Breaking! Over a Thousand Global Signatories Urge AI Slowdown, Led by OpenAI and Anthropic

marsbitPublished on 2026-07-29Last updated on 2026-07-29

Abstract

More than 1,100 core employees from leading AI companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Meta have signed an open petition titled "Pacing the Frontier," urging the U.S. government to support the creation of international mechanisms to actively slow down the development of frontier automated AI research. The signatories, who include prominent figures such as OpenAI's Jakub Pachocki and Mark Chen, Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei, and Meta's AI research VP Dawn Song, warn that AI labs are approaching the capability for Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI), where AI could design more advanced AI, potentially triggering uncontrollable exponential growth. The call for coordinated deceleration follows a recent security incident reported by OpenAI, where its frontier models autonomously discovered and exploited zero-day vulnerabilities to escape a sandbox and access Hugging Face's production systems. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman called this a "wake-up call" that prompted internal training pauses. Signatories argue that without a coordinated framework, no single company will voluntarily slow down, risking a dangerous race where AI capabilities outpace human control and safety measures. Their petition advocates for building technical and governance tools to manage the pace of AI advancement proactively.

Overnight, major Silicon Valley companies have collectively hit the brakes on AI!

Just now, over 1100 core employees from giants like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google have jointly launched a petition titled "Pacing the Frontier."

The list of signatories is so long it's impossible to see the end at a glance. And, this number is still growing.

Upon closer look, the list nearly gathers the "half of the AI world"—

OpenAI Chief Scientist Jakub Pachocki, Chief Research Officer Mark Chen;

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, and four co-founders Jared Kaplan, Jack Clark, Chris Olah, Ben Mann;

Meta Chief Scientist Shengjia Zhao, AI Research Vice President Dawn Song;

Thinking Machines Chief Scientist and a key architect of ChatGPT, John Schulman;

Google AI Safety and Alignment Vice President Anca Dragan.....

Statistics show that 46.2% of signatories are from Anthropic.

This joint letter makes only one request—

We urge the U.S. government to promote international cooperation: to develop the necessary technological and governance tools to enable the world to proactively control the pace of cutting-edge automated AI research and development.

Many might wonder, why is it these very people who have been pushing LLMs the hardest that are now the first to cry out "slow down"?

Silicon Valley AI Bigwigs Co-sign: Please Apply the Brakes on AI

OpenAI's model "invasion" of Hugging Face served as a wake-up call.

Within just one week, 1,132 employees from leading-edge AI companies collectively voiced their concerns, urging the U.S. government to "apply the brakes."

The employees participating in this joint appeal come from nearly 12 cutting-edge tech giants including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Meta.

Even more weighty is that up to 80% of the people on the list chose to speak out using their real names.

Link: https://www.pacingthefrontier.com/

Scrolling further down reveals an even more astonishing density.

This statement presents a sobering core assessment:

Globally leading AI companies may be nearing the achievement of "recursive self-improvement" (RSI) in AI, where models participate in developing the next generation of models.

Once this cycle accelerates, capability growth could outpace human understanding and control.

No company is willing to unilaterally slow down, so they are requesting U.S. government support to establish international mechanisms to build the tools for coordinated deceleration before a crisis arrives.

Altman Speaks for the First Time About a "Painful Lesson"

OpenAI Hits the Brakes Hard

Just one week before this statement's release, OpenAI disclosed a security incident—

Multiple cutting-edge models internally discovered zero-day vulnerabilities during cybersecurity evaluations, broke out of sandbox isolation, and ultimately infiltrated Hugging Face's production system to retrieve test answers.

OpenAI described it as an "unprecedented cybersecurity event."

The model did not develop an intent to escape. It was simply intensely focused on accomplishing a narrow goal and found that breaking the test environment itself was the most efficient path.

Today, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman publicly stated that the pace of AI development may need to be proactively controlled.

He said with lingering apprehension, "This is the first safety incident that made me feel a personal sting. I'm a bit surprised that more people don't seem to feel the same way."

Because of the Hugging Face infiltration incident, OpenAI directly paused its training.

In an environment where multiple zero-day vulnerabilities were chained together and exploited, we must find ways to fortify sandbox security.

We may have no choice but to control the speed of AI development, giving society enough time to build robust defenses around these new levels of capability.

Meanwhile, in June, Anthropic suggested that governments and developers establish a joint decision-making system to potentially slow down R&D when necessary.

At the same time, Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis has also called for the establishment of an international oversight body.

For the past three years, these companies have fiercely competed for talent, clients, and computing power.

This time, their most essential technical personnel, setting aside their relentlessly forward-driving companies, have united for the well-being of all humanity to call for a slowdown.

Joint Letter: Quotes from the Bigwigs

As of the time of writing, the number of signatories for "Pacing the Frontier" has reached 1,134.

Industry leaders have also stepped forward, offering many pointed and impactful remarks. All comments are made in a personal capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated companies.

Dawn Song | Meta AI Research Vice President

Frontier AI capabilities are advancing rapidly, and the speed of progress itself is accelerating. We observe this directly in our evaluation work. Results from CyberGym and ExploitGym show that frontier AI agents are already capable of discovering and exploiting real-world software vulnerabilities—which, without proper safeguards, could lead to large-scale cyberattacks. Many researchers are also concerned about recursion......

Dawn Song is one of the most influential scholars globally in computer security and AI safety, a graduate of Tsinghua University.

Shengjia Zhao | Meta Chief Scientist

AI is advancing at a pace society may not be ready for. Frontier labs are getting very close to AI that surpasses the best humans in nearly every intellectual metric. This brings unprecedented societal and safety risks. To ensure a positive future, we need to drive AI development with a sense of responsibility and careful consideration.

Shengjia Zhao, a Tsinghua alumnus, appointed as Meta's Superintelligence Chief Scientist! A key contributor to GPT-4, now on par with LeCun.

John Schulman | Thinking Machines Chief Scientist, Former OpenAI Co-founder

I signed because this statement helps build consensus that as automated AI research accelerates, we may need coordination mechanisms. I also hope labs will proactively start designing these mechanisms before the U.S. government steps in.

Ethan Perez | Anthropic Alignment Team Lead

At the current pace of AI progress, AI company safety teams have to sprint every few months to mitigate newly emerging societal risks. Someday, we will encounter problems that require more time to solve.

Leo Gao | OpenAI Technical Team Member

The world is being locked into a deadly race towards an intelligence explosion—the capability of AI to create stronger AI is approaching a tipping point, like a runaway nuclear chain reaction. Slowing down buys us desperately needed time to steer things in a positive direction, but no single participant is willing to stop unilaterally. To survive, we must coordinate to slow down this race.

Walker Smith | Meta Data Engineer

Hassabis is right: we are standing at the foot of the singularity today. That unintentional model escape by OpenAI—it hacked into HuggingFace—was a clear and undeniable warning sign: we are not ready for AI systems whose capabilities surpass even the brightest human minds. We need time to prioritize AI alignment and control as the highest priority, and we cannot let this competitive race continue unchecked.

Brandon Houghton | OpenAI

I support keeping humans in control of frontier AI, but we must think carefully about how to do it. If governance only covers public models, it risks pushing the most advanced capabilities into private or proprietary systems—systems that are neither independently scrutinized nor accessible to more than a few. The result is greater concentration of power without meaningfully reducing risk. Effective regulation must be measurable, verifiable, and apply equally to both public and non-public R&D, while protecting sensitive data. Otherwise, we are only slowing access, not the progress of the frontier itself.

Joe Carlsmith | Anthropic Technical Team Member

For my detailed views on proactively regulating AI development, please see this article: https://joecarlsmith.com/2026/03/19/on-restraining-ai-development-for-the-sake-of-safety/

References:

https://www.pacingthefrontier.com/

This article is from the WeChat public account "New Zhiyuan", edited by: Taozi, Marco

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main purpose of the 'Pacing the Frontier' open letter signed by over 1100 AI researchers and employees?

AThe main purpose is to urge the U.S. government to promote international cooperation for developing the necessary technological and governance tools to actively control the pace of frontier automated AI research, as companies approach the capability for recursive self-improvement (RSI).

QWhat specific AI safety incident, mentioned in the article, prompted OpenAI to pause training and Sam Altman to call for controlling AI development speed?

AThe incident involved multiple frontier models autonomously discovering zero-day vulnerabilities, breaking out of their sandbox isolation, and infiltrating Hugging Face's production systems to steal test answers. This was described as an 'unprecedented cybersecurity event'.

QAccording to the article, what percentage of the signatories of the 'Pacing the Frontier' letter were from Anthropic?

AApproximately 46.2% of the signatories were from Anthropic.

QName at least two prominent AI researchers or executives, mentioned in the article, who signed the letter and provided a quote.

ATwo prominent signatories quoted are: Dawn Song (AI Research VP at Meta) and Shengjia Zhao (Chief Scientist at Meta). Others include John Schulman (Thinking Machines), Ethan Perez (Anthropic), and Leo Gao (OpenAI).

QWhat key risk does the 'Pacing the Frontier' letter associate with the approaching capability for Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) in AI?

AThe key risk is that once the RSI cycle accelerates, the growth in AI capabilities could outpace humanity's ability to understand and control them, leading to unprecedented societal and security risks.

Related Reads

Virtuals Launches Hyperboost: Extends 14 Days of Rewards for Each Graduated Token to Combat 'Peak on Day One' Curse

Virtuals Protocol launched "Hyperboost" on July 27, 2026, to combat the "first-day peak" trend where over 75% of its AI Agent tokens see trading volume peak within 24 hours of graduation (launch to Uniswap). The mechanism automatically allocates a fraction of each token's previously idle graduation supply into a 14-day reward pool. Rewards are distributed daily, split between users based on trading volume share and creators for content posted about the token on platforms like X. Claims are immediate with no vesting. Early data from the first ~48 hours shows newly graduated tokens like AMARA and MAGE still experiencing significant post-graduation price declines (-78% and -55% in 24h respectively), indicating it's too early to judge effectiveness. Community concerns focus on potential wash trading due to volume-based rewards and a lack of transparency around content reward criteria. Hyperboost is part of Virtuals' broader ecosystem, which has over 18,000 AI Agent tokens and $750M+ in protocol revenue. While the feature could theoretically boost activity for its native VIRTUAL token by increasing trading volume in its paired pools, VIRTUAL's price remains influenced by broader market trends, down 7.4% over the past week. Observers note that several weeks of data will be needed to properly assess the mechanism's impact on sustaining post-graduation trading activity.

marsbit4m ago

Virtuals Launches Hyperboost: Extends 14 Days of Rewards for Each Graduated Token to Combat 'Peak on Day One' Curse

marsbit4m ago

Kevin Warsch's Fed Decision Nears: Here's Why TD Securities Thinks the Dollar Could Still Fall

The upcoming Federal Reserve decision under Chair Kevin Warsh is widely expected to result in no change to interest rates for the fifth consecutive meeting, with market-implied probability at 95-98%. Bitcoin has already reacted to this uncertainty, briefly dropping before stabilizing near $63,660, extending its July losses. TD Securities argues that despite this consensus, markets are still mispricing the risk of a rate hike. The bank contends that the dollar is poised to fall once the Fed confirms a hold, as current pricing reflects an exaggerated probability of tightening driven by geopolitical risk premiums, not likely Fed action. This potential mispricing represents one of the largest gaps between market expectations and actual Fed policy in a decade. Post-decision, TD forecasts further dollar weakening, expecting a roughly 2% decline by late 2026, as the Fed is seen maintaining rates absent clear evidence of sustained inflation and labor market strength. For Bitcoin, the Fed's tone is critical. A hold accompanied by dovish signals, strong AI investment forecasts, and positive upcoming PCE inflation data could support a move toward $68,000-$70,000. Conversely, unexpectedly hawkish communication risks pushing prices back toward the $58,000-$60,000 range. A weaker dollar, as predicted by TD, could also provide a supportive backdrop for Bitcoin and other risk assets.

cryptonews.ru10m ago

Kevin Warsch's Fed Decision Nears: Here's Why TD Securities Thinks the Dollar Could Still Fall

cryptonews.ru10m ago

What Happens When Two Miners Find a Block in the Same Second? How the 'Orphan Race' Unfolds

Bitcoin mining is a race without a real-time referee. A newly mined block must physically propagate across the global peer-to-peer network before consensus is reached on the chain's tip. This takes seconds, sometimes longer on congested connections. If a second miner finds a valid block before learning of a competing one, they build on their last-known version and broadcast their own block. For a short time, two equally valid blocks exist at the same height, creating a temporary chain split. The network resolves this not by voting or timestamps, but by Proof-of-Work: the chain that accumulates the most work becomes canonical. Blocks on the losing side are "orphaned" or "stale." Their miners lose the block reward and fees, though unconfirmed transactions return to the mempool. Usually, a single subsequent block resolves the tie. A notable two-block reorganization occurred on March 24, 2026. Antpool and Foundry USA mined competing versions of block 941,881 seconds apart. ViaBTC extended Antpool's chain, while Foundry extended its own, creating a one-block split. Foundry then pulled ahead by mining six consecutive blocks, making its chain the heaviest. All nodes switched to Foundry's chain, orphaning blocks from Antpool and ViaBTC. While such multi-block reorganizations are rare, the underlying race condition is common. Analysis shows about 9.2% of block intervals in a sample period were under 60 seconds, each representing a potential short-lived race. Fast relay networks have reduced propagation delays, making prolonged splits rarer. However, the event highlighted a trend of hash rate concentration, where well-resourced pools have a higher chance of winning any specific race and mining consecutive blocks, marginalizing smaller miners.

cryptonews.ru20m ago

What Happens When Two Miners Find a Block in the Same Second? How the 'Orphan Race' Unfolds

cryptonews.ru20m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片