Telegram 将在哈萨克斯坦开设办事处，提高监管合规性

tokeninsight_newsPublished on 2024-10-14Last updated on 2024-10-14

据 Cointelegraph 报道，Telegram 同意在哈萨克斯坦设立办公室，这与该公司日益增强的合规努力相一致，而其首席执行官仍在法国，正在接受调查。

加密友好的通讯应用 Telegram 正在通过在哈萨克斯坦建立当地办公室来改善与监管机构的合规和沟通。

10 月 14 日，哈萨克斯坦数字发展、创新与航空工业部表示，Telegram 已同意任命一名当地代表并在哈萨克斯坦共和国开设办公室。

根据部长扎斯兰·马迪耶夫（Zhaslan Madiyev）的说法，Telegram 在该国的实体存在将是“增加对内容控制的重要一步”。

考虑到 Telegram 在该国的影响力，这一举措非常重要。根据 Telegram 创始人兼首席执行官帕维尔·杜罗夫（Pavel Durov）的说法，每月有 1250 万哈萨克斯坦人使用 Telegram，超过该国 2000 万人口的一半，比 2023 年增长了 25%。

哈萨克斯坦与美国政府及科技公司会晤以应对欺诈

该公告正值哈萨克斯坦官员与美国商会及包括 Meta 和 Apple 在内的主要美国科技公司代表会面之际。

在会议上，哈萨克斯坦官员讨论了与数据保护、打击社交媒体平台（如 Meta 的 WhatsApp）上的欺诈和假账户相关的问题。Meta 表示，在第三季度，它利用人工智能全球封锁了 12 亿个假账户。

根据马迪耶夫的说法，哈萨克斯坦政府一直在与国际合作伙伴合作，以确保公民在数字空间的安全：

“我们正积极与 Telegram 合作，及时删除非法内容和封锁非法频道。根据我们的法律，像 Telegram、WhatsApp 和 TikTok 这样的互联网平台现在必须在哈萨克斯坦有一名代表。”

在杜罗夫在法国接受调查之际，Telegram 加强合规努力

Telegram 在哈萨克斯坦开设办公室的决定是其更广泛合规推动的一部分，此时杜罗夫因平台处理非法活动而面临法国的审查。

自从法国当局在 8 月底对杜罗夫提出多项指控以来，Telegram 加强了对该通讯应用上非法活动的打击。

在 9 月，杜罗夫表示，当相关当局要求时，Telegram 正在分享违反应用规则的用户的 IP 地址和电话号码。

杜罗夫还表示，Telegram 更新了其搜索引擎，从搜索结果中移除了“问题”内容，并使用 AI 来识别非法内容。

Telegram 在哈萨克斯坦的办公室是公司为增加合规性而设立的首批办公室之一。《币电报》曾联系 Telegram 请求评论，但在发表时未收到回复。

Related Reads

Galaxy Weighs Theories After $8.3M Bitcoin Burn Mystery

Galaxy Research is investigating a mysterious Bitcoin transaction where approximately 107 BTC (worth $8.3 million) was deliberately sent to a provably unspendable "burn" address. The primary question is the motive behind destroying such a large sum. Galaxy proposed several theories, including a tax-loss strategy (though deemed unlikely for old coins), a religious or ideological act, an attempt to dispose of illicit funds, or coercion. The firm suggested a plausible explanation could be an automated error, where a trading system mistakenly sent funds to a known burn address labeled "Counterparty" instead of the intended recipient. Galaxy acknowledged all theories are speculative, and the true reason may never be known.

bitcoinist1h ago

Galaxy Weighs Theories After $8.3M Bitcoin Burn Mystery

bitcoinist1h ago

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

A disgruntled early Ethereum developer and token holder presents six core criticisms of the project's trajectory, contrasting it with Solana's rise. 1. **Premature Complacency**: The Ethereum Foundation shifted from a "building" to an "infrastructure" mindset too soon, adopting a passive, "retired chairman" posture before securing market dominance, reflected in ETH's ~65% decline against BTC post-Merge. 2. **Misguided Messaging**: The Merge was marketed primarily on ESG (99.95% energy reduction) rather than user benefits like speed or yield, appealing to internal ideals instead of market demands. 3. **Delayed Execution**: Proof-of-Stake, on the roadmap since 2015, took seven years to launch, ceding critical narrative and development windows. Competitors like Solana built entire ecosystems in that time. 4. **Poor Native Staking UX**: Years after the Merge, there is still no first-party, user-friendly staking application, forcing reliance on centralized services like Lido and undermining ETH's "sound money" narrative. 5. **Managed Decline**: The rollup-centric roadmap deliberately weakens the base layer's fee capture, outsourcing value and profitability to L2s like Arbitrum and Base, which issue their own tokens and fragment capital. 6. **Ideology Over Product**: Ethereum culture prioritizes philosophical purity ("credible neutrality," "public goods") over competitive product delivery that meets user demands (e.g., financialization), while Solana's ecosystem focuses on coordinated execution. The diagnosis is accumulated execution debt, not a coordination failure. Ethereum possessed a structural advantage in 2021 but spent years in governance debates, while Solana efficiently executed. The current market cap reflects these specific strategic failures, not abstract theory.

marsbit1h ago

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

marsbit1h ago

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

Six Grievances from an Ethereum Developer The author, an early investor and developer still building on Ethereum, expresses deep frustration with its trajectory and declining ETH/BTC price since the merge. The core argument is that Ethereum's current market position stems from concrete failures in execution and strategy, not abstract coordination problems. The first grievance targets a shift in the Ethereum Foundation's mentality from builders to "infrastructure," adopting a premature posture of a retired victor. Second, marketing the Merge around ESG (99.95% energy reduction) is seen as talking to its own conscience rather than the market, which prioritizes user experience and yield. Third, the seven-year delay in delivering Proof-of-Stake (PoS) ceded critical narrative and development time to competitors like Solana. Fourth, three years post-merge, there is still no user-friendly first-party staking application, forcing reliance on centralized services like Lido and undermining ETH's monetary narrative. Fifth, the rollup-centric roadmap has strategically surrendered base-layer fee capture to L2s, fragmenting value within the ecosystem while Solana demonstrates an integrated L1's value accrual. Finally, the author criticizes an institutional culture that prioritizes philosophical ideals (credible neutrality, pluralism) over competitive product delivery focused on what users actually want. The diagnosis is "accumulated execution debt." Ethereum possessed a structural advantage in 2021 but spent years in governance debates, while Solana's ecosystem coordinated efficiently to deliver and capture the next wave of value. The conclusion is that Ethereum's market cap reflects its abandonment of the fight for asset appreciation.

链捕手1h ago

Six Complaints from an Ethereum Developer

链捕手1h ago

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the 'Accounting Era'

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the "Accounting Era" Enterprise AI is shifting from the question of "whether to adopt" to "how to account for it." As AI inference costs evolve from experimental budgets into ongoing operational expenses, CEOs and CFOs are demanding proof of value: what tangible results does each dollar spent on tokens deliver? The core of "Token Budget Wars" is not simply about reducing AI bills, but about intelligently allocating compute resources. It involves determining which business processes warrant more computational power, which tasks can use cheaper models, which can be outsourced or handled manually, and which are merely inefficient consumption. A key insight is that AI usage (token consumption) does not equal value. While SaaS usage indicated software adoption, AI token usage only indicates the "meter is running." The same workflow can cost vastly different amounts due to factors like prompt quality, context, model choice, and retries. The critical metric for scaling is "marginal token utility"—the business value created per additional dollar of inference cost. However, this is difficult to measure due to challenges like the long tail of retries, context inflation (where costs can scale quadratically with context length), and inefficient model routing (defaulting to the most powerful model for all tasks). The competition for token allocation is intensifying because, in the AI era, influence is tied to how much intelligence one can command, not just team size. AI spending is essentially competing with labor costs, whether for replacing external BPOs, internal staff, or generating new revenue. BPO contracts provide a clearer benchmark as they are priced per completed unit. The missing layer is attribution from tokens to business outcomes. Companies need a system that connects inference spending to completed work and results, capturing the agent's decision trajectory—what it saw, retrieved, tried, and why it succeeded or failed. This recorded rationale becomes a valuable asset. Ultimately, those who master token-to-outcome attribution will control the allocation of AI resources within enterprises, deciding which workflows get more compute, which are capped, or which revert to humans. The first phase of enterprise AI proved models could do the work. The next phase will determine how much of that work is worth paying for.

marsbit1h ago

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the 'Accounting Era'

marsbit1h ago

Anthropic's Revenue Surpasses OpenAI by at Least 35%, IPO Race Dynamics Shift

Anthropic has overtaken OpenAI in revenue by at least 35%, according to a recent report. Anthropic's annualized revenue is now approximately $45 billion, compared to OpenAI's roughly $33 billion. This represents a dramatic five-fold revenue increase for Anthropic over the first five months of the year, while OpenAI saw growth of just over 50%. The profitability gap is even more significant. Anthropic is expected to post an operating profit in Q2 with around a 5% margin. In stark contrast, OpenAI reported a massive operating loss of over 100% of its revenue in Q1, equating to a loss of at least $7 billion for the quarter. OpenAI also faces substantial costs, including paying 20% of its revenue to Microsoft and high AI server rental fees. This financial reversal impacts their potential IPO timelines. Previously, OpenAI might have been favored to go public first, but now its leadership may view an accelerated IPO as a "more financially prudent choice" to avoid direct, unfavorable public market comparisons. If Anthropic, with its superior growth and profitability metrics, were to file for an IPO first, it would gain a significant valuation advantage. At its current growth rate, Anthropic's revenue could soon surpass major tech firms like Netflix and Salesforce within a year.

marsbit2h ago

Anthropic's Revenue Surpasses OpenAI by at Least 35%, IPO Race Dynamics Shift

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy TON

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing TONCOIN (TON) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy TONCOIN (TON) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your TONCOIN (TON)After purchasing your TONCOIN (TON), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade TONCOIN (TON)Easily trade TONCOIN (TON) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

14.3k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2025.07.23

How to Buy TON

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of TON (TON) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow