Pump.fun Launches Trader Cashbacks in Fee Model Shift

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-18Обновлено 2026-02-18

Введение

Solana-based memecoin launchpad Pump.fun has introduced a new Trader Cashback system, shifting its fee model. Token creators must now choose between the traditional Creator Fees or the new cashback option before launch, a decision that is irreversible. Under the cashback model, traders earn automatic rewards on every trade made through Pump.fun's Terminal interface, aiming to better distribute incentives and reward active market participants rather than just deployers. This change comes as the platform experiences a significant revenue decline, with fees dropping 75.6% in January from its peak. On-chain data highlights a profitability disparity, as only a small fraction of the millions of interacting wallets have earned substantial profits. The community reaction is mixed; some welcome the trader-focused incentives, while others worry it may reduce developer promotion post-launch. This move reflects a broader industry trend of platforms testing new incentive models to boost participation and confidence in the volatile memecoin market.

Solana-based memecoin launchpad Pump.fun has introduced a new trader-focused rewards system that reshapes its fee model. The platform now allows token creators to choose between traditional Creator Fees or a new Trader Cashback structure before launching a coin. Once selected, creators cannot reverse the decision.

Pump.fun originally rewarded token deployers with 0.3% of all fees generated by their coins. That model fueled rapid growth and helped the platform generate more than $15 million in daily fees at its peak. However, critics argued that the system favored deployers while most retail traders absorbed losses.

Trader Cashback Model Takes Center Stage

Under the new framework, creators must decide whether their token qualifies for Creator Fees or should operate as a “Cashback Coin.” If creators select the Trader Cashback option, traders earn rewards on every trade executed through Terminal, Pump.fun’s built-in trading interface.

Terminal generates cashback rewards automatically and makes them accessible within the platform. According to Pump.fun, this change brings about a more balanced distribution of incentives, particularly for successful tokens that do not have organized teams or development plans.

The company noted that many viral memecoins gain traction organically. In this regard, the Creator Fees might end up favoring the deployers who do not contribute much to the process. The new system tries to shift the incentives to the people who are actively participating in the market.

Platform Revenue Faces Sharp Decline

The new system is being introduced at a time when the platform revenue is experiencing a drastic drop. Pump.fun has seen a 75.6% drop in its fees to $31.8 million in January, compared to the $148.1 million it saw in January 2025, which is its best month so far. February has brought in $15.6 million so far, putting the platform on track to underperform January’s total.

On-chain data reveals another challenge. Dune Analytics shows that out of 58.7 million wallets that interacted with Pump.fun, only 4.76 million wallets earned between $1,000 and $10,000. Fewer than 13,700 wallets reached millionaire status. The information points to the disparity between viral token launches and the profitability of traders.

Santiment analysts have recently indicated that memecoins could be close to a possible market bottom. You can follow memecoin market trends and on-chain data using tools such as CoinMarketCap and follow Solana ecosystem data using Solscan.

Community Reaction and Industry Context

The community responded positively to the news, although some users questioned the long-term implications of the change. Some critics believe that lowering Creator Fees could lead to a decrease in the number of developers who promote tokens following a launch. This is because developers currently use early trading volume as a reward, and this change could affect that.

However, other platforms have made different decisions. Coinbase’s Base has decided to end its Creator Rewards program in favor of tradable assets. The program rewarded about 17,000 creators with a total of $450,000 over a period of seven months.

The adjustment signal by Pump.fun indicates a larger trend in the economics of memecoins. The platforms are now testing different models of incentives as trading volumes become volatile and retail participation slows down. By putting traders front and center in the incentive scheme, Pump.fun aims to regain confidence and drive participation.

The memecoin market is driven by speculation and social momentum. For healthy growth, there has to be a balance in incentives. The cashback system of Pump.fun is testing the hypothesis of whether reward redistribution can help stabilize participation.

Highlighted Crypto News:

World Liberty Financial (WLFI) Posts 18% Surge: Are Buyers Taking the Driver’s Seat?

Tagscrypto tradingDeFimemecoinsPump.funSolana

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the key change Pump.fun has made to its fee model?

APump.fun has introduced a new Trader Cashback system, allowing token creators to choose between the traditional Creator Fees or the new cashback structure for traders before launching a coin.

QWhat was the primary criticism of the original Pump.fun fee model?

ACritics argued that the original model, which rewarded token deployers with 0.3% of all fees, favored deployers while most retail traders absorbed the losses.

QHow does the new Trader Cashback system work?

AIf a creator selects the Trader Cashback option, traders earn rewards on every trade executed through Pump.fun's built-in trading interface, Terminal, which generates and makes the cashback accessible within the platform.

QWhat significant challenge is Pump.fun facing alongside this model change?

AThe platform is experiencing a sharp decline in revenue, with a 75.6% drop in fees to $31.8 million in January compared to its peak of $148.1 million, and February is on track to underperform January.

QWhat is one potential negative consequence of lowering Creator Fees, as mentioned by some critics?

ASome critics believe that lowering Creator Fees could lead to a decrease in the number of developers who promote tokens after launch, as they currently use early trading volume as a reward.

Похожее

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

The crypto industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. The era defined by minting novel, native digital assets (altcoins) is fading. These assets, lacking real-world cash flows or clear value, are losing relevance as attention and capital flow elsewhere. Two powerful external forces are reshaping the space. First, traditional assets like U.S. stocks, bonds, gold, and oil are being tokenized and traded on-chain. Second, the explosive growth of AI, with its tangible products, has overshadowed crypto's once-dominant "future narrative." This marks a critical pivot: crypto is transitioning from being a "factory for new assets" to becoming a "global conduit for existing assets." Its validated utility is not complex financial reinvention but efficient global settlement, transfer, and trading—the original promise of blockchain. Stablecoins like USDT and USDC exemplify this, offering faster dollar movement rather than replacing it. Consequently, native ecosystems like Ethereum face profound challenges. While still crucial infrastructure, ETH struggles to capture value as users interact with Layer 2s or trade traditional assets without needing to hold it. DeFi's grand narrative of rebuilding finance has narrowed to core needs like cheap transfers and deep liquidity. The true breakout innovation is the perpetual contract (Perp). It brilliantly bypasses the complexities of direct asset ownership (custody, compliance, dividends) by creating pure price exposure. Users can speculate on the price movement of *any* asset—NVIDIA, gold, oil—24/7, globally, and with leverage. This "price casino" model, while risky and ethically fraught, delivers unmatched liquidity and accessibility. Projects like Hyperliquid succeeded not by inventing new mechanics but by perfecting the timing and execution of this model. Key drivers included making on-chain Perps feel like centralized exchanges, post-FTX trust migration towards transparency, and rising demand to trade macro assets and equities round-the-clock. In conclusion, the crypto world's most enduring successes are the dollar (via stablecoins), Bitcoin, and trading. Its new frontier is not creating alternative assets but providing a seamless, perpetual trading layer—a new API—for the world's existing financial system. The age of native altcoins is over; the age of perpetual synthetic exposure has begun.

Odaily星球日报9 мин. назад

The Crypto Scene Is Dead, Perpetual Swaps Are Eternal

Odaily星球日报9 мин. назад

After Marvell's 32% Surge, the Chinese Chip Family Behind It Emerges

The stock price of Marvell Technology surged 32.5% on June 2nd, driven by NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang highlighting its custom ASICs and optical interconnects as core to AI data center architecture. This event brought attention to the Chinese semiconductor family behind Marvell: the Dai siblings. The story centers on three siblings, all UC Berkeley graduates, whose three-decade entrepreneurial journey aligns with major semiconductor industry shifts. In 1995, youngest sister Dai Wei Li co-founded Marvell with her husband Sehat Sutardja and his brother, focusing on storage controllers. Eldest brother Dai Wei Min founded EDA company Ultima, later sold to Cadence, and later founded VeriSilicon (芯原) in China, becoming a leading semiconductor IP provider. Second brother Dai Wei Jin co-founded EDA firm Silicon Perspective (sold to Cadence) and GPU IP company Vivante, later acquired by VeriSilicon. The combined "Dai-Sutardja" family network extends beyond Marvell. Their ventures and investments form a comprehensive ecosystem for the post-Moore's Law, chiplet era. Key holdings include: Dream Big Semiconductor (AI SuperNICs, acquired by Arm), Alphawave (high-speed SerDes IP, acquired by Qualcomm), and Silicon Box (a chiplet advanced packaging foundry). VeriSilicon itself thrives on the AI ASIC and IP boom in China. Collectively, the family's AI infrastructure-related portfolio is estimated at over $22 billion. Their strategy represents a distinct path: building critical components for open standards and key manufacturing capacity in the chiplet era, rather than pursuing standalone AI chip dominance. While this path may not create the next NVIDIA, it has enabled repeated successful exits and sustained influence within the global semiconductor industry.

marsbit1 ч. назад

After Marvell's 32% Surge, the Chinese Chip Family Behind It Emerges

marsbit1 ч. назад

Microsoft is Afraid of Being Marginalized by AI Giants

Microsoft, once the defining force of the PC era, now faces a familiar challenge in the AI age: the risk of being relegated to a profitable but invisible infrastructure provider. This anxiety was laid bare at Build 2026, where CEO Satya Nadella unveiled a major strategic pivot. The catalyst was a quiet April agreement that dissolved Microsoft's exclusive licensing and cloud-hosting deal with OpenAI, its once-vital partner. This erased Microsoft's key AI moat. With OpenAI and Anthropic defining AI applications and gaining enterprise traction—even within Microsoft's own ranks—Nadella had to answer: without exclusivity, what is Microsoft's role? The answer was a suite of seven in-house AI models, a developer-focused AI workstation (Surface RTX Spark Dev Box), and, most crucially, the Agent 365 platform for enterprise AI governance. The models, notably targeting Anthropic's strengths in coding and enterprise, signal a defensive move. However, the broader strategy is to make the models themselves less decisive. Financially, Microsoft's AI revenue is strong, driven largely by Azure running others' models. Yet its user-facing products like Copilot show weak penetration and engagement. Microsoft earns infrastructure money but lacks direct user mindshare. Nadella's core fear is being "hollowed out." As OpenAI and Anthropic prepare for IPOs and gain financial independence, they may build their own infrastructure, threatening Azure's lucrative AI revenue stream. Microsoft's window is to entrench itself deeper: not as the model creator, but as the indispensable platform for securely deploying, managing, and governing all AI models within the enterprise through Agent 365. Build 2026 revealed Microsoft's bet: in the AI era, the ultimate power lies not in any single model, but in the enterprise "operating system" that controls them. Nadella is determined to ensure Microsoft is the driver of this new era, not just a passenger.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Microsoft is Afraid of Being Marginalized by AI Giants

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на SOL (SOL) представлены ниже.

活动图片