‘Ethereum can do much better than Google,’ Vitalik Buterin says – Here’s why

ambcrypto发布于2025-09-20更新于2025-09-21

Key Takeaway

What long-term vision did Buterin share?

He emphasized using low-risk DeFi protocols to provide Ethereum with a stable economic foundation.

What tension exists in the Ethereum ecosystem?

Balancing revenue-generating applications with projects that preserve Ethereum’s original mission and values.


Ethereum [ETH] is back in the spotlight, or we can say it has never left the spotlight.

But, this time, not just for its price action but also for co-founder Vitalik Buterin shifting his attention from price milestones to Ethereum’s long-term vision as per his recent blog post.

Vitalik Buterin’s long-term Ethereum vision

He argued that revenue generated from low-risk decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols could serve as a financial backbone for the network.

Buterin compared this to how Google Search sustains Google, while ensuring that non-financial applications continue to preserve Ethereum’s cultural and community-driven values.

Needless to say, for years, the Ethereum ecosystem has wrestled with a fundamental tension. 

This included balancing applications that generate enough revenue to sustain the network against those that embody its original mission and values.

On one side, financial activity, often dominated by NFTs, memecoins, and DeFi loops fueled by incentives, generated significant capital but relied heavily on short-lived, sometimes circular dynamics.

On the other hand, non-financial and semi-financial projects like Lens, Farcaster, ENS, Polymarket, Seer, and privacy protocols showcased Ethereum’s cultural and technological depth.

Yet, they struggled with low adoption and insufficient fee generation to support the scale of a multi-hundred-billion-dollar economy.

Remarking on which, Buterin added, 

“This disjointness created a lot of dissonance in the community, and a large amount of community momentum was backed by the theoretical hope that some application could emerge that fills both boxes at the same time.”

Did Ethereum find its “Google Search” moment?

Seeing this, Buterin suggests that Ethereum may have finally found its “Google Search” moment in low-risk DeFi.

Just as search and ads underpin Google’s revenue while allowing the company to pursue diverse projects, stable and accessible DeFi protocols could provide Ethereum with a reliable economic foundation.

These protocols, focused on democratizing global access to payments and savings in key asset classes like currencies, stocks, and bonds, would generate sustainable revenue without compromising Ethereum’s spirit.

Unlike Google, which critics argue drifted toward profit-maximization, Ethereum’s decentralized structure could ensure that financial success and community values remain aligned, allowing the network to “do well” while also “being good.”

“In fact, I hope Ethereum can do much better than Google.”

Ethereum network activity and price action

This coincided with Ethereum’s latest on-chain trends, presenting a nuanced picture of the network’s momentum.

While ETH traded at $4,485.13 at press time, much of the activity stemmed from smaller wallet holders.

In the chart below, address distribution shows four main categories: mega-holders with more than 1,000,000 ETH, large holders with 100,000–1,000,000 ETH.

Mid-tier wallets contained 10,000–100,000 ETH, and smaller accounts held 1,000–10,000 ETH.

ETH network activtyETH network activty

Source: Santiment

The data underscores that the majority of engagement comes from smaller wallets, signaling a broad user base rather than heavy reliance on whales.

Activity levels also fluctuate noticeably, with a spike in participation observed around mid-September, reflecting periods of higher engagement on the network.

What’s more?

At the same time, Ethereum’s unstaking queue has stretched beyond 45 days, drawing sharp criticism on Crypto Twitter.

Many users expressed frustration, noting that the extended delay makes it difficult to access funds for everyday needs such as rent and utility bills.

Comparisons were quickly made to Solana, where unstaking takes just two days.

Finally, addressing the concerns, Buterin defended the longer wait, describing it as a necessary part of the network’s “security deal,” likening it to the process of a soldier leaving military service.

Share

热门币种推荐

你可能也喜欢

您会惊讶地发现,WeChat 和 Telegram 在架构层面竟如此不同

微信与Telegram在架构层面有着根本性的差异,主要体现在数据存储、功能设计和生态开放度上。 **数据存储方式**:Telegram提供无限云端存储,所有消息历史在各设备间自动同步。微信则采用本地存储,消息在服务器交付后不保留,因此更换设备需通过特定功能迁移,且桌面版必须依赖手机在线确认才能登录。 **功能设计差异**:在频道讨论方面,Telegram为帖子自动关联评论区,实现一体化讨论。微信的公众号文章评论需经发布者审核才可显示,缺乏与文章直接关联的讨论系统,用户交流需跳转至聊天或小程序。文件传输上,Telegram支持最大2-4GB的文件,微信则限制为200MB,大文件需借助“文件传输助手”或第三方服务。 **开发与生态**:Telegram的Bot API完全开放免费,开发门槛低。微信小程序生态庞大(活跃数量超480万),但属于封闭系统,需经过审核、认证,甚至提供商业许可才能使用部分API,准入要求更高。 **支付整合**:微信支付深度融入中国日常生活,覆盖绝大多数线下场景及公共服务,替代了现金和银行应用。Telegram没有内置的法定货币支付系统,主要通过第三方机器人实现支付功能,尤其侧重加密货币,这反映了其去中心化理念,但在传统金融基础设施完善的地区,限制了其作为日常金融工具的应用。 **安全考量**:文章未深入讨论加密机制。Telegram提供端到端加密的私密聊天选项,而微信聊天信息不采用端到端加密。值得注意的是,微信将通讯与支付高度集成于单一界面,理论上扩大了潜在的攻击面。有数据显示,仅2025年初新加坡就记录了数百起涉及仿冒微信等支付平台员工的诈骗案件,损失巨大。这引出一个技术问题:当通讯与支付功能在同一个应用内结合得越紧密,聊天安全漏洞可能带来的代价就越高。 总结而言,两者代表了不同的平台哲学:微信构建了一个深度融入现实经济的封闭但高度集成的生态系统;而Telegram则围绕开放协议、灵活数据存储和低开发者门槛进行设计。这种架构选择决定了各自的目标用户和使用场景。

cryptonews.ru2小时前

您会惊讶地发现,WeChat 和 Telegram 在架构层面竟如此不同

cryptonews.ru2小时前

交易

现货

热门文章

如何购买S

欢迎来到HTX.com!我们已经让购买Sonic(S)变得简单而便捷。跟随我们的逐步指南,放心开始您的加密货币之旅。第一步:创建您的HTX账户使用您的电子邮件、手机号码注册一个免费账户在HTX上。体验无忧的注册过程并解锁所有平台功能。立即注册第二步:前往买币页面,选择您的支付方式信用卡/借记卡购买:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即时购买Sonic(S)。余额购买:使用您HTX账户余额中的资金进行无缝交易。第三方购买:探索诸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方法以增加便利性。C2C购买:在HTX平台上直接与其他用户交易。HTX场外交易台(OTC)购买:为大量交易者提供个性化服务和竞争性汇率。第三步:存储您的Sonic(S)购买完您的Sonic(S)后,将其存储在您的HTX账户钱包中。您也可以通过区块链转账将其发送到其他地方或者用于交易其他加密货币。第四步:交易Sonic(S)在HTX的现货市场轻松交易Sonic(S)。访问您的账户,选择您的交易对,执行您的交易,并实时监控。HTX为初学者和经验丰富的交易者提供了友好的用户体验。

3.7k人学过发布于 2025.01.15更新于 2026.08.06

如何购买S

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对S(S)币价的意见。

活动图片