Ripple’s Legal Battle With SEC Continues – Here Are The Facts

bitcoinist发布于2024-09-08更新于2024-09-08

文章摘要

The long-running legal battle between Ripple and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has yet to be concluded despite...

The long-running legal battle between Ripple and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has yet to be concluded despite Judge Analisa Torres’ August 7 ruling, which appeared to have ended the case. This follows a recent development showing that the SEC is still considering appealing the court’s ruling. 

Ripple Requests Stay On Monetary Judgement

Ripple recently filed a letter requesting a stay on the court’s monetary judgment awarded against the crypto firm in favor of the Commission. In her judgment delivered on August 7, Torres ruled that Ripple should pay the SEC a fine of $125 million for violating securities laws. 

Ripple was meant to have paid the SEC by September 6. However, the stay request, which Judge Torres granted, showed Ripple would no longer have to pay the $125 million to the SEC until 30 days after the expiration of the time allowed for an appeal with no appeal filed or after a decision by the Court of Appeals resolving any potential appeal.

This suggests that the SEC, which consented to the stay request even before Judge Torres granted it, is still considering appealing the case. As explained by legal expert Fred Rispoli, the Commission likely agreed to this request as they could pay Ripple an interest on the monetary judgment if the crypto firm were to pay now, and the SEC ended up appealing and losing the appeal. 

XRP is currently trading at $0.52. Chart: TradingView

As such, the Commission is content for Ripple to keep the funds in trust while they weigh their options on whether to appeal Judge Torres’ ruling, especially the one in which she declared that XRP wasn’t a security in itself. Rispoli also increased the likelihood of an SEC appeal to 60% following the stay request put forward by Ripple. 

The Commission will have until October 6 to decide on whether to file an appeal. Ripple, on its part, has long made it clear through its CEO, Brad Garlinghouse, and Chief Legal Officer (CLO) Stuart Alderoty that it has no intention to file an appeal as they see the court’s ruling as a victory in their search for legal clarity.  

Ripple Looks To Lobby For More Favorable Conditions For Crypto

Ripple’s legal battle against the SEC seems to have pushed the crypto firm to lobby for more favorable conditions for the crypto industry as it seeks to end the Commission’s enforcement actions against crypto firms. Bitcoinist recently reported that Ripple’s co-founder Chris Larsen was one of 88 corporate leaders who signed a letter endorsing Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris. 

Meanwhile, Alderoty had earlier shown support for Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, donating $300,000 to the former US president’s campaign. Alderoty is believed to have donated because Trump has adopted a pro-crypto stance. Interestingly, Trump has also promised to fire SEC Chair Gary Gensler on his first day in office if elected. Gensler has overseen the Commission’s legal battle against Ripple and is known for his anti-crypto stance. 

Featured image from The New York Times, chart from TradingView

Scott Matherson

Scott Matherson

Scott Matherson is a leading crypto writer at Bitcoinist, who possesses a sharp analytical mind and a deep understanding of the digital currency landscape. Scott has earned a reputation for delivering thought-provoking and well-researched articles that resonate with both newcomers and seasoned crypto enthusiasts. Outside of his writing, Scott is passionate about promoting crypto literacy and often works to educate the public on the potential of blockchain.

你可能也喜欢

世界模型、元宇宙、数字孪生、物理AI:它们是一回事吗?

过去几年,元宇宙、Web3.0、仿真数据平台、数字孪生、物理AI等概念轮番登场。它们与世界模型并非同一回事,但都指向数字世界与物理世界边界模糊的大趋势。世界模型更像是这些概念的“认知层”或“底层操作系统”,负责让AI理解并推演世界。 这些概念大致可分三类:一是“空间体验”如元宇宙;二是“生产关系”如Web3.0;三是“技术能力”如仿真数据平台、数字孪生、物理AI和世界模型。世界模型属于第三类,且更为底层。 具体来看:元宇宙是虚拟空间体验,世界模型可能成为其内容生成的“发动机”。Web3.0聚焦于所有权与经济规则,与世界模型基本不在同一技术图层。仿真数据平台可视为世界模型的1.0版本,后者旨在实现场景生成的智能化。数字孪生是现实的镜像,而世界模型更进一步,具备预测未来的能力。物理AI指能在物理世界行动的AI,世界模型是其理解与推演世界的核心组件。 在层次结构中,世界模型处于认知层,向上支撑应用工具层(如仿真平台、数字孪生)、行动层(物理AI)和体验层(元宇宙),向下依赖算力和数据。它可能成为连接数字与物理世界的共同底座,就像操作系统支撑各类应用。这些概念当初描绘的愿景,其实现很可能离不开世界模型的发展。

marsbit3小时前

世界模型、元宇宙、数字孪生、物理AI:它们是一回事吗?

marsbit3小时前

交易

现货
活动图片