# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Valuation

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Valuation", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Why I Am Not Bullish on Ethereum at Its Current State?

Why I'm Not Bullish on Ethereum at Current Prices The author expresses skepticism about Ethereum's current valuation, not its long-term business growth potential (user base and transaction volume are expected to increase). The author believes the price is too high relative to its fundamentals, based on the following analysis: - Active users and transaction counts have reached new highs but are growing slower than some leading e-commerce platforms. - Monthly transaction fees are only 0.6% of the previous cycle's peak, and average fees per transaction are 0.5% of previous highs. This slow growth comes at the cost of drastically reduced service prices, which is unfavorable in any industry. - If Ethereum is viewed as a company selling block space, its price-to-fee (PF) ratio exceeds 2,000x and its price-to-sales (PS) ratio exceeds 10,000x. It has negative net profit, so no P/E ratio exists. In comparison, traditional cloud service companies have P/E ratios of 20-30 and single-digit PS ratios. - If considered a commodity (like digital oil), Ethereum faces competition from other chains and rollups offering similar services. Its value proposition may not justify such a high premium, especially as its narrative as a store of value (like Bitcoin) has faded. - There is a lack of new, product-market-fit crypto native applications this cycle, leading to oversupply of block space and stagnant growth in the public chain sector. - Grand visions of Ethereum becoming a decentralized "Wall Street on-chain" lack supporting data and factual evidence. The author advocates for investment based on rationality, not belief or hype, and suggests waiting for concrete data before buying into this narrative.

marsbit01/19 09:08

Why I Am Not Bullish on Ethereum at Its Current State?

marsbit01/19 09:08

$200 Million Investment in MrBeast's Company: Top Creator MrBeast Becomes Tom Lee's Trump Card

Investment firm BitMine Immersion Technologies (BMNR), led by Wall Street analyst Tom Lee, has announced a $200 million investment into Beast Industries, the parent company of top YouTube creator MrBeast (Jimmy Donaldson). The deal signals a strategic move toward integrating decentralized finance (DeFi) into Beast Industries’ upcoming financial services platform. MrBeast, with over 460 million subscribers and 100 billion views, has built a massive media empire through high-cost, high-impact videos, often spending $3–5 million per video. Despite annual revenues of around $400 million, his content business operates with thin margins. His profitable venture, Feastables—a chocolate brand with $250 million in annual sales—provides a stable cash flow and retail presence. MrBeast has openly discussed his “cash-poor” status, reinvesting nearly all earnings back into content and expansion. His approach prioritizes growth and audience retention over short-term profitability. The partnership with Tom Lee and BMNR suggests a deeper foray into financial infrastructure, potentially involving DeFi solutions for payments, programmable accounts, and decentralized asset management. This move could redefine the relationship between creators, audiences, and financial ecosystems—though it also carries risks regarding user trust and regulatory complexity. At 27, MrBeast continues to leverage his unprecedented influence to explore new frontiers, now entering the world of crypto and decentralized finance.

marsbit01/18 05:37

$200 Million Investment in MrBeast's Company: Top Creator MrBeast Becomes Tom Lee's Trump Card

marsbit01/18 05:37

After the Implementation of Uniswap's Fee Switch: Is This DeFi Transformation's 'Report Card' Impressive Enough?

Uniswap's fee switch activation, implemented through the "UNIfication" proposal, marks a pivotal shift in its tokenomics by linking UNI tokens directly to protocol usage and revenue. Previously a governance-only asset, UNI now accrues value through a deflationary mechanism where a portion of protocol fees from Uniswap V2, V3, and Unichain is used to programmatically burn UNI tokens. An initial one-time treasury burn of 100 million UNI was executed to compensate holders for past unaccrued fees. Early data indicates an annualized protocol revenue of approximately $26-27 million, resulting in a revenue multiple of around 207x relative to UNI’s $5.4 billion market capitalization. The current annualized burn rate is estimated at 4-5 million UNI, representing only 0.4% of the circulating supply. This high valuation implies strong market expectations for future growth, requiring expanded fee capture—such as broader pool coverage, V4 hooks, and Unichain optimization—to justify current levels. The move reflects a broader DeFi trend toward "fee-hooked" token models, where tokens are designed to better align holders with protocol economics through mechanisms like burns, staker rewards, or ve-token lockups. This transition makes UNI more analytically grounded but also subjects it to greater scrutiny based on sustainable value accumulation and real yield generation. Regulatory developments regarding revenue-sharing tokens will also play a critical role in shaping its future.

marsbit01/14 10:05

After the Implementation of Uniswap's Fee Switch: Is This DeFi Transformation's 'Report Card' Impressive Enough?

marsbit01/14 10:05

活动图片