# Сопутствующие статьи по теме DeFi

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "DeFi", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

When Hyperliquid Steals Solana's 'Internet Capital Markets' Playbook

The article discusses how Solana's grand vision of becoming an "Internet Capital Markets" platform is facing significant challenges in 2026, primarily from the unexpected rise of Hyperliquid. Solana's performance has weakened, with its token SOL experiencing the largest price decline among major cryptocurrencies. Its core narrative of building a global, chain-based marketplace for all assets is under pressure both internally and externally. Hyperliquid, originally a perpetual futures exchange, has evolved into a dedicated Layer 1 financial infrastructure network. Its focused, trading-centric approach is attracting capital and challenging the assumption that a "general-purpose" ecosystem like Solana is necessary for a capital market. Hyperliquid's success suggests that for high-frequency trading, superior performance, liquidity, and user experience may be more critical than a broad application ecosystem. Internally, Solana's strategy suffered a blow from a major hack on the Drift Protocol in April, resulting in over $200 million in losses. In response, Solana founder Anatoly Yakovenko has heavily promoted Phoenix as a new decentralized perpetual futures platform on Solana. While this boosted Phoenix's visibility, its trading volume remains far behind leading platforms. Solana's community has launched a rhetorical attack against Hyperliquid, questioning its decentralization due to its limited validator set and closed-source code. Critics, however, point out Solana's own decreasing validator count and increasing centralization of stake. This focus on "decentralization metrics" has also caused internal friction, with other Solana ecosystem developers expressing discontent over the foundation's perceived favoritism towards Phoenix. The article concludes that the rise of Hyperliquid represents a challenge to the "general-purpose blockchain" narrative, proving that an efficient trading engine might be more central to a capital market than a vast ecosystem. If Solana cannot regain dominance in the derivatives space, it risks remaining a "meme coin paradise" rather than achieving its ambition of hosting global assets.

链捕手05/19 15:00

When Hyperliquid Steals Solana's 'Internet Capital Markets' Playbook

链捕手05/19 15:00

Following the KelpDAO Hack: $40 Billion in Assets Flee LayerZero, Chainlink Emerges as the Primary 'Beneficiary'

Following a major security breach in April where KelpDAO's bridge using LayerZero was attacked for approximately $292 million, a significant shift is underway in the cross-chain infrastructure landscape. An estimated $40 billion in assets is in the process of migrating or has already migrated from LayerZero to Chainlink's Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP). The attack exploited a single-point-of-failure vulnerability due to KelpDAO's 1-of-1 validator configuration within the LayerZero network. Attackers corrupted RPC nodes and used DDoS attacks to force the system to rely on compromised nodes, allowing fraudulent messages. While LayerZero acknowledged a serious error in allowing its validator network to service high-value transactions with such a configuration, the incident highlighted critical security risks. This triggered a rapid migration wave. Starting with KelpDAO on May 6th, several major protocols—including Solv Protocol, Re, Tydro, Kraken, and Lombard—announced switching their cross-chain infrastructure exclusively to Chainlink CCIP. The combined value of these migrations is estimated to be around $40 billion. This movement followed earlier major adoptions by Coinbase (in late 2025) and Circle (in early 2024). Market sentiment reflected this shift, with LINK's price showing relative stability while ZRO (LayerZero's token) declined significantly. Data indicates a net outflow of approximately $20.1 billion from the LayerZero network over 30 days. The migration is largely driven by perceived security differences. Chainlink CCIP employs a decentralized oracle network as its default consensus layer, featuring multiple independent node operators, a separate Risk Management Network, and built-in safeguards like rate limits. In contrast, LayerZero's highly modular architecture offers flexibility but places more responsibility on application developers to configure security settings, a risk underscored by the KelpDAO incident. LayerZero has since apologized for its communication handling post-attack and stated the protocol itself was not compromised, but rather its Labs DVN's internal RPC was poisoned. An official post-mortem report with external security partners is forthcoming.

marsbit05/19 08:10

Following the KelpDAO Hack: $40 Billion in Assets Flee LayerZero, Chainlink Emerges as the Primary 'Beneficiary'

marsbit05/19 08:10

Why is the RWA Boom Failing to Benefit DeFi?

The rapid growth of the tokenized real-world assets (RWA) market, now nearing $30 billion on-chain, has largely bypassed the DeFi ecosystem. Only about $2.47 billion is actively locked in DeFi protocols, indicating a penetration rate of just 9%. A major barrier is the "permissioned" architecture of most RWA products, like BlackRock's BUIDL fund, which are designed for institutional compliance. They require whitelisting, off-chain settlement, and strict investor accreditation, making them incompatible with open, permissionless DeFi applications like Aave or Uniswap. This is evident in categories like bonds/money market funds ($16.6B on-chain, $920M in DeFi) and tokenized equities ($2.7B on-chain, $78M in DeFi). Notable exceptions are private credit protocols (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge) and assets like Ondo's USDY, which were designed from inception for DeFi composability, allowing them to be used freely as collateral. Morpho and Aave Horizon also demonstrate successful RWA lending integrations. However, industry reports (IOSCO, ECB) warn that growth may remain confined within traditional financial systems due to fragmented regulations, lack of unified standards, and inherent conflicts between DeFi's open logic and compliance requirements like minimum investments and fixed redemption windows. The RWA sector is effectively split into two markets: a compliant, permissioned on-chain finance market and a smaller DeFi-native market focused on composability. For DeFi penetration to rise significantly, asset issuers must prioritize designs that enable permissionless circulation from the start, moving away from models centered solely on institutional compliance.

marsbit05/19 07:31

Why is the RWA Boom Failing to Benefit DeFi?

marsbit05/19 07:31

Clarity Act Outlook: No Yield, No Payment

"Clear Act Outlook: No Yield, No Payment" analyzes the evolving U.S. regulatory landscape for stablecoins, focusing on the interplay between the proposed "Clarity Act" and the existing "Genius Act." The article argues that the Genius Act successfully fostered "payment stablecoins" by permitting tokenized assets like U.S. Treasuries as reserves. This created a structured market where stablecoin issuers (like USDC) must hold these reserves, often purchased as Tokenized Money Market Funds (TMMFs) from giants like BlackRock. These TMMFs are primarily B2B products, ensuring user-facing stablecoins remain non-interest-bearing and used primarily for payments. The upcoming Clarity Act is seen as the next phase, aiming to restrict passive yield on stablecoins. Its goal is to dismantle the arbitrage advantage of offshore stablecoins like USDT by redirecting Treasury demand towards compliant, U.S.-sanctioned TMMFs. For on-chain and compliant offshore dollars, this creates new pressure: they must spur adoption and utility to generate yield, as simple Treasury staking may be restricted. This indirectly promotes dollar circulation and sustained Treasury purchases. Ultimately, the analysis posits that U.S. regulation seeks to create a new dollar distribution model. By separating payment function from yield generation and anchoring both to U.S. debt instruments, it aims to embed the dollar and Treasury demand into the global crypto economy, managing yields through sanctioned intermediaries while leaving room for DeFi and cross-border arbitrage.

marsbit05/19 07:02

Clarity Act Outlook: No Yield, No Payment

marsbit05/19 07:02

Deconstructing the Real Risks of DeFi Lending: Annual Loss Rate Only 0.03%

Deconstructing the true risks of DeFi lending reveals an annual loss rate of only 0.03% from hacks and exploits. Analysis of DeFi Llama data (excluding cross-chain bridge incidents) for EVM and Solana lending protocols shows that despite high historical attack frequency due to concentrated assets, the sector's security has matured significantly. Over the past year, non-cross-chain lending on these chains saw gross losses of $309M, with net losses after recoveries at $301M. Against a daily average TVL of $99.6B, this translates to a minimal annualized loss rate of approximately 0.03%. The Euler Finance case in 2023, where $197M was fully recovered, exemplifies improving asset recovery capabilities, which now account for roughly 20% of losses in this sector. Loss events follow a log-normal distribution: most are small-scale, with catastrophic losses being rare outliers. This pattern, combined with the massive scale of the total lending market, means single incidents rarely impact the broader ecosystem. It underscores the effectiveness of portfolio diversification and provides a basis for sustainable insurance models. The data indicates DeFi lending has entered a mature phase where risks are quantifiable, categorized, and manageable. The actual financial loss relative to the total capital deployed is extremely low, challenging prevailing narratives of systemic risk.

marsbit05/19 02:15

Deconstructing the Real Risks of DeFi Lending: Annual Loss Rate Only 0.03%

marsbit05/19 02:15

SEC Issues Licenses for 'Wild Tokenized Stocks': A Revolution Where Listed Companies Are Stripped of Veto Power

The US SEC is reportedly set to release an "Innovation Exemption" framework, potentially allowing tokenized versions of publicly traded stocks (like Tesla or Apple) to be issued and traded on-chain without the consent of the underlying companies. This marks a significant shift from the controversy in July 2025, when Robinhood faced backlash for offering tokens linked to unlisted companies like OpenAI without their approval. The SEC's move likely legitimizes two tokenization models: "custodied certificates" where a third-party custodian holds the actual stock, and "synthetic" derivatives tracking stock prices—both operating without issuer permission. This could benefit on-chain brokers, DEXs, and RWA protocols by enabling 24/7 global trading, while concerning listed companies who lose control over secondary markets and traditional intermediaries like the DTCC. Key unresolved questions remain, such as investor eligibility (retail vs. accredited), cross-border regulatory alignment with frameworks like MiCA, legal protections for issuers if sued, and whether the 12-36 month sandbox will become permanent. This development could accelerate the migration of the world's largest asset class onto blockchain, fundamentally rewriting equity trading paradigms, though real liquidity for tokenized stocks has so far been limited.

marsbit05/19 01:37

SEC Issues Licenses for 'Wild Tokenized Stocks': A Revolution Where Listed Companies Are Stripped of Veto Power

marsbit05/19 01:37

"JUST 6th Anniversary x GasFree Super Carnival Month" Grandly Arrives: Enjoy "0" Gas Transfer Freedom & Share the 10,000 USDT Bonus Pool

The "JUST 6th Anniversary x GasFree Super Carnival Month" event has launched, celebrating the JUST ecosystem's six-year milestone within the TRON network. Running from May 18th to June 7th, the event features a 10,000 USDT prize pool and is designed to promote the GasFree smart wallet. GasFree, a key product of the JustLend DAO protocol, allows users to pay transaction fees directly with the token being transferred (e.g., USDT), eliminating the need to hold the network's native token (TRX) for gas. This innovation aims to simplify on-chain transactions and lower the entry barrier for new users. The carnival offers five main activities: 1. **GasFree Activation Challenge:** New users can earn random rewards (5.2-522 USDT) for activating GasFree and completing their first transfer. 2. **Transfer Rebate:** 200 users daily are randomly selected to receive a 100% rebate on their activation and transaction fees. 3. **Bitcoin Pizza Day Special:** A dedicated event with custom rewards to celebrate crypto culture. 4. **JUST 6th Anniversary Lucky Draw:** Special anniversary reward packages for lucky participants. 5. **Knowledge Quiz:** A trivia contest where users can win prizes by answering questions about JUST and GasFree. To participate, users need a compatible wallet like TronLink (recommended), Klever, Guarda, or NOW Wallet. They must then find the GasFree feature, fund it with USDT, and complete at least one USDT transfer to qualify for the rewards. The article highlights GasFree's significant adoption, reporting over 872 billion USD in cumulative transaction volume and more than 612 million USD in saved user fees since its launch. The event underscores JUST's commitment to enhancing the DeFi user experience by making on-chain interactions more accessible and cost-effective.

链捕手05/18 14:42

"JUST 6th Anniversary x GasFree Super Carnival Month" Grandly Arrives: Enjoy "0" Gas Transfer Freedom & Share the 10,000 USDT Bonus Pool

链捕手05/18 14:42

Meme Wrapped Contracts: Is alt.fun Real Innovation or a Pseudo-Need?

A new platform called alt.fun on Hyperliquid has gained attention by merging meme coin creation with leveraged futures trading. Unlike typical meme platforms like Pump.fun, alt.fun requires creators to select an underlying asset (like HYPE or S&P 500) and a leverage level (2x, 3x, or 5x) to take a long or short position. The issued meme token is directly linked to a corresponding leveraged token (LT) on BounceTech, which represents that perpetual contract position. This means the token's price is driven by both the standard bonding curve (community buying/selling) and the performance of its leveraged underlying asset, allowing value to increase even without new purchases. The platform's "graduation" to a DEX pool requires a市值 of $9,000, achievable through market demand or underlying asset growth. While this mechanism can amplify gains in trending markets, it also introduces significant risks from asset volatility, leverage decay during rebalancing, and potential liquidation during sharp price moves. Despite early traction—with its top token ALT reaching an $8.8M market cap—alt.fun faces challenges. Its limited selection of 14 underlying assets constrains variety, leading to tokens with identical financial profiles. More fundamentally, critics argue it misunderstands the meme coin ethos: its tokens are primarily financial instruments tied to asset performance, lacking the community-driven narratives and cultural appeal essential for sustaining meme coin value. The article concludes that while mechanically innovative, alt.fun may be better suited as a niche DeFi product than a true meme platform.

marsbit05/18 12:45

Meme Wrapped Contracts: Is alt.fun Real Innovation or a Pseudo-Need?

marsbit05/18 12:45

Meme Wrapped Contracts: Is alt.fun Real Innovation or Pseudo-Demand?

"Last week, the new Meme token launch platform alt.fun on Hyperliquid gained significant attention. Its flagship token ALT reached a peak market cap of $8.8 million. The platform's novelty lies in combining the mechanics of Pump.fun with leveraged trading on Hyperliquid. When a user creates a Meme token on alt.fun, they must also open a leveraged long/short position (2x, 3x, or 5x) on an underlying asset like HYPE. The platform then mints a corresponding leveraged token (LT) on BounceTech, which represents that perpetual contract position. Essentially, users are trading a tokenized derivative. This creates a dual price driver: the token's value is influenced both by market buying/selling via a bonding curve and by the performance of its underlying leveraged position. Hence the slogan: 'Your token pumps even when nobody's buying.' Tokens 'graduate' to a liquidity pool when their market cap (effectively the LT's value) reaches $9,000, achievable through either mechanism. However, this model faces key challenges. Gains are amplified only in strong, one-directional markets for the underlying asset. In volatile conditions, the mandatory 'rebalancing' of LTs leads to value decay. More fundamentally, alt.fun struggles to foster the community consensus vital for Meme tokens. Investment is driven primarily by price speculation on the underlying asset, not by narrative or cultural appeal. With limited underlying assets, token differentiation is low. The article concludes that while mechanically innovative, alt.fun may be better suited as a DeFi platform than a true Meme launchpad, as its core product lacks the community-driven essence of successful Memes."

Odaily星球日报05/18 12:41

Meme Wrapped Contracts: Is alt.fun Real Innovation or Pseudo-Demand?

Odaily星球日报05/18 12:41

Perspective: Tokens on alt.fun are double-layered leverage

**Title:** Tokens on alt.fun are Double-Layered Leverage **Summary:** Tokens on alt.fun (like ALT) are not simple 5x leveraged bets on HYPE. Instead, they represent a **double layer of leverage**. The core mechanism involves HyperSwap V2 pools. After "graduation," these tokens are paired not with USDC, but with **HYPE5L**—a 5x long leverage token (LT) issued by BounceTech that tracks HYPE. Therefore, an alt.fun token's price in USDC is determined by multiplying two independent factors: 1. **AMM Exchange Rate:** The pool's ratio between the alt token and HYPE5L, driven by trading activity on alt.fun. 2. **LT Net Asset Value (NAV):** HYPE5L's value, which moves at approximately 5x the daily return of HYPE. This creates a compounding effect: * If HYPE rises 1%, HYPE5L's NAV rises ~5%. Profit-taking HYPE5L holders may then buy alt tokens, increasing demand and pushing the AMM exchange rate higher. The alt token's total gain thus exceeds 5%, potentially reaching 8-15%. * Conversely, if HYPE falls, losses are amplified beyond 5x due to combined NAV decline and AMM selling pressure. During crashes, large sell orders may fail due to non-atomic redemption paths, potentially trapping later sellers. In contrast, platforms like pump.fun pair tokens with stable assets like SOL, applying only the AMM amplifier to a 1x underlying asset. Alt.fun's use of a pre-leveraged quote asset (HYPE5L) fundamentally shifts the risk profile, creating a **second-order product with floating, often higher, effective leverage (typically 8-15x)** that is not clearly communicated in the interface. This results in amplified gains in strong trends but significantly magnified losses and unique liquidity risks during downturns.

marsbit05/18 10:16

Perspective: Tokens on alt.fun are double-layered leverage