Cathie Wood's June $77M Investment: Are Crypto Stocks a True 'Substitute' for Bitcoin?

marsbit发布于2026-07-06更新于2026-07-06

文章摘要

In June, Cathie Wood's ARK Invest purchased $77 million worth of publicly traded crypto-related stocks, including Coinbase, Circle, and Bullish, during Bitcoin's worst monthly performance in four years. This aligns with the investment thesis that such stocks offer a compliant way to gain exposure to the crypto cycle without directly holding Bitcoin. However, data analysis reveals significant drawbacks. A group of nine U.S.-listed crypto companies showed 30-day annualized realized volatility between 68% and 90%, nearly double Bitcoin's 37.6%. Over 90 days, Circle's volatility reached 103.6% versus Bitcoin's 37.8%. Drawdowns were also more severe for stocks like Circle (-51.4%) and MicroStrategy (-48.6%) compared to Bitcoin's -36.4% from its January high. Correlation analysis shows most stocks share only a moderate link to Bitcoin. For example, Circle, Robinhood, and Bullish have a 90-day correlation coefficient of just 0.55–0.58 with BTC, meaning only about one-third of their price movement is explained by Bitcoin's action. The rest stems from company-specific risks: earnings, competition, fundraising, and equity dilution. MicroStrategy (MSTR) is the notable exception, acting as a leveraged Bitcoin proxy with a beta of 1.59 and 0.85 correlation. Coinbase offers relatively balanced exposure. Circle exemplifies "crypto-wrapped" corporate risk, with its recent crash tied to stablecoin competition, not Bitcoin. Robinhood's diversified business insulates it from crypto downturns...

Author: Andjela Radmilac, cryptoslate

Compiled by: Luffy, Foresight News

ARK Invest, led by Cathie Wood, purchased a total of $77 million worth of shares in crypto-related public companies in June. According to ARK's daily trading disclosures, during Bitcoin's worst monthly performance in four years, the fund increased its positions by $44 million in Coinbase, $25.25 million in Circle, and $8.2 million in Bullish.

Wood and several institutions have adhered to the same investment logic for years: crypto public companies provide investors with a compliant channel to participate in the crypto industry's cyclical gains without directly holding Bitcoin. However, an analysis of market data by CryptoSlate as of July 2 reveals the significant hidden costs of this stock investment path.

The 30-day annualized realized volatility for nine U.S.-listed crypto companies ranges from 68% to 90%, nearly double Bitcoin's 37.6% volatility. Over a 90-day period, Circle's volatility is as high as 103.6%, while Bitcoin's is only 37.8%. The gap in price drawdowns is also significant: Circle has fallen 51.4% from its high, MSTR is down 48.6%, and Bullish is down 43.6%; meanwhile, Bitcoin has retreated 36.4% from its near $97,000 peak in January, with all declines smaller than those of the aforementioned stocks.

30-day annualized realized volatility of BTC, ETH, and nine U.S.-listed crypto company stocks from January 1, 2026, to July 2, 2026.

Judging by volatility alone, crypto stocks appear to be leveraged Bitcoin. However, correlation data reveals a completely different truth. Over the past 90 trading days, the correlation coefficients of Circle, Robinhood, and Bullish with Bitcoin are only 0.55–0.58 (the correlation range is 0 to 1, where 1 represents perfectly synchronized movements and 0 represents no correlation). This means Bitcoin price fluctuations can only explain about one-third of the volatility in crypto company stocks. The remaining volatility stems entirely from company-specific risks: quarterly earnings reports, industry competition, fundraising activities, share dilution, and more. Investors aiming to gain crypto industry exposure through stocks end up with only partial Bitcoin exposure while additionally bearing a full set of business risks unique to the stock market.

Only One Stock Truly Tracks Bitcoin

The table below shows the correlation of crypto company stocks with Bitcoin from the end of 2025 to the present. Beta represents the percentage change in a stock for every 1% move in Bitcoin.

MSTR is the only stock in the entire market that can be considered a Bitcoin alternative. With a beta of 1.59 and a correlation of 0.85, it is essentially an equity tool for holding Bitcoin with leverage. In the recent downturn, its year-to-date decline and drawdown from highs have far exceeded Bitcoin's.

Coinbase is a relatively balanced choice, with a year-to-date decline of -26.8%, slightly less than BTC's. Its beta coefficient is 1.26, and its correlation coefficient is 0.75, making it the second-strongest correlated with Bitcoin within the sector. However, its volatility is still nearly double that of Bitcoin, and its stock price is down 60.6% from its all-time high of $419.78 in July 2025. Losses for investors who bought at that peak are far greater than for those who entered at Bitcoin's historical high in October 2025.

Circle perfectly illustrates 'business risk in crypto clothing.' It has the lowest correlation with Bitcoin in the sector and the highest 90-day volatility. The trigger occurred on June 30: with the official launch of the Open USD stablecoin, backed by a consortium of over 140 companies including Coinbase, Stripe, Visa, Mastercard, and BlackRock, CRCL plummeted 17.5% in a single day. This sharp drop was almost entirely unrelated to Bitcoin's performance, purely a company-specific negative driven by competition for market share in the stablecoin sector.

Robinhood is a counterexample, similarly demonstrating that individual stock performance can be independent of crypto trends. The stock has only declined slightly by 0.3% year-to-date, with a maximum drawdown of just 8.5%. Crypto business is just a small part of its overall brokerage portfolio, which includes stocks, options, and derivatives. Its diversified business has cushioned the decline; conversely, during a crypto bull market, it is unlikely to provide investors with substantial gains from crypto price movements.

Mining company trends are the most anomalous. While Bitcoin fell 29.5% year-to-date, RIOT surged 74.5%, MARA rose 38.1%, and CleanSpark gained 24.7%. The core logic is that mining companies are transforming into AI high-performance computing service providers, signing hundreds of billions in computing power leasing contracts while continuously selling their Bitcoin holdings. Although their daily price movements still follow Bitcoin (beta coefficients are all greater than 1), their annual returns are entirely driven by AI hosting business, decoupled from coin prices.

Year-to-date price changes of BTC, ETH, and nine U.S.-listed cryptocurrency stocks.

Bitcoin's own volatility is not insignificant. Volmex's Bitcoin 30-day Volatility Index dropped to a low of 24.5 in late May, peaked at 68.7 in early February, and rebounded to 41.6 in early July. Even so, the volatility of most crypto stocks remains nearly double.

Strategy Case Study: Equity Structure Adds Extra Risk

Holding Bitcoin only requires bearing the risk of price fluctuations; buying shares in crypto public companies adds multiple variables: business operations, equity dilution, disappearing valuation premiums, fundraising pressure, changes in capital structure, and more.

Strategy recently exposed all these risks in a concentrated manner over the past month. At the end of June, its price-to-book ratio (mNAV) fell below 1 for the first time. This metric measures the company's total valuation relative to its net assets. A ratio below 1 means the market values the entire company less than the cash and Bitcoin it holds. According to the June 22 disclosure, Strategy held 847,363 Bitcoins. On the day mNAV fell below 1, these Bitcoins were worth approximately $50 billion.

An mNAV greater than 1 is the foundation of Strategy's entire growth flywheel. In the past, the company could issue common and preferred shares at a premium, raise funds, and continue to acquire Bitcoin, increasing Bitcoin holdings per share. Once mNAV falls below 1, this cycle can reverse and erode shareholder value—issuing shares to raise funds for buying Bitcoin is equivalent to selling existing Bitcoin assets at a discount.

CryptoSlate reported as early as January that Bitcoin-holding companies are divided into those trading at a valuation premium and those at a discount. By the end of June, Strategy's total market capitalization was $29.54 billion, less than half of its peak of over $71 billion in 2024, with all four classes of preferred shares at historical lows.

Strategy announced countermeasures. On June 29, it unveiled a stock buyback plan of up to $1.25 billion and authorized the sale of Bitcoin to supplement liquidity, covering preferred stock dividends and debt interest. In the preceding weeks, on June 1, the company conducted its first Bitcoin sale since 2022, selling only 32 Bitcoins. After the announcement, the stock surged 12.6% in a single day, ending an eight-day losing streak. The world's largest Bitcoin holder needing to sell its holdings in a bear market to secure cash flow is a constraint not encountered when directly holding Bitcoin and is a risk unique to stocks.

This is precisely the backdrop for ARK's contrarian accumulation. On June 25, amidst a collective slump in crypto stocks, Wood's funds bought $3.27 million worth of Robinhood shares in a single day, simultaneously increasing positions in Coinbase, Circle, and Bullish. Wood believes Bitcoin's long-term target price is in the millions of dollars and is currently investing heavily at a discount in crypto public companies that have seen deep corrections since their 2025 highs.

The data reveals the true nature of these companies.

  • Strategy = Leveraged Bitcoin + Equity Dilution Risk;
  • Circle = Stablecoin sector payment company, deeply entangled in market share battles;
  • Robinhood = Comprehensive broker, crypto is just a side business.

Wood's basket purchase of these company stocks is essentially a bet on a combination of different business models, with vastly differing levels of crypto exposure.

Each individual stock has its own investment logic: Coinbase has outperformed Bitcoin year-to-date, Robinhood has maintained its price since the beginning of the year, and the mining sector has led in overall returns. But the core question remains: are crypto stocks really less risky than holding coins directly?

Data from the nine public companies shows that stocks either amplify Bitcoin's volatility or add company-specific operational risks unrelated to coin prices.

The truly strong-performing cryptocurrency stocks this year rely on independent growth businesses like AI computing power, brokerage traffic, and payment products, with Bitcoin being only a secondary influencing factor.

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QWhat is the main argument presented in the article regarding cryptocurrency stocks as a substitute for holding Bitcoin directly?

AThe article argues that cryptocurrency stocks are generally not a good substitute for direct Bitcoin exposure. They tend to have significantly higher volatility than Bitcoin and carry additional company-specific risks unrelated to Bitcoin's price movements, such as earnings reports, competition, and financing activities.

QWhich publicly traded company is cited as the most accurate proxy for Bitcoin investment, and what metrics support this?

AMicroStrategy (MSTR) is cited as the most accurate proxy. It has a high correlation of 0.85 with Bitcoin and a beta of 1.59, meaning it acts like a leveraged bet on Bitcoin's price.

QHow does Circle (CRCL) differ from being a simple Bitcoin investment according to the data?

ACircle shows the lowest correlation with Bitcoin among the studied stocks and the highest 90-day volatility. Its stock price is heavily influenced by company-specific factors like competition in the stablecoin market, as evidenced by a 17.5% single-day drop due to the launch of the Open USD stable币, which was largely independent of Bitcoin's price action.

QWhat unexpected trend is highlighted regarding major Bitcoin mining companies in 2026, and what is the driving factor?

ADespite Bitcoin's price decline in 2026, major mining companies like RIOT, MARA, and CleanSpark posted significant gains (e.g., RIOT up 74.5%). This is primarily driven by their successful pivot to becoming AI high-performance computing service providers, securing large compute rental contracts, which has decoupled their performance from Bitcoin's price.

QWhat unique financial risk did MicroStrategy (MSTR) face in June, according to the article, and how did it respond?

AMicroStrategy's market cap to net asset value (mNAV) ratio fell below 1, meaning the market valued the entire company for less than the value of the Bitcoin and cash it held. This threatened its growth model of issuing premium-priced shares to buy more Bitcoin. In response, it announced a $1.25 billion stock buyback plan and authorized selling some Bitcoin to cover obligations, a constraint not faced by direct Bitcoin holders.

你可能也喜欢

OUSD 假合作风波?稳定币与巨头背书的信用游戏

上周,Open Standard 推出美元稳定币 OpenUSD(OUSD),并公布了140多家企业组成的豪华背书名单,包括 Visa、万事达卡、Stripe、贝莱德、谷歌、三星、Coinbase 等巨头。此举一度引发市场震动,但名单很快遭到质疑。多家韩国企业如三星电子、新韩金融等出面澄清,称仅进行过初步接洽或表示会评估,并未正式同意加入,部分公司甚至是通过新闻才得知自己被列为成员。美国也有行业人士指出,名单存在误导性。 OUSD 宣称提供零手续费铸造赎回、无交易量上限,并将大部分储备收益分享给合作伙伴。然而,这种模式使得被列入名单具有实际商业和信誉含义,加剧了争议。文章指出,利用巨头名声造势是加密行业的常见营销手法,并引用了此前 Facebook 的 Libra(后更名 Diem)项目为例:该项目初期同样拥有全明星联盟,但在监管压力下,PayPal、Visa 等核心伙伴迅速退出,最终项目失败出售。 面对竞争,Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire 表示欢迎,但他指出稳定币市场具有网络效应,趋向赢家通吃。他认为联盟模式历史上协调困难、进度缓慢,且将收入全部分配会导致基础设施投入不足。目前稳定币市场由 USDT 和 USDC 主导,两者合计占据近90%市场份额。 文章总结道,稳定币的成功最终取决于真实的使用场景和用户,而非营销声势。OUSD 虽拥有部分真实背书和差异化模型,但其前景仍需市场检验。这场风波再次揭示了加密行业依赖“巨头站台”进行信用背书所伴随的风险。

链捕手34分钟前

OUSD 假合作风波?稳定币与巨头背书的信用游戏

链捕手34分钟前

交易

现货

热门文章

如何购买S

欢迎来到HTX.com!我们已经让购买Sonic(S)变得简单而便捷。跟随我们的逐步指南,放心开始您的加密货币之旅。第一步:创建您的HTX账户使用您的电子邮件、手机号码注册一个免费账户在HTX上。体验无忧的注册过程并解锁所有平台功能。立即注册第二步:前往买币页面,选择您的支付方式信用卡/借记卡购买:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即时购买Sonic(S)。余额购买:使用您HTX账户余额中的资金进行无缝交易。第三方购买:探索诸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方法以增加便利性。C2C购买:在HTX平台上直接与其他用户交易。HTX场外交易台(OTC)购买:为大量交易者提供个性化服务和竞争性汇率。第三步:存储您的Sonic(S)购买完您的Sonic(S)后,将其存储在您的HTX账户钱包中。您也可以通过区块链转账将其发送到其他地方或者用于交易其他加密货币。第四步:交易Sonic(S)在HTX的现货市场轻松交易Sonic(S)。访问您的账户,选择您的交易对,执行您的交易,并实时监控。HTX为初学者和经验丰富的交易者提供了友好的用户体验。

2.8k人学过发布于 2025.01.15更新于 2026.06.02

如何购买S

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对S(S)币价的意见。

活动图片