Bitcoin: How a $1.3B liquidity gap could stall BTC’s next move

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-03-20Обновлено 2026-03-20

Введение

Bitcoin has shown a 12% gain since late February, contrasting with a decline in the S&P 500, reigniting discussions about its role as a digital safe haven. However, despite a recent increase in stablecoin exchange inflows, the 30-day moving average remains $1.3 billion below the annual average, indicating insufficient demand to fuel a sustained rally. Broader macroeconomic concerns, including inflation risks and rising U.S. Treasury yields, are making investors cautious about risk assets like Bitcoin. While a short-term rise toward $83k–$89k is possible, analysts caution that this should be viewed as a retracement within a longer-term bearish trend rather than the start of a true recovery.

Bitcoin [BTC] has been trending higher over the past two weeks. Though it was trading within a longer-term downtrend, it had made a bullish market structure shift on the 4-hour timeframe on the 25th of February. This structural shift saw Bitcoin continue its steady rally.

Since making the local low of $63k on the 28th of February, Bitcoin has gained 12% in three weeks. During this time, the S&P 500 has shed roughly 3.5%. This show of relative strength has given rise to arguments that BTC was acting as a hedge against macroeconomic uncertainty- the old digital gold argument.

The “safe haven” discourse has drawn retail FOMO, reported AMBCrypto. It remains to be seen if retail is right and the current rally has room to grow, or if market participants should adopt a more pessimistic outlook.

Recovery in stablecoin liquidity might not translate into demand

A crypto analyst noted that the 30-day Moving Average (DMA) of the exchange inflow of USDT and USDC has improved in February-March 2026. The 30DMA rose to $3.84 billion on the 10th of February, but had fallen by nearly 30% to $2.74 billion by the 19th of March.

Comparing the 30DMA to the 365DMA showed that the current stablecoin inflow to exchanges was noticeably below the annual norm. According to the analyst, the return of the 30DMA of stablecoin inflows above the yearly average generally indicates a return toward a Bitcoin recovery phase.

As things stand, there was a $1.3 billion gap between the moving averages.

Analyst Darkfost argued the case that inflation risks and geopolitical concerns made it an unfavorable scenario for risk assets such as Bitcoin. The rising U.S. Treasury yields made them attractive as a low-risk return.

In these conditions, BTC is a riskier bet with potentially less capital flow into it. This meant it could take a while longer to escape the crypto bear market, despite recent gains.

The long-term BTC swing structure remains bearish. In the coming weeks, a rally to $83k-$89k is possible. Traders and investors should be prepared to think of this move as a retracement within a broader bearish trend, rather than the beginning of a recovery.

Final Summary

Bitcoin saw a recovery in stablecoin liquidity, but this has not translated into aggressive demand for the leading crypto.
The broader market fears, such as inflation risks, mean that the path to recovery will not be straightforward for BTC.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the $1.3 billion liquidity gap mentioned in the article and why is it significant for Bitcoin's price movement?

AThe $1.3 billion gap refers to the difference between the 30-day moving average (30DMA) of stablecoin (USDT and USDC) inflows to exchanges and the 365-day moving average (365DMA). It is significant because the 30DMA being below the yearly average indicates a lack of sufficient liquidity entering the market, which historically is needed to fuel a sustained Bitcoin recovery. This gap suggests that the recent price gains may not be supported by strong underlying demand.

QAccording to the analyst Darkfost, why is the current macroeconomic environment unfavorable for risk assets like Bitcoin?

AAnalyst Darkfost argued that inflation risks and geopolitical concerns create an unfavorable scenario for risk assets. In such conditions, rising U.S. Treasury yields become more attractive to investors as they offer a low-risk return. This makes Bitcoin, a perceived riskier asset, less appealing and could result in reduced capital flow into it.

QWhat does the article suggest about Bitcoin's role as a 'safe haven' or 'digital gold' based on its recent performance?

AThe article notes that Bitcoin's recent show of relative strength, gaining 12% while the S&P 500 shed 3.5%, has revived arguments that BTC can act as a hedge against macroeconomic uncertainty—the 'digital gold' narrative. However, the overall analysis in the article presents a more cautious outlook, suggesting that broader market fears mean its path to recovery is not straightforward.

QWhat is the outlook for Bitcoin's price trend in the coming weeks according to the technical analysis presented?

AThe long-term swing structure for Bitcoin remains bearish. While a rally to the $83,000-$89,000 range is possible in the coming weeks, the article advises traders and investors to view this potential move as a retracement within a broader bearish trend rather than the beginning of a new recovery or bull market.

QHow did the exchange inflow of major stablecoins (USDT and USDC) change between February and March 2026?

AThe 30-day Moving Average (30DMA) of the exchange inflow for USDT and USDC improved in February, rising to $3.84 billion by February 10th. However, it then fell by nearly 30%, dropping to $2.74 billion by March 19th, indicating a significant decrease in stablecoin liquidity moving onto exchanges.

Похожее

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinist3 мин. назад

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinist3 мин. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1 ч. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1 ч. назад

marsbit1 ч. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit1 ч. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот

Фьючерсы

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на S (S) представлены ниже.

Bitcoin: How a $1.3B liquidity gap could stall BTC’s next move

Введение

Recovery in stablecoin liquidity might not translate into demand

Final Summary

Связанные с этим вопросы

Похожее

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

Торговля

Популярные статьи

Как купить S

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

Обсуждения

Топ вопросы

Популярные категории

Популярные теги