Bittensor [TAO] targets $241 as the ‘AI narrative’ attempts a comeback

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-15Last updated on 2026-02-15

Abstract

The crypto AI sector has seen a brief recovery after a significant downturn, with its market cap rising from recent lows. Bittensor (TAO) led this uptick with a notable 30.93% rally, alongside gains in other AI tokens like Render and NEAR Protocol. This suggests a potential shift towards an AI narrative, possibly due to capital rotation from Bitcoin. Despite the short-term upward momentum, TAO's overall trend remains bearish. Technical analysis indicates that while the token could potentially reach short-term bullish targets at $241.4 and $268.2, it faces a key resistance at $302.4 to confirm a bullish structure. Given current market sentiment and Bitcoin's bearish bias, this appears unlikely in the near term. The analysis also suggests TAO might experience volatility, with a possible pullback to the $165-$175 range to fill imbalances before attempting higher climbs. Investors are advised to monitor Bitcoin's performance, as a sell-off could hinder this recovery. The information presented is solely the writer's opinion and not financial advice.

The crypto AI sector has been struggling in recent weeks. Over the past month, it has shed 30.28% in market cap to fall to a combined $14.66 billion capitalization.

However, since Thursday, the 12th of February, the sector has noted some gains.

In this brief uptick phase, Bittensor [TAO] has noted a 30.93% rally. This could be due to capital rotation into altcoins, evidenced by the slight slump in the Bitcoin [BTC] dominance in February.

Other leading crypto AI sector tokens, such as Render [RENDER] and NEAR Protocol [NEAR], were also up 18% and 15% since Thursday’s lows. This could be an early sign of a shift towards an AI narrative.

Should investors bet on a sustained Bittensor recovery?

The 1-day swing structure was bearish, captured by the bearish impulse move the altcoin made in 2026.

The moving averages and the MACD captured the overall bearish momentum lately, although some short-term upward momentum was underway.

The OBV saw a bounce alongside the price, but like the price, remained in a longer-term downtrend.

The current TAO bounce can extend beyond the local $200 supply zone. The Fibonacci retracement levels at $241.4 and $268.2 were the short-term bullish price targets.

To flip the daily timeframe’s swing structure bullishly, TAO has to close a 1-day trading session above January’s high at $302.4.

At the time of writing, this appeared unlikely because of the wider market sentiment and the bearish Bitcoin bias.

Brace for more TAO volatility

The local supply at $202 has been swept, and the H4 chart revealed sizeable imbalances (white box) around $170. This price area also lined up well with the 20- and 50-period moving averages.

Therefore, over the next few days, it is possible that the Bittensor token will drop to $165-$175 to fill this imbalance before climbing higher toward $241 and $268.


Final Summary

  • The AI sector has shown strength over the past four days but has been in a longer-term downtrend.
  • The short-term strength could see leading tokens such as TAO climb past key local resistances in the following days, provided Bitcoin doesn’t witness a sell-off.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Related Questions

QWhat is the current market capitalization of the crypto AI sector and how much has it declined over the past month?

AThe crypto AI sector currently has a combined market capitalization of $14.66 billion, having declined by 30.28% over the past month.

QWhich AI tokens have shown gains since Thursday, February 12th, and by how much?

ASince Thursday, February 12th, Bittensor (TAO) has rallied 30.93%, Render (RENDER) is up 18%, and NEAR Protocol (NEAR) is up 15% from their lows.

QWhat are the short-term bullish price targets for Bittensor (TAO) according to Fibonacci retracement levels?

AThe short-term bullish price targets for TAO are the Fibonacci retracement levels at $241.4 and $268.2.

QWhat does TAO need to do to flip its daily timeframe's swing structure to bullish?

ATo flip the daily timeframe's swing structure bullishly, TAO has to close a 1-day trading session above January's high at $302.4.

QWhat potential price movement is expected for TAO in the near future according to the H4 chart analysis?

AThe H4 chart analysis suggests TAO could drop to the $165-$175 range to fill a sizeable imbalance around $170, which aligns with the 20- and 50-period moving averages, before potentially climbing higher toward $241 and $268.

Related Reads

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

**Summary: Rising Interest Rates Are Not the Killer of Tech; EPS Is: The "Keep the Strong, Ditch the Weak" Strategy After the AI Theme Plunge** The author argues that the sharp sell-off in tech and AI-related stocks, triggered by a strong US jobs report that heightened Fed rate hike fears, represents a "pullback to pick up passengers" rather than a "car crash." The true end of a tech bull market is not determined by an extra 25 basis point hike, but by industry overcapacity and the disproval of earnings per share (EPS) expectations. Historical analysis shows that during past rate hike cycles, the Nasdaq-100 often outperformed, provided EPS growth remained strong. The current phase is seen as a shift from a "broad narrative-driven rally" to a "focused verification stage" for AI. The investment strategy should be to "keep the strong, ditch the weak." * **Retain exposure** to high-conviction AI infrastructure leaders with clear order visibility, stable margins, strong cash flow, and upward EPS revisions (e.g., AI servers, advanced packaging, optical modules, key cloud suppliers). * **Reduce exposure** to high-beta, narrative-driven stocks with unclear profit paths (e.g., some quantum computing, space, or speculative chip stocks), especially on rebounds. Valuation concerns should focus on whether earnings can catch up to high multiples, not on high P/E alone. Crowded positioning signals a concentration into quality assets, not necessarily a market top. The upcoming Q2 earnings season will be a key validation point. The core principle is to hold stocks with proven EPS, while using macro events (CPI data, central bank meetings) to manage timing and risk.

marsbit36m ago

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

marsbit36m ago

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

SpaceX's potential IPO is priced at $135 per share, aiming to raise $75 billion and valuing the company at approximately $1.77 trillion, which would make it the largest IPO in history. This valuation has sparked intense debate among investors. Bullish analysts, including major underwriters Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, argue the valuation is justified by SpaceX's long-term potential. They see it not just as a rocket company but as a future leader in space infrastructure, with key growth drivers being Starlink satellite internet, low-cost rocket launches, and future AI-related ventures. They project revenues reaching hundreds of billions to trillions of dollars by 2030-2040. ARK Invest's model suggests a 2030 enterprise value could reach $2.5 trillion. Bearish analysts from independent research firms like Morningstar, PitchBook, and New Constructs contend the IPO price is excessively high, already pricing in unrealistic future growth. Using DCF and sum-of-the-parts models, they estimate fair value between $780 billion and $1.7 trillion, significantly below the IPO target. They highlight risks such as the speculative nature of AI projections, over-dependence on Elon Musk, high growth expectations, and corporate governance concerns. Trefis set a target price of just $79 per share. While both sides acknowledge SpaceX's unique position in commercial space, the core disagreement centers on whether the $135 share price offers a reasonable margin of safety or is overly optimistic. Despite the valuation controversy, reported strong demand for the IPO indicates significant market interest.

marsbit2h ago

The Largest IPO in History Ignites Heated Debate: Is SpaceX Worth $1.77 Trillion?

marsbit2h ago

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

The article discusses the evolution of on-chain credit, distinguishing three markets: overcollateralized crypto lending, unsecured lending (largely unsuccessful), and asset-backed credit (ABC). ABC, backed by identifiable real-world collateral with legal recourse, is identified as the fastest-growing category and the only one credibly addressing adverse selection—the core problem in credit where the riskiest borrowers self-select. Current growth in on-chain Real World Assets (RWAs), particularly tokenized private credit funds (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge), is substantial but often merely "wraps" existing fund structures, inheriting their risks rather than solving adverse selection at the protocol level. The regulatory landscape is a key driver, with the US GENIUS Act (prohibiting stablecoin issuers from paying yield) and the proposed CLARITY Act (closing loopholes on indirect yield) set to redefine permissible yield-bearing products. This makes vaults (like ERC-4626) the critical architecture—they become the primary compliant vehicle for delivering yield, functioning as issuance, disclosure, distribution, and recovery mechanisms. The author's thesis is that the correct post-GENIUS/CLARITY architecture involves building ABC solutions where credit assessment, structure, and recovery are encoded directly into the smart contract vault layer, moving beyond mere tokenized fund wrappers to solve adverse selection fundamentally and ensure regulatory compliance.

Foresight News3h ago

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

Foresight News3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片