# Stablecoins Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Stablecoins", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

The War Between Stablecoins and Banking May Not Actually Exist

The article argues that the perceived war between stablecoins and traditional banking is largely illusory, drawing a parallel to the "Javon's Paradox" where technological efficiency (like ATMs) expands, rather than shrinks, an industry. From the supply side, blockchain and stablecoins are dismantling fragmented global payment infrastructures, replacing them with a single, open ledger. This drastically reduces the cost and complexity of offering financial services, enabling companies like Sling Money to operate globally with a small team. Examples like M-Pesa in Kenya and UPI in India show that lowering transaction costs to near zero leads to a massive expansion in financial inclusion, serving previously unbanked populations. On the cost side, the piece highlights the immense compliance burden on banks, which spend hundreds of billions annually on tasks like auditing and reconciling opaque transactions across correspondent banks. Shared ledger technology directly solves this by providing a single source of truth, eliminating reconciliation layers. Projects like J.P. Morgan's Onyx and the Canton Network demonstrate how banks are using this technology to achieve near-instant settlement and free up trapped capital. The convergence of these forces—lower barriers to entry and reduced internal operational costs—points to a future where more financial services are available to more people at a lower cost, much like cloud computing democratized access to computing power. The conclusion is that stablecoins will not destroy the banking system but will instead become a foundational infrastructure upon which more products are built, ultimately expanding the entire market.

Odaily星球日报02/23 12:47

The War Between Stablecoins and Banking May Not Actually Exist

Odaily星球日报02/23 12:47

Crypto’s Investable Universe Is Shrinking: NYDIG

According to NYDIG's Head of Research Greg Cipolaro, the crypto industry's investable universe is shrinking as markets mature. He argues that only a limited set of blockchain applications can attract sustained capital, suggesting the broader Web3 vision may need recalibration. Investors are now focusing on applications that extend traditional financial products onto blockchain infrastructure, including Bitcoin, tokenized assets, stablecoins, select DeFi infrastructure, and general-purpose blockchains like Ethereum. Cipolaro emphasizes that blockchain’s core attributes—trustlessness, permissionlessness, and censorship resistance—align best with financial use cases, where they provide clear advantages over centralized systems. He notes that most non-financial applications, such as gaming or social media, don’t require global immutable ledgers and are more efficiently served by centralized alternatives. This shift has led to capital concentration around fewer, stronger narratives, increasing Bitcoin’s market dominance while reducing investment in speculative altcoins. Cipolaro views this trend as market consolidation rather than collapse, with a focus on economically sustainable applications. A smaller, more durable market grounded in financial utility may enhance long-term stability and attract institutional interest. The crypto space may ultimately function as a specialized financial technology layer rather than a comprehensive Web3 overhaul. The next phase of development will likely emphasize real-world utility, regulatory clarity, and prudent capital allocation over rapid narrative expansion.

TheNewsCrypto02/23 09:02

Crypto’s Investable Universe Is Shrinking: NYDIG

TheNewsCrypto02/23 09:02

AI Payment Undercurrents: Google Brings 60 Allies, Stripe Builds Its Own Entire Road

The AI payment war is intensifying as major tech companies race to control the infrastructure for AI-driven transactions. Google has formed an alliance with over 60 traditional financial and tech companies, including Mastercard and PayPal, to establish the "AI Agent Payment Protocol." Meanwhile, Stripe has taken a more independent approach by acquiring key companies like Bridge (for stablecoin capabilities) and Privy (for wallet technology), co-developing the Tempo blockchain with Paradigm, and launching the Agentic Commerce Protocol (ACP) with OpenAI. This allows AI platforms like ChatGPT to enable seamless, in-chat payments without redirecting users. At the heart of the conflict is the "toll" for processing AI transactions. Stripe’s strategy involves building a full-stack solution—from stablecoin accounts and blockchain infrastructure to banking licenses—while Google’s coalition relies on established financial networks. Notably, Circle and its USDC stablecoin emerge as a likely winner regardless of which camp dominates, as both ecosystems depend on compliant, auditable digital dollars for settlement. The broader implication is the need for a financial system capable of supporting autonomous AI agents conducting economic activities. While Stripe envisions a future where AI handles end-to-end transactions, Google’s alliance prefers integrating AI with existing human-centric systems. Regardless, the adoption of stablecoins for AI payments is accelerating, with regulatory and consumer protection questions remaining unresolved. The infrastructure is being built rapidly, and the toll collection has already begun.

marsbit02/23 07:34

AI Payment Undercurrents: Google Brings 60 Allies, Stripe Builds Its Own Entire Road

marsbit02/23 07:34

Who Controls the Profit Rights of Digital Dollars? The Wall Street vs. Crypto Capital Game Behind the CLARITY Act

The CLARITY Act represents a pivotal U.S. legislative effort to regulate digital assets, moving beyond the infrastructure-focused GENIUS Act. It aims to end "regulation by enforcement" by granting the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over digital commodities and the SEC over investment contracts. A major conflict emerged in the Senate over "yield-bearing stablecoins." Traditional banks, fearing massive deposit outflows and damage to their net interest margins, lobbied for a total ban on third-party stablecoin yields. The crypto industry, led by Coinbase, argued this would stifle innovation, deprive users of rightful earnings from underlying assets like Treasuries, and drive capital offshore. The debate reached a stalemate in early 2026, stalling the bill's progress. White House mediation set a March 1 deadline for a compromise. A proposed solution, the "Digital Markets Restructure Act," introduced a "Yield Neutrality" principle, decoupling yield rights from bank charters, and a "Residual-Risk Assessment Model" to regulate based on actual risk (enterprise, exposure, market) rather than outdated classifications. The outcome will profoundly impact the U.S. financial system: potentially deepening demand for U.S. Treasuries, lowering government borrowing costs, and extending dollar hegemony digitally. It forces traditional banks to digitize and could cause a major schism in DeFi, pushing compliant players toward institutionalization and smaller, non-compliant protocols offshore. The act ultimately decides who controls the profits of the digital dollar.

marsbit02/22 05:34

Who Controls the Profit Rights of Digital Dollars? The Wall Street vs. Crypto Capital Game Behind the CLARITY Act

marsbit02/22 05:34

活动图片