VIRTUAL eyes $1.33 – Why traders must watch THIS level next

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-24Last updated on 2026-01-24

Abstract

The crypto AI sector has seen significant losses over the past week, with Virtuals Protocol (VIRTUAL) declining by 15.71%. Despite the drop, technical analysis suggests this retracement may present a buying opportunity. VIRTUAL retraced toward the key demand zone of $0.73–$0.76, as anticipated. Although short-term momentum appears bearish—with price below key moving averages and negative capital flow—the early January breakout above $0.73 and $1.05 indicated bullish shift. As long as the token holds above the $0.758 retracement level, traders may consider buying, targeting $1.19 and $1.33. Exchange netflows have mostly favored sellers, but price action remains the more reliable indicator.

The crypto AI sector tokens have taken a beating over the past week. CoinMarketCap data revealed that this sector’s leading tokens have all registered sizeable losses over the past week.

Except for Story [IP] (-7.53%), the top ten tokens within this sector have noted double-digit percentage losses, with Artificial Superintelligence Alliance [FET] the lowest at -16.84%.

Virtuals Protocol [VIRTUAL] was not performing much better, recording a 15.71% dip over the past week. Yet, from a technical analysis perspective, this pullback is welcome.

A buying opportunity in sight?

The 1-day timeframe saw a deep retracement after the swift rally to $1.19 made in the first week of January. In a report earlier this month, AMBCrypto had highlighted this retracement toward $0.75 as a likelihood.

Back then, the $0.73-$0.76 area was seen as a key demand zone. This remained true at present, though the short-term momentum and recent capital flows painted a bearish picture.

The price sank below the 20 and 50-day moving averages, and the CMF had moved below -0.05 to signal heavy capital flows out of the market.

Exchange flows shake bullish belief

Apart from the technical indicators, the exchange netflows metric also appeared to favor the sellers. Over the past six months, the exchange flows (7DMA) have been predominantly positive. There were brief periods of outflows, such as August, November, and a couple of days ago.

The bearish argument was that holders continued to send VIRTUAL tokens to exchanges to exit their positions. It signaled a lack of market conviction.

Traders must buy now

While the netflows and indicators might be persuasive, the price action was more reliable. The VIRTUAL breakout in early January, past the $0.73 and $1.05 swing levels from the multi-month downtrend, represented bullish intent.

Until the 78.6% retracement level at $0.758 is ceded to the bears, swing traders can maintain this bullish bias. The deep retracement represented a buying opportunity, targeting $1.19 and $1.33.

Final Thoughts

  • The VIRTUAL structure has shifted bullishly after the early January rally, and it remains bullish.
  • The token established a short-term range between $0.8 and $0.88 over the past week that lower timeframe traders can keep an eye on.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Related Questions

QWhat is the current price trend of VIRTUAL and the broader crypto AI sector tokens over the past week?

AThe crypto AI sector tokens have taken a significant beating, with most top tokens registering double-digit losses. VIRTUAL specifically recorded a 15.71% dip over the past week.

QAccording to the technical analysis, what key price area is identified as a demand zone for VIRTUAL?

AThe $0.73-$0.76 area is identified as a key demand zone, with the 78.6% retracement level at $0.758 being a critical level to watch.

QWhat do the exchange netflows for VIRTUAL indicate about market sentiment?

AThe exchange netflows metric, which has been predominantly positive over the past six months, indicates that holders are sending tokens to exchanges to exit their positions, signaling a lack of market conviction and favoring sellers.

QDespite the bearish indicators, why does the article suggest that traders should consider buying VIRTUAL?

AThe article suggests buying because the price action, specifically the breakout past $0.73 and $1.05 in early January, showed bullish intent. The current deep retracement is seen as a buying opportunity with targets of $1.19 and $1.33, as long as the price holds above $0.758.

QWhat is the short-term trading range that lower timeframe traders should watch for VIRTUAL?

AThe token has established a short-term range between $0.8 and $0.88 over the past week that lower timeframe traders can keep an eye on.

Related Reads

Bitcoin Falls To $61,300 As Mt. Gox Moves BTC, Raising Selloff Concerns

Bitcoin fell to around $61,300 as markets reacted to Mt. Gox moving funds, raising selloff concerns. The defunct exchange transferred 116.3 BTC (worth ~$8.16 million) directly to Bitstamp, following a larger earlier move of 10,422.65 BTC (~$739 million) to a new wallet. The trustee is working towards the final creditor repayment deadline of October 31, 2026. While most eligible creditors have been repaid, roughly 24,081 BTC (~$1.55 billion) remains under Mt. Gox control, and its on-chain movements are closely watched for potential market pressure. Bitcoin later recovered above $64,000.

bitcoinist36m ago

Bitcoin Falls To $61,300 As Mt. Gox Moves BTC, Raising Selloff Concerns

bitcoinist36m ago

The Allocation Value of Gold as 'Financial Insurance' Against US Debt Crisis and High Yields

This report analyzes gold's role as "financial insurance" amid high US bond yields and escalating debt concerns. Gold prices surged from ~$2,624 in early 2025 to a record high of $5,589 by January 2026, driven by five key factors: 1) Unsustainable US fiscal trajectory and debt exceeding $39 trillion, 2) Accelerating de-dollarization and central bank gold purchases (e.g., China added 8 tons in April 2026), 3) Geopolitical tensions and energy-driven inflation from the Iran conflict, 4) Record-high investment demand via ETFs, and 5) Policy uncertainty under the new Fed Chair. Gold's price is inversely related to real interest rates and the US dollar. Investors can gain exposure through physical gold, ETFs like GLD/IAU (low-cost), or mining ETFs like GDX (higher risk/return). Key risks include rising real rates, a stronger dollar, easing geopolitical tensions, and potential overvaluation after the sharp rally. The report recommends a 5-10% portfolio allocation for diversification, viewing gold as a hedge against fiscal instability and systemic risk rather than a growth investment.

marsbit38m ago

The Allocation Value of Gold as 'Financial Insurance' Against US Debt Crisis and High Yields

marsbit38m ago

"Unlimited Money Printing" Bug Lurked for Four Years, Privacy Coin ZEC Plummets 50% in One Day

A critical "unlimited, undetectable counterfeit" vulnerability existed for nearly four years in the Orchard privacy pool of Zcash (ZEC), a privacy-focused cryptocurrency. The bug, which could theoretically allow attackers to create unlimited fake ZEC, was disclosed by founder Zooko Wilcox on June 5th. While officially patched and deemed low-probability for exploitation, the news triggered a market panic. ZEC's price plummeted over 50% in a single day. The core crisis stems from the inability to prove whether any counterfeit ZEC was created during the vulnerability's active period, as Orchard's design inherently hides transaction details. This casts severe doubt on ZEC's total supply integrity. The sell-off accelerated after prominent investor and ZEC narrative supporter Arthur Hayes announced he had sold his entire position, citing the inability to cryptographically prove the impossibility of extra minting. Community trust eroded further upon learning the bug was discovered with AI-assisted auditing, raising questions about Zcash's development and security review processes. The incident has evolved from a price correction into a fundamental crisis of confidence regarding the network's core security promises.

Odaily星球日报51m ago

"Unlimited Money Printing" Bug Lurked for Four Years, Privacy Coin ZEC Plummets 50% in One Day

Odaily星球日报51m ago

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight News1h ago

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight News1h ago

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News1h ago

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions