Trump’s Emergency Energy Strategy Signals a Turning Point for Bitcoin Miners

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-16Last updated on 2026-01-16

Abstract

Former President Trump's proposed emergency energy strategy aims to address rising U.S. electricity prices by having large companies, particularly AI data centers, fund new power plants through 15-year contracts. This could unlock $15 billion in new power generation, increasing supply and stabilizing costs. For Bitcoin miners, who rely on cheap electricity, this offers potential relief from current pressures where high energy prices and competition from AI firms are forcing many to transition to AI-related work. If implemented, the plan may slow this shift by making mining more economically viable again, though benefits would take years to materialize. The proposal ultimately shifts power expansion costs to tech giants, potentially helping miners remain competitive in the long term.

U.S President Donald Trump plans an Emergency Power Auction to fix the high electricity prices in the U.S. Electricity has been getting very expensive in recent years because the AI data centers consume a massive amount of power. The idea of this plan is that big companies would pay upfront for the new power plants, and they would sign a 15 year contract. Even if they don’t use electricity, they still pay, and this could unlock $15 billion in new power generation. The goal is to increase the electricity supply and to stop increasing power prices.

This plan would be a huge relief for the Bitcoin miners, as Bitcoin mining needs cheap electricity to be profitable. Right now, AI companies pay more money for electricity, and data companies consume huge amounts of power; also, electricity prices are rising fast. Power companies and miners like Galaxy Digital, CleanSpark, and IREN prefer AI over bitcoin miners. So many miners’ plans are switching to AI work.

Long-Term Power Expansion Could Ease Energy Costs and Slow Miners’ Shift to AI

If the new power plants are built, there will be more electricity, and the prices of electricity will stop rising. If this happens, Bitcoin mining becomes cheaper, and there is no need to switch bitcoin miners to AI and reduce pressure on miners to abandon Bitcoin for AI. However, this is not going to happen soon, and power plants take years to build, and the benefits will arrive gradually.

This plan is really about who controls the electricity in the AI era. AI firms want to get long-term control over power so that they can run a huge number of data centers. Because they can pay more, Bitcoin miners are losing access to cheap electricity. This proposal tries to shift power expansion costs to tech giants and indirectly gives bitcoin miners a chance to stay competitive.

Highlighted Crypto News:

‌Pump.fun (PUMP) Price Prediction 2026, 2027-2030

TagsBitcoin MiningTRUMP

Related Questions

QWhat is the main purpose of President Trump's proposed Emergency Power Auction?

AThe main purpose is to address high electricity prices by having big companies pay upfront for new power plants through 15-year contracts, aiming to increase electricity supply and stop rising power prices.

QHow could this energy strategy benefit Bitcoin miners specifically?

AIt could provide huge relief for Bitcoin miners by increasing electricity supply and stabilizing prices, making mining more profitable and reducing the pressure to switch to AI.

QWhy are Bitcoin miners currently losing access to cheap electricity according to the article?

ABitcoin miners are losing access because AI companies can pay more for electricity, and power companies prefer AI clients over Bitcoin miners due to higher profitability.

QWhat long-term effect could the power expansion have on miners' business models?

AIt could ease energy costs, slow the shift of miners transitioning to AI work, and help them remain competitive in Bitcoin mining by ensuring cheaper electricity.

QWhich specific mining companies are mentioned as preferring AI over Bitcoin mining?

AThe article mentions that power companies and miners like Galaxy Digital, CleanSpark, and IREN prefer AI over Bitcoin miners.

Related Reads

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

How much of Arthur Hayes's market credibility remains? Recently, the "godfather of crypto perpetual swaps" and BitMEX co-founder has faced public criticism, including accusations from on-chain investigator ZachXBT about creating exit liquidity for his followers. Starting last week, Hayes executed multiple sudden sell-offs. He had repeatedly publicly predicted the HYPE token would reach $150. After a $100,000 bet defending Hyperliquid on June 1st, he announced just three days later that he had completely sold his HYPE and NEAR holdings, successfully exiting near the peak. He also sold ZEC and WLD. His sale of WLD appeared to be a classic "pump and dump" maneuver. On June 3rd, he publicly set a $10 target for WLD, causing its price to surge over 35%. By June 6th, he announced he had sold his WLD, citing "anomalous" SpaceX pre-IPO price action, which triggered a sharp price drop. On June 9th, Hayes published a lengthy article explaining his actions, citing factors like rising energy costs and a potential AI bubble burst. Consequently, his family office, Maelstrom, now holds positions in US energy producers and only core crypto assets BTC and ETH, having sold AI-related stocks and non-core cryptocurrencies. This pattern is not new. In 2025, he similarly touted HYPE before selling it at what turned out to be a cycle peak, only to repurchase it at the next cycle's low. Similar scenarios played out with tokens like ETHFI and ENA. Long-term observers have developed a strategy: ignore Hayes's public statements but closely monitor his on-chain actions—be cautious following his buys, but decisively follow his sells. If he continues these tactics, especially as seen with the WLD case, his market credibility risks being permanently damaged. As Hayes himself admitted in his latest article, "I remain an unapologetic gambler."

marsbit15m ago

From Shouting 150 Dollars to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

marsbit15m ago

From Calling for $150 to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

Arthur Hayes, co-founder of BitMEX and a prominent crypto figure, is facing scrutiny over his market credibility. Recent on-chain data and public criticism, notably from detective ZachXBT, question whether he uses his influence to create exit liquidity for his followers. Hayes has executed several abrupt sell-offs, including publicly advocating for HYPE to reach $150 before completely selling his holdings just three days later, after which the price dropped sharply. He similarly promoted WLD with a $10 target, only to sell his entire position three days afterward, citing vague concerns about SpaceX's pre-IPO activity and causing a significant price decline. Hayes justifies these moves with detailed macroeconomic analyses, such as a recent essay citing energy costs and AI market risks, explaining his shift into energy stocks and core cryptocurrencies BTC and ETH. However, his pattern of bullish public statements followed by unannounced sell-offs—previously seen with tokens like ETHFI and ENA—has led many investors to adopt a strategy of ignoring his commentary but closely monitoring his on-chain actions for sell signals. Analysts warn that this "cry wolf" pattern risks eroding his market trust, with Hayes himself admitting in a recent article, "I remain an unapologetic gambler."

Odaily星球日报20m ago

From Calling for $150 to Liquidating HYPE in Just Three Days, How Much Credibility Does Arthur Hayes Have Left?

Odaily星球日报20m ago

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

The article details a series of absurd and revealing anecdotes shared by Silicon Valley founders about their venture capital fundraising experiences, sparked by Greg Isenberg's story of pitching to a sleeping a16z partner. Founders describe surreal pitch meetings: one faced a barefoot, peanut-eating investor who offered triple the requested amount after 30 seconds; another performed a pitch in a VC's parked car; a founder discovered his audience understood no English beyond "yes." These stories highlight the often irrational and performative nature of fundraising. Beyond the absurdity, darker power imbalances are exposed. Stories include investors suggesting founders fire co-founders for their equity, blatant market misjudgments, disrespectful behavior from LPs, and discriminatory remarks. A debate also emerges around "Sequoia's" practice of splitting a round into two valuations. However, the thread isn't solely critical. Positive counter-narratives celebrate supportive VCs who offered crucial advice during crises, respected founders' timelines, and showed simple gestures of respect—like a partner personally fetching coffee before a major pitch. Ultimately, the collective sharing acts as a pressure release, illustrating that fundraising is a complex dance of power, trust, and sometimes sheer theater. It underscores that beyond capital, mutual respect and integrity remain the most enduring foundations of the founder-investor relationship.

marsbit29m ago

Fundraising is Like a Strange Dance: The 'Absurd Drama' of Silicon Valley Founders' Capital Raises

marsbit29m ago

Taiwanese Nodes on the AI Industry Chain: 9 Taiwanese Stock Picks Favored by 'New Stock God' Serenity

Investment analyst Serenity has spotlighted 9 Taiwanese stocks positioned within three key themes of the AI hardware supply chain: CPO (Co-packaged Optics), ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuits), and Compound Semiconductors. For the CPO theme, anchored by TSMC's COUPE platform expected to mass produce in 2026, Serenity highlighted five stocks: FOCI (fiber array unit supplier), Shunsin Technology (optical packaging & testing), Xintec (wafer-level packaging & testing), MSSCorps (inspection/measurement tools), and Nextronics (connectors & thermal modules). Regarding the ASIC theme, driven by hyperscalers' custom chips, three companies were named: Alchip (design services for AWS), Unimicron (ABF substrates for Google TPU/AWS), and MediaTek (potential collaboration on Google TPU). A singular, strong conviction pick is Win Semiconductor, a compound semiconductor foundry and leader in InP/GaAs, seen as a beneficiary in areas like laser sources for silicon photonics and LEO satellite communications. Serenity argues that current valuations are not in a bubble, geopolitical risks are overstated, and the real systemic risk lies not in cross-strait tensions but in potential future cuts to hyperscaler (Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Meta, Oracle) capital expenditure—the primary driver of the current AI infrastructure boom.

marsbit1h ago

Taiwanese Nodes on the AI Industry Chain: 9 Taiwanese Stock Picks Favored by 'New Stock God' Serenity

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik's Vision for the Next Evolution of On-Chain Finance: How to Reconstruct DeFi with an 'Options Mindset'?

Vitalik Buterin recently proposed a conceptual shift for DeFi: replacing traditional Collateralized Debt Positions (CDPs) and forced liquidations with an options-based mechanism. This aims to address key vulnerabilities in current DeFi lending. The traditional CDP model, foundational to protocols like MakerDAO and Aave, allows users to borrow against collateral but relies on real-time oracles and triggers sudden, mandatory liquidations during price volatility. This can cause cascading sell-offs, oracle manipulation risks, and significant MEV extraction, exacerbating market stress. Vitalik's alternative envisions splitting an asset like 1 ETH into two complementary components: one offering stable/index-like exposure and the other absorbing the opposite risk/reward. Instead of a hard liquidation threshold, a user's exposure to the target asset would gradually and smoothly deviate (following a near-quadratic curve) as the collateral price moves. The system would primarily depend on "slow oracles" for periodic settlement rather than instant price feeds. Key potential benefits include: the elimination of abrupt, forced liquidations; drastically reduced reliance on vulnerable real-time oracles; and inherent resistance to certain MEV exploits centered on liquidation auctions. The article posits that for Ethereum DeFi to maintain its relevance amid competition from faster, cheaper chains, it must compete on sophisticated financial engineering and robustness—not just transaction speed or yields. The core value proposition should shift towards offering users clearer, more manageable risk structures, greater autonomy, and resilience in extreme scenarios, moving DeFi from high-risk experimentation towards becoming reliable financial infrastructure.

marsbit1h ago

Vitalik's Vision for the Next Evolution of On-Chain Finance: How to Reconstruct DeFi with an 'Options Mindset'?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow