Acting CFTC chair to join MoonPay after leaving agency

cointelegraphPublished on 2025-12-17Last updated on 2025-12-17

Abstract

Caroline Pham, acting chair of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), will leave the agency to join crypto payments firm MoonPay as chief legal and administrative officer. Her departure follows the Senate confirmation of her successor. Pham, the sole Republican commissioner, became acting chair in January. She had initially planned to leave after Brian Quintenz’s confirmation, but his nomination was withdrawn. Pham is the latest high-level regulator to move into the crypto industry, following former CFTC Commissioner Summer Mersinger, who joined the Blockchain Association. During her tenure, Pham’s agenda aligned with White House directives, and she launched initiatives like the Crypto CEO Forum. The move highlights concerns about the "revolving door" between regulators and the crypto industry, as previously criticized by Senator Elizabeth Warren.

Caroline Pham, the acting chair of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission, will leave the financial regulator to join MoonPay, following the Senate confirmation of her successor.

In a Wednesday X post, MoonPay confirmed reports that Pham would join its team as a chief legal and administrative officer. She became acting chair in January amid the changeover in presidential administrations and has been the sole Republican commissioner at the CFTC for months, following the end of other leaders’ terms and resignations.

Pham said in May that she planned to leave the CFTC following the Senate confirmation of Brian Quintenz, US President Donald Trump’s first pick to replace her as chair. However, after a pushback from Gemini co-founders Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, the White House withdrew Quintenz’s nomination and later named Securities and Exchange Commission official Michael Selig as the president’s pick for CFTC chair.

The acting CFTC chair would not be the first person in a high-level regulatory position to immediately move into a role with the crypto industry. Summer Mersinger, another CFTC commissioner, left the agency in May to become the CEO of the Blockchain Association, a crypto advocacy group.

Related: Exodus, MoonPay to roll out stablecoin in early 2026, joining gold rush

During her time as acting chair, Pham’s agenda was consistent with White House directives, including those related to the cryptocurrency industry. She reported in September that the CFTC had taken only 18 actions while she was in charge, and no enforcement cases.

The acting chair also launched the Crypto CEO Forum and CEO Innovation Council, which included leaders from crypto companies.

US Senator calls out crypto industry for ‘revolving door’ hiring strategies

Before Mersinger joined the Blockchain Association and MoonPay announced Pham would accept a role after her departure from the CFTC, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren suggested that some government officials could be laying the groundwork to “audition” for lobbying and regulatory positions at crypto companies and organizations.

Warren signed onto a 2022 letter with several other lawmakers raising similar concerns about public officials’ priorities while in office. The letter cited reports claiming that “over 200 government officials,” including members of Congress and White House staff, had taken positions as advisers, board members, investors, lobbyists, legal counsel and executives at crypto companies.

Magazine: When privacy and AML laws conflict: Crypto projects’ impossible choice

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Chainlink Adds 6,100 Wallets In Two Days In Strongest Growth Burst Of 2026

Chainlink experienced its strongest wallet growth burst of 2026, adding approximately 6,100 new addresses in just two days. This notable increase in network participation occurred despite LINK's price trading in a difficult market environment alongside other altcoins. The surge in new wallets is seen as a positive signal for user and investor interest, suggesting the ecosystem continues to attract attention even when price action is weak. Wallet growth is considered a useful metric as it measures real participation rather than just price speculation. For an infrastructure project like Chainlink, whose value is tied to oracle services, data, and real-world assets, such growth indicates ongoing engagement with its core technology. However, the article notes that this data point, while constructive, is not conclusive on its own. The nature of the new wallets—whether they belong to small holders, new users, or exchange-related entities—remains unclear. The report maintains a balanced perspective, stating that while this wallet growth is a positive adoption signal for LINK bulls, it does not guarantee a price increase. Skeptics may question whether this user growth translates into value capture for the token. The key takeaway is that this burst of activity should be monitored alongside other factors like transaction volume, price structure, and broader market trends for a more complete picture. The signal requires follow-through in price and demand to be fully validated.

bitcoinist16m ago

Chainlink Adds 6,100 Wallets In Two Days In Strongest Growth Burst Of 2026

bitcoinist16m ago

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

As Bitcoin falls below $60,000, the author reflects on the relationship between AI and Bitcoin, seeing them as two sides of the same coin. In the AI era, the cost of generating content has plummeted, making fake text, images, and videos increasingly easy and cheap to produce. This has led to a fundamental shift: while AI dramatically lowers the cost of information production, it also undermines trust and authenticity online. What becomes truly valuable is not more content, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This perspective offers a new lens for Bitcoin. Its massive energy consumption, often criticized as wasteful, is reinterpreted. While AI burns energy to enhance "capability" and efficiency, Bitcoin burns energy to produce "verifiability." Its purpose is not to be trusted but to enable a system where no trust in intermediaries—banks, platforms, or developers—is needed. Every transaction and the entire ledger's history is secured by cryptography and a decentralized network of nodes, making it independently verifiable. AI cannot forge a transaction on the Bitcoin network because the system is designed for proof, not generation. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance: the printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce. Today, AI is the new printing press, reducing content creation costs to near zero. Blockchain, and Bitcoin as its pioneer, may be the modern equivalent of double-entry bookkeeping—a foundational technology for verifying digital asset ownership and historical records without centralized authorities. Thus, AI and blockchain are not competitors. AI lowers the cost of creation; blockchain lowers the cost of verification. In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may lie not in more content, but in independently verifiable facts. Whether the market will reprice Bitcoin accordingly remains uncertain, but its core value proposition as a "machine for producing verifiability" becomes strikingly relevant.

marsbit1h ago

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

marsbit1h ago

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

Author: Sevclub, Seven Research Amid Bitcoin's recent drop below $60k, the author reflects on a growing sense that AI and Bitcoin are two sides of the same coin. Today, encountering any content triggers a new default question: "Was this made by AI?" The cost of generating convincing text, images, and video is now negligible. While the internet lowered information *distribution* costs, AI is crashing information *production* costs to near zero. The consequence is a flood of content where truth and falsehood are increasingly indistinguishable. In this environment, what becomes truly valuable is not more information, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This reframes the common criticism that Bitcoin "wastes electricity." AI consumes power to produce "capability" (e.g., more powerful models). Bitcoin consumes power to produce something else: "verifiability." Bitcoin's core purpose isn't about belief or trust in any institution, developer, or even its creator. It's about enabling independent verification. Every bitcoin's origin, every transaction, and the integrity of the entire ledger are secured by mathematics, cryptography, and a global network of nodes. AI can fabricate convincing media, but it cannot falsify a transaction on the Bitcoin network. The expended energy makes篡改历史 (tampering with history) prohibitively expensive, purchasing a globally verifiable ledger. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance. The printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce—one enabled creation, the other verification. Today, AI is the new printing press, driving content production costs toward zero. The question becomes: what is this era's "double-entry bookkeeping"? Blockchain appears to be the leading candidate. It doesn't verify which news is true or which image is real, but it provides a foundational layer for independently verifying asset ownership and historical records in the digital realm without centralized authorities. Therefore, AI and blockchain are not in competition. AI lowers the cost of *generation*. Blockchain (and Bitcoin as a prime example) lowers the cost of *verification*. One creates, the other proves. Whether Bitcoin ultimately succeeds remains uncertain, facing potential challenges from quantum computing, regulation, and technical evolution. However, the author now sees it less as a "machine for making bitcoin" and more as a "machine for making verifiability." In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may no longer be "more content," but "more independently verifiable facts." Whether the market will price this accordingly is a separate question.

链捕手1h ago

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy US

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Talus Network (US) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Talus Network (US) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Talus Network (US)After purchasing your Talus Network (US), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Talus Network (US)Easily trade Talus Network (US) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

5.0k Total ViewsPublished 2025.12.11Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy US

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of US (US) are presented below.

活动图片