Ethereum VS Solana: Which Blockchain is Better for Minting NFTs?

CryptoPotatoPublicado a 2022-03-28Actualizado a 2022-03-27

Resumen

Ethereum and Solana are the two largest networks that artists prefer when it comes to minting non-fungible tokens. But which one is better suited for it?

If you’re struggling to decide between choosing Solana or Ethereum to mint your Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs), you have come to the right place. In this guide, we’ll explore each blockchains’ strengths, capacities, weak points, and overall differences so you can make a better decision that suits your goals in the NFT market.
Ethereum: Ecosystem, Marketplace, and Security
There’s no doubt that Ethereum is the largest ecosystem of the DeFi (decentralized finance) sector, with thousands of projects of all kinds building on it — so it’s no surprise that the vast majority of NFTs are running on it, as ERC-721 tokens.
To be accurate, roughly 95% of all the NFT ecosystem uses Ethereum, so it’s no coincidence that when investors look for an NFT marketplace, the first one they usually run up to is OpenSea, Rarible, Nifty Gateway, and more.
When it comes to size, Ethereum takes the lead with a much bigger pool of buyers and sellers – or in other words, trading volume. So if you mint NFTs in an Ethereum-based marketplace like OpenSea, you could get more exposure and people willing to buy or place bids on your NFTs. On the other hand, everyone knows there’s also a huge supply of NFTs that no one would ever like to buy or bid for.
Want to mint your first NFT on OpenSea? Check our step-by-step guide here.
Ethereum’s attributes place it as one of the top ecosystems to start a DeFi project. Its data architecture and security components are the reason why so many developers are building on top of its blockchain.
However, when network activity increases exponentially (which is something frequent), the network suffers a major transaction backlog, which leads to an enormous spike in transaction fees that usually surpass the digits per transaction, something that could be affecting the number of users who can afford to mint NFTs.
This has prompted NFT creators and collectors to seek alternative blockchains with higher throughput, scalability, and lower gas fees. One option that has become a very serious competitor  is Solana —a high-performance blockchain that leverages different cryptographic mechanisms to scale its network (we’ll discuss this later.)
While paying elevated gas fees can be a crippling experience sometimes, the upside is there’s more money flowing in Ethereum, so the flipping ceiling is way higher. Data from CryptoSlam shows that Ethereum has had a whopping selling volume of over $1.8 billion in the last 30 days, compared to $120 million from Solana-based marketplaces.

Source: CryptoSlam As per current data from CryptoSlam, we can see that the most popular NFT collections in the market exist in the Ethereum blockchain. These include CryptoPunks, the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC), the Mutant Ape Yacht Club (MAYC), and so forth.
Additional data shows that the average NFT sale price in Ethereum (as of Q4 2021) was around $3,000 compared to Solana’s $1,000.
Solana: Throughput, Low Fees, Growing Ecosystem
In terms of technology, functionality, and versatility, Solana takes the lead here.
Solana is a high-performance blockchain that uses a consensus mechanism called Proof-of-History, which leverages a set of protocols to execute transactions with high throughput— more than 60,000 transactions per second (TPS).
In Solana, transaction costs are usually less than a dollar. Many NFT projects and collectors are migrating to Solana to benefit from the scalability and cheap transaction fees. They have more freedom to build their projects without suffering from technical limitations, a reason why Solana is turning into a hub for general NFTs.
Minting NFTs with a Solana-based marketplace like Solsea is remarkably cheap, fast, and easy to profit from once it hits the secondary market. Usually, Solana mints are quickly snapped up, and royalties in Solana-based markets are also frequently higher compared to Ethereum-based ones.
While Solana’s ecosystem isn’t near as big as Ethereum’s, it doesn’t mean it isn’t growing. In fact, Solana’s user base has been growing at a much faster pace since the beginning of 2022, and even analysts from investment bank JP Morgan have claimed that it could overtake Ethereum in the long run.
The NFT market in Solana has been gaining a lot of momentum throughout the third quarter of 2022, as per data from CryptoSlam. By the end of January, the sales volume in the ecosystem crossed the $1 billion mark.

Source: CryptoSlam One of the most popular collections on the Solana blockchain is the Degenerate Ape Academy, a collection of 10,000 unique NFT Apes.

While they may look similar to the Bored Apes from Ethereum, they have their own set of unique traits.
They can be pretty expensive, too – the highest sale for a Degen Ape was of $1.1 million in September 2021. However, in mid-December, an NFT from the Solana Monkey Business collection was sold for over 13,000 SOL, or about $2 million.
Growing ecosystems are frequently a great opportunity for early adopters to establish themselves at the top of the list by the time it reaches a larger audience. However, one of their problems is that the risk is usually higher. Since the beginning of 2022, the Solana network has suffered several downtimes, forcing users to liquidate their positions as they were unable to top up their collateral during the outages.
Another concern that has been addressed lately by developers is the rise of rugpulls in Solana. This is usually the problem with emerging technologies, as scammers will try spot and take advantage of any weak points they can find. However, rug pulls and scams can happen on both sides of the story, so it’s not only about security issues but rather making sure you make good research before investing in an NFT or any DeFi projects.
Rugpulls are the most common type of scam in the DeFi ecosystem. If you want to learn how to spot them, check our latest guide on the matter.
Closing Thoughts
Each blockchain has its own pros and cons, so it really comes down to what you want to do with each one. If you’re looking for a high-throughput blockchain with scalability and low gas fees, then Solana might be more suitable for you.
Solana
Pros:

  • Higher throughput and scalability.
  • Growing ecosystem.
  • Low gas fees and environmentally friendly.
  • Minting NFTs is cheap and relatively straightforward.

Cons:
Less secure network.

  • Lower exposure with a smaller market.
  • Downtimes are more frequent.

Now, if you want exposure to a bigger market and benefit from the security aspects, then you might be better off with Ethereum.
Ethereum
Pros:

  • Access to a larger market.
  • High network security.
  • NFTs are sold for a much higher price on average.

Cons: 

  • Network congestion can cause transaction delays.
  • Lower throughput and scalability.
  • Transaction fees can become unpayable for a good percentage of users who want to mint NFTs.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Comprar ETH con descuento: ¿Cómo elegir entre Bitmine y SharpLink?

En el mercado bajista de ETH, SharpLink y Bitmine, las dos mayores tesorerías, acumulan pérdidas superiores al 50%. SharpLink reanudó sus compras tras ocho meses, adquiriendo 39,196 ETH a un precio medio de ~3,609 dólares, con una pérdida no realizada de más de 1,7 mil millones. Bitmine mantiene una posición de 5,7 millones de ETH (~4,7% del suministro), con pérdidas no realizadas superiores a los 11 mil millones de dólares. Ambas empresas han sido incluidas en índices Russell y son patrocinadoras de Ethlabs, pero el mercado valora sus descuentos de forma muy diferente: SharpLink cotiza con un ~21% de descuento sobre su valor patrimonial neto (NAV), mientras que el descuento de Bitmine es de solo ~6%, una diferencia clave para los inversores. Aunque los costes de adquisición y las caídas porcentuales de sus acciones son similares, Bitmine destaca por su mayor liquidez, mejor acceso a financiación (incluida la emisión de acciones preferentes) y su inclusión en el Russell 1000. SharpLink, con una estructura de capital más simple y un mayor descuento, podría ofrecer más potencial de revalorización si se recupera ETH, pero su liquidez es menor y su narrativa de tokenización RWA aún no se ha materializado. En resumen, para una exposición indirecta a ETH, Bitmine ofrece mayor liquidez y un descuento reducido, adecuado para operaciones a corto plazo. SharpLink, con un descuento más profundo y menos lastres de valoración pasada, podría ser más interesante para una perspectiva a más largo plazo, asumiendo sus riesgos de liquidez. La elección depende de la tolerancia al riesgo y del horizonte de inversión.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Comprar ETH con descuento: ¿Cómo elegir entre Bitmine y SharpLink?

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

¿Lighter está jugando un ajedrez maquiavélico junto a Robinhood?

Resumen de Lighter y su asociación estratégica con Robinhood El exchange de contratos perpetuos Lighter ha anunciado recientemente importantes actualizaciones en su tokenómica y una integración clave con Robinhood. En junio, la plataforma detalló cambios centrados en la quema permanente de tokens LIT comprados mediante ingresos del protocolo y una transición hacia el uso de reservas del ecosistema para recompensas de staking, buscando una mayor sostenibilidad. La primera quema está programada para después del Q2 de 2026. En julio, Lighter se convirtió en el socio oficial de contratos perpetuos de Robinhood, integrándose directamente en Robinhood Wallet. Esta alianza permite a usuarios en jurisdicciones elegibles operar con contratos perpetuos de forma autodirigida y con liquidación en cadena desde la billetera de Robinhood. Lighter ha asignado 11 millones de dólares en LIT para un programa de recompensas dirigido a esta comunidad, ofreciendo el doble de puntos por operar a través de la wallet de Robinhood. Esta colaboración brinda a Lighter acceso a la gran base de usuarios minoristas de Robinhood (más de 20 millones), su fuerte reconocimiento de marca y su alcance geográfico, lo que podría impulsar significativamente el volumen y la adopción de Lighter. A cambio, Lighter sirve como un terreno de prueba para que Robinhood explore mercados internacionales con productos derivados. Adicionalmente, Lighter planea lanzar productos de opciones en el tercer trimestre del año, expandiendo su oferta de derivados. La empresa, fundada en 2022 y valorada en 1.5 mil millones de dólares tras una ronda de financiación en 2025, también está en conversaciones con el CFTC de EE. UU. para operar como un exchange descentralizado de contratos perpetuos regulado. El token LIT, con un suministro fijo de 10 mil millones, tiene asignaciones significativas para el equipo (26%) y los inversores (24%), sujetas a un *cliff* de 1 año y un desbloqueo lineal de 3 años a partir de diciembre de 2025. La ejecución del equipo y la transparencia serán clave para navegar el próximo desbloqueo de tokens a finales de 2026.

Foresight NewsHace 26 min(s)

¿Lighter está jugando un ajedrez maquiavélico junto a Robinhood?

Foresight NewsHace 26 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片