# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Fees

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Fees", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Why I Am Not Bullish on Ethereum at Its Current State?

Why I'm Not Bullish on Ethereum at Current Prices The author expresses skepticism about Ethereum's current valuation, not its long-term business growth potential (user base and transaction volume are expected to increase). The author believes the price is too high relative to its fundamentals, based on the following analysis: - Active users and transaction counts have reached new highs but are growing slower than some leading e-commerce platforms. - Monthly transaction fees are only 0.6% of the previous cycle's peak, and average fees per transaction are 0.5% of previous highs. This slow growth comes at the cost of drastically reduced service prices, which is unfavorable in any industry. - If Ethereum is viewed as a company selling block space, its price-to-fee (PF) ratio exceeds 2,000x and its price-to-sales (PS) ratio exceeds 10,000x. It has negative net profit, so no P/E ratio exists. In comparison, traditional cloud service companies have P/E ratios of 20-30 and single-digit PS ratios. - If considered a commodity (like digital oil), Ethereum faces competition from other chains and rollups offering similar services. Its value proposition may not justify such a high premium, especially as its narrative as a store of value (like Bitcoin) has faded. - There is a lack of new, product-market-fit crypto native applications this cycle, leading to oversupply of block space and stagnant growth in the public chain sector. - Grand visions of Ethereum becoming a decentralized "Wall Street on-chain" lack supporting data and factual evidence. The author advocates for investment based on rationality, not belief or hype, and suggests waiting for concrete data before buying into this narrative.

marsbit01/19 09:08

Why I Am Not Bullish on Ethereum at Its Current State?

marsbit01/19 09:08

DeFi Gold Rush: 6 Metrics to Filter Out 90% of Shitcoins

Title: DeFi Gold Rush: 6 Key Metrics to Filter Out 90% of Low-Quality Projects This article explains how to evaluate crypto projects using on-chain fundamental metrics, a revolutionary advantage DeFi has over traditional finance. Unlike quarterly corporate reports, DeFi data is transparent, real-time, and publicly available on the blockchain. The author, drawing on four years of experience, including work with DefiLlama, outlines six core metrics: 1. **TVL (Total Value Locked):** The total value of assets deposited in a protocol. It's a measure of trust but should be analyzed alongside activity metrics as it's highly correlated with token prices. 2. **Fees, Revenue & Holders' Revenue:** *Fees* are the total amount users pay (gross revenue). *Revenue* is the portion of fees kept by the protocol (gross income). *Holders' Revenue* is the share distributed to token holders via buybacks or dividends. 3. **Volume:** Tracks trading activity on DEXs and perpetual exchanges. Market share trends within a category are often more insightful than absolute numbers. 4. **Open Interest:** The total value of unsettled derivative contracts, indicating liquidity on a platform. It can collapse quickly during market volatility. 5. **Stablecoin Market Cap:** The total value of stablecoins on a blockchain, representing real capital inflows into an ecosystem, unaffected by token price volatility. 6. **App Revenue & Fees:** The total fees and revenue generated by all applications on a blockchain, excluding stablecoins and gas. It acts as a "GDP" for a chain's economic activity. The article provides a three-step framework for analysis: 1. **Focus on sustained, stable growth** over time rather than short-term spikes. 2. **Track both stock metrics** (e.g., TVL, OI) and **flow metrics** (e.g., Fees, Volume) to get a complete picture of capital deposits and actual activity. 3. **Consider token unlocks and incentives**, as they create sell pressure. High revenue is less impressive if it's outweighed by token emissions. The key takeaway is that these on-chain fundamentals provide a powerful filter to identify valuable projects with real traction long before market narratives catch up.

marsbit01/08 13:08

DeFi Gold Rush: 6 Metrics to Filter Out 90% of Shitcoins

marsbit01/08 13:08

TVL, Trading Volume, Open Interest: How to Use DeFi Data to Find the Next Breakout Project?

Analyzing DeFi projects requires moving beyond hype and narratives to focus on on-chain fundamentals—a revolutionary advantage over traditional finance due to its real-time, transparent data. Key metrics include: - **TVL (Total Value Locked)**: Reflects assets deposited in a protocol, similar to AUM in TradFi, but should be combined with USD net inflows to distinguish actual deposits from price changes. - **Fees, Revenue, and Holder Revenue**: Fees are total user payments (gross revenue), revenue is the protocol’s share (gross income), and holder revenue is what token holders earn via dividends or buybacks. - **Volume**: Tracks trading activity on DEXs and perpetual exchanges, with market share trends often more meaningful than absolute numbers. - **Open Interest**: Measures active derivative positions, indicating liquidity and platform resilience during volatility. - **Stablecoin Market Cap**: Represents real USD capital flowing into a blockchain, a key indicator of ecosystem growth. - **App Revenue & Fees**: The "GDP" of a chain, showing economic activity excluding stablecoins and gas fees. Effective analysis prioritizes sustained growth over time, combines stock metrics (e.g., TVL) with flow metrics (e.g., fees), and accounts for token unlocks and incentives that may cause sell pressure. Platforms like DefiLlama provide real-time data to identify trends early, as seen with Polymarket and Hyperliquid’s growth before they peaked. Mastering these metrics helps cut through noise and spot genuinely valuable projects.

marsbit01/08 05:02

TVL, Trading Volume, Open Interest: How to Use DeFi Data to Find the Next Breakout Project?

marsbit01/08 05:02

Solana Users Beware: Your SOL Is Being Quietly Harvested in These Ways

A recent article titled "Payment for Order Flow on Solana" has exposed exploitative practices in Solana’s fee market, drawing widespread attention. Similar to traditional finance PFOF models—like Robinhood’s zero-commission trading—Solana applications are leveraging information asymmetry to extract hidden fees from users. Front-end apps and wallets control transaction routing, execution, and fee structures, creating multiple avenues for rent-seeking. These include selling user order flow to market makers, enabling toxic MEV strategies like sandwich attacks, and inflating priority fees and tips. Users—especially retail—are often overcharged due to fear of transaction failure, even when the network isn’t congested. Data shows significant fee disparities: for instance, Axiom users pay median priority fees 200x higher than those paid by high-frequency traders. Much of these excess fees are believed to be captured by the applications themselves, often through kickback arrangements with landing services like Jito. To address these issues, Solana is proposing protocol-level upgrades such as Multiple Concurrent Proposers (MCP) to reduce monopolistic control, Priority Ordering to ensure fair transaction ordering, and a Dynamic Base Fee mechanism to return fee pricing power to the protocol and users. These changes aim to create a more transparent and equitable market structure, essential for Solana’s long-term growth and credibility.

marsbit01/07 06:05

Solana Users Beware: Your SOL Is Being Quietly Harvested in These Ways

marsbit01/07 06:05

活动图片