Dormant Bitcoin awakens – Analyzing BTC cycle’s key liquidity test

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-23Last updated on 2026-01-23

Abstract

This cycle is witnessing an unprecedented reactivation of long-dormant Bitcoin supply, far exceeding the levels seen in the 2017-2018 bull market. Over 1.6 million BTC, valued at approximately $150-160 billion, have moved since 2024. This distribution is occurring during price expansions, signals calculated profit-taking by long-term holders rather than distress selling, which has bolstered market liquidity without causing structural breakdowns. Concurrently, significant ETF outflows, including a single-session withdrawal of over $700 million, are acting as a liquidity catalyst. These outflows are not purely bearish; they represent a broader rebalancing where long-term holders supply liquidity as ETF demand cools. This rotation has led to price consolidation but not a market collapse. The released dormant coins are being absorbed by short-term holders (STHs), whose supply has climbed toward the upper end of its historical range. This absorption is increasing market volatility and fostering a sentiment geared toward short-term trading, likely sustaining choppy price action before a clearer trend can resume. The overall dynamic points to a major liquidity rotation feeding into price strength, with near-term volatility expected to remain elevated until the redistribution is complete.

Long-dormant Bitcoin [BTC] supply is re-entering circulation at an unprecedented pace in this cycle. Historically, the prior record occurred during the 2017-2018 bull market.

At that time, roughly 900k to 1 million BTC held for over two years became active, valued at around $15–20 billion.

That distribution phase increased market liquidity and ultimately capped upside momentum, leading to extended volatility and a cyclical top.

However, the current cycle far exceeds those levels. Since 2024, more than 1.6 million dormant BTC have moved.

At prices near $95,000-$100,000, this amount equates to roughly $150-160 billion in value.

Importantly, these movements aligned with price expansions rather than drawdowns. As a result, the market absorbed supply without structural breakdowns.

Investor behavior signals calculated profit-taking, not selling distress. Long-term holders are distributing in strength, reinforcing liquidity while maintaining bullish conviction.

ETF Outflows reflect a broader liquidity rebalancing cycle

ETF Outflows are emerging as an active liquidity catalyst rather than a purely bearish signal.

CoinGlass data shows over $700 million exiting Bitcoin ETFs in a single session, matching the largest withdrawal since the 20th of November 2025.

Historically, similar outflow episodes in early 2024 and late 2025 coincided with short-term price compression.

However, those phases did not trigger structural breakdowns. Instead, they redirected liquidity sources.

As ETF demand cooled, older coins began re-entering circulation. Long-term holders supplied liquidity where ETFs stepped back.

Consequently, dormant Bitcoin activity increased alongside ETF redemptions, suggesting rotation rather than panic.

Investors adjusted their exposure rather than exiting the market. This shift was reflected in price consolidation lasting several weeks, followed by renewed trend continuation.

At the time of writing, ETF outflows aligned with revived long‐term supply, suggesting near‐term volatility may remain elevated. However, if absorption continues, prices are likely to stabilize once redistribution is complete.

Are STHs absorbing the supply?

Short-term holder supply has expanded in clear cycles over the years, tracking phases of price acceleration and redistribution.

In early bull markets, short‐term holder (STH) supply rose to 5–6 million BTC as new demand absorbed circulating coins. During stronger rallies, supply peaked at 7–8 million BTC, reflecting rapid turnover in ownership.

More recently, STH supply has again climbed toward the upper end of that range, reflecting renewed inflows.

This growth did not occur in isolation. Coins released from long-dormant holdings are fed directly into STH accounts. As older holders sold their coins to take advantage of market strength, newer participants absorbed the available supply.

Consequently, market liquidity improved while volatility increased. Sentiment shifted toward short-term trading rather than long-term conviction, leading to consolidation phases after rallies.

Historically, similar STH expansions followed dormant releases during 2017 and liquidity-driven macro easing in 2020-2021.

If dormant coin releases persist, STH supply may continue rising. That would likely sustain choppy price action before a clearer trend resumes.


Final Thoughts

  • Bitcoin is seeing its largest liquidity rotation ever, as dormant coins and ETF outflows feed supply into price strength rather than distress-driven selling.
  • ETF redemptions are shifting liquidity to short-term holders, raising volatility and signaling consolidation before potential trend continuation.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the unprecedented trend observed in the dormant Bitcoin supply during the current cycle?

ALong-dormant Bitcoin supply is re-entering circulation at an unprecedented pace, with over 1.6 million dormant BTC moving since 2024, far exceeding the previous record of 900k to 1 million BTC during the 2017-2018 bull market.

QHow did the market react to the movement of dormant BTC in terms of price and liquidity?

AThe market absorbed the increased supply without structural breakdowns. The movements aligned with price expansions rather than drawdowns, indicating calculated profit-taking by long-term holders, which reinforced liquidity while maintaining bullish conviction.

QWhat role do ETF outflows play according to the article, and are they purely bearish?

AETF outflows are described as an active liquidity catalyst rather than a purely bearish signal. They reflect a broader liquidity rebalancing cycle, where older coins re-enter circulation as long-term holders supply liquidity where ETFs step back, suggesting rotation rather than panic.

QHow has the supply held by Short-term Holders (STHs) changed, and what does it indicate?

AShort-term holder supply has expanded, climbing toward the upper end of its historical range of 7-8 million BTC. This reflects renewed inflows and the absorption of coins released from long-term holders, leading to improved market liquidity but increased volatility and consolidation phases.

QWhat is the overall implication of the current liquidity rotation for Bitcoin's price trend?

AThe liquidity rotation, involving dormant coins and ETF outflows, is feeding supply into price strength rather than distress-driven selling. It signals near-term elevated volatility and consolidation, but if absorption continues, prices are likely to stabilize and resume the trend once redistribution is complete.

Related Reads

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

**Title: Analyzing AI's Impact on Economic Growth and Productivity** This article examines three contrasting views on AI's influence on economic growth and productivity. **The Optimistic View** posits that AI, especially through automating R&D ("recursive self-improvement"), could dramatically accelerate growth, even triggering a technological "singularity" with explosive, potentially infinite, economic expansion. **The Moderate/Mainstream View** acknowledges AI's productivity benefits but emphasizes significant real-world constraints that could limit its impact. These include: limited cost savings per task, structural ceilings on which jobs and industries are "exposed" to AI, adoption bottlenecks (e.g., compute, energy, regulatory hurdles), and the "weak link" effect where non-automatable tasks cap overall gains. Consequently, the realized AI dividend may be far lower than optimistic projections, with estimates typically ranging from 0.1% to 1.3% annual productivity growth. **The Pessimistic View** stems from two strands. The first aligns with the moderate view but applies extremely conservative assumptions about task exposure and efficiency gains, yielding minimal projected impact. The second introduces a demand-side critique: if AI primarily replaces rather than augments labor, it could depress labor's share of income, weaken consumer demand, and create a "demand trap" that ultimately stifles growth, unless offset by redistribution policies. **The authors' assessment** is nuanced: * **Short-term (1-2 years):** AI will support growth primarily through investment spending, not significant productivity gains. * **Medium-term (3-5 years):** Three potential paths emerge based on AI demand and bottleneck severity: 1. **"Optimistic Path":** High demand, few bottlenecks. Rapid productivity gains but risk of major job displacement and social conflict without redistribution. 2. **"Moderate Path" (most likely):** High demand but significant, surmountable bottlenecks. Leads to moderate productivity gains, financial market volatility (K-shaped returns), and sectoral job losses. 3. **"Pessimistic Path":** Low demand or severe bottlenecks. Minimal productivity and growth impact, triggering financial market corrections but allowing a smoother societal transition with less labor disruption. * **Long-term:** AI holds potential for a major productivity revolution and prosperity. The conclusion stresses that no path is smooth. Technologically "optimistic" outcomes could be socially detrimental, while "pessimistic" technological diffusion might be more socially stable. Policymakers must monitor developments and prepare balanced responses to manage economic, financial, and social sustainability.

marsbit1m ago

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

marsbit1m ago

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War The article argues that the contemporary geopolitical and economic rivalry between the US and China represents a "New Cold War," but one fundamentally fought through technology and financial markets, not physical barriers or conventional trade. Historically, US dominance was secured through financial systems. The Soviet Union, reliant on the rigid "Transferable Ruble," was ultimately undermined by its dependency on the US dollar for oil trade. Later, Japan's semiconductor challenge was countered not just by tariffs (e.g., Plaza Accord, 301 investigations) but by binding it to US Treasury bonds. China presents a more complex, "embedded" challenger. While it holds vast dollar reserves and US debt like Japan, its industrial base is stronger and more diversified than the Soviet Union's. Surviving the initial 2018 trade war phase, the conflict has evolved into a "tech-financial war." The core battlefield is now the stock market. US tech stocks (AI, semiconductors) are treated as sovereign assets, buoyed by bipartisan national will. China is pushing to strengthen its own financial markets to convert industrial strength into financial power and fund its tech ambitions. Companies like ChangXin (semiconductors), Moonshot AI, and DJI compete not just for market share but as financial proxies for their respective systems. The new paradigm is moving from globally efficient monopolies (Apple, Google) towards companies that achieve monopolistic profits within their respective geopolitical spheres. This competition over "pricing power" and financial valuation in segmented markets defines the current era, making the stock market the primary arena for this tech-centric struggle.

marsbit10m ago

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

marsbit10m ago

RWA Weekly: Ten European Financial Institutions Establish Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network

RWA Weekly: European Banks Form Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network Covering July 24-31, 2026, the RWA sector saw a steady on-chain total value locked (TVL) of $36.8 billion, with holder count hitting a record high. However, stablecoin transfer volumes fell sharply (~30%), indicating low on-chain settlement demand. Key regulatory moves include South Korea advancing stablecoin legislation and a push to scrap crypto taxes, Kenya lowering capital requirements for stablecoin issuers, and Zimbabwe approving seven projects for its crypto sandbox. In project developments, BIS-led Project Agorá successfully tested cross-border payments with tokenized funds across six currencies. Ten major European financial institutions formed the RL1 blockchain cooperative to build tokenized asset infrastructure. Other notable updates: Aviva launched a tokenized dollar liquidity fund on XRPL, POSCO International tokenized commercial invoices on Injective, and a Brazilian farmer used tokenized cattle as collateral for a loan. Additional progress includes BNY Mellon migrating its core transfer agent operations to blockchain, Securitize gaining SEC investment advisor registration, and Tether’s compliant stablecoin USA₮ launching on Celo. Ondo Finance introduced Ondo Network, a new execution layer focused on speed and privacy, moving away from its initial chain plans. An analysis highlights that despite the growing scale of on-chain RWAs (~$32B), approximately 90% remain underutilized in DeFi, pointing to a critical challenge in unlocking liquidity and fostering real-world application beyond mere issuance.

marsbit11m ago

RWA Weekly: Ten European Financial Institutions Establish Tokenized Asset Cooperative; Ondo Launches New Execution Network Ondo Network

marsbit11m ago

South Korean Stock Market Sees Sharp Rebound After Forceful De-leveraging, SK Hynix Rises 30%

On July 31, South Korean stocks staged a historic rebound. The benchmark KOSPI index surged 18.27%, with chipmaker SK Hynix hitting a 30% gain limit. This followed a brutal, near-40% decline in the KOSPI over the previous month, driven largely by a deleveraging spiral involving leveraged ETFs. Analysts attributed the sharp sell-off to structural liquidity issues rather than deteriorating corporate fundamentals. The rally was triggered by a confluence of positive catalysts. Firstly, strong earnings from U.S. cloud giants Microsoft and Amazon alleviated fears of an "AI bubble burst," boosting global tech sentiment. Secondly, SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won made a rare personal purchase of SK Hynix shares, seen as a strong vote of confidence. Thirdly, the South Korean government announced a 20 trillion won ($139 billion) AI investment fund. In response to the market turmoil, South Korean regulators are tightening controls on leveraged ETFs, admitting oversight shortcomings. Measures include raising minimum cash保证金 requirements for散户 investors and suspending new product launches. While the rebound signals eased liquidity pressure, analysts note deep structural issues remain. The market's future stability is seen as dependent on global tech capital expenditure trends and memory chip price cycles, with some viewing the surge as a technical correction rather than a definitive trend reversal.

marsbit31m ago

South Korean Stock Market Sees Sharp Rebound After Forceful De-leveraging, SK Hynix Rises 30%

marsbit31m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片