Circle's Q2 Earnings Report is Out, Does It Answer Wall Street's Bull-Bear Split?

marsbit发布于2026-08-05更新于2026-08-05

文章摘要

Circle released its Q2 2026 financial results. Total revenue and reserve income reached $7.01B, slightly below expectations but reversing a previous declining trend. Adjusted EBITDA was $143M, and net income from continuing operations was $48M. Key financial metrics showed mixed signals. USDC's average circulation grew to $76.5B, but the quarter-end circulation shrank to $73.3B, and its market share among dollar stablecoins slightly declined. Reserve income remained the primary revenue driver at $6.68B. Other revenue was $34M, down sequentially, but the full-year guidance for this segment was nearly doubled to $3.1-3.3B, mainly due to the inclusion of ARC token pre-sale revenue. The core RLDC Margin held strong at 41%. Operationally, the Arc network mainnet is scheduled for launch on September 16th, with major validators like BlackRock and Visa. The Circle Payments Network (CPN) showed significant growth in transaction volume. The company also secured key regulatory approvals, including a federal trust charter from the OCC. The report highlighted Wall Street's ongoing valuation debate. Morgan Stanley's downgrade reflects concerns about USDC growth and over-reliance on interest income. TD Cowen's bullish view finds support in Circle's expanding infrastructure platform, including Arc and CPN. The earnings confirm Circle's strategic pivot towards building a broader digital finance platform, but the success of this transition in generating sustainable non-interest revenue rema...

Author|Azuma(@azuma_eth)

At 8:05 AM ET on August 5th, stablecoin issuer Circle officially released its Q2 2026 earnings report.

The financial report data shows that Circle's total revenue and reserve income for Q2 was $701 million (below market expectations of $717 million), a year-over-year increase of 7%; adjusted EBITDA was $143 million, a year-over-year increase of 8%; net income from continuing operations was $48 million (above market expectations of $43 million), an increase of $530 million year-over-year.

Affected by the earnings release, CRCL surged in pre-market trading but subsequently weakened. As of 8:45 PM ET, it was temporarily quoted at $61.55, down 2.84% pre-market.

Core Data Analysis

1. Total Revenue Missed Expectations, But Reversed the Trend

As shown in the report, this quarter Circle's Total Revenue and Reserve Income was $701 million. Although it did not meet market expectations ($717 million), it reversed the contraction trend from the previous quarter ($579 million ➡️ $658 million ➡️ $740 million ➡️ $770 million ➡️ $694 million ➡️ $701 million).

Breaking down the revenue structure, Reserve Income remains the absolute main contributor, recording $668 million in Q2, up 5% year-over-year and 2% quarter-over-quarter.

2. USDC Average Circulation Still Growing, but Saw Significant Outflow at Quarter-End

The growth in reserve income primarily benefited from the increase in USDC circulation volume —— In Q2, USDC circulation exhibited a divergent pattern of "average growth, quarter-end contraction."

Financial report data shows that the average USDC circulation in Q2 was $76.5 billion, a 25% year-over-year increase and about a 2% quarter-over-quarter increase (previous quarter average was $75.2 billion); however, the quarter-end circulation was $73.3 billion, which, while up 19% year-over-year, decreased by about 4.8% from the previous quarter-end's $77 billion.This indicates that the outflow of USDC funds mainly occurred at the quarter-end window. While the overall scale is still expanding, the marginal trend warrants caution.

Another concerning metric is market share. The report shows that USDC's market share in dollar-denominated stablecoins at the end of this quarter was 27%, down 66 basis points year-over-year —— Against the backdrop of shrinking total industry supply, USDC failed to gain market share and instead lost some ground.

3. Other Revenue Declined Quarter-over-Quarter, but Full-Year Guidance Significantly Revised Upward

Excluding reserve income, Circle's Other Revenue for this quarter was $34 million, a significant 41% year-over-year increase, but down 19% quarter-over-quarter, breaking the previous streak of five consecutive quarters of growth ($21 million ➡️ $24 million ➡️ $29 million ➡️ $37 million ➡️ $42 million ➡️ $34 million).

Notably, Circle simultaneously revised its full-year 2026 Other Revenue guidance significantly upward, from $150–170 million to $310–330 million, nearly doubling, specifically explaining that this guidance includes recognized ARC token presale revenue.

According to explanations from the Q1 earnings call, ARC tokens held by Circle, after fulfilling presale agreement obligations, will be recognized at fair value as "Other Revenue" and directly included in RLDC and adjusted EBITDA. This means that Other Revenue in the coming quarters will be significantly elevated due to ARC token recognition. However, it's important to note that this portion of revenue is closer to a one-time accounting gain rather than sustainable subscription or service income; excluding the ARC impact, the growth trajectory of core Other Revenue still requires ongoing observation.

4. RLDC Margin Remains High, Distribution Cost Control Optimized

RLDC Margin was the most resilient metric in Circle's quarterly report this time —— This figure refers to the profit margin after subtracting distribution costs from revenue, reflecting the core business profitability level after accounting for distribution expenses, and is widely regarded as Circle's most crucial profitability metric.

In Q2, Circle's RLDC (Revenue Less Distribution Costs) was $289 million, a year-over-year increase of 15%; RLDC Margin reached 41%, up 3.02% basis points year-over-year, flat compared to last quarter, and stable with slight increases over the past five quarters (38% ➡️ 39% ➡️ 40% ➡️ 41% ➡️ 41%).

The significance of this data is that, in the headwind environment of declining reserve yields (attributed to the Federal Reserve lowering the federal funds rate), Circle still maintained its profit margin. The key behind this lies in refined control over distribution costs —— Q2 distribution and transaction costs were $410 million, up only 1% year-over-year, far lower than the 5% year-over-year growth rate of reserve income.

Similar to Other Revenue, Circle's management also raised the full-year RLDC Margin guidance from 38–40% to 41.7–43.7%. However, it's important to note that this revision also includes recognized ARC token presale revenue. Therefore, the profit margin figures for the second half of the year will carry a certain "non-recurring" characteristic.

5. Distribution Remains Largest Expense, Product Development Investment Increases

On the expense side, distribution and transaction costs remain Circle's largest cost item, reaching $410 million in Q2, up only 1% year-over-year, with quarter-over-quarter growth also controlled below 1%.

Looking at operating expenses under GAAP, Q2 was $254 million, a sharp 56% year-over-year decrease. However, this is largely due to a high base effect from last year's IPO-related stock-based compensation expenses ($435 million), offering limited reference value.

More meaningful are the Adjusted Operating Expenses, which were $146 million in Q2, a 23% year-over-year increase, reflecting Circle's continued investment in product development, infrastructure, and AI capabilities. Breaking it down specifically, general and administrative expenses increased to $66.3 million, IT infrastructure costs rose to $16.4 million, and depreciation and amortization expenses more than doubled year-over-year to $29.9 million. Combined with management's statements about ongoing investment in product development, infrastructure, and AI capabilities, these expense increases are likely highly correlated with businesses like Arc, Agent Stack, and CPN.

Business Progress: Platformization Layout Continues to Advance

Beyond financial data, the multiple business-level developments disclosed by Circle in the Q2 earnings report are also noteworthy.

First is the formal countdown to the Arc network launch. Circle announced that the Arc mainnet will officially launch on September 16th, with the first batch of network validators including a host of traditional financial institutions such as BlackRock, DTCC, Galaxy, Visa, Mastercard, and Standard Chartered Bank. Simultaneously, BlackRock's tokenized money market fund BUIDL will be deployed on the Arc network, while DTCC plans to support the tokenization of assets custodied by DTC on Arc.

Compared to previous introductions that remained more at the level of technical roadmaps and visions, this disclosure signifies that Arc has begun to gain actual participation from traditional financial institutions. For Circle, Arc's positioning is no longer merely a public chain built around USDC, but rather an attempt to become the underlying infrastructure connecting stablecoins, RWAs, and traditional financial institutions.

Another notable business is the Circle Payments Network (CPN). The report shows that as of the end of Q2, CPN's annualized transaction volume over the past 30 days has increased to $14.7 billion, a roughly 76% increase from the $8.3 billion disclosed in Q1; the number of connected financial institutions has grown from 136 to 175, a 29% quarter-over-quarter increase. Although CPN's direct contribution to revenue is still relatively limited, both transaction volume and the number of institutions indicate that this payment network is gradually accumulating network effects.

On the regulatory front, Circle also achieved a significant breakthrough this quarter. The company officially received approval from the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to establish Circle National Trust, becoming one of the first stablecoin issuers to receive a U.S. federal trust bank charter; concurrently, its application to establish Circle New York Trust was also approved by the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS).

For a stablecoin issuer that prioritizes compliance as a core competitive advantage, these two charters not only further elevate Circle's regulatory standing within the U.S. financial system but also provide a more solid institutional foundation for the future development of custody, payment, and institutional finance businesses.

Does the Earnings Report Answer Wall Street's Valuation Disagreement?

Yesterday, we published an article titled "On the Eve of Circle's Earnings, Wall Street Shows Huge Divergence in CRCL Valuation." The article mentioned that on the eve of this quarter's earnings release, Wall Street had already shown significant divergence regarding Circle's future value.

On August 3rd, Morgan Stanley (hereafter "MS") downgraded Circle's rating from "Equal Weight" to "Underweight" and significantly lowered its target price from $106 to $38; meanwhile, TD Cowen initiated coverage of Circle for the first time, giving it a "Buy" rating and setting a target price of $82.

The two institutions offered completely different rating judgments. The core divergence reflected behind this lies in how to evaluate Circle's revenue growth expectations —— Does Circle's long-term value come from USDC? Or from the digital financial infrastructure built around USDC?

Looking at this earnings report, both sides' viewpoints have been validated to some extent.

On one hand, several issues Morgan Stanley raised concerns about still exist —— USDC quarter-end circulation continues to decline quarter-over-quarter, and market share hasn't improved; company revenue still mainly comes from reserve earnings; the full-year guidance for Other Revenue was significantly revised upward, but the new additions primarily come from ARC token presale revenue recognition, not from sustained scaling of payment, API, or RWA businesses. This means that, in the short term, Circle's profit model remains highly dependent on USDC's growth situation and the interest rate environment.

On the other hand, new evidence supporting TD Cowen's bullish thesis also seems to be increasing. The Arc mainnet launch date is officially set, traditional financial institutions like BlackRock and DTCC are joining the ecosystem, CPN continues its rapid expansion, and a federal trust bank charter is obtained... These businesses, while not yet revenue pillars, are continuously enriching Circle's platformization layout.

In summary, the definitive answer we can truly find from this earnings report seems to be only that "Circle is moving forward in the direction of platformization." As for whether these layouts can ultimately translate into sustained non-interest revenue growth and support a valuation logic based on a digital financial infrastructure platform, it may still require validation in the coming quarters.

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QWhat were Circle's Q2 2026 total revenue and reserve income, and how did it compare to market expectations?

ACircle's Q2 2026 total revenue and reserve income was $701 million. This was below the market expectation of $717 million.

QWhat was the key trend in USDC circulation during Q2 2026, and why was the quarter-end figure concerning?

AThe key trend was a divergence between average daily circulation and quarter-end circulation. The average circulation grew 2% quarter-over-quarter to $76.5 billion. However, the quarter-end circulation was $73.3 billion, a decrease of 4.8% from the previous quarter-end ($77.0 billion), indicating significant net outflows at the end of the period.

QWhy did Circle significantly raise its full-year 2026 guidance for Other Revenue, and what is a key caveat about this increase?

ACircle raised its full-year Other Revenue guidance from $150-170 million to $310-330 million, primarily due to the inclusion of confirmed ARC token presale revenue. A key caveat is that this portion of the revenue is more akin to a one-time accounting gain rather than sustainable subscription or service income.

QWhat was a major business milestone announced regarding the Arc network, and which traditional financial institutions are involved?

ACircle announced that the Arc mainnet is scheduled to launch on September 16. Initial network validators include traditional financial institutions such as BlackRock, DTCC, Galaxy, Visa, Mastercard, and Standard Chartered Bank.

QHow did the Q2 2026 earnings report reflect the differing investment theses of Morgan Stanley (bearish) and TD Cowen (bullish) on Circle's stock (CRCL)?

AThe report provided evidence supporting aspects of both views. It confirmed Morgan Stanley's concerns, showing a decline in USDC's quarter-end circulation and continued heavy reliance on reserve income. Simultaneously, it supported TD Cowen's bullish platform thesis with progress on Arc (launch date, institutional partners), growth in the Circle Payments Network (CPN), and the acquisition of key federal and state trust bank charters.

你可能也喜欢

德国守了几十年的榜首没了,中国机床悄悄干到全球第一

中国机床产业近年来取得显著突破,出口额在2025年达到86亿欧元,首次超越德国(71亿欧元),登上全球第一的位置。这一成就的背后,是中国从长期依赖进口到逐步实现自主创新的艰难历程。 长期以来,中国机床面临核心部件依赖进口的困境,高档数控系统、伺服系统、主轴、丝杠等关键部件90%以上需要从德国、日本等国购买,设备不仅价格昂贵,还常附有严格的使用限制(如GPS定位锁机)。同时,国产机床在精度保持性、平均无故障时间等指标上与国外顶级产品存在差距。 转机始于国家层面的长期投入。2009年启动的“高档数控机床与基础制造装备”国家科技重大专项,经过十多年攻关,将高档数控系统的国产化率从不足1%提升至31.9%,整机平均无故障时间从约600小时大幅提升至2000小时以上,解决了“有没有”的问题。 更重要的是,中国庞大的制造业市场,尤其是新能源汽车产业的爆发,为国产机床提供了独特的试炼场和迭代机会。面对一体化压铸、电池壳体等全新工艺需求,国内厂商凭借贴近市场、快速响应的优势,与国外巨头站在了相近的起跑线上,催生了一批针对性解决方案。 然而,出口额登顶仅是阶段性成果。目前中国出口的优势品类集中在特种加工机床,主要市场在亚洲。在高端精密机床领域,尤其在汽车制造的核心装备上,国产化率仍不足10%。此外,从“卖出去”到“站稳脚”,建立全球化的售后服务体系、赢得客户长期信任,是中国机床产业面临的下一个关键挑战。从被管制购买方,转变为需要精细管理敏感技术出口的一方,这本身也标志着中国机床产业进入了新的发展阶段。真正的成功,在于全球客户是否愿意将未来十年的生产线,放心地托付给“中国制造”的机床。

marsbit23分钟前

德国守了几十年的榜首没了,中国机床悄悄干到全球第一

marsbit23分钟前

Coldcard攻击事件是否意味着所有硬件钱包都不再安全?

当加密货币市场信心低迷之际,Coldcard硬件钱包的熵漏洞事件再次敲响了安全警钟。该漏洞导致超过1596枚比特币(价值约1亿美元)被盗,其根源在于特定固件版本中生成钱包种子时,随机数生成存在缺陷。 事件暴露了硬件钱包安全模型的核心挑战:用户几乎无法自行审计设备硬件、固件及底层的熵生成过程。尽管Coldcard已发布固件更新并建议用户转移资金,但此事引发了一个严峻问题:这是否意味着所有硬件钱包都不安全? 深入分析发现,问题并非出在比特币或密码学本身,而是源于生成私钥所需的“随机性”不足。若随机性被削弱,攻击者便能大幅缩减可能的私钥范围,进而破解钱包。此漏洞可能源于2021年的固件变更,导致设备错误地使用了较弱的伪随机数生成器。 各硬件钱包厂商对此采取了不同策略: * **Ledger** 依赖经过认证的安全元件硬件生成真随机数。 * **Trezor** 结合设备内部与外部(主机)的随机源,并内置熵检查。 * **Foundation** 强调开源透明,结合多重硬件熵源,并支持可复现构建以供验证。 专家普遍认为,此次事件是特定实现的失败,而非对硬件钱包或自我托管模式的最终判决。但这也警示行业:随机数生成不能依赖单一来源或代码的绝对正确。 对于比特币持有者的建议: 1. **立即行动**:受影响的Coldcard用户应按指引迁移资金。 2. **长期策略**:考虑采用**多签钱包**架构,并结合独立生成的熵源。这样,单个设备、厂商或机构的失败就不会导致资产损失。 总之,Coldcard事件揭示了特定产品的实现漏洞,促使整个行业更关注熵生成的透明与验证。它并未宣告所有硬件钱包都不安全,但强调了采用稳健架构(如多签)和分散风险的重要性。

cointelegraph1小时前

Coldcard攻击事件是否意味着所有硬件钱包都不再安全?

cointelegraph1小时前

交易

现货

热门文章

如何购买S

欢迎来到HTX.com!我们已经让购买Sonic(S)变得简单而便捷。跟随我们的逐步指南,放心开始您的加密货币之旅。第一步:创建您的HTX账户使用您的电子邮件、手机号码注册一个免费账户在HTX上。体验无忧的注册过程并解锁所有平台功能。立即注册第二步:前往买币页面,选择您的支付方式信用卡/借记卡购买:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即时购买Sonic(S)。余额购买:使用您HTX账户余额中的资金进行无缝交易。第三方购买:探索诸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方法以增加便利性。C2C购买:在HTX平台上直接与其他用户交易。HTX场外交易台(OTC)购买:为大量交易者提供个性化服务和竞争性汇率。第三步:存储您的Sonic(S)购买完您的Sonic(S)后,将其存储在您的HTX账户钱包中。您也可以通过区块链转账将其发送到其他地方或者用于交易其他加密货币。第四步:交易Sonic(S)在HTX的现货市场轻松交易Sonic(S)。访问您的账户,选择您的交易对,执行您的交易,并实时监控。HTX为初学者和经验丰富的交易者提供了友好的用户体验。

3.3k人学过发布于 2025.01.15更新于 2026.06.02

如何购买S

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对S(S)币价的意见。

活动图片