# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Fintech

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Fintech", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

The U.S. Can No Longer Control Latin America, So They Took Maduro

US influence over Latin America is waning, as evidenced by the recent US military operation to extract Venezuelan President Maduro. For decades, the US maintained control through three key financial tools: debt, dollarization, and sanctions. In the 1980s, Latin America’s foreign debt reached 50% of GDP, but today it stands at just 20%, partly due to China’s rise as a major lender and trading partner since the 2000s. Countries like Brazil and Argentina used commodity-driven revenue to pay off IMF debts and reduce dependency. Dollarization, once a means of control, has evolved into “de-Americanized dollarization”—people use the dollar for stability but reject US political influence. Meanwhile, extreme sanctions, such as those imposed on Venezuela, backfired. Instead of crushing resistance, they spurred the growth of a parallel financial ecosystem. This new system includes: - Stablecoins like USDT, used for 80% of Venezuela’s oil revenue - Local fintech platforms (e.g., Brazil’s Pix and Nubank) serving millions - Non-dollar trade channels, such as currency swaps with China - A thriving underground economy and crypto markets US policies—like proposed taxes on remittances and Wall Street’s “de-risking”—have unintentionally accelerated this shift. As the US tightens control, dollar usage becomes more decentralized, echoing the historical decline of the British pound. The very tools meant to enforce dominance are now fueling its erosion.

marsbit01/05 04:03

The U.S. Can No Longer Control Latin America, So They Took Maduro

marsbit01/05 04:03

What Impact Does Interest-Bearing Digital Yuan Have on Hong Kong's Digital Finance?

China's digital yuan (e-CNY) has entered a new phase with the introduction of interest-bearing wallets starting January 2026, transitioning from a "digital cash" to a "digital deposit currency" model. This makes it the world’s first CBDC to pay interest to general users, fundamentally changing its legal nature from a central bank liability to a commercial bank liability, while still backed by sovereign credit. This innovation addresses a core challenge faced by global CBDC initiatives: avoiding financial disintermediation while promoting adoption. By allowing commercial banks to manage and profit from e-CNY deposits, China has turned a potential competitor into a integrated part of the banking system, creating sustainable incentives for adoption and enabling new monetary policy tools. For Hong Kong, interest-bearing e-CNY is transformative development. It enhances the city’s role as an offshore RMB hub by encouraging longer-term retention of digital yuan within its financial system, especially through platforms like mBridge. It also strengthens Hong Kong’s digital asset ecosystem by providing a high-credit settlement option for tokenized assets, enables new fintech innovations around programmable money, and complements—rather than competes with—Hong Kong’s own wholesale-focused digital Hong Kong dollar strategy. Together, these advances support Hong Kong’s ambition to become an international digital asset center.

marsbit01/01 08:12

What Impact Does Interest-Bearing Digital Yuan Have on Hong Kong's Digital Finance?

marsbit01/01 08:12

The 2026 Showdown: Will the Financial Super App Ultimately Belong to HOOD or COIN?

Coinbase and Robinhood are competing to build the ultimate financial super app, but with distinct strategies. Robinhood (HOOD) is creating an all-in-one platform for everyday financial life, targeting a young user base (75% under 44) with its digital banking features, Robinhood Gold subscription, and integrated services like stock trading, crypto, and a 3% cash-back card. It aims to capture the generational wealth transfer and keep users within its ecosystem. Coinbase (COIN) is building a crypto-native super app with recent updates like 24/5 commission-free stock trading, prediction markets via Kalshi, and a DEX aggregator. Beyond its user-facing app, Coinbase’s larger vision is to become the backend infrastructure for traditional finance (TradFi), offering crypto custody, stablecoin-as-a-service, and institutional solutions. Its revenue is diversifying, with 41% from subscriptions and services in Q3 2025. While both are expanding into each other’s territories—Robinhood with tokenized stocks and its own chain, Coinbase with extended trading hours and stock perps—their core visions differ: Robinhood wants to be the user’s financial home, and Coinbase aims to be the pipes powering the on-chain economy. Both face risks like costly incentives (HOOD) and stagnant user growth (COIN), and their stocks have seen significant rallies. The race in 2026 will test which foundation proves stronger.

marsbit12/31 07:15

The 2026 Showdown: Will the Financial Super App Ultimately Belong to HOOD or COIN?

marsbit12/31 07:15

Robinhood vs. Coinbase: The Final Showdown of Financial Super Apps in 2026

The article analyzes the escalating competition between Robinhood and Coinbase to become the dominant financial "super app" by 2026. Robinhood is building a traditional, all-in-one platform for managing personal banking, spending, and investing. Its strategy focuses on product aggregation, targeting a younger demographic with its Robinhood Gold subscription (offering a credit card, high-yield cash, and IRA matching). Its revenue is diversified across options, crypto (21%), and net interest income (35%). Coinbase is also building a super app but with a crypto-native approach and a dual strategy. It aims to be a front-end for users' on-chain and off-chain financial lives (with new stock trading, prediction markets, and a DEX aggregator) while simultaneously acting as the essential backend infrastructure for traditional finance (TradFi) institutions. Its "Crypto as a Service" platform, custody for major ETFs, and stablecoin services form a robust B2B revenue stream, with subscription services now making up 41% of its income. While both are encroaching on each other's territories with plans for 24/7 trading and prediction markets, their core visions differ. Robinhood bets on being the primary platform for the great wealth transfer to a younger generation. Coinbase bets on the broader migration of the global economy on-chain, positioning itself as the indispensable infrastructure provider. Both face risks: Robinhood's costly incentives and Coinbase's stagnant user growth. Ultimately, Robinhood aims to be the user's financial home, while Coinbase aims to be the pipes that power everyone else's.

比推12/30 20:42

Robinhood vs. Coinbase: The Final Showdown of Financial Super Apps in 2026

比推12/30 20:42

活动图片