Crypto today: Markets open under pressure as Trump’s tariffs rattle risk assets

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-24Last updated on 2026-02-24

Abstract

Cryptocurrency markets faced initial selling following former President Trump's imposition of 15% global tariffs, which triggered broad risk-off sentiment across financial assets. While equities and tech indices declined, Bitcoin demonstrated resilience, rebounding above $66,000 as capital rotated defensively into the leading cryptocurrency, boosting its dominance to 58–60%. Ethereum underperformed, dropping 1.72%. In a significant regulatory development, the SEC eased capital requirements for certain USD stablecoins, allowing broker-dealers to treat them as cash equivalents with a 2% haircut. This change improves balance-sheet efficiency and is expected to encourage institutional adoption. Meanwhile, infrastructure progress continued with the rollout of XRPL’s permissioned DEX and Société Générale’s euro stablecoin issuance, though XRP’s price declined amid the broader market retracement. Despite near-term price weakness, structural adoption signals continued to strengthen.

Crypto markets opened under pressure after President Trump imposed 15% global tariffs following the Supreme Court setback.

The ruling constrained prior trade measures, prompting a broader tariff expansion targeting key partners, including China and Europe.

This policy shock injected immediate geopolitical friction into financial markets.

Equities reacted first as global growth exposure was repriced. US 30 fell 0.55% to 49,354.5, while US 500 declined 0.66% to 6,863.9.

Tech exposure weakened further, with US Tech 100 sliding 0.89% to 24,790.9. Small Cap 2000 also dropped 0.95% to 2,638.5, reinforcing broad liquidation.

Selling then began to exhaust near key demand zones. Bitcoin [BTC] rebounded above $66,000 and advanced toward $68,000, despite swings near $67,500.

This recovery signaled safe-haven rotation rather than speculative inflows. Meanwhile, Ethereum [ETH] fell 1.72% as traders de-risked high-beta exposure. Capital consolidated into Bitcoin, lifting dominance to 58–60%.

Correlation remained elevated with Nasdaq at 0.62–0.80, yet lower at 45.83% volatility versus Ethereum’s 50–60%, reinforcing Bitcoin’s maturing macro-hedge behavior.

SEC eases capital rules for USD stablecoins

Regulatory clarity emerged after prolonged capital treatment uncertainty surrounding stablecoins within broker-dealer frameworks.

Firms previously applied punitive 100% haircuts, excluding USD-pegged stablecoins from net capital recognition. This constraint limited balance-sheet efficiency and discouraged institutional usage.

In response, SEC staff issued guidance redefining eligible stablecoin treatment. Broker-dealers may now classify qualifying USD-pegged stablecoins as cash equivalents.

A standardized 2% haircut applies, allowing 98% capital recognition. For instance, a $100 million position contributes $98 million toward net capital calculations.

As the balance sheet pressure eases, firms expand stablecoin integration within settlement and collateral operations. Market participants gain faster funding mobility, while tokenized asset flows scale more efficiently.

At the ecosystem level, legitimacy strengthens as compliant issuers attract institutional trust.

Lower capital frictions also compress holding costs, enabling yield structures to align with money-market benchmarks, thereby reinforcing stablecoin competitiveness within short-duration liquidity markets.

Adoption advances, yet market sentiment remains defensive

As institutional blockchain infrastructure continued evolving, XRPL’s permissioned DEX rollout extended this development trajectory. Following its activation, liquidity architecture began shifting toward regulated trading environments.

Compliance-gated pools enabled controlled exchange of tokenized fiat and stablecoins, gradually deepening bank-grade participation.

Société Générale’s euro-denominated stablecoin issuance soon reinforced this institutional progression.

Even so, market pricing diverged from these structural gains. XRP declined nearly 4% to $1.37, reflecting the broader crypto retracement. As realized losses surfaced, holders reduced exposure, sustaining near-term sell pressure.

Beneath price weakness, adoption signals continued firming. Liquidity remained tight while institutions assessed operational integration.

Historical infrastructure cycles reflect similar sequencing, where deployment precedes capital inflows, allowing demand formation to mature before measurable liquidity expansion materializes.


Final Summary

  • Bitcoin [BTC] showed relative resilience under tariff-driven risk-off flows, with dominance rising to 58–60% as capital rotated defensively.
  • Stablecoin regulatory relief and XRP Ledger [XRPL] DEX expansion strengthened crypto infrastructure, positioning liquidity and yield integration.

Related Questions

QWhat was the immediate market reaction to President Trump's announcement of 15% global tariffs?

ACrypto markets opened under pressure, with equities declining first as global growth exposure was repriced. Major indices like US 30 fell 0.55%, US 500 declined 0.66%, and US Tech 100 slid 0.89%.

QHow did Bitcoin behave differently from other risk assets following the tariff announcement?

ABitcoin showed resilience, rebounding above $66,000 and advancing toward $68,000. This signaled safe-haven rotation rather than speculative inflows, with its dominance rising to 58-60% as capital consolidated into BTC.

QWhat significant regulatory change did the SEC announce regarding stablecoins?

AThe SEC issued guidance allowing broker-dealers to classify qualifying USD-pegged stablecoins as cash equivalents with a standardized 2% haircut, enabling 98% capital recognition instead of the previous punitive 100% haircuts.

QWhat was the market performance of XRP despite institutional adoption advances?

AXRP declined nearly 4% to $1.37, reflecting the broader crypto retracement, even as adoption signals continued firming with developments like XRPL's permissioned DEX rollout and Société Générale's euro-denominated stablecoin issuance.

QHow did Bitcoin's volatility and correlation with traditional markets compare to Ethereum's?

ABitcoin showed lower volatility at 45.83% compared to Ethereum's 50-60%, while maintaining elevated correlation with Nasdaq at 0.62-0.80, reinforcing Bitcoin's maturing macro-hedge behavior.

Related Reads

From 'Old Dogs' to 'New Darlings': How AI is Revaluing Old Infrastructure, from Dell to Nokia

"Old Dogs" Become AI's New Darlings: Revaluing Legacy Infrastructure The AI investment narrative is shifting. Beyond the spotlight on core chipmakers like Nvidia, a new wave of interest is rising for legacy tech companies—Dell, HPE, Nokia, Cisco, Corning, Western Digital—once labeled as slow-growth, outdated stories. This resurgence stems from AI's evolution from model development to real-world deployment, creating massive demand for physical infrastructure. As AI moves into data center construction and enterprise adoption, the focus turns to who can actually build and deliver complex systems. These established players hold decades of experience in supply chains, integration, networking, and enterprise delivery—assets now critical for scaling AI. The revaluation can be grouped into three key infrastructure areas: 1. **Servers & Integration (e.g., Dell, HPE):** They are becoming essential system integrators, transforming GPUs into full-scale AI servers with networking, power, and cooling, then delivering them to clients. Strong recent earnings and AI-specific revenue/order growth for Dell and HPE underscore this shift. 2. **Networking & Connectivity (e.g., Corning, Nokia, Cisco):** As AI clusters grow, high-speed data transfer becomes paramount. Corning benefits from fiber demand for data center links, Nokia is exploring AI-integrated wireless networks (AI-RAN), and Cisco sees surging orders for data center switches—all critical for efficient AI operations. 3. **Storage (e.g., Western Digital, Seagate):** The AI data explosion requires vast capacity. Beyond high-speed memory (HBM), there's growing need for high-capacity HDDs to store training data, logs, video, and cold/archival data cost-effectively. This revaluation, however, is not a blanket endorsement. True reassessment requires concrete proof: AI-driven orders and revenue growth, upward revisions to company guidance, and sustainable improvements in profit quality, not just top-line sales. In essence, AI is not turning all old tech firms into high-growth stocks; it is selectively re-pricing the "old assets" of companies that are mission-critical for building the new AI infrastructure, transforming their legacy capabilities into renewed growth engines.

marsbit10m ago

From 'Old Dogs' to 'New Darlings': How AI is Revaluing Old Infrastructure, from Dell to Nokia

marsbit10m ago

Probability in the Price: How World Cup Odds Are Calculated

**The Probability in the Price: How World Cup Odds Are Calculated** Two major systems released their "championship probabilities" before the 2026 World Cup, and they disagreed on the favorite. Prediction market aggregators listed France at around **17%**, while the Opta supercomputer gave European champion Spain **16.1%**. These numbers look similar, but their production methods are fundamentally different. The market's **17%** is the **price** that clears after hundreds of millions of dollars in trading across platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, where contracts trade between 0 and 100 cents, directly representing implied probability. This liquidity is provided by crypto-native market makers like Wintermute, though the market still has "the liquidity profile of an early-stage" asset class. In contrast, Opta's **16.1%** is a **simulated frequency**. Its model uses team data (including betting market odds as an input) to estimate match probabilities, then runs **10,000 full tournament simulations**, counting how often each team wins. Which is more accurate? There is **no rigorous, cross-tournament academic study** directly comparing their track records. However, a persistent **longshot bias**—where low-probability outcomes are systematically overvalued—observed in traditional betting for nearly a century, has also been found in modern crypto prediction markets. Research shows low-price contracts on Kalshi/Polymer less likely to pay out than their implied odds suggest. Unlike traditional bookmakers, prediction markets operate on **public blockchain ledgers**, making every transaction auditable and enabling such research. However, price formation is also influenced by **regulatory uncertainty**, as seen in recent US state-level bans and legal battles over jurisdiction. In summary, the "probability" you see is either a **market-clearing price** subject to behavioral biases and liquidity constraints, or a **model-simulated frequency** that partially incorporates market data. The question of which method is more reliable remains open, highlighting the importance of asking: **How was this number produced?**

marsbit39m ago

Probability in the Price: How World Cup Odds Are Calculated

marsbit39m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片