Tokenomics in Detail: Supply and Demand, Incentives and Governance

Twitter发布于2022-08-01更新于2022-08-02

文章摘要

Token economics is an important part of cryptocurrencies.

Tokenomics is one of the most important aspects of Crypto

If you don't understand tokenomics, you're not gonna make it.

Here’s everything you need to know about Tokenomics🧵

This may be better to listen to.

Here's the video:

https://youtu.be/w0HX5Y-yIJY

What we’ll be covering:

• What is tokenomics?

• A deep dive into supply & Demand

• Market Cap & FDV ( + how to use them)

• Unlocks & Emissions

• Demand Drivers

• The questions to ask

Let’s dive in

Tokenomics refers to the economics & incentives surrounding tokens.

It’s a broad term that covers:

• How the token works

• Supply & demand

• The mechanisms that govern it

• Incentives, psychology & behavioral aspects

• Game Theory & a lot more.

Economies of a token

Supply & Demand

Tokenomics = Supply & Demand of a token

Let’s look at the supply side

The lower the supply, the greater the value due to scarcity (assuming demand is constant)

Projects have fixed token supply or aim to reduce it to make it more scarce.

Bitcoin.

Bitcoin has a fixed supply of 21M. There can only ever be 21M BTC.

If the supply was doubled, price would drop significantly.

Not all BTC is released at once. Today, around 19.1M btc exists.

This is why BTC is considered sound money

Mt.Gox Case.

137K BTC was lost 8 years ago due to Mt.Gox ( then popular trading platform)

Now, the money is being returned & it’s going to enter BTC supply.

People are worried that it’ll have a big negative impact on the price.

Maintaining Scarcity

Ways to maintain scarcity:

• Fixed supply cap

• Burn mechanisms: taking tokens out of circulation

• Lost tokens & tokens sent to the wrong address

Tokens with poor tokenomics have no fixed supply and no mechanisms to reduce supply

Burning Tokens

Taking tokens out of circulation is known as burning. It’s similar to a company buying back shares.

ETH gas fees are split into a tip to the miner & base fee. The base fee is burnt.

Burning happens in many ways. It increases scarcity & drives up value.

The total number of tokens isn’t always the most important factor.

Pay attention to:

1. Current supply

2. Rate of release

If only 30% of total supply is in circulation, I wouldn’t be too happy.

Supply will increase by 70%, adding serious pressure to the price.

The time frame matters.

If 70% of total is being released in 1 month, that’s bad. It’ll cause huge downward pressure on price.

If it’s over 10 years, the loss of value each month may be small.

The project’s growth over 10 years could outperform loss of value

Inflationary Tokens

Inflationary tokens: When there’s:

• No fixed supply

• Increasing supply

• No token removal from supply

There’s loss of value due to increasing supply. This is known as inflation

Doge is an example of this.

Deflationary Tokens:

• Fixed supply

• Decreasing supply

• Burning tokens

This is good as it drives up scarcity.

Market Cap & FDV

Market Cap = number of tokens in circulation X current price

Fully Diluted Value (FDV) = total supply that’ll ever exist X current price

Let’s say token A has a price of $1.

100 tokens are in circulation & a total of 1000 will ever exist.

Mcap = $1 x 100 = $100

FDV = $1 x 1000 = $1000

Mcap to FDV ratio

This ratio is useful.

If there’s a large difference between Mcap & FDV, it means that a lot of tokens are still locked & will be released over time.

In this case, it would be smart to investigate the release schedule & where they’re going to come from.

I would be very careful with a project that has 70% of its supply locked up.

As supply increases, there’s a downward pressure on price.

If Mcap & FDV are close to each other it could mean that the change in value due to increased supply won’t have as much of an impact.

Supply terms

Max supply: The maximum number of tokens ever

Current supply: Number of tokens that exist now.

Circulating supply on CoinGecko & other platforms doesn’t always reflect current supply

They remove coins staked & locked by users out of the circulating supply.

Unrealistic Expectations.

People invest in shitcoins priced at $0.0005 with 1T supply.

The hope is that the shitcoin will go to $1 & they’ll get rich. This just can’t happen.

Shitcoins won't be larger than BTC & ETH

If the shitcoin went to $1, the mcap would be 1T, larger than Eth & BTC.

A random shitcoin isn’t gonna be larger than Eth & BTC.

This sort of bias gets countless people rekt.

Token Allocation

Tokens are distributed through:

1. Private Sale/Pre mined: The team, investors & other insiders get allocated tokens privately. Usually at a BIG discount.

2. Fair launch: It’s completely fair.

If there’s a private sale, it comes with a vesting period.

Vesting Period & Unlocks

Tokens allocated to the Team & VCs come with a vesting period.

These tokens are locked for a period of time, during which they cannot sell them.

Knowing when it unlocks. When large quantity of tokens is unlocked & enters supply, price falls.

Emissions

Emissions refer to how quickly a token is released. The emission schedule includes info on unlocks.

You won’t find this on CoinGecko or CoinMarketCap.

Instead, search through the docs.

Example:

Current supply: 100. 1st Month 5 tokens unlock | 2nd Month 10 tokens unlock.

This means that inflation is 2x in month 2.

Tokens that unlock in month 2 would have a higher incentive to sell immediately, because inflation is higher & they got a discount.

VCs dumping unlocks.

This isn’t to say that every VC is looking to dump

Consider these:

• We’re in a bad market, VCs want liquidity

• VC’s solvency situation

• Inflation at unlock

• Emissions schedule

In a bad market, there’s a greater incentive to dump at unlock

Initial Supply:

The % of total supply released at launch plays a big role.

If only 10% of the total supply is released, 90% will be released over time. Then, early Investors will get hit hard by inflation.

Conversely, if 50% is released, inflation will be less impactful.

Supply Side questions

In your analysis, here are some things to look for on the supply side.

• Number of tokens in circulation

• Whether there’s a fixed supply

• When the tokens unlock

• Rate of release

• Burn mechanisms

• How tokens leave supply

• Rate of inflation

• Incentives to sell due to increasing supply

• Inflation at unlock

The Demand Side

No matter how scarce something is, without demand it has no value.

My jar of dirt is 1/1 but no one’s wants it.

Demand can come in multiple forms:

• Value & Yield

• Utility

• Speculation & Memes

Utility

Utility comes in many forms:

• Service/product that actually solves a problem

• Gas fees

• Token being used in a protocol

• Fun - GameFi & Music

• Great Community & Events- BAYC

Yield & Value - Staking & Rewards

Being rewarded for holding the token.

Staking your ETH in Rocketpool gives you 4% APR

Tokens reward holders for holding them in order to increase demand.

你可能也喜欢

产品发布:市场指南针

Glassnode推出全新工具“市场指南针”,旨在解决用户面对海量数据时难以抉择的问题。该工具通过七个维度综合分析市场:其中四个前瞻性维度(宏观环境、资金流动、投资者行为、链上基本面)汇合成一个从“风险规避”到“风险偏好”的主综合评分;另外三个独立维度(周期位置、衍生品、跨资产轮动)则描述当前市场状态。 目前主评分为14(满分100),处于“风险规避”区间,显示市场仍处熊市阶段。比特币价格约64,400美元,月内下跌16%。具体来看: * **宏观**:评分23,主要受美元走强拖累。 * **资金流动**:评分31,稳定币供应增长转负,市场“弹药”略有减少。 * **投资者行为**:评分35,长期持有者占比创新高,显示筹码正流向坚定持有者。 * **链上基本面**:评分38,网络活动有初步回暖迹象,但尚未全面复苏。 * **周期位置**:评分18,处于“投降”阶段,但现价仍高于平均成本。 * **衍生品**:评分43,杠杆率较低,市场仓位谨慎且对冲充分。 * **跨资产轮动**:评分70,显示资金相对青睐山寨币,但各板块普跌,实为“跌得少”的相对优势。 总体而言,市场处于低位盘整阶段,内部结构正在修复,但由美元主导的宏观约束尚未解除,明确的趋势反转仍需等待美元指数回落至其200日均线以下。该工具每日更新数据,每周提供分析摘要。

insights.glassnode4小时前

产品发布:市场指南针

insights.glassnode4小时前

英伟达CPU压境,中国RISC-V迎战:半导体深观察之四

英伟达即将向中国客户提供其首款专为AI设计的独立CPU Vera,基于Arm架构,单颗售价超2万美元。这凸显了中国在AI算力需求激增下,对CPU架构自主可控的迫切性。文章指出,除了x86和Arm,RISC-V正成为中国突破“不可能三角”(繁荣、可控、自主)的关键赛道。 RISC-V因其开源、模块化特性,被视为实现自主可控且有机会繁荣的路径。当前,中国已成为全球RISC-V发展的热点,受AI算力需求、出口管制压力、开源降本以及政策支持等多重因素推动。国内多家厂商的高性能RISC-V核心在SPEC定点跑分上已触及或超过15分的行业门槛,并实现了3GHz以上的主频,拿到了进入高性能计算俱乐部的“入场券”。 产业焦点已从单核性能转向完整的“计算子系统”,包括自研一致性片上网络(NoC)和满足数据中心要求的全栈RAS能力。已有厂商交付了40核、严格兼容RVA23国际标准的服务器处理器,体现了对生态统一性的重视。在视频编解码、加解密等特定负载上,部分国产RISC-V处理器已接近甚至超越x86/Arm同代产品。 挑战同样严峻。生态碎片化、EDA工具链不完善、验证复杂度高、单核能效追趕、以及先进工艺制约等都是必须啃下的“硬骨头”。业界清醒认识到,在数据中心领域超越成熟架构的周期将比预期更长。 结论是,面对英伟达Vera的敲门,中国自研CPU并非只有跟随Arm一条路。RISC-V赛道已在中国推开大门,并在高性能计算领域取得了实质性进展。虽然前路漫长,充满工程挑战,但它为中国提供了在下一轮算力革命中掌握主动权的可能性。

marsbit5小时前

英伟达CPU压境,中国RISC-V迎战:半导体深观察之四

marsbit5小时前

Stratosphere、Pudgy Penguins与Streamex于2026年ETHConf及纽约科技周期间举办创始人圆桌VIP晚宴

2026年6月9日,在ETHConf 2026和纽约科技周期间,Stratosphere、Pudgy Penguins和Streamex在纽约市联合举办了一场私密的“创始人桌”VIP晚宴,汇聚了数字资产、科技、人工智能、传统金融和机构资本领域的众多领导者。 此次仅限受邀者参加的晚宴,旨在将精选的创始人、运营商、基金、高管及机构领袖聚集一堂,在私密环境中促进自然交流。出席嘉宾包括来自花旗、BitMine、BitGo、未来资产证券(美国)、Experian、Pyth Network、Space and Time、MegaETH、B3、Stable、Antler、Delphi Digital、Fun、Linera、Vanta Trading、Streamex、PolyData、Horizen Labs、World Foundation、Zipcode、OpenLedger、Onyx、Definitive、Notalone Ventures等机构的代表。 晚宴由Stratosphere主办,Pudgy Penguins和Streamex联合举办。Stratosphere贡献了其广泛的创始人、运营商、投资者和机构网络;Pudgy Penguins带来了数字资产领域强大的消费品牌和社区;Streamex则聚焦于代币化黄金和大宗商品市场,引入了机构及现实世界资产的视角。 Stratosphere首席执行官哈桑·谢赫表示:“我对数字资产的下一阶段,尤其是商品代币化感到乐观。这类晚宴让我们能将基金、机构和创始人聚集在同一房间,探讨市场走向。”该“创始人桌”系列活动计划在全年主要全球会议期间持续举办,致力于在私密、以关系驱动的场合中连接创始人、资本、机构和领先品牌。 Stratosphere是一家服务于科技和金融行业领导者的生态合作伙伴与增长咨询公司。

TheNewsCrypto7小时前

Stratosphere、Pudgy Penguins与Streamex于2026年ETHConf及纽约科技周期间举办创始人圆桌VIP晚宴

TheNewsCrypto7小时前

交易

现货
合约
活动图片