2026-06-14 Воскресенье

Новостной центр - Страница 848

Получайте криптоновости и тенденции рынка в режиме реального времени с помощью Новостного центра HTX.

Old Case Resurfaces: The 1011 Crash Sparks a Mixed Battle of Public Opinion Between Exchanges and Ecosystems

A wave of criticism targeting Binance resurfaced on social media, reignited by ARK Invest CEO Cathie Wood's comments blaming a past "system glitch" at the exchange for the crypto market's prolonged stagnation. She referred to the October 11th ("1011") event, a major market crash that saw over $190B in liquidations, as a key reason crypto wasn't rallying with other assets. Binance co-founder He Yi quickly countered, suggesting Wood, a Coinbase investor, was not a user and misinformed. The 1011 event itself was a "black swan" where a sharp market downturn was exacerbated by a liquidity anomaly on Binance, triggering its Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism and causing massive, cascading liquidations. Binance later paid $283M in compensation but maintained the sell-off was market-driven. The criticism evolved into a broader industry debate. Key figures leading the charge included Leonidas, a Bitcoin Ordinals proponent, who accused Binance of extracting value from the ecosystem via high token listing fees. OKX founder Star (Xu Mingxing) presented a more technical critique, arguing Binance's high-yield USDe promotion allowed systemic risk to accumulate, fundamentally altering the market's microstructure post-1011. Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko indirectly supported critics, leading CZ to unfollow him—highlighting underlying competition between the BSC and Solana ecosystems. In Binance's defense, some analysts like Dragonfly's Haseeb Qureshi argued the crash lacked a single cause, citing pre-existing market stress from Trump's tariff comments, API issues affecting market makers, and a lack of circuit breakers. Amid the FUD, Binance announced it would convert its $1B SAFU insurance fund from stablecoins to Bitcoin. The incident underscores the immense scrutiny Binance faces as the industry's largest exchange, raising questions about its role in maintaining systemic stability in a leveraged and narrative-driven market.

Odaily星球日报02/02 03:12

Old Case Resurfaces: The 1011 Crash Sparks a Mixed Battle of Public Opinion Between Exchanges and Ecosystems

Odaily星球日报02/02 03:12

From Libya to Iran: Nations in Blackout, Bitcoin Miners Uninterrupted

From Libya to Iran: Nations in Darkness, Bitcoin Miners That Never Stop In the summer of 2025, Tehran and other parts of Iran faced extreme heat and severe power outages, forcing government offices and schools to shut down. Hospitals relied on diesel generators to keep life-saving equipment running. Yet, behind city walls, rows of Bitcoin mining machines continued operating at full capacity, almost never losing power. Similarly, in Libya, residents endure daily blackouts of 6 to 8 hours, while unauthorized mining farms in abandoned industrial sites run non-stop, using some of the world’s cheapest electricity—subsidized as low as $0.004 per kWh—to mine Bitcoin, often with outdated equipment smuggled into the country. This reflects one of the 21st century’s starkest energy paradoxes: in nations crippled by sanctions and civil conflict, electricity is no longer just a public service but a form of “exportable” hard currency. In Iran, mining was legalized in 2019 as a state strategy to bypass international financial sanctions. Miners were required to sell mined Bitcoin to the central bank. However, an estimated 85% of mining occurred illegally or semi-legally, often with ties to powerful entities. Despite temporary bans and crackdowns, mining rebounded quickly, draining the national grid and worsening public power shortages. Libya, fragmented since the fall of Gaddafi, lacks coherent regulation. Although cryptocurrency transactions and mining imports are officially banned, enforcement is weak. Low subsidized electricity prices create irresistible incentive for mining operators—including foreign groups—to run energy-intensive operations with obsolete machines, while ordinary citizens face daily blackouts. In both countries, Bitcoin mining functions less as a legitimate industry and more as a form of resource extraction: it creates few jobs, contributes little in taxes, and often channels profits overseas. The real cost is borne by society—frequent blackouts, overloaded grids, and compromised public services like healthcare and education. Ultimately, the issue is not Bitcoin itself, but who controls the allocation of public resources. When energy subsidies meant for public welfare are diverted for private gain, it deepens inequality and institutional distrust. As citizens sit in darkness, the miners’ machines continue to hum—a symbol of energy injustice in a fractured world.

marsbit02/02 02:38

From Libya to Iran: Nations in Blackout, Bitcoin Miners Uninterrupted

marsbit02/02 02:38

Dialogue with a16z Crypto Partner: Privacy Will Become the Most Important 'Moat' in Cryptocurrency

In a discussion with a16z Crypto’s Ali Yahya, the argument is made that privacy will become the most critical moat in the cryptocurrency space, driving winner-take-all network effects. As blockchains become increasingly commoditized and performance differences narrow, privacy stands out as a key differentiator. Unlike social media, where users may overlook privacy, financial activities demand confidentiality—individuals and institutions will not tolerate transparent exposure of salaries, transactions, or spending habits. Privacy creates strong user lock-in due to the difficulty of migrating secrets between chains. Moving private assets risks exposing metadata, reducing anonymity set size, and compromising security. Thus, users are likely to remain on chains with the largest anonymity pools, reinforcing network effects. Several technologies enable privacy: zero-knowledge proofs (currently leading), fully homomorphic encryption (still theoretical), multi-party computation (for key management), and trusted execution environments (most practical for performance). Hybrid approaches may emerge. Despite concerns around centralization, privacy chains can remain decentralized if they are open-source, verifiable, and node-distributed. Looking ahead, quantum computing poses a long-term threat but is not an immediate risk, while AI’s pervasive data collection will only heighten the demand for privacy.

marsbit02/02 01:26

Dialogue with a16z Crypto Partner: Privacy Will Become the Most Important 'Moat' in Cryptocurrency

marsbit02/02 01:26

活动图片