The Uptober effect: Is Bitcoin’s $110K dip really a set-up for $160K?

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-09-21Last updated on 2025-09-22

Key Takeaways

Is Bitcoin’s $110k dip capitulation?

Bitcoin’s dip looked more like a leverage flush, with HODLers steady and overexposed longs squeezed.

Can the Uptober effect play out again?

Yes, Bitcoin’s September weakness aligns with history. Uptober averages +21.89%, and flows plus liquidity sweeps suggest a setup for a rebound toward $160k into Q4.


Investor patience seems to be wearing thin.

After a week-long pause, Bitcoin [BTC] couldn’t hold $115k to kick off a fresh leg into price discovery. The 2.17% intraday pullback dragged it to near a two-week low, with the market showing clear signs of FUD.

Moreover, BTC’s Open Interest (OI) dropped over $3 billion in just three days, trimming September’s ROI to 4.38%.

But with the shakeout hitting overleveraged longs, is this just a strategically engineered dip?

The Uptober effect on trader psychology

Bitcoin’s historical cycles show a clear price-action pattern. 

Source: CoinGlass

September tends to bleed, averaging -3.14%, making it BTC’s historically weakest month.

But October flips the sentiment with average gains of 21.89%, while Q4 delivered cumulative 85.42% since 2013.

This pattern, known as the “Uptober effect,” has delivered nearly 50% gains in the past two cycles (2023 and 2024), following a weak or red September. Notably, flows suggest traders are pricing in a repeat run. 

Fed expectations skew bullish

RATE CUTRATE CUT

Source: CME Fed Tool

On the macro front, positioning is skewed bullish. 

CME FedWatch data showed 91.9% probability of a 25 bps rate cut at the 29th of October FOMC, lowering the target to 375–400 bps. That marked a 17.6% jump in cut odds from last week.

In this setup, BTC’s September weakness looks like a classic seasonal flush.

Last week’s 25 bps cut barely moved the needle, suggesting the Fed may need to deliver a full 50 bps to trigger stronger risk-on flows.

Bitcoin liquidity sweep raises engineered dip speculation

On-chain flow showed Bitcoin HODLers were still in the game. 

The Net Realized Profit/Loss (NRPL) hasn’t flipped red, even with BTC trading 11.3% below its $124k all-time high. Underwater holders are holding strong, showing conviction for the next leg up.

Meanwhile, realized profits compressed, showing “in-the-money” holders avoided taking gains.

This marked a key divergence from September 2024, when STH NUPL went negative, signaling weak-hand capitulation.

STH NUPLSTH NUPL

Source: Glassnode

In short, traders are leaning into Uptober psychology.

Meanwhile, BTC swept a long-liquidity cluster at $114k, stacked with $60 million+ in long leverage, triggering a clean 3% drawdown in 24 hours. It was a textbook flushout, not weak-hand capitulation.

Therefore, with HODLers holding through the FUD, overexposed longs squeezed, and October as a historical pivot, Bitcoin’s $110k dip looks like a setup for a seasonal rebound toward $160k into year-end.

Share

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

An article compares the core architectural philosophies of WeChat and Telegram, highlighting fundamental differences in data storage, monetization, and developer ecosystems. **Data Storage:** Telegram offers unlimited, synchronized cloud storage for seamless access across all devices. In contrast, WeChat stores chat history locally on each device, requiring a manual migration process for transfer and tethering desktop sessions to an active smartphone. **Features & Ecosystem:** Telegram's open Bot API allows for easy, free bot creation, while WeChat's massive ecosystem of over 4.8 million "mini-programs" operates within a closed, curated, and more regulated platform. Commenting also differs: Telegram uses integrated discussion threads for channels, whereas WeChat relies on pre-moderated comments for official accounts and separate chats for interaction. **File Sharing & Payments:** Telegram supports large file transfers (up to 4GB for Premium), while WeChat limits most files to 200MB. A key divergence is in payments: WeChat Pay is deeply integrated into daily life and commerce in China, whereas Telegram lacks a comparable built-in fiat payment system, focusing instead on third-party bots and crypto. **Analysis:** The comparison reveals two distinct models: WeChat is a tightly integrated, closed ecosystem deeply embedded in the real economy, while Telegram prioritizes open protocols, flexible data handling, and low barriers for developers. An added perspective notes that WeChat's fusion of messaging and payments in a single interface without end-to-end encryption for chats potentially broadens the attack surface, raising security questions as more functions converge.

cryptonews.ru51m ago

You'll Be Surprised How Much WeChat's Architecture Differs from Telegram's

cryptonews.ru51m ago

Hacker Leaks GTA6 and Launches a Token: Leaked Videos Become Ad Space for $CYBERLEEK, Must Buy Tokens to Vote for Next Clip

A hacker group called "CyberLeek" has leaked gameplay footage of the highly anticipated video game *GTA 6*, which is slated for release in 2026. Simultaneously, the group launched a meme token, $CYBERLEEK, on Solana. The leaks, which include maps and gameplay clips, are heavily watermarked with advertisements urging viewers to buy the token. Investigations of blockchain data reveal that the token was created and funded from a single wallet approximately eight hours before the first leak was released, suggesting a coordinated plan. The group has implemented a voting system where token holders can "vote" for the next type of content to be leaked by sending $CYBERLEEK tokens to a designated wallet—a process that permanently transfers the tokens to the hackers. This creates a self-sustaining cycle where interest in the leaks drives token purchases. Financially, the operation involved minimal upfront costs (less than $3,500 in out-of-pocket expenses) but generated significant revenue. On its first day, the token saw $15 million in trading volume, netting the creators an estimated $30,000 from transaction fees alone. While the group later burned a large portion of its developer-held tokens (worth over $1 million) to build trust, the fee-generating mechanism remains intact. The game's publisher, Take-Two Interactive, has initiated legal proceedings to identify the hackers. Despite this, the case demonstrates a new model where leaked intellectual property is used as leverage to promote and profit from a cryptocurrency, with meme token markets serving as an additional revenue stream.

marsbit3h ago

Hacker Leaks GTA6 and Launches a Token: Leaked Videos Become Ad Space for $CYBERLEEK, Must Buy Tokens to Vote for Next Clip

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片