Dubai’s regulator warns MEXC, KuCoin to cease ‘unlicensed’ crypto activity

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-07Last updated on 2026-03-07

Abstract

Dubai's Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) has issued cease and desist orders to crypto exchanges MEXC and KuCoin for operating without a license in the region. The regulator warned investors that engaging with these unlicensed platforms poses financial and legal risks. This crackdown occurs amid heightened regional tensions, particularly concerning Iran, where crypto activity surged by 700% as the regime uses digital assets to bypass U.S. sanctions. The UAE, the second-largest crypto market in the MENA region, is intensifying scrutiny of unlicensed exchanges, partly due to Western pressure to prevent illicit capital flows.

Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) has ordered crypto exchanges MEXC, KuCoin, and their affiliates to immediately cease all “unlicensed” activity in the region.

In a public statement, the regulator said that MEXC affiliates do not hold a VARA license. It also warned investors that engaging with the exchange exposes them to financial risk and legal consequences.

Interestingly, the Friday warning against MEXC followed a similar move against KuCoin. On Thursday, the agency issued a stern warning to KuCoin and its users in the region.

“VARA advises consumers and investors in Dubai to avoid engaging with Kucoin or the purpose of Virtual Asset services, and to exercise caution when considering interactions with unregulated entities.”

Dubai intensifies crackdown on crypto activity

Dubai has positioned itself as a crypto-friendly jurisdiction, but only to firms that adhere to its compliance framework. In October 2025, the regulator fined 19 firms for operating unlicensed crypto activities, slapping each with penalties ranging from $27k to $ 163k.

Although most firms tend to resume operations after receiving regulatory approval, the latest crackdown coincided with Iran’s escalations and a sharp increase in crypto activity across the broader region.

The UAE is the second-largest crypto market in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, after Turkey. It saw $53 billion in crypto flows as of June 2025.

However, recent tensions have led to a notable 700% surge in crypto activity across Iran, both from Iranian citizens and the government. Crypto has become one of the alternatives for the Iranian government to bypass U.S sanctions.

Now, the U.S has shifted its focus to crypto exchanges, including Binance, for potentially aiding Iran in bypassing these sanctions.

Although Binance has denied facilitating illicit Iranian capital flows, the pressure could be one of the reasons Dubai is scaling its crackdown on unlicensed exchanges.

Separately, the UAE is also reportedly exploring freezing Iranian assets to block Tehran’s access to foreign currency and global trade. In January, the blockchain security research firm TRM Labs found that the Iranian regime accounted for half of the crypto activity in the country.

Put differently, crypto has become a key lifeline for the Iranian regime and could attract more scrutiny from regional and Western regulators amid the ongoing tensions.


Final Summary

  • Dubai’s watchdog issued a “cease and desist” warning to MEXC and KuCoin for operating without a license in the region.
  • Intense crackdown follows rising regional and Western pressure to block capital inflows to the Iranian regime.

Related Questions

QWhich two crypto exchanges did Dubai's VARA order to cease unlicensed activities?

ADubai's VARA ordered MEXC and KuCoin to cease all unlicensed activities.

QWhat is the stated reason for investors to avoid engaging with these unlicensed exchanges according to VARA?

AVARA warned that engaging with these unlicensed exchanges exposes investors to financial risk and legal consequences.

QWhat significant regional geopolitical event is mentioned as coinciding with Dubai's latest regulatory crackdown?

AThe latest crackdown coincided with Iran's escalations and a sharp increase in crypto activity across the broader region.

QHow much did crypto activity in Iran surge by, according to the article, and what is one major reason for this surge?

ACrypto activity across Iran saw a 700% surge, partly because crypto has become an alternative for the Iranian government to bypass U.S. sanctions.

QWhat broader action is the UAE reportedly exploring in relation to Iran, beyond the crypto crackdown?

AThe UAE is reportedly also exploring freezing Iranian assets to block Tehran's access to foreign currency and global trade.

Related Reads

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbit9m ago

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbit9m ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbit1h ago

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片