Has the Era of Global Central Banks 'Hoarding Gold' Come to an End?

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-04-03Обновлено 2026-04-03

Введение

The article questions whether the global central bank gold-buying spree, ongoing for 15 years, is ending. Citing a UBS report, it concludes that a structural shift to large-scale selling is highly unlikely. While the pace of purchases may slow to 800-850 tons in 2026 from 860 tons in 2025, central banks are expected to remain net buyers. The report challenges the narrative that recent sales, like Turkey's alleged sale of 50 tons, signal a trend. It argues Turkey's data is distorted by commercial bank positions and swaps, and its central bank uses gold for domestic liquidity management, not necessarily market speculation. Short-term price volatility is attributed to dollar strength and real interest rates, not central bank selling. The underlying logic for holding gold remains strong: over 60% of central banks follow a buy-and-hold strategy, with diversification being the primary motive. While short-term noise and price consolidation are expected, the medium-term outlook is bullish, with UBS forecasting an average 2026 price of $5000/oz and a year-end target of $5600/oz.

Original Author: Zhao Ying

Original Source: Wall Street News

The hottest question in the market recently is: Are global central banks selling gold? Has this 15-year-long official "gold hoarding wave" come to an end?

According to Wind Trading Desk, UBS strategist Joni Teves gave a clear judgment in the latest precious metals research report released on April 2: The possibility of a structural shift and large-scale selling by central banks is extremely low. Official institutions will maintain a net buying stance, but the pace of purchases will slow moderately—it is estimated that gold purchases in 2026 will be about 800 to 850 tons, slightly lower than the approximately 860 tons in 2025.

The report targeted the most glaring recent example—the news that Turkey "sold about 50 tons of gold in a few weeks." Teves believes: Turkey's official gold data includes commercial bank positions, swaps, and other operations. Relying solely on headlines to infer that "central banks are starting to sell" is highly risky, and it is better to wait for more detailed breakdown data before making a judgment.

In terms of price, UBS defines the short term as "full of noise": news cycles about geopolitical situations will keep gold prices fluctuating and consolidating; but the medium-term logic still points to new highs. The bank lowered its 2026 average gold price forecast to $5,000 (previously $5,200, mainly an adjustment for the first quarter) and maintained its year-end target price of $5,600 (set at the end of January).

Evidence That "Central Bank Gold Selling" Is the Main Cause of This Pullback Is Not Solid; 800-850 Tons Is More Like "Slowing Down"

The market's concern is specific: If the Middle East conflict prolongs, oil prices push up inflation, growth weakens, and local currencies depreciate, some central banks may be forced to sell gold to cope with the pressure. The report does not deny that "individual central banks may sell," but it emphasizes that this does not equate to a trend reversal in the official sector.

A key reminder from the report is: During the past 15 years of continuous gold accumulation by the official sector, "selling" in a single month is not uncommon. The reasons can be practical—central banks that bought cheaply earlier may take some profit tactically outside their core positions; sharp gold price increases trigger rebalancing; "natural inflows" from gold-producing countries turn into external shipments at certain points. In other words, selling can be an action, not necessarily a stance.

The baseline judgment is that net buying continues, but at a slower pace. The detail here lies in the trading habits of the official sector: They are more like "physical buyers," often providing support during pullbacks, helping the market stabilize more quickly at higher levels; conversely, the official sector typically does not chase rallies, preferring to intervene when prices are more suitable and volatility is lower.

This also explains why, when volatility increases, the market suddenly feels that "central banks have disappeared." The observation mentioned in the research is: Recently, the official sector and other long-term holders have tended to wait and see rather than immediately replenish positions in every decline.

The Narrative of Turkey Selling "50 Tons" Is Overstated; Short-Term Gold Prices Are More Influenced by the Dollar and Real Interest Rates

The case of Turkey is sensitive because it seems to fit the narrative of "central banks starting to sell gold." But Turkey has certain particularities: Some changes may be due to swaps rather than direct selling; more importantly, the Turkish Central Bank has long used gold as a policy tool to support liquidity management in the domestic banking system.

Part of the total gold disclosed by the Turkish Central Bank corresponds to commercial bank positions. Combined with policies since 2017 that allow banks and other entities to use gold within the financial system, "changes in total data" do not equal "central bank selling in the market." The report's advice is clear: Wait for more detailed data that can break down the口径 before discussing trends.

The trading environment in March had "dual uncertainty": On one hand, gold prices were seeking a new stable range after sharp rises and falls in January-February when Iran-related news fermented; on the other hand, the impact of the Middle East conflict on macro and asset pricing is nonlinear, and long-term funds are reluctant to bet easily.

When strategic funds that "buy on dips" are absent, gold prices in the short term are more likely to return to the traditional framework: A stronger U.S. dollar and rising U.S. real interest rates suppress gold prices; long positions are further squeezed out, and even some short-selling forces emerge. In addition, Chinese demand supported the decline during this phase, with gold prices stabilizing near $4,500 before fluctuating around the $4,700 level.

The Underlying Logic of Central Bank Gold Holdings: Buy and Hold

The World Bank's "Fifth Biennial Reserve Management Survey Report (2025)" explains a more fundamental question: How do central banks really think about gold? The survey covers holdings as of December 2024, with 136 institutions participating—the highest ever—and for the first time includes a separate chapter on gold.

Several numbers can clarify the behavioral boundaries of central banks: About 47% of central banks determine gold holdings based on "historical legacy," about 26% based on qualitative judgment; only about a quarter incorporate gold into a formal strategic asset allocation framework.

More critically, only about 4.5% make short-term tactical adjustments to gold reserves, while the investment style for gold is mainly buy-and-hold (about 62%). This profile means: Even if the buying pace slows, the official sector is not like a group of traders driven by news to frequently trade positions.

In terms of reasons for increasing holdings, more than half cited "diversification" as the primary reason; local gold purchase plans accounted for about 35%, geopolitical risks about 32%; only about 6% cited "liquidity needs" as a reason. The official sector's rationale for gold has not been invalidated by recent volatility.

Short-Term Volatility Is Inevitable, but "New Highs Not Finished" Remains the Main Theme

Returning to the trading level, gold's rise is not a straight line: It may continue to consolidate and experience bumpy movements in the coming weeks as the market repeatedly reassesses geopolitical risks. But it believes that the two long-term drivers pushing funds to allocate to gold—the combination of growth and inflation risks, and the persistence of geopolitical tensions—are making "diversification into gold" a more common portfolio action.

Under this framework, the report's pricing anchor is: An average gold price of $5,000 in 2026, with a year-end target of $5,600. It also mentions that speculative positions are already "cleaner," and long-term participants are still underweight; if another pullback occurs, it is closer to a "strategic window for building positions" rather than a signal of the end of the trend.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QIs the UBS report suggesting that global central banks are structurally shifting away from gold and starting large-scale selling?

ANo, the UBS report states that the possibility of a structural shift and large-scale selling by central banks is extremely low. They are expected to maintain a net buying stance, albeit at a slightly slower pace.

QWhat is the specific reason cited in the report for the recent news about Turkey selling gold, and why should it be interpreted cautiously?

AThe report cautions that Turkey's official gold data includes commercial bank positions and swap operations. It suggests waiting for more detailed, disaggregated data before concluding that the central bank is selling, as the headline figure does not equate to direct central bank market selling.

QAccording to the World Bank's survey, what is the primary investment style and main reason central banks hold gold?

AThe primary investment style for central banks is 'buy and hold' (approximately 62%). The main reason for increasing gold holdings is 'diversification', cited by over half of the central banks surveyed.

QWhat is UBS's medium-term price target for gold by the end of 2026, and what is their revised average price forecast for the year?

AUBS maintains a year-end 2026 price target of $5600 per ounce. They have revised their average annual price forecast for 2026 down to $5000 from a previous $5200, mainly as an adjustment for Q1 performance.

QWhat two long-term factors does the report identify as driving continued gold allocation, despite short-term noise and volatility?

AThe two long-term factors driving gold allocation are the combination of growth and inflation risks, and the persistence of geopolitical tensions, which are making diversification into gold a more common portfolio action.

Похожее

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

This text explores the unexpected connection between Pinduoduo founder Colin Huang and blockchain, as suggested in his article *Turning Capitalism Upside Down*. Huang argues Pinduoduo's core business is about managing "uncertainty." He posits that wealth flows to the rich because they absorb life's uncertainties (e.g., illness, job loss) that devastate the poor, who pay a premium for certainty through insurance or stable prices. Pinduoduo's model attempts a "reverse insurance": by aggregating consumer demand via group-buying and flash sales, it creates a large, predictable order for manufacturers. This certainty allows factories to remove risk premiums, passing savings back as lower prices, thus partially reversing the wealth flow. The key obstacle, Huang notes, is that an individual's buying intent is an unreliable promise. He then asks if blockchain is the natural solution for this "reverse insurance." The text elaborates that blockchain, through smart contracts with binding deposits, could transform casual intent into a costly-to-break, enforceable commitment. This replaces interpersonal trust with coded rules, making promises credible, pricable, and resistant to fraud. Finally, the author draws a parallel to Bitcoin, framing two paths to creating certainty: the "Pinduoduo path" of aggregating decentralized will into scale, and the "Bitcoin path" of locking rules into immutable code. Both sacrifice something—personal freedom or system flexibility—to manufacture trust and predictability.

链捕手17 мин. назад

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

链捕手17 мин. назад

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

**Summary:** "The Memory Magnate Who Built a Trillion-Dollar Empire, Yet Never Became the Richest" explores the journey of Zhu Yiming, founder of GigaDevice (603986) and co-founder of the soon-to-IPO ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The article positions GigaDevice, a fabless chip designer now valued at ~¥340 billion, as a prequel to the massive IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) venture, CXMT. Starting in 2005 with minimal capital, Zhu strategically "picked up the pieces" by focusing on niche markets like NOR Flash and microcontrollers (MCUs), areas major players were exiting. This allowed GigaDevice to grow into a diversified semiconductor company, maintaining robust profitability even during industry downturns by controlling costs. However, the piece argues that in the highly cyclical and capital-intensive memory chip industry, the fabless model has limits. True resilience and scale require the ability for "counter-cyclical expansion" – investing heavily during downturns – a tactic only possible for IDMs like Samsung or SK Hynix. This insight led Zhu to partner with the Hefei city government in 2016 to establish CXMT, an IDM focused on DRAM. Zhu's symbolic moves, like forfeiting salary and diluting his equity, were crucial in securing the massive state and bank funding needed. CXMT's equipment base is now valued even higher than that of BYD's vast auto manufacturing empire. Despite the potential for CXMT to reach a market cap of ¥1-2 trillion upon its IPO, Zhu's indirect stake in both companies is estimated below 3%, placing his personal wealth far below that of China's top billionaires. The article concludes that his strategic vision built a trillion-yuan memory landscape, but the capital structure necessary to achieve it precluded a personal fortune of similar scale.

marsbit24 мин. назад

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

marsbit24 мин. назад

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

The XRP Ledger is drawing attention as daily network fees have fallen below $400. While low fees align with XRPL's design for affordable transactions and are often seen as a strength, the metric can also serve as an indicator of network demand and paid transaction volume. This data point of around $3,100 in weekly fee burn highlights the stark contrast with higher-fee chains like Ethereum and Bitcoin. The development fuels an ongoing debate. Proponents view low fees as a sign of efficiency and accessibility, while critics may question if the network is generating sufficient high-value activity relative to its market cap and payments-focused narrative. The article cautions against overstating the finding, noting a single low-fee day does not signify network failure. It instead adds context to discussions about XRPL's usage, especially alongside Ripple's broader initiatives in stablecoins (RLUSD), AI payments, and enterprise infrastructure. The report recommends monitoring for a fee rebound, checking transaction counts for a fuller picture, and confirming the trend via native explorers like Bithomp. It frames the story within a larger market shift where on-chain data, protocol updates, and infrastructure developments are becoming crucial alongside price action. The editorial stance is to present the verified data, explain its significance for assessing network activity, and avoid hype, positioning it as part of the daily crypto conversation.

bitcoinist4 ч. назад

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

bitcoinist4 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить ERA

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Caldera (ERA) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Caldera (ERA).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Caldera (ERA)После приобретения вами Caldera (ERA) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Caldera (ERA)С легкостью торгуйте Caldera (ERA) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

741 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.07.17Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить ERA

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на ERA (ERA) представлены ниже.

活动图片