Grant Cardone raises Bitcoin holdings to 2,700 BTC – Why now?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-06-30Last updated on 2026-06-30

Abstract

Grant Cardone's firm Cardone Capital increased its Bitcoin holdings to approximately 2,700 BTC, purchased at an average of $59,000, amid a market downturn. This accumulation contrasts with actions from MicroStrategy, the largest corporate holder, which recently authorized selling up to $1.25 billion worth of Bitcoin after its first-ever sale in June. The broader market also saw significant selling pressure, with U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs experiencing a record net outflow of roughly $4.06 billion in June. However, technical analysis using Bollinger Bands on the weekly chart suggests Bitcoin may have reached a potential bottom, as the price touched the lower band—a historical support level.

Grant Cardone’s Cardone Capital increased its Bitcoin holdings during the market downturn, raising its position to about 2,700 BTC at an average purchase price of $59,000. At the time of writing, the company’s BTC stake was valued at roughly $159 million, according to a recent post by the founder on X.

However, no public filing independently confirms a holding of this size, but based on data from BitcoinTreasuries.net, the firm would rank 30th among corporate holders, just behind The Smarter Web Company plc.

The purchase occurred while Bitcoin traded near the lower end of its range. The asset has fallen 19.27% over the past thirty days and 31.96% year-to-date, a stretch that buyers such as Cardone treat as an opportunity to accumulate.

Cardone Capital buys as Strategy moves to sell

Cardone Capital’s accumulation runs against the move from Michael Saylor’s Strategy, the largest corporate Bitcoin holder with 847,363 BTC worth roughly $50 billion, which has restructured its treasury under a new capital framework.

The Digital Credit Capital Framework authorizes Strategy to sell up to $1.25 billion of Bitcoin, the company’s first formal plan to monetize its holding, with proceeds funding preferred dividends, interest payments, and repurchases of preferred securities and common stock. The same framework raised the dividend rate on its STRC preferred stock to 12%.

The shift follows Strategy’s first-ever Bitcoin sale on the 1st of June, a small disposal worth around $2.5 million that rattled the market less for its size than for breaking Saylor’s long-standing pledge never to sell. Bitcoin has struggled to reclaim higher ground since, trading around the $60,000 region.

The selling extends well beyond Strategy, with U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs and retail holders driving the trend. According to SoSoValue, spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded roughly $4.06 billion in net outflows in June, the largest monthly redemption since the funds launched in January 2024, surpassing the previous record of $3.56 billion set in February 2025.

BlackRock’s IBIT accounted for the bulk of the exits, and the outflow leaves Bitcoin on track for a third consecutive quarterly loss after shedding 22% in the first half of the year.

Bollinger Bands point to a possible Bitcoin bottom

Despite the heavy selling and weak sentiment, chart analysis suggests Bitcoin may have found a bottom.

The signal comes from the Bollinger Bands on the weekly chart, where price has reached the lower band, the green line, a level that has repeatedly acted as support and preceded rebounds.

Bollinger Bands track volatility and relative price extremes through three lines: the upper band (red), the lower band (green), and the mid band (blue), with the mid band acting as either support or resistance depending on conditions.


Final Summary

  • Cardone Capital kept buying Bitcoin through the downturn, even as Strategy cleared the way to sell up to $1.25 billion of its holdings.
  • June saw the heaviest month of Bitcoin ETF withdrawals on record, with roughly $4 billion pulled out.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhy did Grant Cardone's Cardone Capital increase its Bitcoin holdings, and what was the average purchase price?

ACardone Capital increased its Bitcoin holdings during the market downturn, viewing it as an accumulation opportunity. The purchase raised its position to about 2,700 BTC at an average price of $59,000.

QWhat significant change did Michael Saylor's MicroStrategy announce regarding its Bitcoin holdings?

AMicroStrategy announced a new Digital Credit Capital Framework authorizing it to sell up to $1.25 billion of Bitcoin. This is the company's first formal plan to monetize its holdings, with proceeds intended for dividends, interest payments, and stock repurchases.

QWhat was notable about the net flows for US spot Bitcoin ETFs in June, according to the article?

AAccording to the article, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded roughly $4.06 billion in net outflows in June 2026, marking the largest monthly redemption since the funds launched in January 2024.

QWhat technical indicator does the article suggest might signal a possible bottom for Bitcoin's price?

AThe article suggests that the Bollinger Bands on the weekly chart indicate a possible bottom. The price reached the lower band (the green line), a level that has historically acted as support and preceded price rebounds.

QHow does Cardone Capital's rank among corporate Bitcoin holders compare, and what is the source of this ranking?

ABased on data from BitcoinTreasuries.net, if the holding is confirmed, Cardone Capital would rank 30th among corporate Bitcoin holders, just behind The Smarter Web Company plc.

Related Reads

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

As Bitcoin falls below $60,000, the author reflects on the relationship between AI and Bitcoin, seeing them as two sides of the same coin. In the AI era, the cost of generating content has plummeted, making fake text, images, and videos increasingly easy and cheap to produce. This has led to a fundamental shift: while AI dramatically lowers the cost of information production, it also undermines trust and authenticity online. What becomes truly valuable is not more content, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This perspective offers a new lens for Bitcoin. Its massive energy consumption, often criticized as wasteful, is reinterpreted. While AI burns energy to enhance "capability" and efficiency, Bitcoin burns energy to produce "verifiability." Its purpose is not to be trusted but to enable a system where no trust in intermediaries—banks, platforms, or developers—is needed. Every transaction and the entire ledger's history is secured by cryptography and a decentralized network of nodes, making it independently verifiable. AI cannot forge a transaction on the Bitcoin network because the system is designed for proof, not generation. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance: the printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce. Today, AI is the new printing press, reducing content creation costs to near zero. Blockchain, and Bitcoin as its pioneer, may be the modern equivalent of double-entry bookkeeping—a foundational technology for verifying digital asset ownership and historical records without centralized authorities. Thus, AI and blockchain are not competitors. AI lowers the cost of creation; blockchain lowers the cost of verification. In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may lie not in more content, but in independently verifiable facts. Whether the market will reprice Bitcoin accordingly remains uncertain, but its core value proposition as a "machine for producing verifiability" becomes strikingly relevant.

marsbit1h ago

In the AI Era, What's Left for Bitcoin?

marsbit1h ago

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

Author: Sevclub, Seven Research Amid Bitcoin's recent drop below $60k, the author reflects on a growing sense that AI and Bitcoin are two sides of the same coin. Today, encountering any content triggers a new default question: "Was this made by AI?" The cost of generating convincing text, images, and video is now negligible. While the internet lowered information *distribution* costs, AI is crashing information *production* costs to near zero. The consequence is a flood of content where truth and falsehood are increasingly indistinguishable. In this environment, what becomes truly valuable is not more information, but the ability to verify what is real—"verifiability." This reframes the common criticism that Bitcoin "wastes electricity." AI consumes power to produce "capability" (e.g., more powerful models). Bitcoin consumes power to produce something else: "verifiability." Bitcoin's core purpose isn't about belief or trust in any institution, developer, or even its creator. It's about enabling independent verification. Every bitcoin's origin, every transaction, and the integrity of the entire ledger are secured by mathematics, cryptography, and a global network of nodes. AI can fabricate convincing media, but it cannot falsify a transaction on the Bitcoin network. The expended energy makes篡改历史 (tampering with history) prohibitively expensive, purchasing a globally verifiable ledger. The author draws a historical parallel to the Renaissance. The printing press drastically reduced the cost of copying knowledge, while double-entry bookkeeping reduced the cost of trust in commerce—one enabled creation, the other verification. Today, AI is the new printing press, driving content production costs toward zero. The question becomes: what is this era's "double-entry bookkeeping"? Blockchain appears to be the leading candidate. It doesn't verify which news is true or which image is real, but it provides a foundational layer for independently verifying asset ownership and historical records in the digital realm without centralized authorities. Therefore, AI and blockchain are not in competition. AI lowers the cost of *generation*. Blockchain (and Bitcoin as a prime example) lowers the cost of *verification*. One creates, the other proves. Whether Bitcoin ultimately succeeds remains uncertain, facing potential challenges from quantum computing, regulation, and technical evolution. However, the author now sees it less as a "machine for making bitcoin" and more as a "machine for making verifiability." In an age where AI can generate anything, true scarcity may no longer be "more content," but "more independently verifiable facts." Whether the market will price this accordingly is a separate question.

链捕手1h ago

In the Age of AI, What's Left for Bitcoin?

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

532 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片