# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Hedging

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Hedging", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

The Era of 'Passive Income' Ends: How Will Crypto Options Carry the Banner of Returns in 2026?

The "lazy yield" era in crypto is ending as traditional DeFi yields compress. Crypto options are poised to become a key financial instrument by 2026, driven by three trends: the decline of easy yields, the emergence of simplified "entry-level products" that abstract options into one-click interfaces, and institutional validation from acquisitions like Coinbase's $2.9 billion purchase of Deribit. While on-chain options currently represent a small fraction of crypto derivatives volume, the success of platforms like Polymarket—which processed $9 billion in 2024—shows strong retail demand for probabilistic betting. New protocols like Euphoria are radically simplifying options into intuitive, gamified experiences, hiding complexity behind sleek UIs. Simultaneously, advanced DeFi options protocols (e.g., Rysk, Derive, GammaSwap, Panoptic) are evolving to serve institutional needs—offering structured products, hedging tools, and capital-efficient strategies for DAOs, funds, and LPs. These platforms provide transparent, composable, and non-custodial options infrastructure. The market will likely bifurcate: a retail layer focused on abstracted, dopamine-driven applications and an institutional layer offering sophisticated risk management and yield strategies. As passive yields diminish, options are emerging as the next frontier for both speculative and defensive crypto finance.

marsbit01/02 00:05

The Era of 'Passive Income' Ends: How Will Crypto Options Carry the Banner of Returns in 2026?

marsbit01/02 00:05

Gold and Silver Repeatedly Hit New Highs, Why Has Bitcoin Fallen Instead of Rising?

In 2025, precious metals surged dramatically, with silver breaking above $50 and reaching a record high of $72/oz, gaining 143% annually, while gold hit $4,524.30/oz with a 70% yearly increase. In contrast, Bitcoin fell 8% year-to-date to $87,498, down 30% from its October peak of $126,000. This divergence challenges the "digital gold" narrative, as macro tailwinds driving metals—such as a weaker USD, Fed rate cut expectations, and geopolitical risks—did not extend to cryptocurrencies. Investors preferred established safe havens like gold and silver, with central banks and retail buyers increasing physical holdings. Studies confirmed gold's stability during macro shocks, while Bitcoin behaved more as a high-beta risk asset, correlating with equities. Structural demand differences widened the gap: silver benefited from both safe-haven and industrial demand (e.g., solar panels, electronics), whereas Bitcoin lacks real-world utility and relies solely on financial speculation and on-chain settlements. Without industrial demand, Bitcoin depends on ETF inflows, which have recently turned negative. Silver's rally reflects macro pricing of low real rates and a weak dollar, underscoring Bitcoin's exclusion from the hard asset system. For Bitcoin to recover, clearer regulation, renewed institutional interest, or heightened appreciation of its censorship-resistant features may be needed. However, silver's crowded positioning poses indirect risks to Bitcoin if volatility spikes. The 2025 divergence shows Bitcoin has not yet achieved "hard asset" status. While it may outperform under specific conditions, it currently lacks the institutional trust and industrial utility that support precious metals.

marsbit12/26 05:57

Gold and Silver Repeatedly Hit New Highs, Why Has Bitcoin Fallen Instead of Rising?

marsbit12/26 05:57

活动图片