Solana price consolidates in KEY range: Could SOL fall under $50?

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-04-10Обновлено 2026-04-10

Введение

Solana (SOL) has been consolidating within a $78–$92 range since early February, following a sharp drop on March 5. Despite brief attempts to rise above the 50-day moving average (currently at $85.43), SOL has consistently failed to sustain above it since November 2025. This pattern has repeated multiple times, with each consolidation below the 50-day MA followed by a significant sell-off. Analysts suggest that if SOL remains unable to reclaim and hold above this key level, another downward move is likely. The long-term bearish outlook remains, with expectations that SOL could eventually fall below $50, especially after the rejection of the $95.26 resistance level in March.

Solana [SOL] has been trading within a range, for the most part, since the early February crash. This range reached from $78 to $92 and also represented a volatile day of trading that saw SOL drop from $92 to $78 on the 5th of March.

Source: SOL/USDT on TradingView

The fact that the price action has mostly been contained within this 1-day candlestick since then indicates a consolidation underway. Yet, this consolidation can have a few surprises left for the bulls.

Here’s why the next major SOL sell-off could be brewing

In a post on X, crypto analyst Ali Martinez pointed out why the 50-day Moving Average (MA) is important to the long-term Solana price trends. The analyst noted a pattern in play since November 2025, where SOL prices appeared to reclaim the 50-day MA, but were unable to do so for more than a short while.

A consolidation period under the 50-day MA, which was at $85.43 as of writing, has been succeeded by a sell-off since November 2025. The current consolidation could turn into another such bearish rout. This puts the range formation on the 1-day chart from earlier into context. It might not be the market participants testing out the local lows and establishing key demand zones.

Instead, Solana prices might be coiling before another southward expansion. The longer SOL remains unable to reclaim the 50-day MA and stay above it, the more likely such a sell-off would be, based on the past few months of price action.

This also ties in well with the long-term Solana trend expectations. AMBCrypto had reported in February that the $47.9 level was the next projected long-term price target. This was based on the weekly structure.

Source: SOL/USDT on TradingView

The higher timeframe bearish bias remained firm. The retest of the 2025 lows at $95.26 as resistance in March and the subsequent rejection solidified the claim that SOL would fall below the $50 round number level later in 2026.


Final Summary

  • SOL reclaimed the 50-day moving average briefly before falling below this dynamic support once more.
  • This pattern has occurred for the third time since November 2025. The previous two occurrences were followed by consolidation and a strong sell-off.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the key price range for Solana (SOL) mentioned in the article?

AThe key price range for Solana is between $78 and $92.

QAccording to analyst Ali Martinez, what technical indicator is crucial for Solana's long-term price trend?

AThe 50-day Moving Average (MA) is the crucial technical indicator for Solana's long-term price trend.

QWhat pattern has been observed with SOL's price and the 50-day MA since November 2025?

ASince November 2025, SOL price has repeatedly reclaimed the 50-day MA only to fall back below it after a short period, a pattern followed by consolidation and a strong sell-off.

QWhat is the projected long-term price target for SOL based on the weekly structure?

AThe projected long-term price target for SOL is $47.9.

QWhat event in March solidified the bearish bias for Solana's higher timeframe?

AThe retest of the 2025 lows at $95.26 as resistance and the subsequent rejection in March solidified the higher timeframe bearish bias.

Похожее

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

Titled "ETH Bull and Bear Views: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?", this article synthesizes the current heated debate around Ethereum's native token, ETH, following Bankless co-founder David Hoffman's decision to sell his entire ETH holdings. The **bullish case**, represented by figures like Tom Lee (BitMine CEO) and Raoul Pal, argues that ETH's core thesis remains intact. They contend Ethereum is the essential, secure, and neutral foundational layer for future finance—encompassing stablecoins, RWA, DeFi, L2s, and Agentic AI. Bulls bet on ETH's long-term revaluation as institutional adoption of on-chain finance grows, with significant buying activity from entities like BitMine and Consensys cited as evidence. Conversely, the **bearish perspective**, led by Hoffman and analysts like Markus Thielen, questions ETH's value capture mechanism. They acknowledge Ethereum's network success but argue that the value created by L2s, DeFi, and applications does not sufficiently accrue to the ETH token itself. Bears point to ETH's prolonged underperformance versus the broader crypto market, lack of traditional cash flows, weakening "ultrasound money" narrative, and apparent institutional retreat (e.g., Harvard Management Company exiting its ETH ETF position) as key concerns. The debate highlights a pivotal shift: ETH is no longer just a community belief asset. The central question is whether ETH can transition from being a "**used infrastructure**" to a "**continuously bought and held core asset**" as more value enters the Ethereum ecosystem. The market is now critically examining the direct link between network growth and ETH's value.

marsbit6 мин. назад

ETH Bull and Bear Views Compilation: Can Ethereum's Value Flow Back to ETH?

marsbit6 мин. назад

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

The crypto industry is shifting from a focus on creating native assets (like altcoins and protocol tokens) to becoming a "global asset pipeline." Native cryptocurrencies, except for Bitcoin, are seen as failing in their value storage and utility promises, with demand driven largely by speculation. Attention and liquidity are now moving toward real-world assets (RWAs) like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil traded on-chain via perpetual contracts (Perps). Stablecoins like USDT and USDC set the precedent, proving blockchain's core strength is efficient global settlement and transfer, not inventing new monetary systems. Meanwhile, assets like Ethereum and many DeFi tokens struggle as their narratives weaken against tangible traditional assets and the rapid real-world progress of AI. Perpetual contracts have emerged as a pivotal innovation. They simplify trading by offering pure price exposure to any asset, bypassing complexities of ownership, custody, and traditional market hours. Projects like Hyperliquid gained traction by combining CEX-like efficiency with on-chain transparency, capitalizing on post-FTX distrust, macroeconomic volatility, and the surge in demand for 24/7 stock trading. In conclusion, while the era of speculative native "crypto assets" may be over, perpetual contracts persist as the industry's most potent financial instrument—transforming all assets into globally accessible, constantly tradable instruments centered on price speculation.

marsbit12 мин. назад

Crypto is dead, Perps are forever

marsbit12 мин. назад

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

Skill is becoming a key concept in the AI field, essentially serving as a structured "instruction manual" for AI Agents that specifies tool calls, decision logic, and output standards. This allows Agents to execute predefined tasks. As the number of Skills grows, distribution platforms have emerged. Major tech companies are swiftly entering this space. In March, Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance launched Skill stores within their respective Agent platforms. Subsequently, players like Zhipu AI, Meituan, and Xiaohongshu joined the fray. This competition for the "Skill store" is fundamentally a battle for the AI-era user entry point; whoever controls distribution controls the users. While ByteDance's Coze has experimented with paid Skills, most platforms offer them for free. The real value lies not in the stores themselves but in using them to attract and retain users within an ecosystem, driving revenue from services like cloud computing, model calls, or advertising. The landscape features three main player types: 1) **Internet giants** (e.g., Alibaba, ByteDance, Tencent, Meituan), leveraging Skills to drive traffic and monetize through their broader ecosystems (cloud services, transactions, ads). 2) **Large model companies** (e.g., Zhipu AI, Moonshot AI), using Skill stores to increase user engagement and monetize model API calls. 3) **Content platforms** (e.g., Xiaohongshu), treating Skills as a new content format to generate traffic and ad revenue. However, transforming Skill stores into a sustainable business faces significant hurdles. Key challenges include: the **difficulty in pricing Skills** due to inconsistent outputs across different models and contexts; **lack of cost transparency** (varying token consumption); **security risks** like Skill poisoning; and the **absence of standardized protocols** for development and evaluation. Unlike standardized mobile apps, Skills are often personalized workflows resistant to uniformity, which hinders the establishment of a reliable review and monetization system akin to the App Store. While there is genuine user demand for paid Skills—particularly in enterprise (e.g., contract review) and certain personal productivity scenarios—current platforms offer developers limited and unpredictable distribution. The future of Skill stores depends on overcoming these standardization, evaluation, and safety challenges to make acquiring a Skill as straightforward as downloading an app. For now, the stores function more as display shelves than robust marketplaces.

marsbit12 мин. назад

Tencent, Alibaba, ByteDance in a Battle for the Skill Store

marsbit12 мин. назад

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

The crypto industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. The era defined by minting novel, native digital assets (altcoins) is fading. These assets, lacking real-world cash flows or clear value, are losing relevance as attention and capital flow elsewhere. Two powerful external forces are reshaping the space. First, traditional assets like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil are being tokenized and traded on-chain. Second, the explosive growth of AI, with its tangible products, has overshadowed crypto's once-dominant "future narrative." This marks a critical pivot: crypto is transitioning from being a "factory for new assets" to becoming a "global conduit for existing assets." Its validated utility is not complex financial reinvention but efficient global settlement, transfer, and trading—the original promise of blockchain. Stablecoins like USDT and USDC exemplify this, offering faster dollar movement rather than replacing it. Consequently, native ecosystems like Ethereum face profound challenges. While still crucial infrastructure, ETH struggles to capture value as users interact with Layer 2s or trade traditional assets without needing to hold it. DeFi's grand narrative of rebuilding finance has narrowed to core needs like cheap transfers and deep liquidity. The true breakout innovation is the perpetual contract (Perp). It brilliantly bypasses the complexities of direct asset ownership (custody, compliance, dividends) by creating pure price exposure. Users can speculate on the price movement of *any* asset—NVIDIA, gold, oil—24/7, globally, and with leverage. This "price casino" model, while risky and ethically fraught, delivers unmatched liquidity and accessibility. Projects like Hyperliquid succeeded not by inventing new mechanics but by perfecting the timing and execution of this model. Key drivers included making on-chain Perps feel like centralized exchanges, post-FTX trust migration towards transparency, and rising demand to trade macro assets and equities round-the-clock. In conclusion, the crypto world's most enduring successes are the dollar (via stablecoins), Bitcoin, and trading. Its new frontier is not creating alternative assets but providing a seamless, perpetual trading layer—a new API—for the world's existing financial system. The age of native altcoins is over; the age of perpetual synthetic exposure has begun.

Odaily星球日报21 мин. назад

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

Odaily星球日报21 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на SOL (SOL) представлены ниже.

活动图片