Failure of Multi-Function Crypto Firms a Limited Threat to 'Real Economy': FSB

CoinDeskPolicy发布于2023-11-27更新于2023-11-28

文章摘要

A new report by the Financial Stability Board said further assessments of possible implications are required because "significant information gaps remain."

The collapse of crypto firms that engage in multiple activities isn't a big threat to "the real economy," according to a report by the Financial Stability Board (FSB) published Tuesday.

The report by the international standard-setter also said that further assessments are required because "significant information gaps remain."

The FSB, which monitors financial systems and proposes rules to help prevent financial crises, said it was assessing the financial stability implications of multifunction crypto-asset intermediaries (MCIs) in July. MCIs are individual firms or groups of affiliated firms that combine a broad range of services, products and functions typically centered around the operation of a trading platform, according to the FSB. This could apply to numerous crypto heavyweights, like Coinbase or Binance.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The FSB warns that crypto firms combining different activities are more vulnerable to failure and that mitigating the impact of such a failure depends on how well global crypto regulation is implemented. The report also identified "information gaps" that require enhanced cross-border cooperation and information sharing.

The report found that the vulnerabilities of MCIs and firms in traditional finance are not very different. However, vulnerabilities increase when MCIs engage in proprietary trading, market-making on their own trading venues, and lending and borrowing.

The FSB said there is a need to assess whether disclosures and reporting requirements of MCIs are adequately covered or would warrant additional measures.

"Combining functions in MCIs that are typically restricted or separated for traditional finance appears prima facie inconsistent with the principle of ‘same activity, same risk, same regulation’," the report said.

Edited by Sandali Handagama.

你可能也喜欢

美国大模型走向封闭,以安全之名

2026年6月,美国政府以安全为由,对前沿AI模型的发布实施管制。Anthropic的最强网络安全模型Mythos 5被要求下架后,仅获准有限恢复至约100家美国机构,其公众版Fable 5恢复时间未定。同时,OpenAI发布的新模型GPT-5.6系列也只对经政府审批的合作伙伴开放API。此事标志着美国政府首次成功介入商业AI模型的发布审批。 然而,涉事公司的安全评估显示,模型并未越过其自设的风险红线。OpenAI评估其模型不具备自主实施端到端网络攻击的能力;Anthropic则反驳政府的担忧基于一个狭窄、非通用的漏洞。行业批评政府的决策缺乏清晰的技术标准和透明的流程。有观点认为,管制行动的背后是模型能力的“可演示性”引发了政治担忧、竞争对手的举报以及新AI行政令寻求执法案例的需求。 文章回顾了上世纪90年代的“密码战争”,当时美国政府试图管制强加密技术的出口,最终因技术扩散无法遏制、损害美国企业竞争力而失败。历史镜鉴提示,对前沿AI的类似管制可能阻碍技术创新与产业投资,并将市场优势让位于以开源开放策略发展的竞争者。 评论指出,一个没有明确标准和时间表的审批流程,可能动摇前沿AI产业的商业逻辑,并将强大工具的访问权集中于少数特权机构,反而可能增加风险。全球开发者社区开始怀念模型自由发布、快速创新的时代,并将更多期待转向持续开放的中国大模型。

链捕手1小时前

美国大模型走向封闭,以安全之名

链捕手1小时前

交易

现货
活动图片