# Сопутствующие статьи по теме CFTC

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "CFTC", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

U.S. Crypto Regulatory 'Civil War' Ceasefire: A Turning Point in the Decade-Long Power Struggle Between SEC and CFTC

For over a decade, the U.S. cryptocurrency industry has operated under regulatory uncertainty, with two key questions unresolved: what exactly are crypto assets, and which agency should regulate them? The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have long held overlapping and conflicting claims over crypto oversight, creating a "regulatory fog" that hindered innovation and pushed businesses to more predictable jurisdictions. Recently, signs of change have emerged. The SEC introduced a new classification framework in November 2025, categorizing digital assets into four types—digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, and tokenized securities—acknowledging that not all crypto assets are securities. More significantly, the SEC and CFTC signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to enhance coordination in areas like crypto regulation, investor protection, and federal policy. Although non-binding, the MOU signals a move toward resolving jurisdictional conflicts and creating an "adaptive regulatory framework" tailored to digital assets. This shift is partly a response to global competition, as other financial centers develop clearer crypto regulations. Additionally, the growing integration of crypto with traditional finance—through stablecoins and real-world asset tokenization—demands a more structured regulatory approach. If successful, these efforts may lead to a unified federal framework, ending long-standing ambiguities and positioning the U.S. to better compete in the evolving digital financial landscape.

marsbit03/13 10:54

U.S. Crypto Regulatory 'Civil War' Ceasefire: A Turning Point in the Decade-Long Power Struggle Between SEC and CFTC

marsbit03/13 10:54

A New Round Every 5 Minutes: Polymarket Is Stealing the Futures Trading Platform Business

A friend who used to trade perpetual contracts has switched to a "cleaner" form of speculation: Polymarket’s 5-minute Bitcoin price prediction markets. Here, users buy “Yes” or “No” shares on whether Bitcoin’s price will be higher after 5 minutes. A $10 bet on “Yes” returns $100 if correct; if wrong, the user loses only the $10 stake—no liquidation, funding fees, or sudden price spikes causing unexpected losses. This product has quickly gained traction. Within a month of launch, daily trading volume reached over $60 million, accounting for 67% of all crypto directional predictions on Polymarket. The market runs 24/7, with a new 5-minute round starting every five minutes. The appeal lies in its simplicity and transparency. Unlike perpetual contracts, where leverage can lead to rapid liquidations and complex fee structures, the 5-minute market offers capped risk and instant outcomes. It attracts users looking for high-frequency, low-barrier, and instant-result speculation. Polymarket operates on a conditional token framework (CTF) on Polygon, with prices settled via Chainlink Data Streams. To prevent latency arbitrage, it uses dynamic fees: higher when market probability nears 50% (max uncertainty), lower when outcomes are clearer. Twenty percent of fees are rebated to market makers to improve liquidity. However, AI trading bots are active, with some developers claiming over 80% win rates by leveraging vast amounts of intraday data. Polymarket has partnered with Palantir and TWG AI to monitor trading and detect market abuse, creating an AI-vs-AI dynamic. Major exchanges are responding by integrating prediction markets. Binance launched Opinion (OPN), Coinbase integrated Kalshi, and Gemini built its own predictions platform after securing a CFTC license. Kalshi’s integration with Robinhood helped its annual volume surge from $300 million to $23.8 billion, showing the power of distribution. Regulatory challenges remain. In the U.S., the CFTC claims jurisdiction over prediction contracts as swaps, while many states treat them as gambling and have sued or banned platforms. Similar conflicts exist in the EU and Asia, where some countries outright ban such platforms. In summary, Polymarket’s success shows that many users prefer simple, high-frequency outcome-based speculation over complex leveraged products. As exchanges rush to adopt similar offerings, regulatory uncertainty persists, but user adoption continues to grow.

marsbit03/13 09:44

A New Round Every 5 Minutes: Polymarket Is Stealing the Futures Trading Platform Business

marsbit03/13 09:44

How Much Money Has Kalshi Actually Made? Deconstructing the Prediction Market Business Behind 200 Million Trades

In this analysis of Kalshi, a leading prediction market platform, the author examines its business model, transaction data, and regulatory landscape. By accessing Kalshi’s public API, the study reveals that the platform has processed over 203 million transactions with a total volume exceeding $41.7 billion. More than 82% of this volume comes from sports betting, positioning Kalshi as a de facto sports gambling platform accessible to users as young as 18. The platform operates a central limit order book (CLOB) where users trade binary contracts that settle at either $1 (if the event occurs) or $0 (if it does not). Kalshi generates revenue through a variable fee structure: Takers pay a fee based on the formula 0.07 × C × P × (1-P), where C is the number of contracts and P is the price, while Makers pay a quarter of that rate. Total fee income amounts to $545.6 million. Kalshi ecosystem includes markets, events, and series, with major volumes driven by events like the 2024 U.S. presidential election and Super Bowl outcomes. The platform’s fee model is compared to traditional sportsbooks, highlighting how its variable structure adapts to implied probability. Regulatory oversight falls under the CFTC, though enforcement remains limited, creating a grey area that allows Kalshi to operate with fewer restrictions than conventional gambling platforms. The analysis also touches on market结算 practices, liquidity incentives, and the broader context of prediction markets, including competitors like Polymarket and regulatory cases such as PredictIt’s legal battle with the CFTC.

marsbit03/13 04:30

How Much Money Has Kalshi Actually Made? Deconstructing the Prediction Market Business Behind 200 Million Trades

marsbit03/13 04:30

Trading Everything, Never Closing: RWA Perpetual Contracts — The Final Piece of DeFi Devouring Wall Street (Part 2)

This article explores the emergence and implications of Real World Asset (RWA) Perpetual Contracts (Perps) in DeFi, focusing on their potential to bridge traditional and decentralized finance. It analyzes key projects, contrasting two primary architectural models: the order book-based system, exemplified by Hyperliquid's HIP-3 ecosystem (e.g., Trade.xyz), and the oracle-priced liquidity pool model used by protocols like Ostium. The former prioritizes 24/7 market-driven pricing with oracles for risk management, while the latter favors accuracy and safety by pausing trading during market closures. A significant portion is dedicated to the regulatory landscape, particularly in the US. The analysis highlights the legal barrier of the "Shad-Johnson agreement," which subjects equity-based derivatives to dual SEC and CFTC jurisdiction, effectively blocking compliant retail single-stock perps. This creates a window of opportunity for offshore markets operating under Regulation S exemptions. The article proposes a symbiotic "CFD Broker + RWA Perps Dex" model for growth, where DeFi protocols act as back-end clearing engines for traditional brokers handling front-end compliance and user acquisition. Finally, it examines the external variable of traditional exchanges like NYSE planning their own 24/7 trading platforms. While this could erode DeFi's current monopoly on continuous trading and provide better underlying price feeds, it also forces DeFi to compete on different strengths like higher leverage, permissionless access, and superior capital efficiency. The conclusion posits that RWA Perps represent a fundamental restructuring of global leverage markets, evolving into a high-speed execution layer atop regulated traditional finance.

marsbit03/12 03:41

Trading Everything, Never Closing: RWA Perpetual Contracts — The Final Piece of DeFi Devouring Wall Street (Part 2)

marsbit03/12 03:41

活动图片