Four Years of Transformation: A Deep Dive into the Evolution of Coinbase's Business Model

比推Опубликовано 2026-02-20Обновлено 2026-02-20

Введение

Coinbase has undergone a significant business transformation from 2021 to 2025, shifting from heavy reliance on retail trading revenue (88% in 2021) to a more diversified model. By 2025, retail trading contributed only 48% of total revenue, while subscription and service revenue grew to 41% of total revenue—driven largely by stablecoin income (19% of total revenue, via the Circle partnership), staking, and Coinbase One subscriptions. Total revenue in 2025 increased by 9.4% year-over-year but remains 6.4% below the 2021 peak. Transaction revenue fell 40% compared to 2021. The company improved operational efficiency, reducing costs by 45% in 2023 through layoffs and restructuring, resulting in a 21% operating margin in 2025. Coinbase's balance sheet is strong with $11.3 billion in cash, minimal debt cost (~1% interest), and significant crypto holdings. However, it faces risks including competition, regulation, market cyclicality, interest rate sensitivity, and concentration in its Circle partnership. Compared to Robinhood, Coinbase trades at a lower valuation multiple despite a stronger balance sheet, presenting a potential opportunity for long-term crypto investors.

Source: DeFi Report

Author: Michael Nadeau

Compiled and Edited by: BitpushNews


Looking back to 2021, retail trading accounted for 88% of Coinbase's total revenue. By last year (2025), as the company diversified into subscriptions, services, and institutional infrastructure, this proportion had dropped to 48%.

This article will analyze Coinbase's ongoing transformation and what it means for the company's profitability, competitive position, and long-term valuation.

Let's begin.

Revenue Overview 2021 – 2025

Transaction Revenue

Data Source: Coinbase 10k, SEC filings

Revenue Composition Visualization:

(Based on Coinbase 10k and SEC filing data)

Key Takeaways on Transaction Revenue:

  • Retail Dominance Slowly Fading: In 2021, retail trading accounted for 95% of transaction revenue and 88% of total revenue. By 2025, these figures dropped to 82% of transaction revenue and 48% of total revenue, respectively.

  • Institutional Trading Share Growing: In 2025, institutional trading accounted for 12% of total transaction revenue, up from 5% in 2021.

  • Other Transaction Revenue: Currently accounts for 6.2% of total transaction revenue. This primarily stems from Base L2 sequencer fees and payment revenue—a new category that didn't exist before 2023.

  • More Resilient Revenue Structure: When retail trading slowed in 2022, Coinbase lost almost all its income. Today, revenue is supported by three streams rather than a single source, helping to smooth cyclical revenue fluctuations during bear markets.

  • Not Yet Back to Peak: Despite progress, transaction revenue has not returned to 2021 levels. In fact, 2025 transaction revenue was down 40% compared to 2021 (mainly due to a 48% drop in retail transaction revenue).

Subscription and Services Revenue

Data Source: Coinbase 10k, SEC filings

Revenue Composition Visualization:

<极简>

(Based on Coinbase 10k and SEC filing data)

Key Takeaways on Subscription and Services Revenue:

  • Strong Overall Growth: This segment grew 5.5x over the past 4 years, with a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 53%. Most notably, this business grew every year, even during the 2022 bear market.

  • Stablecoins Become a Pillar: Stablecoins have become the largest single revenue source in this segment, growing to $1.35 billion in 2025, a 52x increase from 2021, accounting for 19% of total revenue in 2025. This revenue comes from the partnership with Circle (USDC): Coinbase receives 100% of all USDC revenue generated on its platform (exchange, Prime institutional services, custody) and 50% of all residual interest earned on USDC reserves off-platform (other exchanges, DeFi, wallets, etc.). In fact, Coinbase earns more than half of Circle's revenue through this agreement.

  • Staking Business: Revenue peaked at $706 million in 2024 and declined by 4% in 2025. We attribute this primarily to the growth of DeFi and a significant decrease in ETH staking rewards.

  • Subscription Revenue (Coinbase One): Grew 96% in 2025, accounting for 7.7% of total revenue. Coinbase One now has over 1 million subscribers, generating SaaS-like recurring revenue. Note that custody fee revenue has been consolidated into this item starting in 2025.

  • Revenue Share: Subscriptions and Services now account for 41% of total revenue. This revenue is recurring, less volatile, and consistently growing, providing a good counterbalance to the declining and volatile retail transaction revenue.

Overall: Coinbase's total revenue grew 9.4% in 2025 but is still down 6.4% from the 2021 peak.

Operating Expenses 2021 – 2025

Data Source: Coinbase 10k, SEC filings

Expense Composition Visualization:

(Based on Coinbase 10k and SEC filing data)

Key Takeaways on Operating Expenses:

  • Once on the Brink of Bankruptcy: In 2022, Coinbase's operating expenses reached $5.9 billion, while revenue was only $3.2 billion. The company was burning cash at an alarming rate, with Technology & Development alone costing $2.3 billion and General & Administrative (G&A) $1.6 billion.

  • Structural Adjustment: This was addressed in 2023. By restructuring the workforce (laying off 950 employees), optimizing hiring processes, and refocusing on core products, the company cut operating expenses by 45%.

  • Operating Leverage Emerges: Although current operating expenses have returned to 2022 levels, the business is now twice the size it was then and has successfully turned an operating deficit into operating leverage. Coinbase's operating margin was 21% in 2025.

  • Expense Distribution: 17.7% of expenses are transaction-related (variable costs that scale with business size); 18.4% is for Sales & Marketing (this has grown consistently,主要用于 USDC rewards, NBA sponsorship, and Coinbase One customer acquisition).

  • Management & R&D: The remaining 57.3% comes from Technology & Development (up 13.8% in 2025) and General & Administrative (up 24.6%). Given that 2026 revenue expectations may decline, we believe Coinbase may again reduce headcount to lower fixed costs during a bear market.

Balance Sheet 2021 – 2025

Data Source: Coinbase 10k, SEC filings

Balance Sheet Visualization:

(Based on Coinbase 10k and SEC filing data)

Key Takeaways:

  • Debt Situation: $1.27 billion in debt is due this June. Of the total $7.7 billion debt, about 40% is convertible debt with a 0% interest rate; another $1.26 billion is due in 2030 with an interest rate of just 0.25%. The annual cash interest expense on existing debt is approximately $65 million (a composite rate below 1%). For comparison, Coinbase earned $297 million in interest and other income in 2025 alone—4.5 times its interest expense.

  • Liability Composition: Of the $7.2 billion in total liabilities, $6.2 billion are "pass-through items" hedged by assets on the other side of the balance sheet (customer custodial fund liabilities and return of collateral obligations). The remaining $1 billion consists of current liabilities related to accounts payable and operations.

  • Asset Composition: Besides cash (at an all-time high), Coinbase has $4.2 billion in goodwill related to the acquisition of Deribit, $2 billion in crypto assets (BTC & ETH), $623 million in strategic investments (including Circle equity), and $310 million in tradable investments. Another $3.3 billion consists of operating assets (receivables, loans, equipment).

  • Significant Change: The most notable change in 2025 stemmed from the acquisition of Deribit (a leading derivatives exchange). Goodwill jumped from $1.1 billion to $4.2 billion, and intangible assets increased from $47 million to $1.4 billion due to this transaction.

Overall Assessment: Coinbase's balance sheet is in its healthiest state ever. A net cash position of $3.6 billion (not including $2.9 billion in crypto and strategic assets) means it has ample fuel to weather storms, make strategic acquisitions, and invest in new product lines. Additionally, its debt structure is extremely cheap.

Competitive Landscape

Data Source: Yahoo Finance

COIN vs HOOD

When discussing Coinbase's competition, we focus on Robinhood. Both companies are founder-led, founded around the same time (Coinbase 2012, Robinhood 2013), both serve Millennials and Gen Z, and both are building financial rails based on crypto technology.

We believe both companies have the opportunity to reach a $1 trillion valuation and become leading financial institutions of the future.

Valuation Comparison with HOOD

Data Source: Coinbase 10k, SEC filings

Key Takeaways:

  • Valuation Divergence: Although the trailing P/E ratios of the two companies are almost identical at 37x, COIN is valued at roughly half of HOOD on almost every other metric. This suggests the market views Robinhood's earnings quality and growth trajectory more favorably than Coinbase's.

  • Reason Lies in Profitability: Robinhood's 47% operating margin and 42% net profit margin are more than double those of Coinbase (21% and 18%). This results in Robinhood generating 45% more operating income ($2.09 billion vs $1.44 billion) despite having 35% less revenue.

  • Two Points to Note:

  1. Coinbase's 2025 operating expenses included $345 million in costs related to a data breach and Deribit integration costs, which are non-recurring.

  2. Robinhood has stronger cost control and leaner operations. We believe this stems from focus: Robinhood focuses on retail customers, while Coinbase tries to cater to both institutional and retail segments, leading to a broader product line and higher operating costs.

  • Cash Flow: Coinbase holds $11.3 billion in cash (almost three times Robinhood's $4.3 billion).加上 crypto assets and strategic investments, total available resources of $14.1 billion provide a stronger survival buffer.

  • Nature of Debt: The vast majority of Robinhood's debt ($11.8 billion) is operational broker-dealer debt (securities lending hedges, etc.), with almost no long-term corporate bonds. Coinbase holds $7.7 billion in corporate debt, but at very low interest rates.

  • Buybacks & Selling: Robinhood began aggressive buybacks in Q3 2024 (repurchasing $910 million). Coinbase began buybacks in 2025 ($408 million) and stated it would look for opportunities during bear markets. Meanwhile, CEO Brian Armstrong's selling drew negative attention (selling approximately $550 million between April 2025 and January 2026). While the optics are poor, we believe the market overreacted, as this was part of a normal, pre-set selling plan for executives and represented only 3.3% of his holdings.

  • Risk Factors

    1. Intensifying Competition: Traditional brokers (Schwab, Fidelity) are expanding crypto offerings;Binance remains庞大 internationally;BlackRock and Fidelity are building competitive infrastructure for institutional clients.

    2. Regulation: Coinbase is playing a role in the Clarity Act negotiations. If new regulations favor traditional institutions, it could severely打击 native crypto services.

    3. Cyclicality: Despite revenue diversification, 59% of revenue is still directly tied to crypto prices and market sentiment.

    4. Interest Rate Risk: Stablecoins account for 19% of total revenue. If the Fed cuts rates significantly, it will directly impact this revenue. Coinbase warned in its Q1 2026 guidance that revenue could decline by $100-$150 million due to this.

    5. Security Risk: The data breach in May 2025 resulted in a $345 million loss and reputational damage.

    6. Concentration Risk with Circle: An often underestimated risk is that the potential GENIUS Act could render their partnership illegal. The legal争议点 is whether Coinbase, as the custodian of users' USDC, qualifies as a "holder" prohibited from receiving interest under the Act. While we believe it does not, investors should monitor this.

    Conclusion

    Despite a challenging fourth quarter, the underlying business structure of Coinbase is stronger than in any previous cycle. The company has $11.3 billion in cash reserves, a $2.8 billion base of subscription and services revenue (41% of total revenue), and leading positions in institutional custody and stablecoin infrastructure.

    Currently, COIN is valued at roughly half of Robinhood on P/S, P/B, and EV/EBITDA multiples. Given its stronger balance sheet, we believe COIN offers an attractive risk-reward ratio for investors who believe in the long-term growth of the crypto capital markets.

    We exited most of our COIN position in Q3/Q4 last year (with a 270% gain) but still hold a position with an average entry price of $99.58 and are looking for opportunities to add.


    Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

    Bitpush TG Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

    Bitpush TG Channel: https://t.me/bitpush

    Original Link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7613394

    Связанные с этим вопросы

    QWhat was the percentage of retail trading in Coinbase's total revenue in 2021, and how did it change by 2025?

    AIn 2021, retail trading accounted for 88% of Coinbase's total revenue. By 2025, this percentage had decreased to 48%.

    QWhat is the two largest sources of revenue in Coinbase's Subscription & Services segment as of 2025, and how much did the largest one grow?

    AAs of 2025, the two largest sources in the Subscription & Services segment are Stablecoin revenue and Staking. Stablecoin revenue is the largest, growing 52 times from 2021 to reach $1.35 billion.

    QWhat major acquisition significantly impacted Coinbase's balance sheet in 2025, and what was the effect on its Goodwill and Intangible Assets?

    AThe major acquisition was of Deribit, a leading derivatives exchange. It caused Coinbase's Goodwill to jump from $1.1 billion to $4.2 billion and Intangible Assets to increase from $47 million to $1.4 billion.

    QHow does Coinbase's operating margin in 2025 compare to Robinhood's, and what is a cited reason for this difference?

    AIn 2025, Coinbase's operating margin was 21%, while Robinhood's was 47%. A cited reason is that Robinhood is more focused on retail clients, leading to a leaner operation, whereas Coinbase serves both retail and institutional markets, resulting in a broader product suite and higher cost structure.

    QAccording to the article, what is a significant regulatory risk related to Coinbase's partnership with Circle and the GENIUS Act?

    AA significant risk is that the GENIUS Act could potentially make the partnership illegal. The legal question is whether Coinbase, as the custodian of user USDC, qualifies as a 'holder' that the act prohibits from being paid interest.

    Похожее

    Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

    Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

    marsbit1 ч. назад

    Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

    marsbit1 ч. назад

    Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

    The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

    marsbit1 ч. назад

    Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

    marsbit1 ч. назад

    Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

    In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

    marsbit1 ч. назад

    Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

    marsbit1 ч. назад

    Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

    **Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

    marsbit1 ч. назад

    Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

    marsbit1 ч. назад

    TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

    In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

    marsbit1 ч. назад

    TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

    marsbit1 ч. назад

    Торговля

    Спот
    Фьючерсы

    Популярные статьи

    Как купить S

    Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Sonic (S) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Sonic (S).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Sonic (S)После приобретения вами Sonic (S) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Sonic (S)С легкостью торгуйте Sonic (S) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

    1.4k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.01.15Обновлено 2026.06.02

    Как купить S

    Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

    Он решает проблемы масштабируемости, совместимости между блокчейнами и стимулов для разработчиков с помощью технологических инноваций.

    2.3k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.09Обновлено 2025.04.09

    Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

    HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

    HTX Learn — ваш проводник в мир перспективных проектов, и мы запускаем специальное мероприятие "Учитесь и Зарабатывайте", посвящённое этим проектам. Наше новое направление .

    1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.10Обновлено 2025.04.10

    HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

    Обсуждения

    Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на S (S) представлены ниже.

    活动图片

    Топ вопросы

    Популярные категорииright-arrow

    Популярные тегиright-arrow