AI Industry Welcomes a Cash-Rich Tether

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-05Last updated on 2026-01-05

Abstract

Tether, the company behind the stablecoin USDT, reported a staggering $13 billion profit in 2024, significantly outperforming major AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic, both of which incurred substantial losses. With only 150 employees, Tether achieved a per capita output 60 times greater than OpenAI’s. Its business model is simple: for every USDT issued, Tether holds one US dollar, primarily investing these reserves in U.S. Treasury bonds. It earns the interest income without paying any to USDT holders. In 2024, interest alone contributed $7 billion to its profits. Now, Tether is aggressively investing in AI. It loaned over $600 million to Northern Data, Europe’s largest GPU cloud provider, acquiring what is effectively an AI training base. It also released QVAC Genesis, a massive open-source AI training dataset. Furthermore, Tether invested $200 million in Blackrock Neurotech, a pioneering brain-computer interface company. Additional investments in robotics could bring its total AI-related spending to nearly $2 billion. Tether’s move into AI may be driven by both anxiety over declining Treasury yields and ambition to establish itself as a tech leader. Ironically, it promotes "decentralized AI" despite being a highly centralized company itself. While OpenAI and Anthropic struggle with profitability and continuous fundraising, Tether leverages its highly profitable stablecoin business to fund its AI ambitions risk-free, making a paradoxical case that the best business m...

Written by: Curry, Deep Tide TechFlow

Tether earned $13 billion in 2024.

You might not have a clear idea of this number. Let me put it another way: OpenAI had a revenue of $3.7 billion in 2024 but lost $5 billion. Anthropic had a revenue of $1 billion and also lost $5 billion.

The combined losses of these two legitimate AI companies still fall short of what Tether made in a year.

Tether has 150 employees, while OpenAI has over 3,000. The per capita output difference is roughly:

60 times.

How does Tether make money? When you buy 1 USDT, they take $1 and use it to buy U.S. Treasury bonds. The interest from the bonds goes to them, not you.

The essence of this is that Tether doesn't pay interest. Banks pay interest on savings, but Tether doesn't. You hold your money as USDT and get zero interest. They use your money to buy U.S. Treasury bonds, earning $7 billion in interest in 2024 alone.

150 people managing over $130 billion in Treasury bonds, doing nothing, and the interest just rolls in.

Who wouldn't want to lie back with a business like this?

But with so much money, it has to be spent. Tether has chosen a direction:

AI.

And they’re not just casually investing in a few projects.

First, computing power.

Running AI requires GPUs—the more, the better, and the more expensive, the better. Tether lent over $600 million to a German company called Northern Data.

What does this company do?

It’s Europe’s largest GPU cloud service provider. They have over 10,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs—the same ones OpenAI used to train GPT, each costing $20,000 to $30,000.

The cluster formed by these GPUs ranks 26th in the global TOP500 supercomputer list. Tether’s $600 million investment essentially buys an AI training base in Europe.

Next, data.

Training AI requires feeding it data. Last week, Tether released a dataset called QVAC Genesis, covering 19 disciplines including mathematics, physics, chemistry, and computer science. They claim it’s the world’s largest open-source AI training dataset.

Keep in mind that OpenAI and Anthropic’s training data are not public. Tether is releasing it for free, available to anyone.

Then comes the more sci-fi part.

In April 2024, Tether spent $200 million to acquire a company called Blackrock Neurotech. The name includes "Blackrock," but it has no relation to the asset management firm BlackRock.

This company works on brain-computer interfaces. They implant chips in people’s brains, allowing paralyzed individuals to type with their thoughts, control wheelchairs, and operate robotic arms. It sounds like science fiction, but they started in 2008—eight years before Musk’s Neuralink.

How impressive is this company?

Globally, 35 people have brain-computer interface chips implanted, and 31 of them use Blackrock’s technology. In 2016, a fully paralyzed patient used their device to control a robotic arm and fist-bump Obama. The chip implanted in the sensory cortex allowed him to "feel" the president’s hand.

Last year, this brain-computer interface company enabled an ALS patient to "speak" again. The chip in his brain translated his thoughts into speech at a rate of 62 words per minute.

Tether spent $200 million to become the majority shareholder of this company.

Combined, Tether has invested nearly $1 billion in AI-related fields. Rumor has it they’re also negotiating with a German robotics company, offering $1.2 billion. If that goes through, the total investment could reach $2 billion.

What does this mean?

Anthropic raised $3.5 billion in funding throughout 2024. Tether’s investment alone is almost half of what a top-tier AI company raised in a year.

OpenAI spent $6.7 billion on R&D in the first half of 2025. Tether, with just a fraction of its profits, can play the role of a big spender in the AI world.

Why is a stablecoin company diving into AI?

We think there are two possibilities.

The first is anxiety. The Fed is cutting interest rates, and Treasury yields are falling. In 2024, they made $7 billion in interest just by lying back. From 2025 onward, things might not be as rosy. Even money-printing machines need new stories.

The second is ambition. The whole world is talking about AI—investors, media, politicians. If you say you’re a stablecoin company, no one bats an eye. But if you say you’re working on AI, brain-computer interfaces, and humanoid robots, you become:

A tech leader.

The most amusing part?

Tether’s AI efforts come with slogans like "decentralization," "local operation," and "returning intelligence to individuals."

But Tether itself is the most centralized company in the crypto world.

They decide how many coins to issue, how much reserve to hold. In ten years of operation, they’ve never been audited. Only they know where users’ money is.

Now, this company wants to teach the world what "decentralized AI" means.

It’s a bit like a casino owner teaching people how to quit gambling.

Not that it’s impossible.

After all, OpenAI is still losing money and isn’t expected to break even until 2029. Anthropic is in a similar boat, targeting 2028. Sam Altman is fundraising everywhere, and Dario Amodei is doing the same. The two companies have burned through $10 billion combined and are still telling stories to investors.

Tether doesn’t need to tell stories. The money is already in their pocket.

What’s the biggest challenge in the entire AI industry? The business model.

How to make money? No one knows. When will it make money? No one knows. Can it make money? No one knows.

Tether doesn’t have this problem. Their business model is:

Not doing AI.

They use the profits from stablecoins to invest in AI. If it works out, it’s foresight. If it fails, it’s a learning expense. Either way, it doesn’t affect their core business.

Those doing AI are losing money; those not doing AI are making money. Those doing AI are fundraising; those not doing AI are investing.

In 2026, the best AI business model might just be not doing AI.

First, get your money-printing machine in order.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QHow much profit did Tether make in 2024, and how does it compare to major AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic?

ATether made a profit of $13 billion in 2024. In comparison, OpenAI had revenue of $3.7 billion but lost $5 billion, while Anthropic had revenue of $1 billion and also lost $5 billion. Combined, the losses of these two major AI companies were less than Tether's profit.

QWhat is Tether's core business model that generates such significant profits?

ATether's core business model involves issuing the USDT stablecoin. When users buy 1 USDT, Tether receives 1 US dollar and uses it to purchase U.S. Treasury bonds. Tether earns the interest from these bonds but does not pay any interest to USDT holders, allowing it to profit significantly from the interest income.

QWhat are some key AI-related investments Tether has made, and how much has it invested?

ATether has invested nearly $1 billion in AI-related areas. Key investments include over $600 million in loans to Northern Data, Europe's largest GPU cloud service provider with over 10,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs; $200 million to acquire brain-computer interface company Blackrock Neurotech; and the release of the QVAC Genesis dataset. It is also reportedly negotiating a $1.2 billion deal with a German robotics company, which would bring total investments to around $2 billion.

QWhy is Tether, a stablecoin company, investing heavily in AI technologies?

ATether is investing in AI due to two main reasons: anxiety over declining U.S. Treasury bond yields, which threaten its primary revenue source, and ambition to position itself as a tech leader in the rapidly growing AI field, enhancing its reputation beyond being just a stablecoin issuer.

QWhat ironic contrast does the article highlight between Tether's actions and its stated AI goals?

AThe article highlights the irony that Tether, which is promoting 'decentralized AI,' 'local operation,' and 'returning intelligence to individuals,' is itself one of the most centralized companies in the crypto space. It has full control over USDT issuance, reserve management, and has never undergone an audit, making its advocacy for decentralization seem contradictory.

Related Reads

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手9h ago

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手9h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbit11h ago

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbit11h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手12h ago

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手12h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbit13h ago

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbit13h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片