The Next AI Wave Could Be Held Back by Connectivity, Not Compute

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-06-23Last updated on 2026-06-23

Abstract

The massive investment in AI compute is driving exponential growth in model power, but a critical bottleneck is emerging: connectivity. As AI transitions from centralized training to real-world deployment, applications require massive data mobility, real-time communication, and seamless global networks. Traditional, rigid cloud infrastructure struggles with prohibitive bandwidth costs, latency issues, single points of failure, and data privacy concerns. Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePIN) offer a solution by crowdsourcing underutilized resources like compute, storage, and bandwidth, creating a resilient, alternative infrastructure stack. The next wave of AI—including collaborative agents and autonomous systems—demands ultra-low latency and synchronization, making efficient networking a strategic asset. Projects are building blockchain-agnostic, AI-driven routing layers to complement the cloud, enabling scalable, real-time applications. The focus is shifting from where data is stored and processed to how it moves. The future of AI will be defined by the most efficient global data movement, not just raw compute power.

Billions are pouring into GPUs, data centers, and massive cloud infrastructure. Global AI infrastructure spending hit a whopping $318 billion in 2025. The result is that AI models are growing exponentially more powerful, and rightfully so as the spend gets higher and higher. But in the background a silent bottleneck is emerging: connectivity.

Many investors, users, and AI companies themselves remain obsessed with raw processing power, but the reality is that AI applications don’t thrive on compute alone. They demand massive data mobility, real-time communication, and seamless global networks. As AI transitions from centralized training labs to real-world deployment, connectivity is fast becoming the ultimate bottleneck in the tech stack.

The Hidden Infrastructure Problem

Modern AI is increasingly distributed. Inference workloads span multiple regions, edge devices stream continuous data, and real-time applications, like autonomous systems and collaborative AI agents, require instant communication.

Traditional internet infrastructure, built on rigid, centralized cloud architectures, is failing to keep pace. This centralization introduces severe liabilities:

  • Prohibitive bandwidth costs as data volume explodes.
  • Critical latency bottlenecks for real-time applications.
  • Single points of failure risking systemic downtime.
  • Data sovereignty and privacy vulnerabilities on centralized servers.

Decentralization is the Fix

To bypass these limitations, Web3 came up with its own solution, namely DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks). The world could continue relying on a handful of tech giants, but DePIN bypasses the giants and their stiff control of the AI market by crowdsourcing underutilized resources, specifically compute, storage, and bandwidth, from global participants.

This creates a highly resilient, internet-scale alternative infrastructure stack categorized by:

  • Decentralized compute and storage networks
  • Decentralized AI marketplaces
  • Decentralized connectivity and bandwidth networks

Connectivity Beats Raw Power

The next generation of AI will need to coordinate. An AI assistant, a decentralized video tool, or a swarm of autonomous agents all require ultra-low latency and cross-region synchronization.

Without an efficient networking layer, even the most advanced AI models face immediate performance degradation. Connectivity is a strategic asset under this new mindset.

Projects like Datagram Network are building this exact layer. By aggregating global bandwidth and networking capacity, Datagram creates a blockchain-agnostic, AI-driven routing layer designed for real-time apps. It doesn’t act to replace the cloud, instead it complements it by offering Web2 and Web3 enterprises plug-and-play scalability without requiring deep blockchain expertise.

From Cloud-Centric to Network-Centric

The architecture of the internet is shifting. For decades, tech conversations revolved around where data was stored and processed. Today, the focus is on how data moves.

AI, DePIN, and machine-to-machine ecosystems all depend on fluid, distributed information. Ultimately, the future of AI will be won by whoever moves data across the world most efficiently, not those with the most compute power alone.

TagsAIDePIN

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what is becoming the ultimate bottleneck for AI's transition from labs to real-world deployment?

AConnectivity is fast becoming the ultimate bottleneck.

QWhat are the four main liabilities of traditional, centralized internet infrastructure mentioned in the article?

AThe four main liabilities are prohibitive bandwidth costs, critical latency bottlenecks, single points of failure, and data sovereignty and privacy vulnerabilities.

QWhat is DePIN and how does it aim to solve the connectivity problem?

ADePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks) is a Web3 solution that crowdsources underutilized resources like compute, storage, and bandwidth from global participants to create a resilient, decentralized infrastructure, bypassing tech giants.

QWhat is the strategic asset for the next generation of AI, according to the article's conclusion?

AConnectivity is the strategic asset, as the future of AI will be won by whoever moves data across the world most efficiently.

QHow does the Datagram Network project, as mentioned, address the connectivity bottleneck?

ADatagram Network builds an AI-driven routing layer by aggregating global bandwidth and networking capacity, offering blockchain-agnostic, plug-and-play scalability to complement existing cloud infrastructure.

Related Reads

$2 Trillion: Countdown to AI's Largest IPO in History

The countdown for the largest IPO in AI history, a potential $2 trillion listing for Anthropic, is underway for October. The staggering valuation, reportedly projected by several investors, contrasts with the company's own internal restraint on setting a public target. Founded five years ago by former OpenAI core members, Anthropic's growth has been meteoric. Annual recurring revenue (ARR) surged from ~$9B in late 2025 to $47B by May 2026, with Q2 2026 revenue of $11.5B marking a 14x year-over-year increase. Bank valuations are even based on internal 2028 revenue forecasts of $190-200B. A key growth driver is Claude Code, its AI coding assistant. Its ARR quintupled in five months to $2.5B by February 2026, now constituting nearly 20% of total revenue. Surveys indicate Anthropic commands roughly 40% of enterprise LLM spending, doubling OpenAI's share in programming-specific use. However, alongside this explosive growth, reports detail significant internal cultural strife. Critics describe a divisive "priesthood" of PhD executives, led by CEO Dario Amodei, who promote a "save humanity" narrative that some employees find cult-like and alienating. This has reportedly created a demoralized workforce and a covert "underground network" of dissent among engineers torn between lucrative pre-IPO equity and a toxic work environment. Anthropic now faces a pivotal paradox: pursuing its mission of "safe" AI requires immense capital for compute, yet that capital demands relentless commercial growth. As it approaches its historic IPO, the company must navigate intense regulatory scrutiny, soaring operational costs, and internal tensions—any of which could destabilize its post-listing trajectory, much like SpaceX's significant post-IPO stock drop. The stage is set for a defining moment in tech history.

marsbit59m ago

$2 Trillion: Countdown to AI's Largest IPO in History

marsbit59m ago

AI Boosting Efficiency and Cutting Costs Makes VC Increasingly Expensive

"AI for Cost Reduction Makes VC Funding More Expensive" Despite the "cost-reduction and efficiency" narrative of AI, venture capital (VC) investment in the AI sector is becoming increasingly costly. While AI tools lower the initial costs for many startups—with team sizes shrinking across funding stages—the market is polarizing. For top-tier AI teams, especially those from leading companies like Google and OpenAI, funding rounds are now larger and valuations are higher than ever at the seed and early stages. For example, new ventures by prominent researchers are securing billions in funding with valuations reaching tens of billions before having a mature product. This creates a "barbell" market: lightweight startups need less capital, while elite AI firms attract massive investments early on. This dynamic raises the cost for VCs to acquire and maintain meaningful ownership stakes. As valuations soar early, securing the same equity percentage requires significantly larger capital commitments. VCs must now invest more upfront and reserve substantial funds for follow-on rounds to avoid dilution, prompting large firms like Accel and a16z to raise massive new funds. Consequently, capital is concentrating intensely in a few perceived winners like OpenAI and Anthropic, widening the gap between large and small VC funds. While high valuations bake in future growth expectations, they also compress potential returns, demanding that portfolio companies achieve unprecedented scale. For major VCs, the core strategy is clear: secure early positions in potential winners and maintain the capital to keep investing as valuations rapidly escalate.

marsbit1h ago

AI Boosting Efficiency and Cutting Costs Makes VC Increasingly Expensive

marsbit1h ago

An Eight-Year Investment Takes a Sharp Turn: Why Did Ethereum Suddenly Abandon Poseidon?

On August 13, Ethereum researcher Justin Drake announced a significant shift in Ethereum's Layer-1 cryptographic roadmap: abandoning the SNARK-friendly hash function Poseidon in favor of traditional functions like SHA2 or BLAKE2. This decision ends eight years of research and investment, marking a major revision to the post-quantum security strategy. Poseidon, introduced in 2019, was highly efficient for zkRollups and zkVMs within SNARK circuits. However, its need for prolonged cryptanalysis and the pressing timeline for quantum resistance revealed limitations. Recent breakthroughs in SNARK design, specifically using binary fields, now enable traditional, battle-tested hash functions to perform as efficiently as Poseidon within SNARKs. Benchmarks show modern laptops can now verify over a million traditional hash calls per second. This change is partly driven by accelerated concerns over quantum computing threats. Reports warn that "Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computers" could break current blockchain signatures like ECDSA by the early 2030s, risking trillions in assets. Ethereum's response focuses on hash-based post-quantum signature schemes, deemed more quantum-resistant than some lattice-based alternatives under pressure from AI cryptanalysis. Ethereum's updated post-quantum roadmap targets a production-ready "leanVM" for signature aggregation by 2027, with full deployment across consensus, execution, and data layers by 2028. The shift to mature hash functions like SHA2 reduces reliance on newer algorithms and aligns with the goal of using widely analyzed cryptographic primitives. Other major blockchains are also preparing. Solana's core teams have independently chosen the NIST-standardized Falcon signature scheme for its compact size. Starknet plans a phased migration, starting with replacing its Pedersen hash with BLAKE2. Ethereum's move signifies a strategic pivot towards proven security foundations for the quantum era.

marsbit2h ago

An Eight-Year Investment Takes a Sharp Turn: Why Did Ethereum Suddenly Abandon Poseidon?

marsbit2h ago

Programmers Worldwide Are Wasting Money on Anthropic! The Company Can't Stand It Anymore

Anthropic recently published guidelines to help developers using Claude Code reduce unnecessary token costs. The key recommendations include: 1) Clear (/clear) conversations after completing a task to avoid carrying irrelevant file reads and command outputs into the next task. 2) Set the model and reasoning effort level at the start of a session, as switching mid-session invalidates the prompt cache, requiring a full-price recalculation of the entire dialog history. 3) Attach files using @ references instead of typing paths manually to avoid extra tool calls and searches that bloat the context. 4) Add quiet flags to verbose commands (e.g., in CLAUDE.md) to minimize lengthy output in the dialog history. 5) Use /compact while the session cache is still warm (before breaks) to compress the dialog at one-tenth the cost. 6) Offload large-output tasks to a sub-agent, which runs in an isolated context and only returns conclusions, preventing intermediate outputs from polluting the main dialog. The article explains token pricing: input tokens (prefill) are processed in parallel, while output tokens (decode) are generated serially, making output tokens five times more expensive. Caching is crucial for savings—if a request's prefix (system prompt, CLAUDE.md, dialog history) matches the previous one byte-for-byte, reading it costs only 10% of the standard input price. However, cache invalidation occurs when changing models, effort levels, fast mode, compressing dialogs, after cache expiration, or when resuming old sessions. Dialog history also grows quadratically (O(n²)) as file contents and command outputs accumulate, increasing costs per round. Proactive context management—like isolating noisy tasks, using /rewind to trim unproductive turns, and task-based session clearing—is becoming an essential skill for cost-effective AI-assisted development.

marsbit4h ago

Programmers Worldwide Are Wasting Money on Anthropic! The Company Can't Stand It Anymore

marsbit4h ago

Pax Silica vs. WAICO: The US Wants to Prohibit Europe from Using Chinese Artificial Intelligence

The United States is preparing to demand that European and other partners abandon Chinese artificial intelligence initiatives, threatening exclusion from the American-led "Pax Silica" coalition, according to a leaked U.S. State Department document. This ultimatum forces signatories of the "AI Opportunity Statement" to choose between the Western technological ecosystem and alternative frameworks, with China not explicitly named but clearly targeted. Pax Silica is a U.S. strategy for AI and semiconductor hegemony, launched in late 2025. Its European presence expanded significantly in mid-2026. Concurrently, China, Russia, and 27 other nations established the World AI Cooperation Organization (WAICO) in July 2026 as an independent intergovernmental platform promoting AI governance based on UN principles. This situation creates a difficult choice, especially for European nations balancing strategic autonomy with dependence on U.S. tech and security. It also pressures Global South countries with pragmatic ties to both Washington and Beijing. The formation of competing blocks risks fragmenting the global tech landscape, forcing companies to split supply chains, increasing costs, and potentially leading to incompatible standards and protocols. The era of open globalization in AI may be ending, replaced by geopolitical confrontation where technological sovereignty trumps economic efficiency. The decisions made will shape the global digital economy for decades.

cryptonews.ru6h ago

Pax Silica vs. WAICO: The US Wants to Prohibit Europe from Using Chinese Artificial Intelligence

cryptonews.ru6h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片