Mapping Bitcoin’s liquidity slowdown as old coins re-enter circulation

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-13Last updated on 2025-12-13

Abstract

Bitcoin's rally is showing signs of strain as long-held coins begin to re-enter circulation, signaling potential distribution alarms for the first time in its history. Key indicators, including the Reserve Risk metric, suggest early holders are steadily releasing BTC into the market, often through exchanges, ETFs, and institutional vehicles. This movement coincides with declining liquidity, as evidenced by the falling Inter-exchange Flow Pulse (IFP), which has dipped below its 90-day moving average—a pattern historically associated with slower or corrective market phases. Despite trading near $90,000, Bitcoin remains below key moving averages, with the RSI showing neutral momentum and on-balance volume flattening, indicating a lack of fresh demand. The market appears to be entering a consolidation stage, with thinning capital flows posing challenges for near-term upside momentum.

Bitcoin’s [BTC] rally seems strained. Long-held coins are beginning to move, liquidity is thinning, and nothing looks as straightforward as before.

The market is at a crossroads – the next move may depend on how capital flows evolve from here.

Old coins are moving again

Data shared by Joao Wedson, CEO of Alphractal, showed that Bitcoin now has four clear distribution alarms – a first in its history.

Source: Alphractal

The Reserve Risk indicator, which tracks movements of older, dormant coins, has repeatedly flashed sell signs since 2024. What this means is that early holders are steadily releasing BTC back into circulation.

Source: Alphractal

Much of this supply appears to be flowing into exchanges, ETFs, and institutional vehicles, right at the peak of market attention. So far, similar patterns have come up late in previous cycles, often a change from rapid upside to a slower, more fragile time.

Liquidity lagging behind?

As old coins move back into circulation, the flow of liquidity between exchanges is losing strength.

The Inter-exchange Flow Pulse (IFP) is trending lower and slipping below its 90-day moving average, a level that has often meant slower or corrective phases in past cycles.

Fewer positive flows are moving across exchanges to support the rally.

Source: CryptoQuant

What’s interesting is that Bitcoin’s price is still holding near cycle highs, even as this support fades. This kind of mismatch has so far meant consolidation rather than selloffs.

Unless inter-exchange flows recover, Bitcoin may struggle to sustain upside in the near term.

It’s showing up on the price chart too

Bitcoin traded near $90,000 at press time, but remained below its key short and long-term moving averages – a loss of trend strength.

The RSI showed no strong buying or selling pressure. At the same time, on-balance volume flattened, so there’s a lack of fresh demand entering the market.

Source: TradingView

Bitcoin may be beginning a consolidation stage.


Final Thoughts

  • Bitcoin’s rally is losing structural support.
  • With BTC near $90K but flows thinning, the market may be entering consolidation.
Next: Strategy keeps Nasdaq 100 spot – Will MSCI force $2.8B in outflows?
Share
  • Share
  • Tweet

Related Reads

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

**Summary:** A growing "anti-college" movement is gaining traction among elite circles in Silicon Valley, challenging the traditional value of a four-year university degree. Proponents argue that college has become an expensive, slow, and increasingly irrelevant waste of time, especially in the fast-paced tech world where opportunities pass by quickly. The movement is led by figures like billionaire Peter Thiel, who criticizes universities for high costs, ideological indoctrination, and stifling true innovation. His "Thiel Fellowship" pays young people to drop out and pursue ventures. Companies like Palantir Technologies (co-founded by Thiel) fuel this trend with programs like the "Meritocracy Fellowship," which offers high school graduates paid internships as an alternative to immediate college enrollment, promising a practical "Palantir Degree." Key drivers include: 1. **Economics:** Skyrocketing student debt versus the allure of immediate, high-paying tech jobs or startup funding. 2. **Technology:** AI and online tools lowering barriers to self-education and product development, making formal instruction seem inefficient. 3. **Culture:** A backlash against perceived "woke" ideology and DEI policies in universities, coupled with a belief that these institutions suppress meritocracy and masculine drive. The movement is notably male-dominated. Critics, like economist David Deming, warn against overgeneralizing from dropout success stories (survivorship bias). He emphasizes that genuine autodidacts are rare, corporate training is narrowly focused, and the "college wage premium" remains high for most people. University liberal arts education, he argues, builds adaptable problem-solving skills and broad perspectives. The debate highlights a deeper crisis in education. The core model of the modern university appears increasingly mismatched with the speed of the information age. The movement signals a shift in the locus of learning from institutional "education" to personal, active "learning" powered by the internet and AI. Ultimately, this may not mean the end of university, but rather a painful evolution. The future likely holds more hybrid, personalized, and lifelong learning pathways. The central question becomes: in a world changing faster than any curriculum, how do we best learn?

marsbit1m ago

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

marsbit1m ago

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

The commercialization of generative AI is facing a critical inflection point as a potential price war looms. According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI is considering a significant cut to its token fees to compete with rival Anthropic, signaling a shift from a growth-at-all-costs model focused on token consumption. This move comes as both companies, reportedly losing billions on compute, prepare for IPOs, and as enterprise customers face "bill shock" from switching to usage-based token billing. Reports indicate poor ROI, with one analysis finding only 18 cents of every dollar spent on AI tokens generates user-facing value. The industry's initial phases—from flat-rate subscriptions to aggressive subsidies—have given way to a reckoning with real costs. Analysts debate the future: some predict a bifurcation between premium, high-cost models for complex tasks and cheaper alternatives for routine work, while others believe overall spending will still rise as agentic AI increases tokens per task. Notably, Chinese model DeepSeek's low-cost API is gaining traction with U.S. enterprises, adding competitive pressure. The core challenge is redefining value beyond token volume ("tokenmaxxing") toward measurable productivity ("valuemaxxing"), as the entire AI value chain, from cloud providers to chipmakers, feels the ripple effects of unsustainable pricing.

marsbit5m ago

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

marsbit5m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片