Polygon Version of Bitcoin Ordinals Sends Gas Fees Skyrocketing

Decrypt发布于2023-11-28更新于2023-11-28

文章摘要

Before the drop, Polygon gas fees had increased 1,000% compared to the same time a day ago.

Gas fees for transactions on Polygon’s proof-of-stake chain skyrocketed to more than $0.10 or 5,000 gwei on Thursday—rising sharply as the Ethereum scaling solution weathered an apparent influx of inscriptions-related, PRC-20 activity.

As of this writing, Polygon gas fees had plummeted back down to around 270 gwei, according to livdir.com’s Polygon Gas Price Chart. However, before the steep drop, Polygon gas fees had increased 1,000% compared to the same time a day ago, when transactions cost 477 gwei.

“Watch out for that mass adoption incoming, LOL,” a Reddit user named DingDongWhoDis quipped, as several other community members tried to assess the influx of activity.

Gas fees quantify the computational power required to make a transaction on Polygon’s network—1 gwei is equivalent to 0.000000001 MATIC. Several transactions that occurred on Thursday while gas fees were elevated contained JSON text as input data, which resembles text-based inscriptions associated with BRC-20 tokens on Bitcoin.

Dubbed the PRC-20 protocol, it appears a token called POLS was primarily responsible for the influx of activity on Polygon on Thursday. Twitter user @0xhuoshen shared a screenshot of several PRC-20-related transactions back-to-back that sought to “mint” the POLS token.

As of this writing, around 9% of the token’s 2.1 trillion total supply had been minted, according to evm.ink. In total, POLS had 18,100 different owners, as of this writing.

An influx of activity related to Ordinals on Bitcoin sent transaction fees on Bitcoin to multi-year highs earlier this year, as fervor for “minting” or claiming BRC-20 tokens surged. Eventually, transaction fees came back down, but they have since risen again—albeit, not as much—amid renewed Ordinals activity, according to data from Ycharts.

BRC-20s, an experimental class of tokens, were pioneered by the pseudonymous data analyst Domo in March. Other developers have sought to replicate the BRC-20 standard on other networks, such as Ethereum, with the introduction of Ethscriptions.

“The inscriptions-based token wave cannot be stopped,” Tom Lehman, co-founder of Ethscriptions told Decrypt. “I do wonder the purpose of this on Polygon, where transaction fees are so low. Then again, I also wondered about the purpose of it on Ethereum.”

When Domo developed the first BRC-20 token, the analyst took inspiration from the ERC-20 token standard on Ethereum. Initially proposed in 2015, the standard set of rules outlined a vision for fungible tokens on the network, which is used for tokens like the stablecoin Tether.

Some Bitcoiners have taken matters into their own hands recently, with regards to BRC-20 activity. Named the Sophon, a pseudonymous developer’s bot derailed hundreds of newly created BRC-20 tokens on Bitcoin in October.

你可能也喜欢

美国大模型走向封闭,以安全之名

2026年6月,美国政府以安全为由,对前沿AI模型的发布实施管制。Anthropic的最强网络安全模型Mythos 5被要求下架后,仅获准有限恢复至约100家美国机构,其公众版Fable 5恢复时间未定。同时,OpenAI发布的新模型GPT-5.6系列也只对经政府审批的合作伙伴开放API。此事标志着美国政府首次成功介入商业AI模型的发布审批。 然而,涉事公司的安全评估显示,模型并未越过其自设的风险红线。OpenAI评估其模型不具备自主实施端到端网络攻击的能力;Anthropic则反驳政府的担忧基于一个狭窄、非通用的漏洞。行业批评政府的决策缺乏清晰的技术标准和透明的流程。有观点认为,管制行动的背后是模型能力的“可演示性”引发了政治担忧、竞争对手的举报以及新AI行政令寻求执法案例的需求。 文章回顾了上世纪90年代的“密码战争”,当时美国政府试图管制强加密技术的出口,最终因技术扩散无法遏制、损害美国企业竞争力而失败。历史镜鉴提示,对前沿AI的类似管制可能阻碍技术创新与产业投资,并将市场优势让位于以开源开放策略发展的竞争者。 评论指出,一个没有明确标准和时间表的审批流程,可能动摇前沿AI产业的商业逻辑,并将强大工具的访问权集中于少数特权机构,反而可能增加风险。全球开发者社区开始怀念模型自由发布、快速创新的时代,并将更多期待转向持续开放的中国大模型。

链捕手2小时前

美国大模型走向封闭,以安全之名

链捕手2小时前

交易

现货
活动图片