# Сопутствующие статьи по теме RWA

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "RWA", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

BitMart Research Institute Weekly Highlights: ETF Continued Outflows + AI Drain, Crypto Market Seeks Bottom Amid Volatility

**BitMart Research Weekly Highlights: ETF Outflows and AI Demand Weigh on Crypto Market** The crypto market saw a correction this past week, diverging from the all-time highs in U.S. equity markets. Bitcoin (BTC) fell roughly 6%, while Ethereum (ETH) declined about 4.5%. The primary pressure point was significant and sustained outflows from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, which experienced a record nine consecutive days of net redemptions totaling approximately $2.8 billion. Spot Ethereum ETFs also faced continuous outflows. This weakness in digital assets contrasted with the continued surge in traditional markets, particularly AI-related stocks. The news of Anthropic's secret IPO filing, targeting a potential $750B IPO, and Alphabet's major new AI infrastructure funding further fueled the tech rally. The analysis suggests a potential "liquidity siphon" effect, where capital is being diverted from crypto into the dominant AI investment narrative. Other notable developments include DTCC's DTC announcing plans to integrate Stellar for tokenized asset services, signaling a major step for tokenized equities. Meanwhile, MicroStrategy paused its primary mechanism for funding Bitcoin purchases to focus on debt management, removing a key institutional buyer from the market. The report concludes that the crypto market remains under pressure from the competing AI narrative and major upcoming IPOs, with a potential for a broader market bottom if an AI-driven correction occurs later this cycle.

marsbit2 дня назад 08:52

BitMart Research Institute Weekly Highlights: ETF Continued Outflows + AI Drain, Crypto Market Seeks Bottom Amid Volatility

marsbit2 дня назад 08:52

The Age of Decoupling Has Arrived: Bitcoin is No Longer the Sole Compass of Crypto

The era of the cryptocurrency market moving in lockstep with Bitcoin is ending, as the industry splits into two distinct asset categories: endogenous and exogenous. Endogenous assets, like Bitcoin, derive value purely from the crypto market's cycles. Their narratives swing between being "interstellar money" in bull markets and "digital collectibles" in bear markets. Exogenous assets, however, are nominally crypto but operate with independent value drivers. Examples include: * **Venice:** An AI inference service using tokens for payments; its consumer-AI business model is decoupled from crypto price swings. * **Figure:** A fintech lender using blockchain to speed up loan approvals; its core value is in credit, not crypto. * **Stablecoin firms like BVNK:** Acquired by traditional finance giants (Mastercard, Stripe), their growth is tied to payment infrastructure, not market cycles. Hybrid projects like **Hyperliquid** (a decentralized exchange) show a shift, with a growing share of non-crypto trading (e.g., prediction markets). This divergence is fundamental. Endogenous assets remain highly correlated to Bitcoin, similar to gold miners to gold. Exogenous assets are evolving to have their own fundamentals, like the weak correlation between gold and the S&P 500. This changes investment analysis. Evaluating exogenous assets requires traditional fundamental research—assessing user bases, unit economics, and moats—more akin to fintech investing than charting Bitcoin. Promising exogenous sectors include: on-chain exchanges/brokers, AI-crypto fusion, privacy-focused digital banks, lending (institutional/private credit), stablecoins/real-world asset tokenization, payment rails, and non-financial crypto-consumer products. Currently, investing via equity is often safer than via tokens, as token value accrual mechanisms need further regulatory and industry development (e.g., the CLARITY Act). Nonetheless, the core trend is clear: crypto market drivers are diversifying from a single factor (Bitcoin) to multiple fundamentals, ending the era of uniform market moves.

marsbit06/01 13:06

The Age of Decoupling Has Arrived: Bitcoin is No Longer the Sole Compass of Crypto

marsbit06/01 13:06

Sharplink CEO: Ethereum's Future Is Playing Out Now

This article presents a perspective from Joseph Chalom, CEO of Sharplink and a former BlackRock executive. He argues that current controversies surrounding the Ethereum Foundation (EF) and ETH's price miss the bigger picture for institutional adoption. Chalom asserts that Ethereum is decisively winning in the three key attributes institutions value most: trust, security, and liquidity. He cites its dominance in stablecoin settlement, tokenized real-world assets (RWA), and high-value DeFi as evidence. This success is attributed to the EF's consistent, long-term protocol development over a decade, including major upgrades like The Merge and a robust future roadmap. He defends Ethereum's decentralization as a core strength, not a weakness, stating institutions require a neutral infrastructure not controlled by any single entity. Comparing ETH to Amazon, Chalom suggests critics focusing on short-term price are missing its potential to become the foundational settlement layer for the entire global financial system. The article encourages a contrarian "be greedy when others are fearful" investment approach, drawing parallels to Warren Buffett's strategy and BlackRock's continued investment during crypto winters. Chalom concludes that while the EF correctly focuses on core protocol attributes (CROPS: Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, Security), a leadership gap exists in market-facing narrative and institutional adoption. He calls for ecosystem participants, including his own firm Sharplink, to become more vocal advocates to support Ethereum's impending "supercycle" of institutional adoption.

链捕手05/30 07:10

Sharplink CEO: Ethereum's Future Is Playing Out Now

链捕手05/30 07:10

Reddit Discussion: After 11 Years in Crypto, RWA Is One of the Few Things That Doesn't Feel Like 'Old Wine in a New Bottle'

Reddit Discussion: After 11 Years in Crypto, RWA Feels Unlike the Usual 'Old Wine in a New Bottle' A user with experience since 2014 shares that, having witnessed major crypto cycles from ICOs to FTX, most new narratives are just rebranded old ideas. However, Real World Assets (RWA) feel genuinely different. It's not about moving existing on-chain capital but bringing yields from real-world assets onto the blockchain. While many projects are flawed, the underlying premise is stronger than most. The user outlines key checks before engaging with any RWA project: 1) Existence of a lending business *before* the token launch (citing examples like Maple and 8lends). 2) Clear, transparent handling of defaults, using Goldfinch's 2023 issues as a critical lesson about inevitable credit risk. They note a crucial distinction for newcomers: RWA lending involves slow recovery from real assets (taking months), unlike the instant liquidations of over-collateralized DeFi protocols like Aave. Ultimately, the hard part is the traditional credit work, not the blockchain. Commenters agree, emphasizing the importance of documented default procedures and teams with pre-token real-world credit experience. They observe that a project's response to its first default is more telling than any metrics dashboard, summarizing RWA as "old credit on a new rail."

marsbit05/29 06:09

Reddit Discussion: After 11 Years in Crypto, RWA Is One of the Few Things That Doesn't Feel Like 'Old Wine in a New Bottle'

marsbit05/29 06:09

a16z: RWA Has Passed the Proof of Concept, but the Real Challenges Are Just Beginning

a16z highlights that the tokenized real-world asset (RWA) market, excluding stablecoins, has grown tenfold in under two years to roughly $340 billion. This surge is primarily driven by US Treasury bonds and gold, offering investors yield on idle stablecoins and providing institutions with more efficient settlement and collateral flows. However, the core insight is that most tokenized assets today are simply digital certificates for off-chain holdings—used for ownership and transfer but not deeply integrated into DeFi as composable financial building blocks. For instance, only about 5% of tokenized bonds ($8B) are actively used in DeFi protocols. Smaller categories like reinsurance tokens show much higher DeFi utilization (84%), indicating they were designed for on-chain composability from the start. The market remains concentrated, with US Treasuries and commodities comprising two-thirds of the total. Gold dominates the commodities segment. While Ethereum holds over half the market, activity is spreading across multiple chains like BNB Chain and Solana. Predictions for the market's future size vary widely (from $2 trillion to over $30 trillion by 2030/2034), reflecting different definitions of what constitutes tokenization. All agree on significant growth. The current market is minuscule compared to traditional finance (e.g., tokenized bonds are 0.01% of the global bond market). The key takeaway is that the initial "proof-of-concept" phase for moving familiar assets on-chain is proving successful. The next, harder challenge is moving more complex financial instruments onto blockchains and enabling true on-chain composability, where these assets become programmable components within a native digital financial system, rather than just digitized records.

marsbit05/28 10:26

a16z: RWA Has Passed the Proof of Concept, but the Real Challenges Are Just Beginning

marsbit05/28 10:26

Reframing Ethereum's Valuation: Why the Fee Model is Wrong, and the 'Treasury Logic' is the Future?

"Rethinking Ethereum's Value: The 'Vault Logic' Framework" Traditional valuation models incorrectly treat Ethereum as a company, valuing ETH based on transaction fees ("revenue"). This is flawed. Fees are network friction; a successful network aims to reduce them to zero. Ethereum's average fee has dropped from over $50 in 2021 to around $0.20 today, while transaction volume has tripled. Instead, view Ethereum as a digital vault securing ~$250 billion in on-chain assets (stablecoins, RWAs, L2 bridged funds, wBTC, etc.). Post-merge, Ethereum's security is directly purchased with its own asset: ETH. To attack the network, an attacker must acquire and control staked ETH. Therefore, the vault's security level is intrinsically tied to ETH's market value. Currently, the value of all staked ETH is only ~$72B, protecting ~$250B in assets—a dangerous imbalance. For robust security, the staked ETH securing the network should be valued significantly *higher* than the total value it protects. Applying a conservative security multiplier suggests ETH's fair value should be closer to ~$6,900 (vs. ~$2,070 currently). As on-chain asset value grows into the trillions, ETH's price must rise proportionally to maintain this security budget. Comparisons to free infrastructure like Linux or low-margin utilities like the DTCC are misguided. Their security is provided externally (community, law, banks). Ethereum's security is internal and must be purchased in the open market using ETH. ETH is not the clearinghouse; it is the collateral backing it. The model is not a short-term price predictor but a structural framework. The economic force for ETH appreciation grows monotonically with the adoption of Ethereum for settling value. The narrative that high fees are good is backwards; low fees enable more activity, which increases the value needing protection, thus demanding a more valuable ETH.

marsbit05/28 08:19

Reframing Ethereum's Valuation: Why the Fee Model is Wrong, and the 'Treasury Logic' is the Future?

marsbit05/28 08:19

Hash Global Founder: Why I Also Choose to Liquidate All My ETH Holdings?

Hash Global founder explains his decision to sell all ETH holdings, despite recognizing the potential regulatory clarity from the US CLARITY Act as a positive development. He argues against the narrative that such clarity would automatically grant ETH a "monetary premium" comparable to Bitcoin or gold. The core of his critique is that market valuation for ETH remains tied to fundamental network metrics—like mainnet revenue, DeFi activity, staking yield, and competition—rather than a pure store-of-value narrative. He contends that legal classification solves compliance issues for institutions but does not inherently create the deep, historical consensus required for monetary status. Furthermore, Ethereum's complexity and role as a multi-functional infrastructure asset (gas, collateral, settlement layer) work against the simple narrative needed for such a premium. Looking forward, he suggests that the rise of DeFi and tokenized real-world assets (RWA) will mean ETH is not the only yield-bearing asset; tokenized gold, treasuries, and others will also offer programmable yield. Thus, ETH's "yielding" advantage diminishes. He believes monetary premium will likely remain with Bitcoin, physical gold, and potentially tokenized gold, while ETH's value is more accurately framed as a crucial infrastructure asset. Ultimately, he views CLARITY's benefit as reducing a "regulatory discount" on ETH, not unlocking trillions in monetary re-rating. ETH's long-term value is significant but stems from its network effects, developer ecosystem, and role in on-chain finance—not from being a direct substitute for gold.

marsbit05/28 07:10

Hash Global Founder: Why I Also Choose to Liquidate All My ETH Holdings?

marsbit05/28 07:10

活动图片