WSJ says 'the NFT market is collapsing' but the data says otherwise

CointelegraphPublished on 2022-05-04Last updated on 2022-05-04

Abstract

An article in the Wall Street Journal has claimed sales of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are “flatlining” — in the same week that the top five collections alone accounted for more than $1 billion in primary and secondary sales.
The article cited data from NFT market analysis platform Nonfungible suggesting the number of NFT sales has fallen by 92% since an all-time high in September 2021. Wallets active in the Ethereum (ETH) NFT market were also said to have declined by 88% since a high in November 2021.
“The NFT market is collapsing,” the article concluded.

Red line shows number of sales with volume on left y-axis, white shows active market wallets, volume on right y-axis. Source: NonfungibleHowever, onchain data from Dune Analytics’ dashboard suggest that the NFT market is still robust, with information showing that NFT users and transactions are much higher than what’s reported by Nonfungible.

Dune Analytics total active NFT users

Dune Analytics NFT transactions per day Analytics also show that volume per day in USD on Ethereum NFTs over the week is some of the highest seen since February with popular marketplace OpenSea seeing nearly $550 million in volume on May 1 alone.

Dune Analytics. Source.Analysis from Tom Schmidt, partner at venture capital firm Dragonfly Capital shows a similar story when focused on OpenSea transactions and USD volume.
come on, man pic.twitter.com/CTJFldAHNk
— Tom Schmidt (@tomhschmidt) May 3, 2022
Sub-sectors within the NFT market are emerging and while some areas of the oversaturated market are in a downturn, others are seeing major gains.
Nansen’s analytics platform which indexes NFT collections by type show that “Blue Chip” NFTs — established and highly prized brands such as the Bored and Mutant Ape Yacht Club and Azuki tokens — are far outperforming art or gaming tokens.
The Nansen Blue Chip-10 Index tracking the top 10 NFT projects is up 81% year to date (YTD), while comparatively the indexes tracking the top art and gaming NFT collections are respectively down 39% and 49% YTD.
This phenomenon of NFT market capital consolidating into the top collections was pointed out in an analysis by NFTstatistics.eth who shared a chart in late April showing the top 5 collections are driving the Ethereum NFT market.
This trend continues: BAYC, Azuki, CloneX, Doodles & now Moonbirds separating themselves from everyone else.
I've talked about large-caps outperforming, but it's really the top-5 projects driving all the gains. pic.twitter.com/UsUlwHMJ9M
— NFTstatistics.eth (@punk9059) April 26, 2022
“There’s clearly a trend right now that five or six of the most successful projects are sharply outperforming while the rest are flat to down,” pseudonymous NFT market analyzer NFTstatistics.eth told Cointelegraph.
The data from Nonfungible shows a spike on May 1 with the number of sales and active wallets that day hitting numbers not seen in their data from November 8 2021 directly correlating with the record-breaking (and Ethereum breaking) Otherside metaverse land sale by Yuga Labs again contradicting the claim that NFT sales are “flatlining.”
It’s not clear why the Nonfungible data the WSJ relied on is misaligned with Dune’s data, however it could be due to the inclusion of sales volume from P2E gameAxie Infinity by Nonfungible.
Volume for the popular play-to-earn hit an all-time high of over $40 million on November 4 2021 before a gradual decline to its current levels of around $500,000 according to CryptoSlam data.
But the collapse in popularity of a P2E game as NFTstatistics.eth says “is an extremely different message from ‘NFTs are collapsing.’”
@DJohnson_CPA suggests that AxieInfinity was so big it dominated numbers in November and has since collapsed. Seems possible.
From where I sit, this is an extremely different message from "NFTs are collapsing"https://t.co/lq66GbhbAj
— NFTstatistics.eth (@punk9059) May 3, 2022
While the current debate focuses on Ethereum NFTs, Solana is fast becoming a popular blockchain for this type of asset and is the second-largest blockchain behind Ethereum for NFT sales volume.
Last week, the Solana NFT project Okay Bears topped OpenSea’s 24-hour sales tracker for the first time, and holds fourth place behind the Mutant Ape Yacht Club in 7 day sales volume on CryptoSlam with over $47 million worth transacted.

SpaceX's IPO Gives Birth to a Trillionaire, Musk's Wealth Equals Half of the Crypto Market

Elon Musk becomes the first person in modern history to surpass a net worth of $1 trillion, driven by SpaceX's record-breaking IPO, which valued the company at $2.2 trillion. Musk's wealth, estimated at $1.11 trillion, now exceeds the combined market capitalization of all cryptocurrencies excluding Bitcoin, highlighting extreme wealth concentration and a decline in altcoin valuations. The IPO saw unprecedented trading volume, setting a new single-day record. Despite this milestone, Musk remains deeply involved in the crypto space; he personally holds Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Dogecoin, while SpaceX and Tesla hold significant Bitcoin reserves collectively ranking among the top corporate holders. His acquisition of X (formerly Twitter) further integrates financial data into social media. However, his vast fortune remains largely tied to volatile stock prices rather than liquid assets.

marsbit9m ago

SpaceX's IPO Gives Birth to a Trillionaire, Musk's Wealth Equals Half of the Crypto Market

marsbit9m ago

BP Price Soars 300% in 2 Weeks: What Is Backpack Betting On?

"BP, the native token of the Backpack exchange, surged over 300% in two weeks to $0.475, driven by the launch of its new regulated stock brokerage and asset tokenization arm, Backpack Securities. The platform enables users to trade U.S. stocks and tokenize them on Solana, with the SpaceX tokenized stock (SPCX) generating significant on-chain volume. This expansion into bridging traditional finance with DeFi aligns with the RWA narrative. BP's unique tokenomics, where 25% was airdropped at TGE with zero allocation to the team, and a staking mechanism allowing conversion to equity upon a company IPO, underpins its value proposition. Over 66% of the circulating supply is currently staked."

Foresight News33m ago

BP Price Soars 300% in 2 Weeks: What Is Backpack Betting On?

Foresight News33m ago

Four Questions on the Zcash Orchard Vulnerability: Was It Exploited? Can Funds Be Recovered? Is the Supply Verifiable? And Are There Others?

Zcash Orchard Bug: Four Key Questions Answered A critical forgery vulnerability was discovered in Zcash's Orchard privacy pool, raising four major concerns for users. 1. **Was the Orchard bug exploited?** The likelihood is considered low. The bug was found proactively using advanced AI-assisted tools and was promptly patched, limiting any potential attack window. If exploitation had occurred, evidence would likely have surfaced by now. 2. **Can legitimate Orchard funds be recovered?** It is believed so, based on the assessment that the bug was not exploited. If forgery did happen, existing "turnstile" mechanisms could prevent full recovery of legitimate funds if forged coins were moved out first, though this scenario is deemed unlikely. Users can choose to move funds, but this carries risks like loss of privacy or new wallet/software issues. 3. **Can users verify Zcash's total supply?** Currently, no. The vulnerability's prior existence prevented independent verification of the shielded supply. The proposed "Ironwood" network upgrade will restore this ability by sealing the Orchard pool, allowing anyone running a node to verify that the circulating ZEC does not exceed the correct amount. 4. **Are there other forgery bugs?** Ongoing intensive audits by multiple teams, including AI-assisted analysis, have not found additional forgery vulnerabilities, increasing confidence that none remain. Further work and collaborations are planned to provide additional guarantees. In conclusion, while the team assesses that exploitation was unlikely and the supply is safe, the upcoming upgrade is critical to restore users' ability to independently verify Zcash's supply integrity, moving away from reliance on trust.

marsbit42m ago

Four Questions on the Zcash Orchard Vulnerability: Was It Exploited? Can Funds Be Recovered? Is the Supply Verifiable? And Are There Others?

marsbit42m ago

Four Questions on the Zcash Orchard Vulnerability: Was it Exploited? Can Funds Be Recovered? Is the Supply Verifiable? Are There Others?

**Summary: Zcash Orchard Vulnerability Analysis** A critical forgery vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising concerns about the coin's supply and user funds. The developers, led by Zcash Open Development Labs, acted swiftly to temporarily freeze the pool and deploy a fix. The article addresses four key questions: 1. **Was the vulnerability exploited?** While unknown, the developers believe it is unlikely for several reasons: the bug was difficult to find, using advanced AI tools; the fix was deployed quickly; and typical crypto exploits are fast, with no evidence of abnormal outflows. 2. **Can legitimate Orchard funds be recovered?** If the bug was not exploited, all funds are safe. If exploited, a mechanism limits total withdrawals from the pool to the amount legitimately entered, potentially blocking some legitimate funds. The developers deem this unlikely but advise cautious users to consider moving funds, noting the privacy and risk trade-offs of moving to transparent or Sapling pools. 3. **Can users verify Zcash's total supply?** Not currently. The vulnerability temporarily broke the ability for users to independently verify that no extra ZEC was created. 4. **Are there other forgery bugs?** Ongoing audits by multiple teams, including using advanced AI analysis, have so far found no others, increasing confidence. The proposed "Ironwood" network upgrade is the core solution. It will **seal** the Orchard pool, preventing new entries or internal circulation. This action, combined with the existing withdrawal mechanism, will restore the ability for any node operator to verify that Zcash's supply limit has not been violated, regardless of whether exploitation occurred in the past. The upgrade aims to restore the system's long-term credibility through user-verifiable supply integrity.

Odaily星球日报43m ago

Four Questions on the Zcash Orchard Vulnerability: Was it Exploited? Can Funds Be Recovered? Is the Supply Verifiable? Are There Others?

Odaily星球日报43m ago

Paul Graham: How to Earn a Billion Dollars

Paul Graham argues that earning a billion dollars is possible through legitimate entrepreneurship, not by cheating. The key is creating a startup that achieves exponential growth driven by two factors: a high growth rate and the duration that growth can be sustained. A company that builds a product users love so much they recommend it to others can achieve rapid monthly growth (e.g., 15-93%). If this growth occurs in a large enough market, the founder's wealth scales accordingly as a mathematical outcome of the company's increasing value. Graham illustrates this with calculations: at 93% monthly growth, a startup worth a few million dollars can reach a billion-dollar valuation in under ten months. At a more conservative 15% monthly growth, it could grow over 4000x in five years. He emphasizes that the best startup ideas often emerge not from actively seeking business concepts, but from young founders working on projects they and their friends find genuinely cool or useful. This approach taps into future, unmet needs. Successful entrepreneurship, therefore, relies on deep empathy for users and creating significant value for them, not exploitation. The path to a billion-dollar fortune is difficult but achievable through building a company that delivers what users truly want.

marsbit53m ago

Paul Graham: How to Earn a Billion Dollars

marsbit53m ago

Trading

Spot

Futures