亚洲股市熔断式暴跌,韩国盘中触发熔断机制,日经跌破5万点大关

深潮Published on 2025-11-04Last updated on 2025-11-05

华尔街警告:这只是开始,AI泡沫破裂引发的恐慌才刚刚开始。

作者:金十数据

周三亚洲股市追随隔夜美股的抛售,投资者对估值过高的担忧削弱了市场信心。

截至发稿,韩国股市以逾6%的跌幅领跌,因估值担忧重创了近期表现强势的芯片股、国防和造船类股。芯片制造商三星电子和SK海力士成为主要拖累因素。

KOSPI指数跌破了关键的4000点关口,并从历史高点进一步回落。此次下跌使其两日累计跌幅超过7%,为2024年8月以来最差表现。

韩国交易所在韩国综合股价指数200期货下跌5%后,对KOSPI指数启用了熔断机制,程序化交易暂停5分钟。随后随着跌幅扩大,韩国交易所暂停KOSDAQ期货程序化交易。

今年以来,韩国股市位列全球表现最佳市场之一,因投资者对人工智能的重新乐观以及总统推动的企业改革计划持续买入。然而,近期华尔街高管们对过高估值的一系列警告,正威胁着削弱投资者的热情。

“在10月份单月就飙升20%之后,投资者已显疲态,加之人工智能泡沫论的担忧浮现,”友利投资证券策略师Huh Jae-Hwan表示,“市场中确实存在类似泡沫的领域。”

日经225指数自10月27日以来首次跌破5万点,日内跌3.7%

台湾加权指数周三开盘下跌1.67%。港股恒生指数开跌0.97%,恒生科技指数开跌1.75%。A股上证指数低开0.95%,深证成指低开1.68%,创业板指低开2.08%。

美股欧股股指期货也同步继续走低。欧洲斯托克50指数期货跌超1%,德国DAX指数期货跌1%,英国富时指数期货跌0.4%。

本轮全球股市涨势暂停之前,对人工智能的蓬勃展望以及美联储持续降息的预期,曾推动美股基准指数从4月低点上涨近40%。但随着涨势日益集中在少数股票,情绪与技术指标均显现过热迹象,华尔街巨头纷纷指出市场回调将是健康发展。

在华尔街巨头摩根士丹利和高盛的首席执行官质疑天价估值能否持续之后,人们担心股市可能已经过度膨胀。“大空头”原型,冲基金经理迈克尔·伯里(Michael Burry)披露了做空Palantir和英伟达的头寸后更是加剧了抛售。

“无论中长期走势如何,股市在短期内已为某种实质性回调做好准备,”Miller Tabak分析师Matt Maley表示。

Pepperstone Group研究主管克里斯·韦斯顿表示:“整个市场都是一片红色(下跌)的海洋。现在买入的理由不多,在我们接近英伟达11月19日的财报之前,市场缺乏短期催化剂。”

资本集团首席执行官Mike Gitlin周二在香港金融管理局组织的金融峰会上表示,企业盈利表现强劲但“挑战在于估值水平”。

“市场标准正在不断提高,现在小幅超预期的业绩已无法推动股价上涨,”悉尼Van Eck Associates跨资产策略师Anna Wu在接受彭博电视采访时表示。

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Valuation $1 Billion, Nvidia Doubles Down! Is Prime Intellect Washing Off Its Web3 Label?

Prime Intellect, a decentralized AI infrastructure company founded in 2024, recently announced a $130 million Series A funding round at a $1 billion valuation, with investments from NVIDIA, Intel, and Dell's venture arms. The company claims its annualized recurring revenue (ARR) has exceeded $100 million within a year, serving over 6,000 enterprise clients. Initially rooted in Web3 and decentralized science (DeSci), Prime Intellect has evolved into a full-stack AI training and deployment platform. Its core technology enables distributed training of large language models across globally dispersed, heterogeneous GPU clusters. Key milestones include releasing open-source models like INTELLECT-1 and INTELLECT-3, and launching Prime Intellect Lab, a platform allowing users to train and optimize agentic models without managing their own GPU infrastructure. The company's deep collaboration with hardware giants, particularly NVIDIA, extends beyond investment to joint optimization of software (e.g., integrating NVIDIA Dynamo) and hardware systems. A notable commercial case involves fintech company Ramp using Prime Lab to train a specialized agent, demonstrating the platform's applied value. While achieving rapid commercial growth, Prime Intellect has systematically downplayed its earlier Web3 and token-based incentives from its official documentation, repositioning itself as a mainstream AI infrastructure provider focused on enterprise adoption and potential IPO.

Foresight News8m ago

Valuation $1 Billion, Nvidia Doubles Down! Is Prime Intellect Washing Off Its Web3 Label?

Foresight News8m ago

After 13% Daily Distribution, Why Did SATA Still Fall?

Strive Asset Management's BTC-linked preferred stock SATA transitioned from monthly to daily dividend distributions on June 16, with a current annualized yield of 13%. Despite this change, SATA's price fell approximately 9.9% from June 22 to June 26. The analysis highlights that this decline reflects fundamental credit and structural risks, not simply dividend frequency. SATA represents a perpetual, cumulative preferred equity interest in Strive, not a direct Bitcoin-backed bond. Its dividends depend on Strive's corporate credit and access to capital markets. While Strive's Bitcoin holdings grew from 15,009 to 19,864 BTC between May 12 and June 18, SATA's outstanding shares grew faster (from ~4.96 million to ~7.83 million). Coupled with a drop in BTC price, the pure Bitcoin coverage ratio for SATA's stated amount fell from ~2.44x to ~1.52x. A further ~34.3% decline in BTC to ~$39,416 would bring this coverage to 1.0x. Daily dividends smooth cash flow for investors and reduce dividend-capture trading, but do not eliminate price volatility or credit risk. SATA now trades at a ~12.25% discount to its $100 stated amount, implying a market yield of ~14.81% and a credit spread of ~1,117 bps over SOFR. Key risks include a negative feedback loop if SATA trades below par, making new issuance dilutive; reliance on capital markets for dividend funding despite a ~17-month cash buffer; and the perpetual nature of the security, where dividends can be deferred. In summary, SATA innovates by providing daily income from a Bitcoin-focused corporate balance sheet, but its recent price action underscores its exposure to Bitcoin valuation, company-specific financing risks, and perpetual duration. The market is repricing it from a near-par yield product to a deeply discounted high-risk credit instrument.

marsbit36m ago

After 13% Daily Distribution, Why Did SATA Still Fall?

marsbit36m ago

Unlocking 20%, $125 Million in Pressure, Can PUMP Hold Up?

"Pump.fun Faces Crucial Test with $125M Token Unlock Despite a cooldown in the meme coin market, Pump.fun remains one of Web3's top revenue-generating protocols, earning $28.4 million in the past 30 days. The platform has accumulated approximately $1.05 billion in total revenue from over 12 million tokens created. The protocol now faces its biggest challenge: the first unlock of team and investor tokens. A total of 82.5 billion PUMP tokens (8.25% of total supply, 20.23% of previous circulating supply), valued at around $125 million, have been unlocked. This potential selling pressure is significant compared to the token's 24-hour trading volume of only $28 million. While Pump.fun uses a portion of its revenue to buy back and burn PUMP tokens, creating buy-side pressure, this support has weakened. The buyback rate was reduced from 100% to 50% of net fees in April 2024. In June 2024, monthly buybacks totaled just $9.2 million, an over 80% drop from its peak. At this rate, selling just 7% of the newly unlocked tokens would offset a full month of buybacks. Furthermore, this unlock is only the first batch; team and investors still hold another 247.5 billion locked PUMP tokens, with 240 billion community tokens awaiting a release schedule. Despite these headwinds, PUMP is argued to be a relatively scarce asset in the current market. With a $610 million market cap against $28.4 million in monthly revenue, its valuation is lower than competitors like Hyperliquid. The investment thesis for PUMP is not betting on a single meme coin but on the persistent activity of the meme market and Pump.fun's ability to maintain its position as a key platform. The conclusion suggests that while the unlock tests short-term price resilience, the protocol's underlying revenue strength will determine PUMP's long-term trajectory, potentially making the current dip a viable entry point for long-term accumulation."

Odaily星球日报48m ago

Unlocking 20%, $125 Million in Pressure, Can PUMP Hold Up?

Odaily星球日报48m ago

Aave Withdrawal, TVL Plunges: Where is MegaETH's Valuation Anchor?

MegaETH, once a highly anticipated new blockchain, has seen a dramatic decline in its Total Value Locked (TVL) and token price. According to DefiLlama data, its TVL plummeted nearly 60% in 24 hours, falling to just over $30 million from a May peak, with the Aave V3 protocol withdrawing 80% of its liquidity. The MEGA token price dropped to around $0.048, with a market cap of ~$54 million and a fully diluted valuation (FDV) of ~$480 million. The analysis identifies three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals. First, its high FDV contrasts with minimal real usage: low protocol revenue (~$90k/30 days) and few daily active addresses. Second, its DeFi narrative is contradicted by its revenue structure, where a collectible card game (Monster) generates most income, not major DeFi protocols like Aave. Third, initial hype from VC backing and airdrop farming has faded without sustained user adoption or clear applications. The TVL was heavily concentrated in Aave and largely driven by cyclical arbitrage strategies involving stablecoins like USDm and USDe. As the yield for these strategies diminished, funds rapidly exited. The departure of this speculative capital has exposed a lack of substantial, organic ecosystem activity. While the sharp drop could be seen as a correction from inflated expectations, the article suggests MegaETH's valuation lacks a solid foundation. Future price movements may rely on short-term market sentiment rather than genuine improvement in network fundamentals, such as increased real usage, a diversified application ecosystem, and consistent user growth. The situation reflects a broader market trend of demanding clearer value propositions beyond just high TVL figures.

marsbit1h ago

Aave Withdrawal, TVL Plunges: Where is MegaETH's Valuation Anchor?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片