使用有缺陷的生成器。 **3. 重要警示:手工种子并非万能保护** 安全研究员指出,即使用户使用骰子生成了安全的种子,若他们使用了Coldcard的其他功能(如生成纸钱包、克隆密钥、共享签名密钥、密码等),这些**衍生密钥**仍可能调用有漏洞的随机数生成器,从而存在风险。安全种子不保证设备生成的所有秘密都安全。 **4. 手工生成熵源的现实局限性** 尽管数学上可靠,但该方法对大多数用户并不友好: * **过程繁琐易错**:需投掷50-99次,精确记录,任何输入错误都会导致钱包完全不同。 * **引入新风险**:用户可能在记录、转换过程中泄露信息,或使用有偏的骰子/投掷方式。 * **用户体验差**:难以想象大规模推广需要用户手动投掷近百次骰子。安全措施需适应现实生活场景和普通用户的知识水平。 **5. 给用户的建议** 受影响的Coldcard用户应: * 更新固件至最新版。 * 检查是否使用过有漏洞的功能生成了次级密钥或密码,如有则需立即更换。 * 考虑采用多签方案,使用不同厂商的设备分散风险。 **结论**:手工投掷骰子生成熵源是技术娴熟用户的一个有效安全选项,但其过程复杂、容易出错,不适合作为主流用户的默认方法。长远目标是依赖安全、透明且无需专业知识的硬件/软件随机数生成方案。

cryptonews.ru8小时前

通过掷骰子离线保管比特币密钥:并非人人愿意为之

cryptonews.ru8小时前

交易

现货

热门文章

加密市场宏观研报:《GENIUS Act》法案取得重大进展,BTC突破历史新高,后市全新展望

2025年5月22日,比特币价格正式突破11万美元大关,创下历史新高。在政策面、宏观经济、资金面与投资者结构共同作用下,一场结构性牛市浪潮正在展开。而此轮上涨背后的核心驱动,是美国《GENIUS稳定币法案》的实质性进展以及多项利好的叠加。本文将从政策端突破、宏观环境转向、链上与ETF资金结构、交易行为演化,以及重点受益赛道五大维度,全面解析此轮BTC再创新高的深层逻辑,并前瞻下半年市场的潜在趋势。

1.8k人学过发布于 2025.05.22更新于 2025.05.22

加密市场宏观研报:《GENIUS Act》法案取得重大进展,BTC突破历史新高,后市全新展望

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对BTC(BTC)币价的意见。

活动图片