Schiff: Bitcoin Is 'Anti-Gold' as War and Inflation Fuel Its Price Rise

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-11Last updated on 2026-08-11

Abstract

Peter Schiff, CEO of Euro Pacific Asset Management and a long-time Bitcoin critic, argues that Bitcoin is performing as "anti-gold," falling in price while traditional safe-haven assets like gold and silver rise. He points to a yearly performance where gold is up 9% and silver 11%, while Bitcoin is down 11%, citing this divergence as proof that Bitcoin's narrative as "digital gold" is flawed. Schiff links the surge in precious metals to geopolitical risks, war, and resulting inflationary pressures from higher oil prices, which drive investors to traditional safe havens. In contrast, Bitcoin recently fell below $64,000, extending its period of underperformance against major asset classes he tracks. This is not the first time Schiff has challenged Bitcoin's correlation with gold, having previously stated the connection "was never real." He has also warned of significant potential losses for corporate Bitcoin holders like MicroStrategy. Bitcoin proponents counter that short-term price divergence during a risk-off period does not settle the long-term debate on Bitcoin's role as a store of value.

Schiff, CEO of Euro Pacific Asset Management and a longtime critic of Bitcoin, spent last week arguing that Bitcoin is not just failing to keep pace with rising gold prices but is actually moving in the opposite direction. He recently wrote on X:

Bitcoin has finally become the uncorrelated asset you hoped for. Even as both risky and risk-free assets rise, Bitcoin falls.

In the same post, Schiff provided figures to back up his argument, noting that over the past year, gold is up 9%, silver is up 11%, the Nasdaq is up 13%, and the Russell 2000 is up 14%, while Bitcoin has fallen 11% over the same period. According to Schiff's calculations, the gap has widened to 20 percentage points at other points this year—a divergence he sees as proof that the narrative of Bitcoin as 'digital gold' was never based on how the asset actually trades.

Rising Gold and Silver Prices Fueled by Military Conflict

Schiff directly links rising gold and silver prices to geopolitical risks. In the SchiffGold 'Friday Gold Wrap' review on Friday, Schiff and his team suggested that gold and silver have likely reached a short-term bottom even amid broad stock index fluctuations, as active warfare and a spike in oil prices increase inflationary pressure and push investors toward traditional 'safe havens.'

As of August 10th, gold was trading around $4,378 per ounce, up about 0.8% for the day and continuing to hold at levels significantly higher than at the start of the year. Silver showed an even stronger rise: in January, it set a nominal all-time high of $121.67 and has remained near record levels since. Schiff argues that inflation driven by rising oil prices, higher Treasury yields following a bond sell-off, and a change in the tone of public statements due to the ongoing conflict are the real factors behind strengthening precious metal prices, not any renewed faith in the stability of fiat currency.

Bitcoin, in contrast, fell below $64,000 yesterday and has remained at that level since, extending a period of weak performance that has left it lagging behind all other major asset classes tracked by Schiff, including stocks, which he separately warned could slide into a deeper bear market if the conflict persists.

Recurring Bitcoin Controversy

This is not the first time Schiff has made arguments about the lack of correlation: as Bitcoin.com News reported in July, Schiff argued that Bitcoin's correlation with gold 'was never real,' pointing out that the asset failed to rise alongside gold during the precious metals spike of 2025, which he believes indicates that the perceived connection by traders simply did not exist.

Schiff has also warned that Strategy—the corporate Bitcoin treasury management company led by Michael Saylor—could face 'far more significant' losses given its position of roughly 840,000 BTC; this warning gained even more weight after Strategy began selling coins at a loss this year.

Bitcoin advocates dismiss Schiff's repeated attacks, arguing that short-term price divergence during one wave of risk aversion does not settle the multi-year debate on Bitcoin's role as a store of value, and that gold's own rallies during past crises did not prevent it from experiencing sharp declines.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat key argument does Peter Schiff make about Bitcoin's correlation with other assets in the post?

APeter Schiff argues that Bitcoin is not correlated with other assets like gold or stocks, but moves in the opposite direction. He presents data showing that while gold, silver, and major stock indices gained value over a year, Bitcoin's price fell, which he claims disproves the 'digital gold' narrative.

QAccording to Schiff, what are the main drivers behind the recent rise in gold and silver prices?

ASchiff attributes the rise in gold and silver prices primarily to geopolitical risks from active warfare, increased oil prices creating inflationary pressure, and rising Treasury yields. He states these factors push investors towards traditional safe-haven assets, not a renewed faith in fiat currency stability.

QWhat specific example does Schiff use to argue that the correlation between Bitcoin and gold 'never was real'?

ASchiff points to Bitcoin's failure to rise alongside gold during a precious metals rally in 2025. He uses this as evidence that the perceived correlation touted by traders was not a real or reliable market relationship.

QWhat warning does Peter Schiff issue regarding the company Strategy and its Bitcoin holdings?

ASchiff warns that Strategy, a corporate Bitcoin treasury management company led by Michael Saylor, could face 'much more significant' losses due to its large position of approximately 840,000 BTC. This warning gained weight after Strategy began selling coins at a loss during the year.

QHow do Bitcoin proponents, as mentioned in the article, counter Schiff's criticisms?

ABitcoin proponents counter Schiff by arguing that short-term price divergence during a single risk-off period does not settle the long-term debate on Bitcoin's role as a store of value. They also note that gold itself has experienced sharp declines during past crises despite its safe-haven rallies.

Related Reads

Weak US Employment and $1.1 Billion into ETFs: Wintermute on the New Rally and Inflation Risks

Analysts at Wintermute stated that the cryptocurrency market gained support following a weak U.S. jobs report. Against this backdrop, U.S. spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs collectively attracted $1.1 billion in inflows over the week. While demand via ETFs has recovered, there is insufficient data to confirm a sustainable shift in market sentiment. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw inflows of $853.5 million over five sessions, the best weekly result since mid-April. Ethereum ETFs attracted another $244.9 million, marking a fifth consecutive positive week. Over 80% of the inflows into both groups went to BlackRock. Wintermute notes that relatively restrained trading volumes may indicate large investors gradually building positions rather than short-term capital rotation. A disappointing U.S. employment report for July, which showed a loss of 23,000 jobs versus an expected gain of 80,000, led markets to reduce the probability of a Federal Reserve rate hike in September. This supported risk assets, including crypto. However, Wintermute cautions that the upcoming U.S. Consumer Price Index report on August 12 poses a key test. Higher-than-expected inflation could revive rate hike fears above 50%, risking a reversal of the recent rally. Beyond ETFs, institutional adoption of blockchain infrastructure continues, exemplified by Wells Fargo's planned launch of tokenized deposits. Wintermute views this as banks modernizing their settlement systems, which could eventually support broader digital asset integration. The firm concludes that while the ETF inflows are a positive signal, one week is not enough to confirm a durable trend, and the market remains highly sensitive to macroeconomic data, particularly inflation.

cryptonews.ru54m ago

Weak US Employment and $1.1 Billion into ETFs: Wintermute on the New Rally and Inflation Risks

cryptonews.ru54m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.8k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片