Michael Saylor Claims It Has Become Impossible to Implement the Bitcoin Update He Opposed!

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-02Last updated on 2026-08-02

Abstract

Michael Saylor stated that it has become mathematically impossible for BIP-110 to achieve its required 55% voluntary support threshold within the current Bitcoin mining difficulty adjustment cycle. According to his analysis of 946 blocks generated up to block 960,561, only 24 blocks included a version field signal supporting BIP-110. Saylor noted that all these signaling blocks were mined by DATUM miners sharing rewards through the OCEAN pool, with no supporting signals from miners outside OCEAN. He concluded that BIP-110 will not reach the 55% level in this cycle and argued the current signals do not represent a broad miner consensus. BIP-110 is a proposal aimed at making it harder to embed large non-financial data, like images or text, into the Bitcoin blockchain, promoting a view that Bitcoin should be used primarily for monetary transactions. Saylor opposes this, arguing the Bitcoin network should not arbitrate which transactions are necessary and that rules should not change based on the preferences of a few. He also contends that high support metrics may be inflated by automated signaling software rather than reflecting genuine miner support.

Michael Saylor explained that it is mathematically impossible for BIP-110 to reach the 55% voluntary support threshold in the current Bitcoin mining difficulty cycle.

According to data provided by Saylor, a total of 946 blocks were generated during the current difficulty adjustment period, up to block number 960,561. Only 24 of these blocks had a signal supporting BIP-110 added to the version field in the block header.

Saylor stated that all blocks sending signals were created by DATUM miners, who share their rewards through the OCEAN mining pool, and that no signals of support have been received from miners outside of OCEAN.

Saylor stated that due to this situation, BIP-110 will not achieve the 55% voluntary support level in the cycle under consideration, arguing that the current signals cannot be considered a general consensus among miners.

What is BIP-110, and Why Does Saylor Oppose It?

BIP-110 is a proposal aimed at making it more difficult to add photos, text, or other types of large data to the Bitcoin network, aside from monetary transfers. Simply put, its proponents argue: "Bitcoin should only be used for sending money; unnecessary data should not clog the network." Michael Saylor opposes this.

According to him, the Bitcoin network should not decide which transactions are necessary and which are not, and the rules should not be changed on the whim of a few individuals. Saylor also claims that the high support figures do not reflect genuine miner support, but rather, the numbers appear higher than they actually are because certain software has automated the signaling process.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to Michael Saylor, why is it mathematically impossible for BIP-110 to reach the 55% voluntary support threshold in the current difficulty adjustment cycle?

AAccording to Saylor, only 24 out of the 946 blocks generated in the current period have signaled support for BIP-110. He states this level of support is insufficient to reach the 55% threshold.

QWhich mining entity is responsible for all the blocks signaling support for BIP-110 according to Michael Saylor's data?

AAccording to Saylor, all blocks sending signals were created by DATUM miners who share their rewards through the OCEAN mining pool.

QWhat is the primary goal of the BIP-110 proposal as described in the article?

AThe goal of BIP-110 is to make it more difficult to add photos, text, or other types of large data to the Bitcoin network beyond monetary transfers, arguing Bitcoin should be used primarily for sending money.

QWhat is Michael Saylor's main argument against the BIP-110 proposal?

ASaylor argues that the Bitcoin network should not decide which transactions are necessary and which are not, and rules should not change at the whims of a few people.

QAccording to Saylor, why might the high support numbers for BIP-110 be misleading?

ASaylor claims the high support figures might not reflect genuine miner support because some software has automated the signaling process, making the numbers appear higher than they actually are.

Related Reads

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ru38m ago

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ru38m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.4k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片