Chinese and American AI Companies Rush to List, Crypto Waits in the Corner for Opportunities

marsbit发布于2026-04-03更新于2026-04-03

文章摘要

Chinese AI companies are rushing to IPOs at reasonable valuations, driven by a "common prosperity" policy to distribute wealth more broadly, while US AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic are expected to go public around late 2026 at valuations potentially 100x higher. This AI IPO wave is drawing significant investor attention and capital away from other sectors, including crypto, in the short term. As a result, crypto faces funding headwinds and price pressure. However, this downturn may create attractive early-stage investment opportunities in crypto by 2026, similar to the post-2018 cycle. Longer term, AI is expected to boost crypto adoption by improving user experience through AI frontends and enabling autonomous agent-to-agent commerce on blockchain networks.

Author: Connor Dempsey

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: Connor Dempsey is a seasoned professional in the crypto industry, having worked at Circle, Messari, and Coinbase Ventures. He currently leads marketing at Crossmint. In this short commentary, he presents a viewpoint: under the logic of "common prosperity," China is pushing AI companies to go public quickly at reasonable valuations, while their American counterparts won't IPO until late 2026, by which time their valuations could be 100 times higher than those of Chinese companies. The wave of AI IPOs will continue to drain market funds, putting short-term pressure on crypto, but 2026 could be a good year for early-stage investments.

Main Text:

A wave of IPOs from Chinese AI companies is coming and will last for 1-2 years.

Moreover, their valuations are more attractive than those of their American counterparts.

Disclaimer: The following content is based on a conversation I had with an old friend familiar with the Chinese market (the Chinese market is largely a black box to me).

China's Logic

China is building AI as fast as the U.S. But China has stronger control over the private sector, and they are concerned about the wealth gap.

The logic is this: AI is a winner-takes-all game. The longer companies stay private, the more wealth is concentrated in the hands of a few founders and investors.

Chinese policy pressures high-growth AI companies to go public earlier, allowing ordinary investors to share in the prosperity.

MiniMax (AI video generation) and Zhipu (China's OpenAI) have already gone public. Moon's Dark Side (chatbots), Baichuan Intelligence (medical AI), and Baidu's Kunlun Chip are in the queue, with IPO valuations ranging from $2 billion to $7 billion, which is reasonable. DeepSeek is the only exception, claiming it will continue to raise private funding.

As a Westerner, I'm not taking China's side, but this logic makes sense. U.S. AI giants won't distribute equivalent levels of wealth to the public.

America's Pace

The U.S. also has a wave of AI IPOs coming, expected to start in late 2026 to early 2027. OpenAI, Anthropic, Databricks, Perplexity, and Elon Musk's xAI (merged with SpaceX) should go public within this window.

But by the time ordinary investors can buy in, the valuations of these companies could be 100 times higher than their Chinese counterparts.

OpenAI and Anthropic will likely be trillion-dollar companies at IPO. Databricks and xAI are already valued at over $100 billion.

AI is the Only Game in Town

No matter how it ultimately unfolds, the U.S.-China AI race will proceed at full speed and will likely suck the air out of every other tech sector, including crypto.

Why? Because AI is the most important technology of our lifetime. If you are a capital allocator, it's hard to look elsewhere right now. For example, if you have $1 million to deploy, you'll likely try to find a way to ride this AI wave.

As long as the AI IPO feast continues, crypto asset prices will likely remain under pressure.

Crypto venture capital has noticeably slowed down. I recently met an entrepreneur raising funds in the crypto space. His observation was: if you're not working on AI, most investors aren't interested.

The Silver Lining

Sentiment hitting the toilet and investors losing interest is nothing new for crypto. For example, after the ICO bubble burst in 2018, most of the investing public was indifferent to crypto for a full two years.

But if you were an early-stage investor during that time, you did very well. Seed rounds for Solana, Compound, and Uniswap were all done then. Circle's USDC (2018) was also built during that period.

I believe 2026 could be a similarly good year for those still deploying early-stage capital in crypto.

Meanwhile, U.S. crypto regulation is becoming clearer, and infrastructure for transforming financial markets through tokenization is being built.

Protocols like Hyperliquid are already spilling over into traditional markets, offering 24/7 crude oil futures trading when traditional markets are closed on weekends (see Syncracy's "The Great Perpification").

Although there are fewer crypto founders now, new and interesting companies are still launching. For example, Ryan Yi, with four years of venture capital and corporate development experience at Coinbase, founded Onchain Group, essentially an investment bank built for the token economy. Think traditional M&A, but with tokens as the assets and clients being the largest protocols in crypto.

AI is Crypto's Variable

While AI is sucking the air out of the room at the investment level, it will ultimately become the rocket fuel for crypto's utility.

Crypto has always had a user experience problem. Combining an AI front-end with a crypto back-end will suddenly make using crypto as easy as using Claude or ChatGPT. This will ultimately become a massive onboarding point for crypto assets and protocols.

AI Agents are also poised to become crypto's largest user base. Agent-to-agent commerce—millions of AI Agents transacting autonomously without human involvement—is one of the strongest use cases for stablecoins and blockchains. When you need millions of Agents creating wallets and transacting for fractions of a cent, traditional card networks would break. Crypto won't.

I bet the fusion of crypto and AI will be a big deal at maturity. It will also be one of the most remarkable phenomena in the history of this industry.

~CD

相关问答

QWhat is the main difference between the IPO timelines and valuations of AI companies in China and the United States, as described in the article?

AChinese AI companies are being pushed to IPO earlier with reasonable valuations (e.g., $2-7 billion) to allow public investors to share in the wealth, while US AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic are expected to IPO around late 2026 or early 2027 at valuations potentially 100 times higher, reaching trillions of dollars.

QHow does the article suggest the AI IPO boom will impact the cryptocurrency market in the short term?

AThe AI IPO boom is expected to draw capital away from other tech sectors, including cryptocurrency, putting downward pressure on crypto asset prices as investors focus on allocating funds to AI opportunities.

QAccording to the author, why might 2026 be a good year for early-stage investors in cryptocurrency?

AThe author compares 2026 to the post-2018 ICO bubble period, when investor disinterest and low sentiment created opportunities for early investors in projects like Solana, Compound, and Uniswap, suggesting that similar conditions could yield high returns for early crypto investments.

QWhat role does AI play in potentially improving cryptocurrency usability and adoption, as per the article?

AAI can enhance cryptocurrency usability by combining AI front-ends with crypto back-ends, making crypto as easy to use as AI tools like ChatGPT. Additionally, AI agents are expected to become major users of crypto, enabling autonomous transactions and commerce between agents, which is a strong use case for stablecoins and blockchain.

QWhat example does the article provide to illustrate cryptocurrency's infrastructure advancements impacting traditional markets?

AThe article mentions protocols like Hyperliquid, which are extending into traditional markets by offering 24/7 trading of assets like crude oil futures during times when traditional markets are closed, as highlighted in Syncracy's 'The Great Perpification'.

你可能也喜欢

对话Patagon创始人:揭秘Anthropic二级市场内幕

本文基于Patagon创始人Dio Casares在Bankless播客中的分享,揭示了Anthropic等热门科技公司私募股权二级市场的内幕运作与潜在风险。 市场主要分为两类:一是公司认可的“一级化二级”交易,即通过SPV(特殊目的载体)向公司注入新资金或允许员工出售股权;二是公司反感的灰色二级交易,通常由中介平台撮合,可能干扰公司正式融资并存在欺诈风险。仅Anthropic相关的二级交易规模就达数百亿美元,中介费率高昂(如一次性收取10%),且约10%-20%的交易涉及股权造假或欺诈。 市场结构依赖人脉,信息不透明。不少从业者通过撮合交易赚取的收入已超过其主业。公司如Anthropic和OpenAI已采取措施(如员工要约收购)来引导流动性,挤压灰色市场空间。 核心风险在于复杂的嵌套SPV结构。当公司IPO后,股票需经DTCC系统逐层下发至最终投资者,过程中任何一层的基金管理人(GP)若延迟分发或决定持有,将导致下游投资者无法及时获得股票或现金,可能引发大量诉讼。此外,部分以员工远期合约为底层资产的交易,可能因员工离职或股份被公司收回而完全失效。 对于已参与此类投资的小额投资者,Dio Casares建议保持谨慎,若对持仓感到不安,应考虑退出。总体而言,这个高速增长但缺乏透明度的市场,在IPO后可能面临持续的结算混乱和法律纠纷。

marsbit1小时前

对话Patagon创始人:揭秘Anthropic二级市场内幕

marsbit1小时前

要求Tether将3.44亿美元被冻结的USDT转移给恐怖袭击受害者

一家耶路撒冷家庭在1997年哈马斯自杀式爆炸中失去亲人,他们与其他原告一同向美国联邦法院提出请求,要求法院命令Tether(泰达公司)移交数亿美元被冻结的数字货币。该案件在曼哈顿提起,可能为法院如何对待中心化稳定币发行商确立重要的法律先例。 原告是伊朗相关恐怖袭击的幸存者和遇难者家属,他们持有多年前获得的、针对伊朗的法院判决,但这些判决从未得到赔付。如今,他们试图通过一批被冻结的加密货币来追索欠款。 原告律师查尔斯·格斯坦向美国纽约南区联邦地区法院提起了诉讼。原告声称对两个持有约3.44亿USDT的波场区块链钱包地址拥有合法债权,这些钱包此前已被美国财政部外国资产控制办公室(OFAC)冻结,并被认定与伊朗伊斯兰革命卫队有关联。 与比特币或以太坊不同,USDT由中心化公司Tether控制。Tether可以冻结钱包、阻止交易,并在接到命令时转移资金。格斯坦的法律论据核心正是这种中心化结构。他认为,既然基于Tether的直接操作控制权,已有命令冻结了这些钱包,那么法院也可以命令该公司转移资金。OFAC已宣布这些钱包是伊斯兰革命卫队控制的资产,这为根据美国反恐法规进行扣押扫清了道路。 据报道,格斯坦还提起了涉及与朝鲜相关网络行动针对Arbitrum平台的类似诉讼,并正在处理另一宗涉及隐私协议Railgun DAO的案件。曼哈顿的此次起诉似乎是一场协调法律行动的一部分,旨在测试法院是否能强制对具有中心化控制的加密平台就受制裁钱包中被冻结的资产采取行动。

bitcoinist5小时前

要求Tether将3.44亿美元被冻结的USDT转移给恐怖袭击受害者

bitcoinist5小时前

交易

现货
合约

热门文章

加密市场宏观研报:原油飓风、AI巨浪与比特币的十字路口

全球金融市场正经历一场由地缘冲突引发的系统性重估:霍尔木兹海峡封锁导致原油一度暴涨30%,G7紧急释放储备后涨幅收窄,滞胀风险取代通胀成为核心担忧,美元成为“唯一避风港”并逼近100大关,亚太及美股遭遇“黑色星期一”全线重挫;AI领域则冰火两重天,国家发改委提出“十五五”末10万亿规模目标,OpenClaw项目火爆推动概念股狂飙;比特币在宏观风暴中跌破70000美元关键防线。

481人学过发布于 2026.03.12更新于 2026.03.12

加密市场宏观研报:原油飓风、AI巨浪与比特币的十字路口

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对AI(AI)币价的意见。

活动图片