Uniswap whale sells $10M in UNI – Can $4 support still hold?

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-01-31Обновлено 2026-01-31

Введение

Uniswap (UNI) dropped to a two-year low of $4.11, with a slight rebound to $4.15 at press time. A long-term whale sold 2.49 million UNI ($10.62 million) after five years of dormancy, realizing $1.72 million in profit. This sale, along with a surge in exchange inflows and a two-month high exchange supply ratio of 0.09, indicates increased selling pressure and distribution risk. Technical indicators show strong bearish momentum, with the RSI at 27 and RVGI at -0.12, signaling seller dominance. If selling continues, UNI could break the $4 support and fall to $3.8. However, a significant reversal could see it reclaim $4.8 if buyers step in.

Following the recent market crash and a weakened structure, Uniswap [UNI] slipped to a two‐year low. The altcoin fell to $4.1, a level last seen in November 2023, before staging a modest rebound.

At press time, UNI traded at $4.15, down 1.14% on the daily charts, reflecting increased volatility.

Uniswap whale dumps 2.49M UNI

After UNI] experienced a massive slump, a long-term holder panicked and offloaded his entire UNI holdings. According to Arkham data, a dormant whale returned after five years and dumped 2.49 million UNI for $10.62 million.

This whale sold these tokens after holding them for five years, having purchased them in the early days of Uniswap. With the sale, the whale realized $1.72 million in profit, up only 19% in five years.

Usually, when whales sell during a market downturn, it signals a lack of confidence in the market and a fear of further losses.

Selling pressure shoots up!

In addition to the noted whale sell activity, Uniswap experienced a substantial sell-off by other market participants on the 30th of January.

According to CryptoQuant, Exchange Inflow surged to a two-month high of 4.2 million UNI, then fell significantly as of writing. At the same time, the altcoin recorded 1.7 million in Exchange Outflow.

With Exchange flows soaring, the Exchange Supply Ratio climbed to a two-month high of 0.09. Often, a rising supply ratio suggested increased distribution, further rising dump risk.

Historically, such market conditions have led to reduced scarcity, thereby further accelerating downward pressure, often a prelude to lower prices.

Is $4 support at risk?

Uniswap dropped significantly as investors, both retail and traders, panicked and sold, further accelerating the downtrend.

As a result, the altcoin’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) dropped deeper into the oversold territory, hitting a low of 27 at press time.

When RSI drops to such extreme levels, it signals seller dominance in the market. At the same time, Uniswap’s Relative Vigor Index (RVGI) fell to -0.12, after making a bearish crossover.

With RSI and RVGI dropping to such extreme lows, it suggests strong downward momentum, with sellers dominating the market.

Often, such market conditions signal downside risk and the potential for its continuation. Therefore, if sellers continue to sell, UNI could breach the $4 support level and drop towards $3.8.

However, if holders take this opportunity to buy at a discount, Uniswap could hold above $4 and reclaim $4.8 in the event of a significant reversal.


Final Thoughts

  • Uniswap dropped to a 2-year low of $4.11 before slightly rebounding to $4.19 at press time.
  • A UNI whale woke up after five years of dormancy and dumped 2.49 million UNI for $10.62 million.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the price of Uniswap (UNI) at the time of writing and how much did it decrease on the daily charts?

AAt the time of writing, UNI traded at $4.15, down 1.14% on the daily charts.

QHow many UNI tokens did the dormant whale sell and for what total amount?

AThe dormant whale sold 2.49 million UNI tokens for a total of $10.62 million.

QWhat did the surge in the Exchange Inflow metric to 4.2 million UNI indicate?

AThe surge in Exchange Inflow to a two-month high of 4.2 million UNI indicated a substantial sell-off by market participants, suggesting increased distribution and a higher risk of further price dumps.

QWhat were the readings of Uniswap's RSI and RVGI indicators, and what do they signal?

AUniswap's RSI dropped to 27, and its RVGI fell to -0.12. These extreme lows signal strong downward momentum and seller dominance in the market, indicating a high downside risk.

QWhat are the two potential price scenarios for UNI mentioned in the article based on market behavior?

AIf sellers continue to sell, UNI could breach the $4 support level and drop towards $3.8. However, if holders buy at a discount, Uniswap could hold above $4 and reclaim $4.8 in the event of a significant reversal.

Похожее

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1 ч. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit1 ч. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit1 ч. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit1 ч. назад

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit1 ч. назад

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить 4

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение 4 (4) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки 4 (4).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение 4 (4)После приобретения вами 4 (4) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля 4 (4)С легкостью торгуйте 4 (4) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

646 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.10.20Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить 4

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам 4: В 2025 году экосистема TRON переживает взрывной рост, TRON укрепляет позиции лидера по переводу стейблкоинов

В 2025 году экосистема TRON быстро развивается, уделяя особое внимание взаимодействию, безопасности и практическому внедрению.

2.1k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.12.30Обновлено 2025.12.30

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам 4: В 2025 году экосистема TRON переживает взрывной рост, TRON укрепляет позиции лидера по переводу стейблкоинов

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на 4 (4) представлены ниже.

活动图片