California fraud cases highlight the need for a regulatory crackdown on crypto

Cointelegraph发布于2022-10-02更新于2022-10-02

文章摘要

Some of the highlights included allegations that they offered unqualified securities as well as material misrepresentations and omissions to investors.

The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) announced last month that it had issued desist and refrain orders to 11 entities for violating California securities laws. Some of the highlights included allegations that they offered unqualified securities as well as material misrepresentations and omissions to investors.
These violations should remind us that while crypto is a unique and exciting industry for the public at large, it is still an area that is rife with the potential for bad players and fraud. To date, government crypto regulation has been minimal at best, with a distinct lack of action. Whether you are a full-time professional investor or just a casual fan who wants to be involved, you need to be absolutely sure of what you are getting into before getting involved in any crypto opportunity.
California has toyed with setting up a crypto-specific business registration process for those looking to do business in the state. The proposed framework was recently vetoed by Governor Gavin Newsom as the resources required to establish and enforce such a framework would be prohibitive for the state. While this type of compliance infrastructure has not been employed yet, it points to concerns that regulatory authorities have related to the crypto industry.
There appears to be a pattern that new industries, especially those that garner as much international attention as crypto, are especially susceptible to fraud. One must go only as far back as cannabis legalization to find the last time California had to deal with fraudulent schemes at this scale.
It appears inevitable that California, known to be a first mover in regulation and compliance, will create some form of crypto-specific compliance infrastructure in the name of consumer protection. If history is any indication, once California releases its framework, other states will follow.
Federal and state representatives have been attempting to draft legislation to establish financial standards for crypto with little luck to date. At the federal level, Senators Cory Booker, John Thune, Debbie Stabenow and John Boozman co-sponsored a bill to empower the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to serve as the regulatory body for crypto, while Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Cynthia Lummis co-sponsored a bill to establish more clear guidance on digital assets and virtual currencies. Lawmakers have even reached out to tech luminaries such as Mark Zuckerberg to weigh in on crypto fraud.

Cryptocurrencies, California, CFTC, Legislation, Law, Scams, Fraud, Bitcoin Scams

Source: ChainalysisNone of these or other similarly crypto-focused bills are expected to pass in 2022, but this level of bipartisan cooperation has been unprecedented in recent times. The collaboration should reflect just the sheer magnitude of the need for a regulatory framework. Said another way, Democrats and Republicans speaking to one another about anything should stop the presses, but the fact that they are co-sponsoring multiple bills should tell us that there is a monumental requirement for guidance.
How should one approach investing in the crypto space if the government is not going to establish controls for crypto? There are a few general points that one should consider if they are presented with a crypto investment opportunity.
When reviewing any opportunity, do your due diligence! Do not take anyone’s word without some level of substantive support. If crypto is not an area of expertise, reach out to professionals who do have qualified experience. Make sure to utilize crypto monitoring and blockchain analysis tools, if possible, as part of the vetting process.
A common strategy of fraudsters is putting undue pressure or artificial timelines on a potential close. Slow down the process and use any and all time necessary to make an investment decision.
If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. As overplayed as the cliché may be, it does bring up a valid point. There have been instances of schemes offering to pay initial and ongoing dividends for any new investors that are brought in and for additional dividends to be paid from any investors that those new investors bring in. If this sounds like a pyramid or multi-level marketing scheme, that’s because it is. Terms like “No Risk Investment” get thrown around as well. Ultimately, if no one knows where the opportunity is coming from, beware.
While crypto can be a fun and electrifying topic with many legitimate opportunities, there are bad players who will take advantage of the lack of government oversight and the excitement of overenthusiastic or undereducated investors.
Zach Gordon is a certified public accountant (CPA) and vice president of crypto accounting for Propeller Industries, serving as fractional chief financial officer and adviser to a portfolio of crypto and Web3 clients. He has been named a Forty Under 40 CPA, sits on the Digital Assets Committee for the NYSSCPA and has been working with crypto clients in a variety of capacities since 2016.

热门币种推荐

你可能也喜欢

以太坊正在重走互联网和 Linux 的老路:谁都不服谁,最后中立者通吃

作者Etherealize撰文指出,以太坊正重演互联网和Linux的历史模式:巨头们(如Stripe、摩根大通、Circle)竞相构建自己控制的专有区块链,但谁也不愿在对手的地盘上建设。这使得一个无人控制、可信中立的基础设施——以太坊,成为唯一能被广泛接受的选项。 文章回顾了90年代互联网和Linux如何战胜封闭的专有系统,强调开放、无需许可的“集市”模式,通过分布式贡献和整合,最终在创新和网络效应上超越集中控制的“大教堂”。以太坊的无需许可特性,让开发者能自由创新(如ERC-20、Uniswap的诞生),吸引了超过百万开发者,形成了强大的工具、标准和流动性生态。 与联盟链(如Canton、Tempo)屡屡失败不同,以太坊凭借其去中心化、主权属性(任何单一实体无法强加规则)和路径依赖形成的广泛代币分配,赢得了如Coinbase、贝莱德、摩根大通等成熟机构的采用,承载了绝大部分DeFi贷款、稳定币和代币化资产。 尽管有人担忧金融领域需要问责制,但文章指出,合规和隐私问题可以在应用层通过智能合约标准(如ERC-3643)和零知识证明等技术解决,而无需牺牲结算层的中立性。最终,试图在围墙花园内收租的模式难以持久,在开放的中立基础设施上构建才是胜出策略,正如网景拥抱互联网而非对抗它一样。

marsbit9分钟前

以太坊正在重走互联网和 Linux 的老路:谁都不服谁,最后中立者通吃

marsbit9分钟前

Kalshi 最大的对手不是 Polymarket

2026年FIFA世界杯预计将成为预测市场的重要分水岭,带来巨额交易量。然而,行业竞争逻辑正在发生变化。Kalshi的CEO指出,其最大的竞争对手并非同为预测市场平台的Polymarket,而是传统金融和体育竞猜巨头,包括CME Group、Robinhood和DraftKings。 这些拥有庞大用户基础和渠道的平台正积极将预测市场功能整合到现有业务中。例如,Robinhood通过自建及合作方式推出预测市场服务,该业务已成为其增长最快的部分之一。Interactive Brokers、CME Group、DraftKings等也纷纷入场,让用户能在交易股票、体育竞猜的同时轻松参与事件合约交易。这使得预测市场逐渐从一个独立应用演变为大平台内的一个功能模块,竞争边界被重塑。 面对传统巨头的“降维”竞争,预测市场平台正尝试通过两条路径破局:一是不断扩充交易品类,从政治事件延伸至体育、经济、娱乐等领域,以减少对选举周期的依赖;二是向基础设施和分发层延伸,例如Kalshi通过为多家券商提供底层合约服务来获取流量。然而,风险在于,像Robinhood这样的分发方也开始自建预测市场体系,动摇了“基础设施提供商”的护城河。 这种竞争态势与互联网时代视频会议软件(如Zoom与Microsoft Teams)的博弈相似。入口型平台凭借生态优势挤压专业应用的空间。预测市场平台能否在巨头阴影下找到持续增长的新边界,仍有待观察。

链捕手16分钟前

Kalshi 最大的对手不是 Polymarket

链捕手16分钟前

AI 巨头的「Token 补贴大战」,快打完了吗?

AI巨头间的“Token补贴大战”正趋于白热化,但这场竞争的性质和可能结局与互联网时代的补贴战截然不同。 目前,OpenAI和Anthropic等公司的订阅套餐存在巨额补贴,高端套餐用户享受到的Token价值可能是其付费的数十倍。这种“逆向定价”旨在用亏损绑定重度用户和开发者。然而,与滴滴、美团等通过补贴建立用户锁定效应的模式不同,AI Token的切换成本极低——用户几乎可以无成本地在不同AI模型间迁移。这意味着补贴无法构筑护城河,一旦停止,用户可能迅速流失。 竞争格局呈现结构性不对称。谷歌凭借每年超3000亿美元的广告收入,拥有可持续补贴Token的“印钞机”,而OpenAI和Anthropic则依赖融资,未来上市后将面临盈利压力。Google Ventures创始人Bill Maris指出,谷歌完全有能力将Token价格再降80%,这将给竞争对手带来严峻挑战。 关于终局,文章认为存在两种可能:一是“互联网服务”剧本,通过补贴实现垄断后涨价;二是“水电煤”剧本,Token成为标准化基础资源,价格被压向成本线,利润率趋近于零。由于Token缺乏锁定效应,第二种可能性更大。这意味着AI竞争可能是一场没有明确赢家的“无限游戏”,参战者的核心目标是确保自己始终留在牌桌上,通过竞争共同推动技术普及和生态壮大。 最终,AI可能像电力一样,成为一种任何公司都无法独占的公共基础设施。这对用户而言或许是好事,只要补贴战持续,就能以极低成本享用强大算力。但对OpenAI和Anthropic等公司而言,它们所追逐的靠AI赚取暴利的梦想,可能从结构上就难以实现。

marsbit59分钟前

AI 巨头的「Token 补贴大战」,快打完了吗?

marsbit59分钟前

交易

现货
合约

热门文章

加密市场宏观研报:美国“加密货币周”来袭,ETH开启机构军备赛高潮

本周,加密市场迎来两股重磅催化——华盛顿“加密货币周”的立法攻势与以太坊机构布局的密集爆发,共同构成加密行业2025年下半年的“政策拐点”与“资金拐点”。这一轮加密周期的深层逻辑,正从比特币转向以太坊、稳定币及链上金融基础设施。我们认为:美国的政策明朗化+以太坊的机构化扩展,标志着加密行业正进入结构性转正阶段,市场配置的重心亦应逐步从“价格博弈”过渡至“规则+基础设施的制度红利捕捉”。

1.8k人学过发布于 2025.07.17更新于 2025.07.17

加密市场宏观研报:美国“加密货币周”来袭,ETH开启机构军备赛高潮

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对ETH(ETH)币价的意见。

活动图片