Mantra CEO tells OM holders to withdraw from OKX over ‘inaccurate’ migration plan

cointelegraphОпубликовано 2025-12-08Обновлено 2025-12-08

Введение

Mantra CEO John Patrick Mullin has urged users to withdraw their OM tokens from the OKX exchange, accusing the platform of posting an "inaccurate" migration plan. Mullin claims OKX provided incorrect dates and details about the upcoming token migration from an Ethereum-based ERC-20 token to a native Mantra Chain token. He stated that OKX has not communicated with Mantra since April 13, when the OM token crashed over 90%, an event Mantra attributed to aggressive exchange leverage policies. Mullin advised users to avoid relying on OKX and complete the migration independently. The official migration is set to occur after January 15, contrary to OKX’s announced December timeline.

Tensions between blockchain platform Mantra and crypto exchange OKX are rising after Mantra accused the exchange of posting incorrect information about its token migration.

In a Monday X post, Mantra CEO John Patrick Mullin urged users of centralized cryptocurrency exchange (CEX) OKX to withdraw their Mantra (OM) tokens and cut their “dependency” on the platform.

“Users should consider withdrawing their OM tokens from OKX[...]. Avoid OKX Exchange Dependency: Complete migration without relying on potentially negligent or malicious intermediaries,” said Mullin.

His warning came in response to a Friday announcement from OKX about supporting the incoming OM token migration.

Source: JP Mullin

Related: BitMine buys $199M in Ether as smart money traders bet on ETH decline

According to Mullin, the OKX post contained multiple inaccuracies, including false migration and implementation dates.

OKX said the migration would occur between Dec. 22 and Dec. 25. Mantra’s governance proposal, by contrast, states that the migration will only take place after the Jan. 15 deprecation of the Ethereum-based ERC-20 OM token.

Mullin also said OKX’s post referenced “arbitrary dates throughout December 2025,” while Mantra has not yet announced an official implementation date.

He claimed OKX has not communicated with Mantra since “the events” of April 13, while Mantra has “helpfully [been] communicating with all other major exchanges regarding our migration.”

OKX’s OM Crypto Migration post. Source: okx.com

During the incoming migration, the OM token will migrate from an Ethereum-native ERC-20 token to a Mantra Chain-native token.

Cointelegraph has contacted OKX for comment but had not received a response by publication time.

Related: Prediction markets emerge as speculative ‘arbitrage arena’ for crypto traders

April crash still casting a shadow

On April 13, the Mantra’s OM token price fell by over 90% from around $6.30 to below $0.50.

OM/USD, 1-day chart. Source: Coingecko.com

On April 30, Mantra published a post-mortem report that blamed the aggressive trading policies and high leverage on cryptocurrency exchanges for the token crash.

“Liquidation cascades could happen to any project in the crypto industry,” Mullin said in the post, pointing to the role of “aggressive leverage positions” on exchanges as a broader threat to investor safety.

Mullin also urged exchanges to review their leverage policies while implementing a transparency dashboard for OM tokenomics, along with announcing the burning of 150 million staked OM tokens, permanently removing them from circulation in a bid to tighten the token’s supply.

Magazine: If the crypto bull run is ending... it’s time to buy a Ferrari — Crypto Kid

Похожее

Five Core Forms of AI Agent in YC's Eyes

The article outlines five core architectural patterns for effective AI Agents, emerging from tools like Codex and Claude, that move beyond simple prompts towards reusable, process-based capabilities. 1. **Skills**: Reusable, parameterized workflows that function like method calls, allowing a single process (e.g., "/investigate") to handle various tasks based on input parameters. 2. **Thin Harness**: A lightweight execution framework (~200 lines) that manages the AI model's "hands and feet"—handling loops, file I/O, and context—without becoming bloated. 3. **Resolvers**: Routing tables that map tasks to specific Skills, preventing "context corruption" when managing dozens of Skills and ensuring outputs go to the correct locations. 4. **Latent vs. Deterministic Layer**: A critical separation where LLMs handle judgment, synthesis, and pattern recognition, while deterministic code handles tasks requiring precision, consistency, and low cost (like calculations). 5. **Memory**: A persistent, accumulating knowledge base (e.g., a markdown folder) with a "current trusted conclusion" section and an append-only timeline, enabling the system to learn and retain context over time. Together, these patterns create a "process power"—a durable competitive advantage. Unlike one-off prompt-based applications whose value quickly commoditizes, a well-designed AI Agent system encodes experience into reusable, parameterized workflows, offloads stable rules to code, and continuously learns through memory. This creates a structured, hard-to-replicate capability that can provide sustained value for individuals or businesses, such as an accountant automating client reviews while preserving privacy and accumulating expertise.

marsbit55 мин. назад

Five Core Forms of AI Agent in YC's Eyes

marsbit55 мин. назад

Tiger Research: On-Chain Risk Operators, The Market Cap Gap Between 147 Trillion and 70 Billion

This report by Tiger Research examines the evolution of risk management in decentralized finance (DeFi) lending. It highlights a power shift from protocol developers to specialized professional risk operators who manage on-chain capital. The era of protocols and community governance solely dictating DeFi lending is ending. A new professional asset management layer has emerged. While the sector is nascent, capital and distribution channels are rapidly consolidating around top risk operator teams, whose past performance is now a key criterion for institutional entry. The industry's development, accelerated by modular infrastructures like Morpho, has led to a clear division of labor mirroring traditional finance: distribution channels (e.g., exchanges), strategy/risk management (the risk operators), and product infrastructure/asset custody (smart contract protocols). This structure lowers the entry barrier for traditional institutions. Currently, the total value managed by risk operators is approximately $70 billion, dominated by a few leading teams like Steakhouse (RWA focus), Sentora (AI models), and Gauntlet (crisis management). Competition now centers on collateral standards, distribution access, and crisis response capabilities. The report outlines three primary entry paths for institutions: 1) **Distribution Model**: Leveraging external risk operators as backend service providers (common for exchanges). 2) **Asset Supply Model**: Onboarding real-world assets to DeFi as collateral. 3) **Independent Operator Model**: Building an in-house team to become a risk operator (e.g., Bitwise). The core opportunity lies in the strategy/risk management layer, where traditional financial institutions can leverage their existing expertise in due diligence and risk assessment without deep technical development. A vast opportunity gap exists: the global traditional asset management industry manages ~$147 trillion, while the entire DeFi sector is only ~$800 billion, with the risk operator niche at ~$70 billion. This disparity signifies immense growth potential. Once robust risk frameworks and clearer regulations are established, even a minor allocation from traditional markets could trigger exponential DeFi growth. Early movers who help build these foundational systems will gain significant rule-setting influence and first-mover advantages.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Tiger Research: On-Chain Risk Operators, The Market Cap Gap Between 147 Trillion and 70 Billion

marsbit1 ч. назад

Interview with Circle's Chief Economist: USDC's Entry into Hyperliquid Benefits Circle and HYPE, Stablecoins Are Becoming Marginal Buyers of U.S. Treasuries

In an interview with Circle's Chief Economist Gordon Liao, the conversation covers the strategic significance of USDC replacing USDH as the reference asset on the decentralized perpetual exchange Hyperliquid. This shift, facilitated by Coinbase as the reserve manager and Circle providing technical infrastructure, aims to capture net interest income for the platform, with 90% of reserve earnings directed back to Hyperliquid for HYPE token buybacks. Liao discusses how stablecoins like USDC, with their substantial on-chain settlement volumes (e.g., $21 trillion in Q1 2026), are emerging as marginal buyers of U.S. Treasuries, concentrating on short-term debt and effectively reducing the weighted duration of the market, which may provide underlying support for long-term rates. The dialogue also explores the evolving nature of stablecoins as both a medium of exchange and a vehicle for capital and collateral liquidity. Additionally, the panel touches on the CLARITY Act's legislative progress, noting compromises around "activity-based rewards" and remaining hurdles like ethics concerns. On AI, there's debate over value capture, with predictions that distribution and application layers, rather than foundational model companies like OpenAI, will accrue most value. Regarding the bond market, Liao attributes the rise in 30-year yields primarily to an increased term premium (around 80 bps) driven by supply-demand dynamics, including fiscal expansion and changing investor demand, rather than expectations of Fed rate hikes.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Interview with Circle's Chief Economist: USDC's Entry into Hyperliquid Benefits Circle and HYPE, Stablecoins Are Becoming Marginal Buyers of U.S. Treasuries

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片